Abstract
According to the dynamics of action (DoA)-theory, action is an interplay of instigating and consummatory forces over time. The TAT/PSE—a psychological test instrument—should measure this dynamics. Therefore, people get presented different pictures with the instruction to invent stories. In those stories, the periodical tendencies should be visible, but this could not be shown yet. I reanalyzed two datasets regarding category IS: They were coded by a human expert, a recurrent neural network (RNN), and a convolutional neural network (CNN). It is visible that in Heckhausen's origin data category IS produces saw-tooth related curves in the stories across the pictures and that this could potentially better be detected by the RNN than by the CNN or the human coder. Second, I reanalyzed a study that experimentally assessed the DoA with a picture x position effect and rejected it. Here again, only the RNN coded IS-score produces a statistical significant picture x position effect. This shows that because of its sequential structure the RNN detects different phrases in the text that are barely capable by human coder or other neural networks but are related to motive theories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson JW, Birch D (1970) The dynamics of action. Wiley, New York
Atkinson JW, Bongort K, Price LH (1977) Explorations using computer simulation to comprehend thematic apperceptive measurement of motivation. Motiv Emot 1:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00997578
Atkinson JW (1981) Studying personality in the context of an advanced motivational psychology. Am Psychol 36:117–128
Lorenz K (1937) Biologische Fragestellung in der Tierpsychologie [Biological questions in animal psychology]. Z Tierpsychol 1(1):24–32
Revelle W, Wilt J (2021) The dynamics of personality. In: Rauthmann J (ed) Handbook of personality dynamics and processes. Academic Press, London, pp 4–24
Zeigarnik H (1927) Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen [Keeping completed and undone actions]. Psychol Forsch 9:1–85
Ovsiankina MA (1928) Die Wiederaufnahme unterbrochener Handlungen [The resumption of interrupted actions]. Springer, Cham
Webb TL, Sheeran P (2006) Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? a meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull 132(2):249
Kuhl J, Blankenship V (1979) Behavioral change in a constant environment: shift to more difficult tasks with constant probability of success. J Pers Soc Psychol 37(4):551–563
Brunstein JC, Heckhausen H (2018) Achievement motivation. In: Heckhausen H, Heckhausen J (eds) Motivation and action motivation and action. Springer, Cham, pp 137–183
Scheffer D, Heckhausen H (2018) Trait theories of motivation. In: Heckhausen H, Heckhausen J (eds) Motivation and action. Springer, Cham, pp 67–112
Revelle W (2008) Cues, tendencies and actions: the dynamics of action revisited. Script: Northwestern University.
Beck ED, Jackson JJ (2021) Within-person variability. In: Rauthmann JF (ed) The handbook of personality dynamics and processes. Academic Press, London, pp 75–100
Kuper N, Modersitzki V, Phan L, Rauthmann JF (2021) The dynamics, processes, mechanisms, and functioning of personality: an overview of the field. Br J Psychol 112(1):1–51
Kuhl J (2020) Philosophy of science, motivation and volition, and developing motivational assessment. Motivation Science 63(3):189–191
Blankenship V (1987) A computer-based measure of resultant achievement motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:361–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.361
Blankenship V (2010) Computer-based modeling, assessment, and coding of implicit motives. In: Schultheiss OC, Brunstein J (eds) Implicit Motives. University Press, Oxford, pp 186–208
Blankenship V, Tumlinson J, Sims MA (1995) A STELLA-II teaching simulation of the dynamics of action model. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 27:244–250. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204740
Lewin K (1937) Towards a dynamic theory of personality. McGraw-Hill Inc., US
Morgan CD, Murray HA (1935) A method for investigating fantasies: the thematic apperception test. Arch Neurol Psych 34:289–306
McClelland DC, Atkinson JW (1948) The projective expression of needs II the effect of different intensities of the hunger drive on thematic apperception. J Exp Psychol 38(6):643–652
McClelland DC (1953) The achievement motive. Applation Century-, New York
McClelland DC, Clark R, Roby T, Atkinson JW (1958) The effects of the need for achievement on thematic apperception. In: Atkinson JW (ed) Motives in fantasy, action and society. Van Nostrand, Princeton, N.J, pp 64–82
Heckhausen H (1963) Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation [Hope and fear components of achievement motivation]. Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan
Schultheisss OC (2001) Manual for the assssessment of hope of success and fear of failure: English translation of Heckhausen’s need achievement measures. University of Michigan, Unpublished ScoringManual, Ann Arbor, MI
Breidebach G, Gruber N (2019) Erfolgssicherheit und -gewissheit (ESG) – Konstitution einer “Hoffnung auf Erfolg”-Subkategorie im Rahmen des Auswertungsschlüssels nach Heckhausen zur Steigerung der Güte des TAT. Diagnostica 65:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000215
Gruber N (2014) Ist eine Computerversion bei der Messung impliziter Motive der Papier-Bleistift-Version überlegen? Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des TAT nach Heckhausen [Is a computer version superior to paper-pencil version in measuring implicit motives: An investigation using the TAT/PSE of Heckhausens]. Regensburg: Roderer
Reumann D (1982) Ipsative behavioural variability and the quality of thematic apperceptive measurement of the need for achievement. J Pers Soc Psychol 43(5):1098–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.1098
Tuerlinckx F, De Boeck P, Lens W (2002) Measuring needs with the thematic apperception test: a psychometric study. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:448–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.448
Pang JS, Schultheiss OC (2005) Assessing implicit motives in US college students: effects of picture type and position, gender and ethnicity, and cross-cultural comparisons. J Personality Assessment 85(3):280–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8503_04
Gruber N, Kreuzpointner L (2015) Assessing the implicit achievement motive: effects of input-condition, administration, and picture position. Int J Psychol Edu Sci 3(1):10–19. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2015.03.002
Gruber N (2018) Computer-evaluation of the achievement TAT. Presentation hold at the Motivational colloquium: Erlangen
Geron A (2019) Hands -on machine learning and scikit-learn, keras & tensorflow. Oreilly, New York
Young T, Hazarika D, Poria S, Cambria E (2018) Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 13(3):55–75
Qu Y, Liu J, Kang Y, Shi Q, Ye D (2018) Question answering over freebase via Attentive RNN with Similarity Matrix based CNN arXiv:1804.03317
Zhang D, Wang D (2016) Relation classification: CNN or RNN? In: Lin C-Y, Xue N, Zhao D, Huang X, Feng Y (eds) Natural Language Understanding and Intelligent Applications. Springer, Cham, pp 665–675
Yin W, Kann K, Yu M, Schütze H (2017) Comparative study of CNN and RNN for natural language processing, arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.01923
Bai S, Kolter JZ, Koltun V (2018) An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling, arXiv:1803.01271
Jacovi A, Shalom OS, Goldberg Y (2018) Understanding convolutional neural networks for text classification, arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.08037
Hewamalage H, Bergmeir C, Bandara K (2021) Recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting: current status and future directions. Int J. Forecasting. 37(1):388–427
Tang G, Müller M, Rios A, Sennrich R (2018) Why self-attention?: a targeted evaluation of neural machine translation architectures, Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 4263–4272). Association for Computational Linguistics: Brussels. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1458
Dessì R, Baroni M (2019) CNNs found to jump around more skillfully than RNNs: compositional generalization in seq2seq convolutional networks, arXiv: 1905.08527
Gruber N, Jockisch A (2020) Are GRU cells more specific and LSTM cells more sensitive in motive classification of text. Frontiers Artif Intell 3:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00040
Pang JS, Ring H (2020) Automated coding of implicit motives: a machine-learning approach. Motiv Emot 44:549–566
Gruber N, Kreuzpointner L (2013) Measuring the reliability of picture story exercises like the TAT. PLoS ONE 8(11):e79450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079450.s002
Kim YJ, Cribbie RA (2018) ANOVA and the variance homogeneity assumption: exploring a better gatekeeper. Br J Math Stat Psychol 71(1):1–12
Winer BJ (1962) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York
Lüpsen H (2013) Nonparametric analyses of variance. Technical script, Cologne
Covington MV, Roberts BW (1994) Self-worth and college achievement: Motivational and personality correlates. L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Mischel W, Shoda Y (1995) A cognitive-affective system theory of personality. Psychol Rev 102:246–268
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.
Data statement
The data for the first reanalysis are already published and cited with a doa; the data for the second reanalysis are not open access. Some of the original training data from Gruber and Jockisch [43], were prepared during a research project of Nicole Gruber (DFG; GR4520/3-1), which is also cited there.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gruber, N. Detecting dynamics of action in text with a recurrent neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 15709–15718 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06190-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06190-5