Diversification of heterotrophic protists at the eve of Cambrian explosion

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2021.103545Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Two new types of foraminifera from the Gaojiashan Member, Dengying Formation of the terminal Neoproterozoic.

  • A hollow pear-shaped structure with long extending, a solid spindle-shaped structure with straight narrow central tube.

  • The assemblage of protists increase the global diversification of protists in the latest Ediacaran.

  • The global distributions of Radiolaria, foraminifera and VSMs from the Neoproterozoic to the Cambrian are summarized.

  • Typical representatives of heterotrophic protists are selected from the Neoproterozoic to the Cambrian.

Abstract

Molecular clocks suggest that at least some heterotrophic protists, such as foraminifera, testate amoebae and tintinnids, were present in ecosystems as far back as 1000 Ma. Vase-shaped microfossils of earlier testate amoebae from the supergroups Amoebozoa and Rhizaria occur globally in pre-Sturtian shallow marine deposits, and have thus been considered as a potential biostratigraphic tool, especially at a time span between 789 and 729 Ma. Organic-rich three-dimensional tests having flask-like shapes, constricted necks, distinct and often thickened collars of possible tintinnids affinity were recovered from 715 to 635 Ma carbonate deposits from the Tsagaan Oloom Formation, southwestern Mongolia. Phosphatic scaly structures of unknown affinity were reported from mid-Neoproterozoic (pre-Sturtian) strata of northwest Canada. Anyhow, the fossil records of heterotrophic protists aftermath the Cryogenian age are still shroud in mist. The three putative ciliate fossils, namely Eotintinnopsis, Wujiangella, and Yonyangella from the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation in China were reassessed and likely to be taphonomically and diagenetically distorted and altered acritarchs. Here, we report a diverse assemblage of problematic from the terminal Ediacaran Gaojiashan biota in southern Shaanxi Province, China. Apart from the renowned vase-shaped Protolagena and Sicylagena, likely thought to be the earliest foraminifera, new findings include a hollow pear-shaped structure with long extending, a solid spindle-shaped structure with straight narrow central tube. Possible foraminifera from the Gaojiashan biota may throw welcome new light to the long obscured history of heterotrophic protists at the eve of the Cambrian explosion.

Introduction

Marine protists consist of phototrophic and heterotrophic unicells with a wide cell size ranges (Ohtsuka et al., 2015) and are regarded as categories of eukaryotic microbes that contain all eukaryotes except plants, animals and fungi (O'Malley et al., 2013). Protists account for the enormous majority of eukaryotic life today, representing the major lineages and an evolutionary history far outdistance that of animals, plants and fungi. In addition, eukaryotes might independently be derived from different protistan ancestors (O'Malley et al., 2013). Hence, Protists play noticeable important roles in understanding eukaryotic life on Earth (O'Malley et al., 2013).

The fossil record of the early eukaryotes including marine protists is continual updated (Porter, 2004, 2006; Javaux, 2007, Javaux, 2011; Blank, 2013; Knoll, 2014). The oldest marine protist microfossil recovered is an acritarch from the shales and silty shales of the 1.8-Ga Changzhougou Formation, the lowermost Changcheng Group in the Pangjiapu Region of North China (Lamb et al., 2009). The fossil records of calcareous nannofossils, diatoms and dinoflagellates are vitally beneficial for reconstruction of primary productivity in the geological history (Ohtsuka et al., 2015). In spite of this, dominant heterotrophic protists such as ciliates are considered nearly completely missing in the fossil records (Ohtsuka et al., 2015). Due to the inadequate preservation and paleontological evidence, foraminifera are long thought to emerge in the early Cambrian (McIlroy et al., 2001; Pawlowski et al., 2003; Streng et al., 2005).

However, with more fossil materials identified and biomarker evidence as a tool, fossil record of heterotrophic protists is gradually increased during the Neoproterozoic when modern eukaryotes are supposed to originate (Bosak et al., 2011a, Bosak et al., 2011b). Based on the molecular clocks research, a eukaryotic group including ciliates, dinoflagellates, and apicomplexans diverged at 1360–950 Ma (Douzery et al., 2004; Berney and Pawlowski, 2006) and ciliates diverged at 776 ± 92 Ma (Douzery et al., 2004) or after 500 Ma (Berney and Pawlowski, 2006). Though the oldest ciliates reported in the late Ediacaran phosphorites of the Doushantuo Formation in China (Li et al., 2007) was reinterpretated as diagenetically and taphonomically distorted and altered acritarchs (Dunthorn et al., 2010), exceptionally preserved 715–635 m.y. old putative ciliates with flask-like shapes, constricted necks, extended the stratigraphic range of ciliate body fossils by >100 m.y (Bosak et al., 2011b), which filled the gap of the sparse record of eukaryotes between the Sturtian and Marinoan glaciations, although the Sturtian dramatic environment change made fossil record limited between these two glaciations (Knoll et al., 2006). In addition, vase-shaped fossil testate amoebae from the Rasthof Formation (746 ± 2–635.6 ± 0.5 Ma) of the Congo craton in northern Namibia and the Tsagaan Oloom Formation (773.5 ± 6.6–635 Ma) of the Dzabkhan terrane in Mongolia in the carbonates that cap glacial strata provide evidence of thriving subtidal ecosystems in the aftermath of the Sturtian glaciation (Bosak et al., 2011a). What's more, very large vase-shaped microfossils from carbonate nodules of the upper Chuar Group (Porter and Knoll, 2000) are identified as testate amoebae related to foraminifers. The agglutinated tubular microfossils interpreted as early-diverging foraminifera from the Rasthof Formation, Namibia (715 Ma marine carbonates) predate the earliest undisputed occurrences of fossil foraminifera by ~150 m.y (Bosak et al., 2012). The scarceness of the early foraminiferal fossil record might reflect its poor preservation or incomplete sampling and investigation (Hua et al., 2010).

The Gaojiashan biota (548 ± 8 Ma) (Cui et al., 2016) from the south Shaanxi Province, China yields a vase-shaped microfossil assemblage of putative foraminifera, including two genera and five species, namely Protolagena limbata, P. gaojiashanensis, P. papillata, Sicylagena formosa and S. latistoma (Chai et al., 2020). Here we report a combination of new protists that extend the diversification of the heterotrophic protists after the Snowball Earth event and may add to the record of the ever-growing earliest calcareous foraminifera at the latest Ediacaran.

Section snippets

Geological setting and methods

All fossils illustrated here are associated with the Gaojiashan biota from the Gaojiashan Member of the late Ediacaran Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section in the Ningqiang County, southern Shaanxi Province, South China (GPS: N32°58′17″, E106°15′10″) (Cai et al., 2019), located in the northwestern margin of the Yangtze Platform (Fig. 1). Gaojiashan biota mainly came from the Gaojiashan section (near the village of Gaojiashan) and Lijiagou section (near the village of Lijiagou), and

Palaeontology

Vase-shaped microfossils of possible foraminiferal affinity are recovered in the Gaojiashan biota, of them, two genera and five species are identified (Chai et al., 2020). Apart from the renowned vase-shaped Protolagena and Sicylagena, new findings include one hollow pear-shaped structure with long neck, a solid spindle-shaped structure with straight narrow central tube, and another pear-shaped solid structure with tube-like long neck.

The hollow pear-shaped sample morphologically resembles a

Taxonomy and preservation

All samples illustrated here are phosphatized. The pear-shaped foraminifera from the Gaojiashan biota is morphologically similar to Saccamminopsis? syltensis in size and shape from the cherty limestones and cherts of Middle Ordovician of northern Germany which was regarded as originally calcareous, secondary silicification and infilling caused the labyrinthic appearance (Schallreuter, 1983).

The genus Saccamminopsis is a unilocular foraminifera with aragonitic walls, and aragonitic skeletons

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Acknowledgements

We thank Sanying Precision Instruments Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China for the Micro-CT tomography and Mr. Pang at the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics for help with SEM analyses. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41672025, 41621003, 41890844), the Chinese Geological Survey projects (Grant No. DD20190054, DD20160020), and 111 project (D17013), National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2017YFC0603101), the Strategic Priority Research

References (75)

  • C.W. Allison

    Siliceous microfossils from the Lower Cambrian of Northwest Canada: possible source for biogenic chert

    Science

    (1981)
  • C.W. Allison et al.

    Scale microfossils from the early Cambrian of Northwest Canada

    J. Paleontol.

    (1986)
  • A. Benedetti et al.

    Caudammina gutta, a new species of Caudammina (Hormosinellidae, Foraminiferida) from the Rupelian of Sicily

    Riv. Ital. Paleontol. Stratigr.

    (2009)
  • C. Berney et al.

    A molecular time-scale for eukaryote evolution recalibrated with the continuous microfossil record

    Roy. Soc. Lond. Proc. Ser. B

    (2006)
  • P.L. Binda et al.

    Chitinozoanlike microfossils in a late Precambrian dolostone from Saudi Arabia

    Geology

    (1980)
  • C.E. Blank

    Origin and early evolution of photosynthetic eukaryotes in freshwater environments: reinterpreting Proterozoic paleobiology and biogeochemical processes in light of trait evolution

    J. Phycol.

    (2013)
  • B. Bloeser

    Melanocyrillium, a new genus of structurally complex late Proterozoic microfossils from the Kwagunt Formation (Chuar Group), Grand Canyon, Arizona

    J. Palentol.

    (1985)
  • B. Bloeser et al.

    Chitinozoans from the late Precambrian Chuar Group of the Grand Canyon, Arizona

    Science

    (1977)
  • T. Bosak et al.

    Putative cryogenian ciliates from Mongolia

    Geology

    (2011)
  • T. Bosak et al.

    Possible early foraminiferans in post-Sturtian (716–635 Ma) cap carbonates

    Geology

    (2012)
  • M.D. Brasier

    Towards a biostratigraphy of the earliest skeletal biotas

  • A. Braun et al.

    First early Cambrian Radiolaria

    Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ.

    (2007)
  • A. Braun et al.

    Siliceous microfossils and biosiliceous sedimentation in the lowermost Cambrian of China

    Geol. Soc. Lond., Spec. Publ.

    (2007)
  • Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Shaanxi Province

    Regional Geology of Shaanxi Province. Chinese Ministry of Geology and Mineral Resources, Geological Memoirs, Series 1, Number 13

    (1989)
  • Y. Cai et al.

    Diverse biomineralizing animals in the terminal Ediacaran Period herald the Cambrian explosion

    Geology

    (2019)
  • S. Chai et al.

    Vase-shaped microfossils from the late Ediacaran Dengying Formation of Ningqiang, South China: taxonomy, preservation and biological affinity

    Precambrian Res.

    (2020)
  • S. Chang et al.

    New siliceous microfossils from the Terreneuvian Yanjiahe Formation, South China: the possible earlist radiolarian fossil record

    J. Earth Sci.

    (2018)
  • P.A. Cohen et al.

    Phosphate biomineralization in mid-Neoproterozoic protists

    Geology

    (2011)
  • H. Cui et al.

    Environmental context for the terminal Ediacaran biomineralization of animals

    Geobiology

    (2016)
  • S.J. Culver

    Early Cambrian Foraminifera from West Africa

    Science

    (1991)
  • J.A. Cushman

    Foraminifera, Their Classification and Economic Use

    (2013)
  • L.A. Dalton et al.

    Preservational and morphological variability of assemblages of agglutinated eukaryotes in Cryogenian Cap Carbonates of Northern Namibia

    Palaios

    (2013)
  • P. De Wever et al.

    Radiolarians in the Sedimentary Record

    (2001)
  • E.J.P. Douzery et al.

    The timing of eukaryotic evolution: Does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils?

    National Acad Sci Proc.

    (2004)
  • M. Dunthorn et al.

    Reassessment of the Putative Ciliate Fossils Eotintinnopsis, Wujiangella, and Yonyangella from the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation in China

    Acta Protozool.

    (2010)
  • C. Gaucher et al.

    Upper Vendian skeletal fauna of the Arroyo de Soldado Group, Uruguay

    Beringeria

    (1999)
  • Y. Grahn et al.

    Emergence, biodiversification and extinction of the chitinozoan group

    Geol. Mag.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (5)

    • Geochemical and paleontological evidence of early Cambrian dynamic ocean oxygenation and its implications for organic matter accumulation in mudrocks at the Three Gorges area, South China

      2022, Marine and Petroleum Geology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The early Cambrian witnessed dramatic changes featuring global climate change, highly dynamic marine environments (Ishikawa et al., 2008; Li et al., 2020a, 2020b; Wei et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2022a), and profound bioradiation (i.e., “Cambrian Explosion”) during which almost all the important animal biotas and complex ecosystems similar to today's appeared for the first time. The extensively distributed organic-rich shales during that period (Jin et al., 2020; Li et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2015; Peng, 2003; Shu et al., 2014; Zhai et al., 2019a; Zhu et al., 2017, 2021a) record contemporaneous paleomarine variation and abundant fossil preservation (Betts et al., 2018; Fu et al., 2019; Min et al., 2021) and offer an important media for exploring oceanic redox evolution and its implications for OM enrichment (Jin et al., 2020; Liu et al.,2021, 2022; Zhu et al., 2021a). Attention concerning the early Cambrian has been primarily paid to revealing the redox conditions and their relevance to the great increase in abundance and diversity of metazoan evolution (Li et al., 2017; Li et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2018).

    • Editorial preface to special issue: Extreme environments and biotic responses during the Neoproterozoic-Phanerozoic transition

      2022, Global and Planetary Change
      Citation Excerpt :

      Following the Shuram CIE, multicellar biotas diversified in various environments. Min et al. (2021, this VSI) reported a diverse assemblage of tubular forms of uncertain affinity from the terminal Ediacaran Gaojiashan biota in China. The authors re-assigned material that was previously ascribed to the renowned vase-shaped Protolagena and Sicylagena to the earliest foraminiferans.

    View full text