Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supplier selection and order allocation model with disruption and environmental risks in centralized supply chain

  • Original article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supply chain managers have realized that competition between supply chains has replaced competition between companies. In addition, with increasing disruptions and uncertainty in planning, companies need to be able to make informed decisions at risk. Coordination in the resilient supply chain and appropriate selection of suppliers play a key role in risky situations. In previous research, mainly the impact of resilience strategies in the decentralized supply chain has been investigated and ignored the reliability of suppliers in the decision-making process. Therefore, we provide an effective framework for selecting reliable suppliers and order allocation, which increases the supply chain's benefits by considering the risk reduction strategies and coordination between the buyer and the supplier. Thus, we optimized the problem of supplier selection and order allocation in a centralized supply chain using mixed-integer nonlinear programming models and risk reduction strategies. These strategies are protected suppliers, back-up suppliers, reserving additional capacity, emergency stock, and geographical separation. Also, by considering the failure mode and effects analysis technique and the risk priority number constraint, suppliers' reliability has been considered. A numerical example is solved with the exact method. In addition, the application of the proposed models in a case study has been investigated by the Grasshopper optimization algorithm. Based on the sensitivity analysis results, we found that the simultaneous use of risk reduction strategies in the models significantly reduces supply chain costs and increases its benefits. Also, considering the reliability constraints causes supply chain managers to choose suppliers with more desirable reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abazari SR, Aghsami A, Rabbani M (2020) Prepositioning and distributing relief items in humanitarian logistics with uncertain parameters. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 74:100933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S, Jamshidi A, Ait-Kadi D, Ruiz A (2015) Using fuzzy cost-based FMEA, GRA and profitability theory for minimizing failures at a healthcare diagnosis service. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(4):601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alejo-Reyes A, Mendoza A, Olivares-Benitez E (2021) A heuristic method for the supplier selection and order quantity allocation problem. Appl Math Model 90:1130–1142

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arabsheybani A, Paydar MM, Safaei AS (2018) An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier’s risk. J Clean Prod 190:577–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadeh A, Sheikhalishahi M, Aghsami A (2015) An integrated FTA-DFMEA approach for reliability analysis and product configuration considering warranty cost. Prod Eng Res Devel 9(5):635–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghalian A, Rezapour S, Farahani RZ (2013) Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: a real-life case. Eur J Oper Res 227(1):199–215

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtiari Tavana A, Rabieh M, Esmaeili M (2020) A stochastic programming model of sustainable-resilient supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risks-the case of iran-khodro supply chain. J Prod Op Manag 11(1):111–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiki H, Mohammad Seyedhosseini SV, Ponkratov V, Olegovna Zekiy A, Ivanov SA (2021) Addressing a sustainable supplier selection and order allocation problem by an integrated approach: a case of automobile manufacturing. J Indus Prod Eng 38(4):239-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Meindl P (2007) Supply chain management. Strategy, planning & operation. In Das summa summarum des management. Gabler, pp. 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_22.

  • Chopra S, Sodhi M (2014) Reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 55(3):72–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehghani E, Jabalameli MS, Jabbarzadeh A, Pishvaee MS (2018) Resilient solar photovoltaic supply chain network design under business-as-usual and hazard uncertainties. Comput Chem Eng 111:288–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili-Najafabadi E, Nezhad MSF, Pourmohammadi H, Honarvar M, Vahdatzad MA (2019) A joint supplier selection and order allocation model with disruption risks in centralized supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 127:734–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili-Najafabadi E, Azad N, Nezhad MSF (2021) Risk-averse supplier selection and order allocation in the centralized supply chains under disruption risks. Expert Syst Appl 175:114691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng J, Gong Z (2020) Integrated linguistic entropy weight method and multi-objective programming model for supplier selection and order allocation in a circular economy: a case study. J Clean Prod 277:122597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong J, You F (2018) Resilient design and operations of process systems: nonlinear adaptive robust optimization model and algorithm for resilience analysis and enhancement. Comput Chem Eng 116:231–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasani A, Khosrojerdi A (2016) Robust global supply chain network design under disruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: a parallel memetic algorithm for a real-life case study. Trans Res Part e Log Trans Rev 87:20–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasani A, Mokhtari H, Fattahi M (2021) A multi-objective optimization approach for green and resilient supply chain network design: a real-life Case Study. J Clean Prod 278:123199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini S, Morshedlou N, Ivanov D, Sarder MD, Barker K, Al Khaled A (2019) Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks. Int J Prod Econ 213:124–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu AH, Hsu CW, Kuo TC, Wu WC (2009) Risk evaluation of green components to hazardous substance using FMEA and FAHP. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):7142–7147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Wang G, Li X, Zhang Y, Feng S, Yang A (2018) Joint decision model of supplier selection and order allocation for the mass customization of logistics services. Trans Res Part e: Log Trans Rev 120:76–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabbarzadeh A, Fahimnia B, Sabouhi F (2018) Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: sustainability analysis under disruption risks. Int J Prod Res 56(17):5945–5968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia R, Liu Y, Bai X (2020) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: distributionally robust goal programming model and tractable approximation. Comput Indus Eng 140:106267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner U (2005) Supply chain risk management. Int J Log Manag 16:120–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamalahmadi M, Parast MM (2017) An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies. Int J Prod Econ 184:210–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur H, Singh SP (2021) Multi-stage hybrid model for supplier selection and order allocation considering disruption risks and disruptive technologies. Int J Prod Econ 231:107830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner F, Utz S (2019) Sustainability in supplier selection and order allocation: combining integer variables with Markowitz portfolio theory. J Clean Prod 214:462–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshfetrat S, Rahiminezhad Galankashi M, Almasi M (2020) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: a fuzzy approach. Eng Optim 52(9):1494–1507

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, Liu L, Liu N (2013) Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl 40(2):828–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo HW, Liou JJ, Wang HS, Tsai YS (2018) An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. J Clean Prod 190:339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mari SI, Memon MS, Ramzan MB, Qureshi SM, Iqbal MW (2019) Interactive fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a resilient supply chain. Mathematics 7(2):137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaee H, Naderi B, Pasandideh SHR (2018) A preemptive fuzzy goal programming model for generalized supplier selection and order allocation with incremental discount. Comput Ind Eng 122:292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed A, Harris I, Govindan K (2019) A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation. Int J Prod Econ 217:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed A, Harris I, Soroka A, Naim M, Ramjaun T, Yazdani M (2021) Gresilient supplier assessment and order allocation planning. Ann Oper Res 296(1):335–362

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moheb-Alizadeh H, Handfield R (2019) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: a novel multi-objective programming model with a hybrid solution approach. Comput Ind Eng 129:192–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazhani S, Ventura JA, Mendoza A (2016) A serial inventory system with supplier selection and order quantity allocation considering transportation costs. Appl Math Model 40(1):612–634

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Puente J, Pino R, Priore P, de la Fuente D (2002) A decision support system for applying failure mode and effects analysis. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 19(2):137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei A, Rahiminezhad Galankashi M, Mansoorzadeh S, Mokhatab Rafiei F (2020a) Supplier selection and order allocation with lean manufacturing criteria: an integrated MCDM and Bi-objective modelling approach. Eng Manag J 32(4):253–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei S, Ghalehkhondabi I, Rafiee M, Namdar Zanganeh S (2020b) Supplier selection and order allocation in CLSC configuration with various supply strategies under disruption risk. Opsearch 57:908–934

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rezapour S, Farahani RZ, Pourakbar M (2017) Resilient supply chain network design under competition: a case study. Eur J Oper Res 259(3):1017–1035

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process Mcgraw Hill, New York. Agricultural Economics Review, p 70

  • Saremi S, Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2017) Grasshopper optimisation algorithm: theory and application. Adv Eng Softw 105:30–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawik T (2013) Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega 41(2):259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawik T (2020) A two-period model for selection of resilient multi-tier supply portfolio. Int J Prod Res 58(19):6043–6060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi M, Hosseini-Motlagh SM, Samani MRG, Kalhor T (2020) Novel resilient-sustainable strategies for second-generation biofuel network design considering Neem and Eruca Sativa under hybrid stochastic fuzzy robust approach. Comput Chem Eng 143:107073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatis DH (2003) Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Quality Press, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  • Thangam A (2017) Retailer’s optimal replenishment policy in a two-echelon supply chain under two-part delay in payments and disruption in delivery. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8(1):26–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolooie A, Maity M, Sinha AK (2020) A two-stage stochastic mixed-integer program for reliable supply chain network design under uncertain disruptions and demand. Comput Indus Eng 148:106722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torabi SA, Baghersad M, Mansouri SA (2015) Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Trans Res Part e Log Trans Rev 79:22–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi A, Chauhan A, Singh SP, Kaur H (2017) A multi-objective integer linear program to integrate supplier selection and order allocation with market demand in a supply chain. Int J Procure Manag 10(3):335–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahidi F, Torabi SA, Ramezankhani MJ (2018) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. J Clean Prod 174:1351–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware NR, Singh SP, Banwet DK (2014) A mixed-integer non-linear program to model dynamic supplier selection problem. Expert Syst Appl 41(2):671–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavari M, Zaker H (2020) Designing a resilient-green closed loop supply chain network for perishable products by considering disruption in both supply chain and power networks. Comput Chem Eng 134:106680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zammori F, Gabbrielli R (2012) ANP/RPN: a multi criteria evaluation of the risk priority number. Qual Reliab Eng Int 28(1):85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Aida Rezaei, Amir Aghsami & Masoud Rabbani

  2. School of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Amir Aghsami

Authors
  1. Aida Rezaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amir Aghsami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masoud Rabbani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Rabbani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table

Table 21 The value of the parameters in small sizes
Full size table

21

Appendix 2

See Tables

Table 22 Pairwise comparison matrix of FMEA risk factors of first DM
Full size table

22,

Table 23 Pairwise comparison matrix of risk sub-factors with regard to severity of first DM
Full size table

23,

Table 24 Pairwise comparison matrix of risk sub-factors with regard to occurrence of first DM
Full size table

24,

Table 25 Pairwise comparison matrix of risk sub-factors with regard to detection of first DM
Full size table

25,

Table 26 Final weights of suppliers with regard to risk sub-factors of first DM
Full size table

26,

Table 27 Pairwise comparison matrix of FMEA risk factors of second DM
Full size table

27,

Table 28 Pairwise comparison matrix of risk sub-factors with regard to severity of second DM
Full size table

28,

Table 29 Pairwise comparison matrix of risk sub-factors with regard to occurrence of second DM
Full size table

29,

Table 30 Pairwise comparison matrix of risk sub-factors with regard to detection of second DM
Full size table

30,

Table 31 Final weights of suppliers with regard to risk sub-factors of second DM
Full size table

31,

Table 32 Pairwise comparison matrix of FMEA risk factors of third DM
Full size table

32,

Table 33 Pairwise comparison matrix of risk sub-factors with regard to severity of third DM
Full size table

33,

Table 34 Pairwise comparison matrix of risk sub-factors with regard to occurrence of third DM
Full size table

34,

Table 35 Pairwise comparison matrix of risk sub-factors with regard to detection of third DM
Full size table

35,

Table 36 Final weights of suppliers with regard to risk sub-factors of third DM
Full size table

36

Appendix 3

See Tables

Table 37 The value of the parameters in case study
Full size table

37,

Table 38 The value of the parameters in case study
Full size table

38,

Table 39 The value of the \((C_{ij} ,\alpha_{ij} ,e_{ij} ) \times 10^{3}\) parameters in case study
Full size table

39

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rezaei, A., Aghsami, A. & Rabbani, M. Supplier selection and order allocation model with disruption and environmental risks in centralized supply chain. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 12, 1036–1072 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01164-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01164-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation