Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Watershed-scale Land Use Change Increases Ecosystem Metabolism in an Agricultural Stream

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stream metabolism, in the form of gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER), is an important metric of stream ecosystem function, given GPP and ER are integrative measurements of basal ecosystem activity that are highly sensitive to environmental change. In agricultural streams of temperate North America GPP can be mediated by water column turbidity associated with soil erosion during periods when the terrestrial landscape is bare (that is, typically late fall through spring; Oct–May in N America). We estimated a 10-year time series of stream metabolism using continuous dissolved oxygen measurements in an agricultural watershed (Shatto Ditch, IN), comparing metabolism metrics before and after vegetative cover was added to fields during normally fallow periods when they would otherwise be bare. Adding vegetative cover reduced water column turbidity by 54% during days with high precipitation (upper 25th percentile). We also found that GPP varied seasonally with light and temperature (range = 0.1–17.2 g m−2 d−1) and increased significantly in spring with landscape vegetative cover addition. Finally, we used a subset of storms to show that turbidity was lower and GPP was higher during storms after adding watershed vegetative cover, suggesting that increased GPP could be attributed to increased light availability with less turbid water. We found that ER also increased after adding vegetative cover, which we attribute, in part, to increased autotrophic respiration. These results suggest that water turbidity is a mediating driver of stream metabolism, particularly when other primary drivers are not limiting GPP. Likewise, stream turbidity can be mediated by land cover on the surrounding watershed, demonstrating a clear linkage between land use and stream metabolic signatures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The stream metabolism estimates are available at https://data.streampulse.org/, and scripts for analyses and ancillary data are available at https://github.com/mtrentma.

References

  • Allan JD. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Evol System 35:257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alnoee AB, Levi PS, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Riis T. 2021. Macrophytes enhance reach-scale metabolism on a daily, seasonal and annual basis in agricultural lowland streams. Aquat Sci 83:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appling AP, Hall RO, Yackulic CB, Arroita M. 2018. Overcoming equifinality: leveraging long time series for stream metabolism estimation. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 123:624–645.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arroita M, Elosegi A, Hall RO. 2019. Twenty years of daily metabolism show riverine recovery following sewage abatement: Long-term recovery of a polluted river. Limnol Oceanogr 64:S77-92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basche AD, DeLonge MS. 2019. Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: a meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 14:e0215702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu JJ, Arango CP, Balz DA, Shuster WD. 2013. Continuous monitoring reveals multiple controls on ecosystem metabolism in a suburban stream. Freshw Biol 58:918–937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernot MJ, Sobota DJ, Hall RO, Mulholland PJ, Dodds WK, Webster JR, Tank JL, Ashkenas LR, Cooper LW, Dahm CN, Gregory SV, Grimm NB, Hamilton SK, Johnson SL, Mcdowell WH, Meyer JL, Peterson B, Poole GC, Valett HM, Arango C, Beaulieu JJ, Burgin AJ, Crenshaw C, Helton AM, Johnson L, Merriam J, Niederlehner BR, O’Brien JM, Potter JD, Sheibley RW, Thomas SM, Wilson K. 2010. Inter-regional comparison of land-use effects on stream metabolism. Freshw Biol 55:1874–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernot MJ, Tank JL, Royer TV, David MB. 2006. Nutrient uptake in streams draining agricultural catchments of the midwestern United States. Freshw Biol 51:499–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczak JR, Delesantro JM, Urban DL, Doyle MW, Bernhardt ES. 2019. Scoured or suffocated: Urban stream ecosystems oscillate between hydrologic and dissolved oxygen extremes. Limnol Oceanogr 64:877–894.

  • Bou Lahdou G, Bowling L, Frankenberger J, Kladivko E. 2019. Hydrologic controls of controlled and free draining subsurface drainage systems. Agric Water Manag 213:605–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Palmer MA, Swan CM, Brooks S, Poff NL. 2002. The influence of substrate heterogeneity on biofilm metabolism in a stream ecosystem. Ecology 83:412–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapcott JE, Young RG, Neale MW, Doehring K, Barmuta LA. 2016. Land use affects temporal variation in stream metabolism. Freshw Sci 35:1164–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis RT, Tank JL, Mahl UH, Winikoff SG, Roley SS. 2015. The influence of two-stage ditches with constructed floodplains on water column nutrients and sediments in agricultural streams. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 51:941–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demars BOL, Russell Manson J, Ólafsson JS, Gislason GM, Gudmundsdottir R, Woodward G, Reiss J, Pichler DE, Rasmussen JJ, Friberg N. 2011. Temperature and the metabolic balance of streams. Freshw Biol 56:1106–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Veach AM, Ruffing CM, Larson DM, Fischer JL, Costigan KH. 2013. Abiotic controls and temporal variability of river metabolism: multiyear analyses of Mississippi and Chattahoochee River data. Freshw Sci 32:1073–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling, DR, Kunkel KE, Arnold JR, Knutson T, LeGrande AN, Leung LR, Vose RS, Waliser DE, Wehner MF, 2017: Precipitation change in the United States. In: Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I [Wuebbles, D.J., D.W. Fahey, K.A. Hibbard, D.J. Dokken, B.C. Stewart, and T.K. Maycock (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 207–230.

  • Fellows CS, Bunn SE, Sheldon F, Beard NJ. 2009. Benthic metabolism in two turbid dryland rivers. Freshw Biol 54:236–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa-Nieves D, Royer TV, David MB. 2006. Controls on chlorophyll-a in nutrient-rich agricultural streams in Illinois, USA. Hydrobiologia 568:287–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher SG, Gray LJ, Grimm NB, Busch DE. 1982. Temporal succession in a desert stream ecosystem following flash flooding. Ecol Monogr 52:93–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francoeur SN, Biggs BJF. 2006. Short-term effects of elevated velocity and sediment abrasion on benthic algal communities. Hydrobiologia 561:59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gökkaya K, Budhathoki M, Christopher SF, Hanrahan BR, Tank JL. 2017. Subsurface tile drained area detection using GIS and remote sensing in an agricultural watershed. Ecol Eng 108:370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths NA, Tank JL, Royer TV, Roley SS, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Whiles MR, Beaulieu JJ, Johnson LT. 2013. Agricultural land use alters the seasonality and magnitude of stream metabolism. Limnol Oceanogr 58:1513–1529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RO, Tank JL. 2003. Ecosystem metabolism controls nitrogen uptake in streams in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1120–1128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RO, Beaulieu JJ. 2013. Estimating autotrophic respiration in streams using daily metabolism data. Freshw Sci 32:507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RO, Yackulic CB, Kennedy TA, Yard MD, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Voichick N, Behn KE. 2015. Turbidity, light, temperature, and hydropeaking control primary productivity in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Limnol Oceanogr 60:512–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RO, Tank JL, Baker MA, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Hotchkiss ER. 2016. Metabolism, gas exchange, and carbon spiraling in rivers. Ecosystems 19:73–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan BR, Tank JL, Christopher SF, Mahl UH, Trentman MT, Royer TV. 2018a. Winter cover crops reduce nitrate loss in an agricultural watershed in the central U.S. Agric Ecosyst Environ 265:513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan BR, Tank JL, Dee MM, Trentman MT, Berg EM, McMillan SK. 2018b. Restored floodplains enhance denitrification compared to naturalized floodplains in agricultural streams. Biogeochemistry 141:419–437.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Izagirre O, Agirre U, Bermejo M, Pozo J, Elosegi A. 2008. Environmental controls of whole-stream metabolism identified from continuous monitoring of Basque streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 27:252–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L, Richards C, Host G, Arthur J. 1997. Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems. Freshw Biol 37:193–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CS, Schilling KE, Seeman A. 2019. Relating carbon and nitrogen transport from constructed farm drainage. Agric Water Manag 213:12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan L, Bott TL. 1983. Microbial heterotrophic utilization of dissolved organic matter in a piedmont stream. Freshw Biol 13:363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar TC, Jaynes DB, Parkin TB, Moorman TB, Singer JW. 2012. Effectiveness of oat and rye cover crops in reducing nitrate losses in drainage water. Agric Water Manag 110:25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye JP, Quemada M. 2017. Using cover crops to mitigate and adapt to climate change: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 37:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kladivko EJ, Frankenberger JR, Jaynes DB, Meek DW, Jenkinson BJ, Fausey NR. 2004. Nitrate leaching to subsurface drains as affected by drain spacing and changes in crop production system. J Environ Qual 33:1803–1813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Pan C. 2018. The relative importance of different grass components in controlling runoff and erosion on a hillslope under simulated rainfall. J Hydrol 558:90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik RK, Green TH, Brown GF, Mays D. 2000. Use of cover crops in short rotation hardwood plantations to control erosion. Biomass Bioenergy 18:479–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin C, Kaplan LA. 2013. Biological lability of dissolved organic carbon in stream water and contributing terrestrial sources. Freshw Sci 32:1219–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland PJ, Fellows CS, Tank JL, Grimm NB, Webster JR, Hamilton SK, Marti E, Ashkenas L, Bowden WB, Dodds WK, McDowell WH, Paul MJ, Peterson BJ. 2001. Inter-biome comparison of factors controlling stream metabolism. Freshw Biol 46:1503–1517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock J, Roelke D, Gelwick F. 2004. Interactions between flow, periphyton, and nutrients in a heavily impacted urban stream: implications for stream restoration effectiveness. Ecol Eng 22:197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes AN, de Almeida AC, Coelho COA. 2011. Impacts of land use and cover type on runoff and soil erosion in a marginal area of Portugal. Appl Geogr 31:687–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien JM, Lessard JL, Plew D, Graham SE, McIntosh AR. 2014. Aquatic macrophytes alter metabolism and nutrient cycling in lowland streams. Ecosystems 17:405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell B, Hotchkiss ER. 2019. Coupling concentration- and process-discharge relationships integrates water chemistry and metabolism in streams. Water Resour Res 55:10179–10190.

  • Odum HT. 1957. Trophic structure and productivity of Silver Springs, Florida. Ecol Monogr 27:55–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qasem K, Vitousek S, O’Connor B, Hoellein T. 2019. The effect of floods on ecosystem metabolism in suburban streams. Freshw Sci 38:412–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi Z, Helmers MJ. 2010. Soil water dynamics under Winter Rye cover crop in central Iowa. Vadose Zone J 9:53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Reisinger AJ, Rosi EJ, Bechtold HA, Doody TR, Kaushal SS, Groffman PM. 2017. Recovery and resilience of urban stream metabolism following Superstorm Sandy and other floods. Ecosphere 8:e01776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads BL, Schwartz JS, Porter S. 2003. Stream geomorphology, bank vegetation, and three-dimensional habitat hydraulics for fish in midwestern agricultural streams. Water Resour Res 39.

  • Roberts BJ, Mulholland PJ, Hill WR. 2007. Multiple scales of temporal variability in ecosystem metabolism rates: results from 2 years of continuous monitoring in a forested headwater stream. Ecosystems 10:588–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roley SS, Tank JL, Griffiths NA, Hall RO, Davis RT. 2014. The influence of floodplain restoration on whole-stream metabolism in an agricultural stream: insights from a 5-year continuous data set. Freshw Sci 33:1043–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer TV, David MB. 2005. Export of dissolved organic carbon from agricultural streams in Illinois, USA. Aquatic Sci 67:465–471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder MH, Fares A. 2008. Evaluating cover crops (Sudex, Sunn Hemp, Oats) for use as vegetative filters to control sediment and nutrient loading from agricultural runoff in a Hawaiian watershed. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 44:640–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte LA, Niemi J, Helmers MJ, Liebman M, Arbuckle JG, James DE, Kolka RK, O’Neal ME, Tomer MD, Tyndall JC, Asbjornsen H, Drobney P, Neal J, Ryswyk GV, Witte C. 2017. Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from corn–soybean croplands. PNAS 114:11247–11252.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer RS, Heffernan J, Likens GE. 2003. The influence of dissolved nutrients and particulate organic matter quality on microbial respiration and biomass in a forest stream. Freshw Biol 48:1925–1937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uehlinger U. 2000. Resistance and resilience of ecosystem metabolism in a flood-prone river system. Freshw Biol 45:319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uehlinger U. 2006. Annual cycle and inter-annual variability of gross primary production and ecosystem respiration in a floodprone river during a 15-year period. Freshw Biol 51:938–950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. (Oct 2020). 2017. Census of Agriculture: United States Summary and State Data. Volume 1, Geographic Area Series, Part 51. AC-17-A-51. www.agcensus.usda.gov.

  • Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP. 2005. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:706–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel RG. 2001. Limnology: lake and river ecosystems, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley MJ, Osborne LL, Larimore RW. 1990. Longitudinal structure of an agricultural prairie river system and its relationship to current stream ecosystem theory. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 47:373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams MR, King KW. 2020. Changing rainfall patterns over the western Lake Erie Basin (1975–2017): effects on tributary discharge and phosphorus load. Water Resour Res 56:e2019WR025985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young RG, Huryn AD. 1999. Effects of land use on stream metabolism and organic matter turnover. Ecol Appl 9:1359–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young RG, Matthaei CD, Townsend CR. 2008. Organic matter breakdown and ecosystem metabolism: functional indicators for assessing river ecosystem health. J North Am Benthol Soc 27:605–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Zhang L, Xia Z, Xu W, Xia L, Liang Y, Xia D. 2019. Effects of Rainfall Intensity and Vegetation Cover on Erosion Characteristics of a Soil Containing Rock Fragments Slope. Advances in Civil Engineering 2019:e7043428. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ace/2019/7043428/. Last accessed 08/12/2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by grants from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Regional Conservation Partnership Program (68-52KY-15-003) and the Conservation Innovation Grant Program (10-912), along with the Walton Family Foundation and the Indiana Soybean Alliance. We thank the numerous members of the Tank Lab for their assistance in the field and with laboratory work. We also thank the private landowners for access to the field sites.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Matt T. Trentman

    Present address: University of Montana-Flathead Lake Biological Station, Polson, Montana, 59860, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, 46556, USA

    Matt T. Trentman, Jennifer L. Tank & Ursula H. Mahl

  2. University of Notre Dame, Environmental Change Initiative, Notre Dame, Indiana, 46556, USA

    Jennifer L. Tank

  3. Houston Engineering, West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266, USA

    Robert T. Davis

  4. USDA-ARS Soil Drainage Research Unit, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA

    Brittany R. Hanrahan

  5. School of the Environment, Washington State University-Tri Cities, Richland, Washington, 99354, USA

    Sarah S. Roley

Authors
  1. Matt T. Trentman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer L. Tank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert T. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Brittany R. Hanrahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ursula H. Mahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sarah S. Roley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt T. Trentman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Additional information

Author Contributions

MTT designed the study, performed the research, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. JLT conceived the study, performed the research, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. RTD performed the research and wrote the paper. BRH performed the research and wrote the paper. UHM performed the research and wrote the paper. SSR performed the research and wrote the paper.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 271 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trentman, M.T., Tank, J.L., Davis, R.T. et al. Watershed-scale Land Use Change Increases Ecosystem Metabolism in an Agricultural Stream. Ecosystems 25, 441–456 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00664-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00664-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation