Abstract
Background and Purpose: Most current studies on the passive biomechanical properties of esophageal tissues directly use the exponential strain energy function (SEF) to fit and calculate the constants of the constitutive equation. In the context of the extensive application of exponential SEF, in-depth research on the exponential SEF is still lacking. The purpose of this study is to combine the exponential function with the polynomial SEF to obtain the most suitable constitutive equation to describe the three-dimensional passive behavior of the esophagus. Methods: fresh pig esophagus with a length of 13 cm in the middle position was selected as esophageal samples. The esophageal sample was separated into muscular layer and mucosal layer with surgical scissors. Stretch–inflation mechanical tests of the intact esophagus, esophageal muscular, and esophageal mucosa were carried out on a triaxial test machine. The external radius, axial force, and internal pressure were recorded simultaneously. The seven-parameter Fung-type SEF and several new SEFs combining polynomials and exponents were used to fit the experimental data curves. Results: The stretch–inflation test data and the morphometric parameters at the zero-stress state of the layered esophagus were obtained. The new SEF with polynomial and exponential combination is more suitable to describe describing the three-dimensional passive biomechanical properties of esophageal tissue. Among them, New-Fung13 SEF is more suitable for describing the passive biomechanical properties of intact esophageal tissue, Sokolis-Fung13 SEF is more suitable for the esophageal muscle layer, and New-Fung10 SEF is more suitable for the esophageal mucosa. The constitutive parameters of the optimal constitutive model for each layer of the esophagus were obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aho JM, Qiang B, Wigle DA et al (2016) Nondestructive measurement of esophageal biaxial mechanical properties utilizing sonometry. Phys Med Biol 61:4781–4795. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/13/4781
Chuong CJ, Fung YC (1983) Three–dimensional stress distribution in arteries. J Biomech Eng 105:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138417
Fan Y, Gregersen H, Kassab GS (2004) A two-layered mechanical model of the rat esophagus. Exp Theory Biomed Eng Online 3:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-3-40
Kou W, Bhalla APS, Griffith BE et al (2015) A fully resolved active musculo-mechanical model for esophageal transport. J Comput Phys 298:446–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.05.049
Liao D, Fan Y, Zeng Y, Gregersen H (2003) Stress distribution in the layered wall of the rat oesophagus. Med Eng Phys 25:731–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00122-X
Liao D, Zhao J, Gregersen H (2010) 3d Mechanical properties of the partially obstructed guinea pig small intestine. J Biomech 43:2079–2086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.008
Liao D, Gregersen H, Agger P et al (2018) 3D reconstruction and fiber quantification in the pig lower esophageal sphincter region using in vitro diffusion tensor imaging. Biomed Phys Eng Express. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aa976e
Lin C, Liu W, Xie J et al (2020) The lubricating function of mucin at the gastroscope device-esophagus interface. Tribol Lett 68:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-020-01322-9
Natali AN, Carniel EL, Gregersen H (2009) Biomechanical behaviour of oesophageal tissues: material and structural configuration, experimental data and constitutive analysis. Med Eng Phys 31:1056–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.07.003
Peirlinck M, Debusschere N, Iannaccone F et al (2018) An in silico biomechanical analysis of the stent–esophagus interaction. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17:111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0948-9
Slae M, Wilschanski M (2018) Cystic fibrosis: a gastrointestinal cancer syndrome. Lancet Oncol 19:719–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30250-X
Sokolis DP (2010) Strain-energy function and three-dimensional stress distribution in esophageal biomechanics. J Biomech 43:2753–2764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.007
Sokolis DP (2012) Multiaxial mechanical behaviour of the passive ureteral wall: experimental study and mathematical characterisation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 15:1145–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2011.581237
Sokolis DP (2013) Structurally-motivated characterization of the passive pseudo-elastic response of esophagus and its layers. Comput Biol Med 43:1273–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.06.009
Sommer G, Schriefl A, Zeindlinger G et al (2013) Multiaxial mechanical response and constitutive modeling of esophageal tissues: Impact on esophageal tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 9:9379–9391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.041
Stavropoulou EA, Dafalias YF, Sokolis DP (2009) Biomechanical and histological characteristics of passive esophagus: experimental investigation and comparative constitutive modeling. J Biomech 42:2654–2663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.018
Stavropoulou EA, Dafalias YF, Sokolis DP (2012) Biomechanical behavior and histological organization of the three-layered passive esophagus as a function of topography. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 226:477–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411912444073
Systèmes D (2016a) Abaqus User Subroutines Reference Guide, Section 1.1.21. In: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. http://130.149.89.49:2080/v2016/books/sub/default.htm
Systèmes D (2016b) Abaqus Analysis User’s Guide, Section 22.6.1. In: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. http://130.149.89.49:2080/v2016/books/usb/default.htm
Tong P, Fung YC (1976) The stress-strain relationship for the skin. J Biomech 9:649–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(76)90107-X
Yang J, Liao D, Zhao J, Gregersen H (2004) Shear modulus of elasticity of the esophagus. Ann Biomed Eng 32:1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.1114/B:ABME.0000039356.24821.6c
Yang J, Zhao J, Liao D, Gregersen H (2006a) Biomechanical properties of the layered oesophagus and its remodelling in experimental type-1 diabetes. J Biomech 39:894–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.022
Yang W, Fung TC, Chian KS, Chong CK (2006b) Directional, regional, and layer variations of mechanical properties of esophageal tissue and its interpretation using a structure-based constitutive model. J Biomech Eng 128:409–418. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2187033
Yang W, Fung TC, Chian KS, Chong CK (2006c) 3D mechanical properties of the layered esophagus: experiment and constitutive model. J Biomech Eng 128:899–908. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2354206
Yuan W, Chen J, Shu Y et al (2017) Correlation of DAPK1 methylation and the risk of gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184959
Yuhua P, Xiaoyang L, WU s (1999) A data-processing technique for the 3-D static nonlinear mechanical properties of arterial wall. J Exp Mech 14:425–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11767-999-0009-3
Yunhua L, Yingping J, Xiaomei G, Feifei L (2021) The effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection combined with pre-purse-string-suture on the lesion clearance rate, gastrointestinal function and complications in patients with early tumor of upper digestive tract. Mod Oncol 29:807–810
Zhao J, McMahon B, Fox M, Gregersen H (2018) The esophagiome: integrated anatomical, mechanical, and physiological analysis of the esophago-gastric segment. Ann New York Acad Sci 1434:5–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13869
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51675447) and Key R & D project of Sichuan Province (2018JY0552); KeZhou Li provided clinical information and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, P., Deng, X., Li, K. et al. 3D biomechanical properties of the layered esophagus: Fung-type SEF and new constitutive model. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 20, 1775–1788 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01476-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01476-y