Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Terminal ileum is the most sensitive site for the histologic diagnosis of grade 4 graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in the lower GI tract and is a harbinger of poor outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The site of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract where biopsies are most likely to be diagnostic of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains controversial. Recent reports have indicated that biopsies from the rectosigmoid have sufficient sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing GI GvHD and can be obtained via a less invasive flexible sigmoidoscopy procedure. While GvHD histologic grades 1–3 have little correlation with patients’ symptoms and overall clinical grade, histologic grade 4 GvHD does correlate with severe clinical presentation and a poor prognosis. We examined cases of lower GI biopsies obtained via a complete colonoscopy with ileal intubation for the evaluation of GvHD within a 2-year period from patients who underwent stem cell transplantation. In our study cohort, grade 4 GvHD was significantly more likely to be identified in a terminal ileum biopsy than in a biopsy from another site in the lower GI tract. Significantly, 5 of 6 patients with histologic grade 4 GvHD diagnosed on ileal biopsies died from complication of severe GI GvHD. Given the poor prognosis of histologic grade 4 GvHD in the terminal ileum, the detection of this finding may serve to inform clinicians that escalation or modification of treatment may need to be considered. Furthermore, our findings suggest that terminal ileal biopsies may help to increase sensitivity for identifying patients at high risk for poor outcome of GvHD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salomao M, Dorritie K, Mapara MY et al (2016) Histopathology of graft-vs-host disease of gastrointestinal tract and liver: an update. Am J Clin Pathol 145(5):591–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Washington K, Jagasia M (2009) Pathology of graft-versus-host disease in the gastrointestinal tract. Hum Pathol 40(7):909–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shulman HM, Cardona DM, Greenson JK et al (2015) NIH Consensus Development Project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: II. The 2014 Pathology Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 21(4):589–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Melson J, Jakate S, Fung H et al (2007) Crypt loss is a marker of clinical severity of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Am J Hematol 82(10):881–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ponec RJ, Hackman RC, McDonald GB (1999) Endoscopic and histologic diagnosis of intestinal graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation. Gastrointest Endosc 49(5):612–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roy J, Snover DC, Weisdorf S et al (1991) Simultaneous upper and lower endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of intestinal graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation 51:642–646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ross WA, Ghosh S, Dekovich AA et al (2008) Endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: rectosigmoid biopsies are more sensitive than upper gastrointestinal biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol 103(4):982–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aslanian H, Chander B, Robert M et al (2012) Prospective evaluation of acute graft-versus-host disease. Dig Dis Sci 57:720–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lerner KG, Kao GF, Storb R et al (1974) Histopathology of graft-vs.-host reaction (GvHR) in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplant Proc 6(4):367–371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Therneau T. A package for survival analysis in R. https://CRANR-Project.org/Package=survival. Published online 2015

  11. Kassambara A. Drawing survival curves using “ggplot2.” https://cran.r-Project.org/web/Packages/survminer/index.html. Published online 2018

  12. Kreisel W, Dahlberg M, Bertz H et al (2012) Endoscopic diagnosis of acute intestinal GVHD following allogeneic hematopoietic SCT: a retrospective analysis in 175 patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(3):430–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shulman HM, Kleiner D, Lee SJ et al (2006) Histopathologic diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: II. Pathology Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 12(1):31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Myerson D, Steinbach G, Gooley TA et al (2017) Graft-versus-host disease of the gut: a histologic activity grading system and validation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 23(9):1573–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin J, Fan R, Zhao Z et al (2013) Is the presence of 6 or fewer crypt apoptotic bodies sufficient for diagnosis of graft versus host disease? A decade of experience at a single institution. Am J Surg Pathol 37:539–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gomez AJ, Arai S, Higgins JP et al (2016) Clinicopathologic threshold of acute colorectal graft-versus-host disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med 140:570–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Castilla-Llorente C, Martin PJ, McDonald GB et al (2014) Prognostic factors and outcomes of severe gastrointestinal GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 49(7):966–971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Basil A. Horst for his helpful critical review of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine of the University of British Columbia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Raymond Yip and Hui-Min Yang conceived and designed the study and performed histologic assessment and confirmation of diagnoses. Julia Naso reviewed and analyzed the data and generated the boxplots and Kaplan–Meier curves. Raymond Yip and Hui-Min Yang wrote the manuscript. All authors edited and reviewed the manuscript and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond H. L. Yip.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by H. Babaie

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yip, R.H.L., Naso, J.R. & Yang, HM. Terminal ileum is the most sensitive site for the histologic diagnosis of grade 4 graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in the lower GI tract and is a harbinger of poor outcome. Virchows Arch 479, 919–925 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03136-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03136-z

Keywords

Navigation