Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Important Distinction Between Peer-Reviewed and Predatory Journals: A Bacterial Endotoxin Test Case

  • Published:
Publishing Research Quarterly Aims and scope

Abstract

Publication following thorough peer review has been one the essential drivers of scientific progress. While the emergence of open access journals has spread knowledge to a wider audience, a few publishers have started to exploit the model of being specifically paid by authors. They have published so-called predatory journals that have sacrificed scientific scrutiny in favor of revenue. Papers in such journals may bear illegitimate conclusions and thus hamper scientific progress. Here, we did not only explain predatory journals in general, we also elaborated on an example and thereby demonstrated how exactly these journals may deviate from scientific standards. Namely, a manufacturer of bacterial endotoxin tests published in a potentially predatory journal and neglected relevant literature, ill-referenced other papers and made use of judgmental, non-scientific language. Apparently, said manufacturer aimed to shed doubt in recombinant DNA technology (here recombinant Factor C) for bacterial endotoxin testing and, thus, restrict its competitors’ access to this market. In turn, this may prevent the development of more accurate, reliable, rapid and affordable bacterial endotoxin tests und in turn hamper progress in pharmaceutical development and manufacturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ross JS, Gross CP, Krumholz HM. Promoting transparency in pharmaceutical industry-sponsored research. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(1):72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Battisti WP, Wager E, Baltzer L, Bridges D, Cairns A, Carswell CI, Citrome L, Gurr JA, Mooney LA, Moore BJ, Peña T, Sanes-Miller CH, Veitch K, Woolley KL, Yarker YE. International society for medical publication professionals good publication practice for communicating company-sponsored medical research: GPP3. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(6):461–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimasaki C.D. (2009) Start with the Idea: Licensing and Protecting Core Assets. In: The Business of Bioscience. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0064-7_3

  4. https://tressacademic.com/identify-predatory-journals/ (retrieved 19/03/2021)

  5. https://doaj.org/ (retrieved 19/03/2021)

  6. Grudniewicz A, Moher D, Cobey KD, Bryson GL, Cukier S, Allen K, et al. Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature.

  7. Oberhaus, D. 2018. Hundreds of Researchers From Harvard, Yale and Stanford Were Published in Fake Academic Journals. https://oralcancernews.org/wp/hundreds-of-researchers-from-harvard-yale-and-stanford-were-published-in-fake-academic-journals/ (retrieved 19/03/2021)

  8. Beall J. Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2016;2(4):115–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schauss, A.G. Published Studies Give Dietary Supplements Credibility, but Watch Out for Bad Journals. October 16, 2014. https://www.nutritionaloutlook.com/view/published-studies-give-dietary-supplements-credibility-watch-out-bad-journals (retrieved 19/03/2021)

  10. Severin A, Low N. Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases. Int J Public Health. 2019;64(8):1123–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01284-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shibata T, Kobayashi Y, Ikeda Y, Kawabata SI. Intermolecular autocatalytic activation of serine protease zymogen factor C through an active transition state responding to lipopolysaccharide. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:11589–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. http://www.journalijdr.com/innovative-mechanism-limulus-amebocyte-lysate-activation-achieve-specificity-and-sensitivity (retrieved 19/03/2021)

  13. https://beallslist.net/standalone-journals/ (retrieved 19/03/2021)

  14. https://predatoryjournals.com/journals/ (retrieved 19/03/2021)

  15. Nakamura T, Morita T, Iwanaga S. Lipopolysaccharide-sensitive serine-protease zymogen (factor C) found in Limulus hemocytes isolation and characterization. Eur J Biochem. 1986;154(3):511–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09427.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kikuchi Y, Haishima Y, Fukui C, Murai T, Nakagawa Y, Ebisawa A, et al. Collaborative study on the bacterial endotoxins test using recombinant factor C-based procedure for detection of lipopolysaccharides. PMDRS. 2017;48:252–60.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reid, N. 2020. The Criticality of Detecting Relevant Endotoxins in Global Pharmaceutical Water Samples. PharmaLab Congress 2020. talk given on 2020–11–10.

  18. Tsuchiya, M. 2014. Possible Mechanism of Low Endotoxin Recovery. American Pharmaceutical Review 17(7).

  19. Tan NS, Ho B, Ding JL. High-affinity LPS binding domain(s) in recombinant factor C of a horseshoe crab neutralizes LPS-induced lethality. FASEB J. 2000;14:859–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tan NS, Ng MLP, Yau YH, Chong PKW, Ho B, Ding JL. Definition of endotoxin binding sites in horseshoe crab Factor C recombinant sushi proteins and neutralization of endotoxin by sushi peptides”. FASEB J. 2000;14:1801–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang C, Nelson T, Chen D, Ellis JC, Abbott NL. Understanding lipopolysaccharide aggregation and its influence on activation of Factor C. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;552:540–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kobayashi Y, Takahashi T, Shibata T, Ikeda S, Koshiba T, Mizumura H, Oda T, Kawabata S. Factor B Is the Second Lipopolysaccharide-binding Protease Zymogen in the Horseshoe Crab Coagulation Cascade. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:19379–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamashita K, Shibata T, Takahashi T, Kobayashi Y, Kawabata SI. Roles of the clip domains of two protease zymogens in the coagulation cascade in horseshoe crabs. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:8857–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nakamura T, Horiuchi T, Morita T, Iwanaga S. Purification and properties of intracellular clotting factor, factor B, from horseshoe crab (Tachypleus tridentatus) hemocytes. J Biochem. 1986;99:847–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang L, Ho B, Ding JL. Transcriptional regulation of limulus factor C: repression of an NFkappaB motif modulates its responsiveness to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(49):49428–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. https://thinkchecksubmit.org/ (retrieved 19/03/2021)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industry bioMerieux SA France, Lyon, France

    Brendan Tindall

  2. Industry, bioMerieux Germany GmbH, Nurtingen, Germany

    Thomas Uhlig

  3. Center for Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, Havana, Cuba

    Rolando Perdomo-Morales

Authors
  1. Brendan Tindall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Uhlig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rolando Perdomo-Morales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan Tindall.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Brendan Tindall and Thomas Uhlig are employees of bioMerieux.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tindall, B., Uhlig, T. & Perdomo-Morales, R. The Important Distinction Between Peer-Reviewed and Predatory Journals: A Bacterial Endotoxin Test Case. Pub Res Q 37, 399–406 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-021-09818-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-021-09818-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation