Abstract
In this paper, I report the results of a study of a large-scale implementation of an evidence-based, objective-oriented approach to teaching via digital platforms among mathematics teachers in Denmark. The aim of the study was to investigate how these platforms affect the work of mathematics teachers and how emergent problems in this process can be addressed from an implementation perspective. This objective was achieved by applying concepts from the theory of instrumental genesis to analyze ethnographical data of teachers’ platform usage and data from participatory workshops. The results of the study indicate that the design of platforms is likely to conflict with the needs of mathematics teachers and thus I argue for the need of addressing such issues by supporting teachers in enacting innovations rather than by redesigning them. Furthermore, in the paper I suggest that future workshop is an adequate format to support such enactments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“EVA” is an abbreviation for Dansk Evalueringsinstitut (Danish Institute of Evaluation) that conducts evaluations of welfare-related initiatives. See: https://www.eva.dk/.
“KL” is the association and interest organization of the 98 Danish municipalities that seeks to safeguard the common interests of the municipalities, assist individual municipalities with consultancy services, and ensure that the local authorities are provided with up-to-date and relevant information. See https://www.kl.dk/english/kl-local-government-denmark/.
References
Ärlebäck, J. B. (2017). Using a Models and Modelling Perspective (MPP) to frame and combine research, practice- and teachers’ professional development. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.) (2017), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3801–3808). Dublin, Ireland: Dublin Institute of Education, Dublin City University and ERME.
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245–274.
Century, J., & Cassata, A. (2016). Implementation research: finding common ground on what, how, why, where, and who. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 169–215.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Davis, J. D., McDuffie, A. R., Drake, C., & Seiwell, A. L. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of the official curriculum: problem solving and rigor. International Journal of Educational Research, 93, 91–100.
Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Ræbild, L. C. Ø. (2017). Fremtidsværksted, brugerindflydelse og ejerskab—om at understøtte det pædagogiske personales ejerskab og fagligt pædagogiske lederskab i brug af læringsplatforme. Report. https://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/fremtidsv%C3%A6rksted-brugerindflydelse-og-ejerskab-om-at-underst%C3%B8tte-. Accessed 3 Feb 2021.
Ejsing-Duun, S., & Misfeldt, M. (2015). Tema 1: Programmering af robotenheder i grundskolen. Tidsskriftet Læring Og Medier, 8(14), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v8i14.21615
EVA (2016). Implementering af Læringsplatforme -de første erfaringer. Evaluation report. https://www.eva.dk/grundskole/implementering-digitale-laeringsplatforme-foerste-erfaringer. Accessed 3 Feb 2021.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218.
Guin, D., Ruthven, K., & Trouche, L. (2005). The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Springer.
Hansen, T. I., & Petersen, C. K. (2018). Måling af læringsmål: Kvantitativ undersøgelse af forsøg med digitalt understøttende læringsmål i dansk og matematik [Measuring learning objectives: quantitative investigations of the experiments with digital learning objectives in Danish and mathematics]. Kognition Og Paedagogik, 28(107), 22–39.
Hattie, J. (2010). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Jankvist, U. T., Aguilar, M. S., Ärlebäck, J. B. & Wæge, K. (2017). TWG23: implementation of research findings in mathematics education. Introduction to the papers of TWG23: implementation of research findings in mathematics education. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.) (2017), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3768–3775). Dublin, Ireland: Dublin Institute of Education, Dublin City University and ERME.
Jungk, R., & Müllert, N. R. (1984). Håndbog i fremtidsværksteder [Handbook in future workshops]. Politisk Revy.
KL (2014). Aftale om konkretisering af det fælles brugerportalsinitiativ for folkeskolen. [Agreement about the specification of The User Portal Initiative for compulsory schools].
KL (2016). Brugerportalsinitiativet. kravspecifikation til læringsplatform. Version 1.0. [User portal initiative. Requirement specification for learning platform. Version 1.0].
KL (2021). Udspil: Brugerportalsinitiativet. [Draft: the user portal initiative]. https://www.kl.dk/ImageVaultFiles/id_81821/cf_202/Pjece_om_brugerportalsinitiativet.PDF/. Accessed 3 Feb 2021.
Koichu, B. & Pinto, A. (2019). Implementation through participation: theoretical considerations and an illustrative case. In U.T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.) (2019), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 4413–4421). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
Kuzle, A. (2017). From theory through collaboration into practice: designing a problem-solving curriculum for grade 6 students. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.) (2017), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3849–3856). Dublin, Ireland: Dublin Institute of Education, Dublin City University and ERME.
Larsen, D. M., Hjelmborg, M., Lindhart, B., Dreyøe, J. Michelsen, C., & Misfeldt, M. (2019). Designing inquiry-based teaching at scale: central factors for implementation. In U.T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.) (2019), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 4421–4429). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute Utrecht University and ERME.
Misfeldt, M. (2016). Digitalt understøttede læringsmål. Udviklingsprojekt med demonstrationsskoleforsøg vedr. it i folkeskolen (Slutrapport) [Digital support of learning objectives. Development project concerning IT in compulsory school (final report)].
Nilsen, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10(53), 1–13.
Rabardel, P., & Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: a developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15(5), 665–691.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concept in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 46(5), 705–718.
Tamborg, A. L. (2019). Pedagogical and organizational implications of implementing digital platforms in Danish compulsory schools. PhD thesis, Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Undervisningsministeriet (2014). Læringsmålstyret undervisning i folkeskolen. [Objective oriented teaching in compulsory schools].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tamborg, A.L. Improving mathematics teaching via digital platforms? Implementation processes seen through the lens of instrumental genesis. ZDM Mathematics Education 53, 1059–1071 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01282-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01282-x