Abstract
Introduction
Smells can be described by assigning the words that come to mind when sniffing an odorous material. A great number of terms can be applied, but not all of them are independent, and it is possible to establish groups of words often applied together when describing a smell. Such classification of olfactory descriptors is of scientific interest in order to better understand the dimensionality and structure of human olfactory perception space. For this purpose, compilations of olfactory profiles contain valuable information that may lead to certain consensus in odor classification.
Methods
One of the most comprehensive odor databases is the Dravnieks’ Atlas, which contains quantitative olfactory profiles for 160 samples. For each one, a large panel rated the applicability of 146 odor character descriptors on a numeric scale.
Results
By applying principal component analysis to this Atlas, 105 descriptors were reorganized in 24 classes, and 33 attributes were considered as odors intermediate of two or three categories. The similarities between classes were studied by means of a further multivariate analysis based on latent variables, which provides valuable information about the most salient dimensions of odor space.
Conclusions
Consistent with other reported statistical analyses of olfactory databases, the perceptual space of odor character is multidimensional with about 20–30 dimensions, and it is better described as a continuum spectrum rather than as a segmented space.
Implications
Attempts to classify all possible odor descriptors in a restricted number of classes appear to be inappropriate. Instead, 24 categories of related terms are proposed here, regarding the rest as intermediate smells, assuming that olfactory classes are not independent and follow certain hierarchy according to particular underlying dimensions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data can be accessed via this link: https://doi.org/10.1520/DS61-EB
References
Abe H, Kanaya S, Komukai T et al (1990) Systemization of semantic descriptions of odors. Anal Chim Acta 239:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)83837-4
Amoore J E (1962) The stereochemical theory of olfaction. I. Identification of seven primary odours. Proc Sci Sect Toilet Goods Assoc 37(suppl):1–13
Amoore JE, Venstrom D (1967) Correlations between stereochemical assessments and organoleptic analysis of odorous compounds. In: Hayashi T (ed) Olfaction and taste II. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 3–17
Arctander S (1969) Perfume and flavor chemicals (aroma chemicals), Vol. I and II. Arctander S publisher, Montclair, NJ
Boelens H, Haring HG (1981) Molecular structure and olfactive quality [Internal report]. Naarden International, Bussum, The Netherlands
Brud WS (1986) Words versus odours: how perfumers communicate. Perf Flavor 11:27–44
Burdock GA (ed) (2004) Fenaroli’s handbook of flavor ingredients, 5th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Callegari P, Rouault J, Laffort P (1997) Olfactory quality: from descriptor profiles to similarities. Chem Senses 22:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/22.1.1
Castro JB, Ramanathan A, Chennubhotla CS (2013) Categorical dimensions of human odor descriptor space revealed by non-negative matrix factorization. PLoS ONE 8:e73289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073289
Cerbelaud R (1951) Formulaire de parfumerie. Opera, Paris
Chastrette M, Elmouaffek A, Sauvegrain P (1988) A multidimensional statistical study of similarities between 74 notes used in perfumery. Chem Senses 13:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/13.2.295
Chastrette M, de Saint Laumer JY, Sauvegrain P (1991) Analysis of a system of description of odors by means of four different multivariate statistical methods. Chem Senses 16:81–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/16.1.81
Coxon JM, Gregson RAM, Paddick RG (1978) Multidimensional scaling of perceived odour of bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, 1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptane and cyclohexane derivatives. Chem Senses 3:431–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/3.4.431
Crocker EC, Henderson LF (1927) Analysis and classification of odours: an effort to develop a workable method. Amer Perf Essent Oil Rev 22:325–356
Davis RG (1979) Olfactory perceptual space models compared by quantitative methods. Chem Senses 4:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/4.1.21
Dravnieks A (1982) Odor quality: semantically generated multidimensional profiles are stable. Science 218:799–801. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7134974
Dravnieks A (1985) Atlas of odor character profiles, data Series DS 61. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. https://doi.org/10.1520/DS61-EB
Dravnieks A, Bock FC, Powers JJ et al (1978) Comparison of odors directly and through profiling. Chem Senses 3:191–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/3.2.191
Dravnieks A, Masurat T, Lamm RA (1984) Hedonics of odors and odor descriptors. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 34:752–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1984.10465810
Ennis DM, Boelens H, Haring H et al (1982) Multivariate analysis in sensory evaluation. Food Technol 36:83–90
Harper R, Bate-Smith EC, Land DG (1968a) Odour description and odour classification: a multidisciplinary examination. Elsevier, New York
Harper R, Bate-Smith EC, Land DG et al (1968b) A glossary of odour stimuli and their qualities. Perf Essent Oil Rec 59:22–37
Henning H (1916) Der geruch. Barth, Leipzig, Germany
Jaubert JN, Gordon G, Doré JC (1986) Classification of odours and their sensorial perception. Quintessenza 5:27–42
Jaubert JN, Gordon G, Doré JC (1987) Une organisation du champ des odeurs. II. Modèle descriptif de l’organisation de l’espace odorant. Parfum Cosmét Arômes 78:71–82
Jeltema MA, Southwick EW (1986) Evaluation and applications of odor profiling. J Sensory Stud 1:123–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1986.tb00165.x
Jennings-White C (1984) Human Primary Odors Perfum Flavor 9:46–58
Kaeppler K, Mueller F (2013) Odor classification: a review of factors influencing perception-based odor arrangements. Chem Senses 38:189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjs141
Keller A, Vosshall LB (2004) Human olfactory psychophysics. Current Biol 14:875–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.066
Keller A, Vosshall LB (2016) Olfactory perception of chemically diverse molecules. BMC Neurosci 17:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0287-2
Khan RM, Luk CH, Flinker A et al (2007) Predicting odor pleasantness from odorant structure: pleasantness as a reflection of the physical world. J Neurosci 27:10015–10023. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1158-07.2007
Klein S (1947) Primary odour element classification. Amer Perfum Essent Oil Rev 50:453–454
Koulakov AA, Kolterman BE, Enikolopov AG et al (2011) In search of the structure of human olfactory space. Front Syst Neurosci 5:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2011.00065
Kumar R, Kaur R, Auffarth B et al (2015) Understanding the odour spaces: a step towards solving olfactory stimulus-percept problem. PLoS ONE 10:e0141263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141263
Licon CC, Manesse C, Dantec M et al (2018) Pleasantness and trigeminal sensations as salient dimensions in organizing the semantic and physiological spaces of odors. Sci Rep 8:8444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26510-5
Linnaeus C (1756) Odores medicamentorum. In: Amoenitates academicae, Vol. 3. Lars Salvius, Stockholm, pp 183–201
Lovell JH (1923) Classification of flower odours. Amer Bee J 63:392–394
Madany-Mamlouk A, Martinetz T (2004) On the dimensions of the olfactory perception space. Neurocomput 58–60:1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2004.01.161
Madany-Mamlouk A, Chee-Ruiter C, Hofmann UG et al (2003) Quantifying olfactory perception: mapping olfactory perception space by using multidimensional scaling and self-organizing maps. Neurocomput 52–54:591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00805-6
Martínez-Mayorga K, Peppard TL, Yongye AB et al (2011) Characterization of a comprehensive flavor database. J Chemom 25:550–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1399
Meister M (2015) On the dimensionality of odor space. Elife 4:e07865. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07865.001
Moskowitz HR, Gerbers CL (1974) Dimensional salience of odors. Ann NY Acad Sci 237:1–16
Pintore M, Wechman C, Sicard G et al (2006) Comparing the information content of two large olfactory databases. J Chem Inf Model 46:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci0502505
Randebrock RE (1985) Geruch und konstitution. Eine beweisführung für die molekulartheorie des geruches. I: Eine objektivierbare sprache für den geruch. Parfüm Kosmet 66:435–443
Ravia A, Snitz K, Honigstein D, Finkel M, Zirler R, Perl O, Secundo L, Laudamiel C, Harel D, Sobel N (2020) A measure of smell enables the creation of olfactory metamers. Nature 588:118–123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2891-7
Rimmel E (1895) The base of perfumes. London. (French translation 1990, Le livre des parfums. Les éditions 1900, Paris)
Schiffman SS (1974) Physicochemical correlates of olfactory quality. Science 185:112–117. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4146.112
Schutz HG (1964) A matching-standards method for characterizing odor qualities. Ann NY Acad Sci 116:517–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb45081.x
Secundo L, Snitz K, Sobel N (2014) The perceptual logic of smell. Curr Opin Neurobiol 25:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.12.010
Sell CS (2004) Scent through the looking glass. Chem Biodivers 1:1899–1920. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.200490146
Sigma–Aldrich Fine Chemicals Company (2005) Flavors and fragrances 2005–2006 catalog. Author, Milwaukee, WI
Stevenson RJ, Boakes RA (2003) A mnemonic theory of odor perception. Psychol Rev 110:340–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.340
Tromelin A, Chabanet C, Audouze K et al (2017) Multivariate statistical analysis of a large odorants database aimed at revealing similarities and links between odorants and odors. Flav Fragr J 33:106–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3430
Urdapilleta I, Giboreau A, Manetta C et al (2006) The mental context for the description of odors: a semantic space. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 56:261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2005.09.013
von Haller A (1763) Classes odorum. In: Elementa physiologiae, Vol. 5. Grasset, Lausanne, pp 162–168
Willis JH (1944) Flower perfumes and their classification. Victorian Naturalist 61:131–136
Wise PM, Olsson MJ, Cain WS (2000) Quantification of odor quality. Chem Senses 25:429–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/25.4.429
Wright RH, Michels KM (1964) Evaluation of far infrared relation to odors by a standard similarity method. Ann NY Acad Sci 116:535–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb45083.x
Woskow MH (1968) Multidimensional scaling of odors. In Tanyolac, N. (ed.), Theories of odors and odor measurement. Robert College Research Center, Istanbul, pp 147–188
Yoshida M (1975) Psychometric classification of odors. Chem Senses 1:443–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/1.4.443
Zarzo M (2008) Psychologic dimensions in the perception of everyday odors: pleasantness and edibility. J Sensory Stud 23:354–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00160.x
Zarzo M (2011) Hedonic judgments of chemical compounds are correlated with molecular size. Sensors 11:3667–3686. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110403667
Zarzo M (2013) What is a fresh scent in perfumery? Perceptual freshness is correlated with substantivity. Sensors 13:463–483. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130100463
Zarzo M, Stanton DT (2006) Identification of latent variables in a semantic odor profile database using principal component analysis. Chem Senses 31:713–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjl013
Zarzo M, Stanton DT (2009) Understanding the underlying dimensions in perfumers’ odor perception space as a basis for developing meaningful odor maps. Atten Percept Psychophys 71:225–247. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.2.225
Zwaardemaker H (1925) Classification des odeurs. L’odorat. Doin, Paris, pp 178–224
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to D. Stanton and A. Richter for valuable comments in the first version of the manuscript, as well as to A. Arenal for a preliminary analysis of the database.
Funding
Partial financial support was received from the Spanish Ministry or Education and Science under grant no. FU2004-1119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 376 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zarzo, M. Multivariate Analysis and Classification of 146 Odor Character Descriptors. Chem. Percept. 14, 79–101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-021-09288-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-021-09288-1