Skip to main content
Log in

Overview of Foreign Boiler Designs for Ultra Supercritical (USC) Boilers and Prospects for Development of USC Power Units in Russia

  • STEAM BOILERS, POWER PLANT FUELS, BURNER UNITS, AND BOILER AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the coming years, global electricity generation will largely be carried out using coal as fuel (coal generation). Certain European countries, the United States, Canada, and Japan are trying to cut down the number of coal-fired power units with their complete disposal by 2030. At the same time, the countries of the Asia-Pacific region, mainly China and India, are extensively developing a technology for the coal generation of steam at ultra supercitical (USC) conditions, which improves the efficiency of electricity generation and reduces harmful atmospheric emissions. The world power industry presently uses steam conditions of approximately 30 MPa and 610/620°C. The efficiency is as high as 47%. An overview is presented of the designs of USC coal-fired power boilers from the largest foreign manufacturers of boiler equipment in Europe (Alstom), Japan (Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems and Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries), and China (Harbin Boiler Co., Ltd, Dongfang Boiler Co., Ltd, and Shanghai Boiler Works, Ltd.). Russia ranks tenth in the world as to the total coal-fired power generation. The percentage of coal-fired generation in Russia was approximately 13.5% in 2016. The development of engineering solutions for the USC power unit was undertaken in Russia at the beginning of the 21st century. Boiler equipment manufacturers worked out projects of boilers designed to operate on various coal types for a 660-MW power unit. The construction of the USC power unit prototype requires joint efforts of the government, power engineers, metallurgists, research organizations, and equipment manufacturers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.
Fig. 17.
Fig. 18.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Japan Coal Phase-Out: The Path to Phase-Out by 2030 (Kiko Network, Tokyo, 2018). https://www.kikonet.org/ wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Report_Japan-Coal-Phase-Out_EG.pdf.

  2. Mapped: The World’s Coal Power Plants. https://www. carbonbrief.org/mapped-worlds-coal-power-plants

  3. STO 70238424.27.100.008-2008. Standard of NP “INV-EL”. Block Installations. Delivery Conditions. Norms and Requirements (NP INVEL, Moscow, 2008).

  4. K. Makino, “Clean coal technology — For the future utilization,” in Clean Coal Technology and Sustainable Development: Proc. 8th Int. Symp. on Coal Combustion, Beijing, China, July 19–22, 2015 (Springer-Verlag and Tsinghua Univ. Press, Singapore, 2016), pp. 3–8.

  5. X. Tan, “Supercritical and ultrasupercritical coal-fired power generation”. https://www.bpastudies.org/ bpastudies/article/view/170/318

  6. A. N. Tugov, “Development of electric energy industry in China,” Energokhoz. Rubezhom, No. 3 (286), 7–14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. “Mitsubishi Hitachi power systems Ltd. Boiler business and technology development,” Mitsubishi Heavy Ind. Tech. Rev 52 (2), 55–63 (2015).

  8. Y. Sato, “Lünen — State of the art 813 MW coal-fired USC boiler with high efficiency and flexibility,” Presented at Proc. Power-Gen Europe 2014, Cologne, Germany, June 3–5, 2014.

  9. G. Welford, “Vertical tubes improve supercritical systems”. https://www.modernpowersystems.com/features/ featurevertical-tubes-improve-supercritical-systems

  10. Y. Shimogori, “Ultra super critical pressure coal fired boiler — State of the art technology applications”. https://pdfslide.net/documents/super-critical-details. html

  11. K. Yamamoto, H. Suganuma, K. Domoto, Y. Yamasaki, Y. Kanemaki, and H. Nakaharai, “Design technology for supercritical sliding pressure operation vertical water wall boilers,” Mitsubishi Heavy Ind. Tech. Rev. 50 (3), 59–68 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Majewski, “Concept of a measurement and test station to determine linear pressure drop and the heat transfer coefficient of internally ribbed tubes,” J. Power Technol. 93, 340–346 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Richardson, Y. Kidera, and Y. Shimogori, “Supercritical boiler technology matures”. https://www.idc-online.com/technical_references/pdfs/electrical_engineering/Supercritical_Boiler_Technology_Matures.pdf

  14. J. Acton, Y. Suzuki, and Y. Shimogori, “495-MW Capacity Genesee Phase 3 Project: The first supercritical pressure coal-fired boiler in Canada”. https://studylib. net/doc/18714214/495-mw-capacity-genesee-phase-3-project

  15. K. Matsumoto, Jun Kasai, T. Saeki, Y. Takei, and T. Suto, “Development of ultra-low NOx coal firing M-PM burner and successfully operational results,” Mitsubishi Heavy Ind. Tech. Rev. 52 (2), 72–77 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Ochi, K. Kiyama, H. Yoshizako, H. Okazaki, and M. Taniguchi, “Latest low-NOx combustion technology for pulverized-coal-fired boilers,” Hitachi Rev. 58, 187–193 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Tamura, Sh. Watanabe, E. Oono, R. Itokazu, and T. Kozaki, “Advanced development of pulverized coal firing technologies,” IHI Eng. Rev. 44, 72–77 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Fukuda, K. Kiyama, Y. Nagai, T. Nakamoto, and T. Yano, “Hitachi latest technologies for coal firing power plant”. http://www.mercuryconvention.org/Portals/ 11/documents/meetings/EG1/LATEST_TECH.pdf

  19. W. Thomas, “Hitachinaka thermal power station unit 2, Tokai, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan”. https://www.powermag.com/hitachinaka-thermal-power-station-unit-2-tokai-ibaraki-prefecture-japan/

  20. A. A. Salamov, “Supercritical pressure boiler for a high-capacity pulverized coal power unit,” Energ. Rubezhom, No. 1, 25–29 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. G. Tumanovskii, V. R. Kotler, and Yu. V. Vikhrev, “1000 MW power unit operating on high-moisture brown coal for Niederaußem thermal power plant,” Energ. Rubezhom, No. 11, 69–74 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. “RDK 8’s three little words: Efficient, reliable and flexible” (2010). https://www.powerengineeringint.com/ world-regions/europe/rdk-8s-three-little-words-efficient-reliable-and-flexible/

  23. “Alstom to provide two 900 MW units for the largest coal-fired power plant in Poland”. https://www.alstom.com/ press-releases-news/2014/1/alstom-to-provide-two-900-mw-units-for-the-largest-coal-fired-power-plant-in-poland

  24. “Coal power: A surprisingly large number of projects in the pipeline modern power system” (2018). https://www. modernpowersystems.com/features/featurecoal-power-a-surprisingly-large-number-of-projects-in-the-pipeline-6905457/

  25. A. Minchener, Developments in China’s Coal-Fired Power Sector (IEA Clean Coal Centre, 2010). https:// www.scribd.com/document/406689966/Developments-in-China-s-Coal-Fired-Power-Sector

  26. http://en.mhps-dongfangboiler.com/ljglsrm.html

  27. http://shanghaielectric-smec.com/1-1-4-boilers/

  28. H. Fan, Zh. Zhang, J. Dong, and W. Xu, “China’s R&D of advanced ultra-supercritical coal-fired power generation for addressing climate change,” Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 5, 364–371 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2018.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia — 2019. Statistical Compilation. https://ac.gov.ru/uploads/2-Publications/ TEK_annual/TEK.2019.pdf

  30. A. G. Tumanovskii, M. Yu. Altukhov, A. L. Shvarts, G. D. Avrutskii, E. Kh. Verbovetskii, E. A. Tugolukov, A. A. Smyshlyaev, L. A. Khomenok, and A. N. Skorobogatykh, “The development of 600 MW pulverized coal power unit with supercritical parameters,” Elektr. Stn., No. 1, 18–27 (2010).

  31. A. G. Tumanovskii, A. L. Shvarts, E. A. Tugolukov, A. A. Smyshlyaev, E. Kh. Verbovetskii, O. V. Nesiolovskii, and N. V. Petrova, “A coal-fired boiler for a new-generation power unit for ultrasupercritical steam conditions,” Therm. Eng. 56, 447–455 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. V. V. Ivanenko, A. N. Bezgreshnov, D. L. Mikhalev, A. N. Ozerov, P. N. Fedotov, K. G. Zhukov, and S. N. Zelenskii, “Technological decisions on the boiler for a 660 MW power unit for supercritical steam parameters,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Sci.-Tech. Conf. on Use of Solid Fuels for Efficient and Environmentally Friendly Production of Electricity and Heat, Moscow, Oct. 28–29, 2014 (Vseross. Tepolotekh. Inst., Moscow, 2014), pp. 61–65.

  33. K. S. Krylova, M. G. Bryksin, M. A. Izyumov, R. B. Burenkova, and S. A. Samokhin, “Steam boilers for supercritical parameters,” in Modern Technologies in Power Engineering — Basis for Improving the Reliability, Efficiency and Safety of Thermal Power Plant Equipment: Proc. Special Sci.-Pract. Conf. of Young Specialists, Moscow, June 7–8, 2012 (Vseross. Tepolotekh. Inst., Moscow, 2012), pp. 253–259.

  34. F. A. Serant, I. Yu. Belorutskii, Yu. A. Ershov, V. V. Gordeev, O. I. Stavskaya, and T. V. Katsel’, “An annular-furnace boiler for the 660-MW power unit for ultrasupercritical parameters intended for firing brown slagging coals,” Therm. Eng. 60, 865–871 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Somova.

Additional information

Translated by T. Krasnoshchekova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Somova, E.V., Tugov, A.N. & Tumanovskii, A.G. Overview of Foreign Boiler Designs for Ultra Supercritical (USC) Boilers and Prospects for Development of USC Power Units in Russia. Therm. Eng. 68, 417–433 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601521060094

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601521060094

Keywords:

Navigation