Skip to main content
Log in

Detecting dynamics of action in text with a recurrent neural network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the dynamics of action (DoA)-theory, action is an interplay of instigating and consummatory forces over time. The TAT/PSE—a psychological test instrument—should measure this dynamics. Therefore, people get presented different pictures with the instruction to invent stories. In those stories, the periodical tendencies should be visible, but this could not be shown yet. I reanalyzed two datasets regarding category IS: They were coded by a human expert, a recurrent neural network (RNN), and a convolutional neural network (CNN). It is visible that in Heckhausen's origin data category IS produces saw-tooth related curves in the stories across the pictures and that this could potentially better be detected by the RNN than by the CNN or the human coder. Second, I reanalyzed a study that experimentally assessed the DoA with a picture x position effect and rejected it. Here again, only the RNN coded IS-score produces a statistical significant picture x position effect. This shows that because of its sequential structure the RNN detects different phrases in the text that are barely capable by human coder or other neural networks but are related to motive theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson JW, Birch D (1970) The dynamics of action. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson JW, Bongort K, Price LH (1977) Explorations using computer simulation to comprehend thematic apperceptive measurement of motivation. Motiv Emot 1:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00997578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson JW (1981) Studying personality in the context of an advanced motivational psychology. Am Psychol 36:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lorenz K (1937) Biologische Fragestellung in der Tierpsychologie [Biological questions in animal psychology]. Z Tierpsychol 1(1):24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Revelle W, Wilt J (2021) The dynamics of personality. In: Rauthmann J (ed) Handbook of personality dynamics and processes. Academic Press, London, pp 4–24

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zeigarnik H (1927) Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen [Keeping completed and undone actions]. Psychol Forsch 9:1–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ovsiankina MA (1928) Die Wiederaufnahme unterbrochener Handlungen [The resumption of interrupted actions]. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  8. Webb TL, Sheeran P (2006) Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? a meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull 132(2):249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhl J, Blankenship V (1979) Behavioral change in a constant environment: shift to more difficult tasks with constant probability of success. J Pers Soc Psychol 37(4):551–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brunstein JC, Heckhausen H (2018) Achievement motivation. In: Heckhausen H, Heckhausen J (eds) Motivation and action motivation and action. Springer, Cham, pp 137–183

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scheffer D, Heckhausen H (2018) Trait theories of motivation. In: Heckhausen H, Heckhausen J (eds) Motivation and action. Springer, Cham, pp 67–112

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Revelle W (2008) Cues, tendencies and actions: the dynamics of action revisited. Script: Northwestern University.

  13. Beck ED, Jackson JJ (2021) Within-person variability. In: Rauthmann JF (ed) The handbook of personality dynamics and processes. Academic Press, London, pp 75–100

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuper N, Modersitzki V, Phan L, Rauthmann JF (2021) The dynamics, processes, mechanisms, and functioning of personality: an overview of the field. Br J Psychol 112(1):1–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhl J (2020) Philosophy of science, motivation and volition, and developing motivational assessment. Motivation Science 63(3):189–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blankenship V (1987) A computer-based measure of resultant achievement motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:361–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Blankenship V (2010) Computer-based modeling, assessment, and coding of implicit motives. In: Schultheiss OC, Brunstein J (eds) Implicit Motives. University Press, Oxford, pp 186–208

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Blankenship V, Tumlinson J, Sims MA (1995) A STELLA-II teaching simulation of the dynamics of action model. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 27:244–250. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewin K (1937) Towards a dynamic theory of personality. McGraw-Hill Inc., US

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan CD, Murray HA (1935) A method for investigating fantasies: the thematic apperception test. Arch Neurol Psych 34:289–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McClelland DC, Atkinson JW (1948) The projective expression of needs II the effect of different intensities of the hunger drive on thematic apperception. J Exp Psychol 38(6):643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McClelland DC (1953) The achievement motive. Applation Century-, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. McClelland DC, Clark R, Roby T, Atkinson JW (1958) The effects of the need for achievement on thematic apperception. In: Atkinson JW (ed) Motives in fantasy, action and society. Van Nostrand, Princeton, N.J, pp 64–82

  24. Heckhausen H (1963) Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation [Hope and fear components of achievement motivation]. Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schultheisss OC (2001) Manual for the assssessment of hope of success and fear of failure: English translation of Heckhausen’s need achievement measures. University of Michigan, Unpublished ScoringManual, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  26. Breidebach G, Gruber N (2019) Erfolgssicherheit und -gewissheit (ESG) – Konstitution einer “Hoffnung auf Erfolg”-Subkategorie im Rahmen des Auswertungsschlüssels nach Heckhausen zur Steigerung der Güte des TAT. Diagnostica 65:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gruber N (2014) Ist eine Computerversion bei der Messung impliziter Motive der Papier-Bleistift-Version überlegen? Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des TAT nach Heckhausen [Is a computer version superior to paper-pencil version in measuring implicit motives: An investigation using the TAT/PSE of Heckhausens]. Regensburg: Roderer

  28. Reumann D (1982) Ipsative behavioural variability and the quality of thematic apperceptive measurement of the need for achievement. J Pers Soc Psychol 43(5):1098–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tuerlinckx F, De Boeck P, Lens W (2002) Measuring needs with the thematic apperception test: a psychometric study. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:448–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pang JS, Schultheiss OC (2005) Assessing implicit motives in US college students: effects of picture type and position, gender and ethnicity, and cross-cultural comparisons. J Personality Assessment 85(3):280–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8503_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gruber N, Kreuzpointner L (2015) Assessing the implicit achievement motive: effects of input-condition, administration, and picture position. Int J Psychol Edu Sci 3(1):10–19. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gruber N (2018) Computer-evaluation of the achievement TAT. Presentation hold at the Motivational colloquium: Erlangen

  33. Geron A (2019) Hands -on machine learning and scikit-learn, keras & tensorflow. Oreilly, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Young T, Hazarika D, Poria S, Cambria E (2018) Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 13(3):55–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qu Y, Liu J, Kang Y, Shi Q, Ye D (2018) Question answering over freebase via Attentive RNN with Similarity Matrix based CNN arXiv:1804.03317

  36. Zhang D, Wang D (2016) Relation classification: CNN or RNN? In: Lin C-Y, Xue N, Zhao D, Huang X, Feng Y (eds) Natural Language Understanding and Intelligent Applications. Springer, Cham, pp 665–675

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Yin W, Kann K, Yu M, Schütze H (2017) Comparative study of CNN and RNN for natural language processing, arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.01923

  38. Bai S, Kolter JZ, Koltun V (2018) An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling, arXiv:1803.01271

  39. Jacovi A, Shalom OS, Goldberg Y (2018) Understanding convolutional neural networks for text classification, arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.08037

  40. Hewamalage H, Bergmeir C, Bandara K (2021) Recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting: current status and future directions. Int J. Forecasting. 37(1):388–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tang G, Müller M, Rios A, Sennrich R (2018) Why self-attention?: a targeted evaluation of neural machine translation architectures, Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 4263–4272). Association for Computational Linguistics: Brussels. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1458

  42. Dessì R, Baroni M (2019) CNNs found to jump around more skillfully than RNNs: compositional generalization in seq2seq convolutional networks, arXiv: 1905.08527

  43. Gruber N, Jockisch A (2020) Are GRU cells more specific and LSTM cells more sensitive in motive classification of text. Frontiers Artif Intell 3:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pang JS, Ring H (2020) Automated coding of implicit motives: a machine-learning approach. Motiv Emot 44:549–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gruber N, Kreuzpointner L (2013) Measuring the reliability of picture story exercises like the TAT. PLoS ONE 8(11):e79450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079450.s002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim YJ, Cribbie RA (2018) ANOVA and the variance homogeneity assumption: exploring a better gatekeeper. Br J Math Stat Psychol 71(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Winer BJ (1962) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Lüpsen H (2013) Nonparametric analyses of variance. Technical script, Cologne

  49. Covington MV, Roberts BW (1994) Self-worth and college achievement: Motivational and personality correlates. L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mischel W, Shoda Y (1995) A cognitive-affective system theory of personality. Psychol Rev 102:246–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Gruber.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Data statement

The data for the first reanalysis are already published and cited with a doa; the data for the second reanalysis are not open access. Some of the original training data from Gruber and Jockisch [43], were prepared during a research project of Nicole Gruber (DFG; GR4520/3-1), which is also cited there.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gruber, N. Detecting dynamics of action in text with a recurrent neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 15709–15718 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06190-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06190-5

Keywords

Navigation