Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of camera settings on image noise and accuracy of subpixel image registration

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Machine Vision and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimating the accuracy of subpixel image registration algorithms in practical experiments is important, yet challenging in many applications. The accuracy of these algorithms in camera-based systems is influenced not only by image content, but also camera noise. In this study, five experiments were designed to quantify the effect of changing camera settings on the image noise level, and consequently on the accuracy of subpixel displacement measurements. The systematic errors of the algorithms were measured separately to provide estimates of their contributions to the total measurement error. Experiments were conducted to measure the effects of random noise on the accuracy of displacement measurements. The results showed that the camera parameters directly influenced the image noise level, but the accuracy of algorithms in measuring displacements was not proportional to the image noise level. These results provide information on the quantitative relationship between camera settings and the registration error for a camera-based measurement system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sutton, M.A.: Computer vision-based, noncontacting deformation measurements in mechanics: a generational transformation. Appl. Mech. Rev. 65(5), 050802 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, Y.G., Tong, W.: A high resolution DIC technique for measuring small thermal expansion of film specimens. Opt. Lasers Eng. 51(1), 30–33 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yi-qiu, T., Lei, Z., Meng, G., Li-yan, S.: Investigation of the deformation properties of asphalt mixtures with DIC technique. Constr. Build. Mater. 37, 581–590 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Speranzini, E., Agnetti, S.: The technique of digital image correlation to identify defects in glass structures. Struct. Control Heal. Monit. 21(6), 1015–1029 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. HajiRassouliha, A., Kmiecik, B., Taberner, A.J., Nash, M.P., Nielsen, P.M.F.: A low-cost, hand-held stereoscopic device for measuring dynamic deformations of skin in vivo. In: Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ), pp. 1–6 (2015)

  6. Wu, R., Chen, Y., Pan, Y., Wang, Q., Zhang, D.: Determination of three-dimensional movement for rotary blades using digital image correlation. Opt. Lasers Eng. 65, 38–45 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammer, J.T., Liutkus, T.J., Seidt, J.D., Gilat, A.: Using digital image correlation (DIC) in dynamic punch tests. Exp. Mech. 55(1), 201–210 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mallon, S., Koohbor, B., Kidane, A., Sutton, M.A.: Fracture behavior of prestressed composites subjected to shock loading: a DIC-based study. Exp. Mech. 55(1), 211–225 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pan, B., Qian, K., Xie, H., Asundi, A.: Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas. Sci. Technol. 20(6), 62001 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Healey, G.E., Kondepudy, R.: Radiometric CCD camera calibration and noise estimation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 16(3), 267–276 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baumgartner, J., Hinsche, M., Manduchi, R.: Empirical characterization of camera noise. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 7914 LNCS, pp. 1–9 (2013)

  12. Jin, X., Xu, Z., Hirakawa, K.: Noise parameter estimation for Poisson corrupted images using variance stabilization transforms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(3), 1329–1339 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Cain, S.C., Hayat, M.M., Armstrong, E.E.: Projection-based image registration in the presence of fixed-pattern noise. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10(12), 1860–1872 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bing, P., Hui-min, X., Bo-qin, X., Fu-long, D.: Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation. Meas. Sci. Technol. 17(6), 1615–1621 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Z.Y., Li, H.Q., Tong, J.W., Ruan, J.T.: Statistical analysis of the effect of intensity pattern noise on the displacement measurement precision of digital image correlation using self-correlated images. Exp. Mech. 47(5), 701–707 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Y.Q., Sutton, M.A., Bruck, H.A., Schreier, H.W.: Quantitative error assessment in pattern matching: effects of intensity pattern noise, interpolation, strain and image contrast on motion measurements. Strain 45(2), 160–178 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bornert, M., et al.: Assessment of digital image correlation measurement errors: methodology and results. Exp. Mech. 49(3), 353–370 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reu, P.L., Sweatt, W., Miller, T., Fleming, D.: Camera system resolution and its influence on digital image correlation. Exp. Mech. 55(1), 9–25 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pan, B., Shi, W., Lubineau, G.: Effect of camera temperature variations on stereo-digital image correlation measurements. Appl. Opt. 54(34), 10089–10095 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grediac, M., Sur, F.: 50th anniversary article: effect of sensor noise on the resolution and spatial resolution of displacement and strain maps estimated with the grid method. Strain 50(1), 1–27 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guizar-Sicairos, M., Thurman, S.T., Fienup, J.R.: Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms. Opt. Lett. 33(2), 156–158 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Foroosh, H., Zerubia, J.B., Berthod, M.: Extension of phase correlation to subpixel registration. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 11(3), 188–200 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. HajiRassouliha, A., Taberner, A.J., Nash, M.P., Nielsen, P.M.F.: Subpixel phase-based image registration using Savitzky–Golay differentiators in gradient-correlation. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 170, 28–39 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reu, P.L.: Experimental and numerical methods for exact subpixel shifting. Exp. Mech. 51, 443–452 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, X., Tanaka, M., Okutomi, M.: Single-image noise level estimation for blind denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(12), 5226–5237 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the New Zealand Government National Science Challenge for Technological Innovation, and the University of Auckland Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir HajiRassouliha.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

HajiRassouliha, A., Richardson, S.P., Taberner, A.J. et al. The effect of camera settings on image noise and accuracy of subpixel image registration. Machine Vision and Applications 32, 95 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-021-01215-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-021-01215-4

Keywords

Navigation