Skip to main content
Log in

Can drones coerce? The effects of remote aerial coercion in counterterrorism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weary of costly on-the-ground military interventions, Western nations have increasingly turned to “Remote Warfare” to address the continued threat of terrorism. Despite the centrality of drone strikes to the practice of Remote Warfare, we still know relatively little about their effectiveness as instruments of coercion. This article offers a conceptual framework for assessing their coercive efficacy in counterterrorism. We argue that remote control drones are fundamentally different from traditional airpower, owing to changes in persistence, lethality, and relative risk. Critically, these technological characteristics produce weaker coercive effects than often assumed. While persistent surveillance combined with lethal, low-risk strikes renders armed drones highly effective at altering the cost–benefit calculations of terrorists, these same technological attributes cause them to be less effective at clear communication, credibility, and assurance—other key factors in coercion success. Overall, drone strikes are poor instruments of coercion in counterterrorism, underscoring some potential limitations of Remote Warfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful feedback from Brig Gen Joseph "Knuckles" Campo, Col Max Bremer, Jim Forsyth, Michael Fowler, Tyrone Groh James Rogers, the anonymous reviewers of this journal, and participants of panels on this topic at the International Studies Association (ISA) and the Yale workshop on “Emerging Trends and Issues in Modern Western Warfare” workshop.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Wesley Hutto.

Ethics declarations

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Air Force or the Department of Defense.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grieco, K.A., Hutto, J.W. Can drones coerce? The effects of remote aerial coercion in counterterrorism. Int Polit 60, 919–943 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00320-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00320-5

Keywords

Navigation