Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Case-based assessment of planned hill town using existing urban sustainability assessment tools

  • Case study
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mountain ecosystems are complex and fragile, with significant topography variations, climatic conditions, and one that faces the most severe threats and challenges due to natural and anthropogenic activities. Despite all contributions within the past few decades on basic concepts, dimensions, sustainability issues, and various aspects of urban sustainability assessment tools, only a few academicians, researchers, and institutions have looked at the peculiar aspects of sustainability in hill areas. However, these have not been implemented or tested for their appropriateness within the context of environmentally sensitive hill areas. This research explores the comparative case study approach for assessing the urban sustainability of hill town using the existing urban sustainability assessment tools (USATs) to address the gap in the available literature. New Tehri Township has been selected as a case for the town’s assessment with the selected USATs to determine the key aspects that are not covered by each of the selected USATs. The case-based assessment findings highlighted that not all the criteria and indicators used in a given USATs are relevant in a particular context due to varying environmental, social, and economic conditions. The results provide valuable information and evidence to planners, developers, and researchers for further studies on township-level sustainability analysis, as well as emphasizing the importance of collaborative efforts and a well-defined mechanism in achieving humane, sustainable, and environment-friendly settlements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, N. J. R. (1986). Accessibility and Altitudinal Zonation Models of Mountains. Mountain Research and Development, 6(3), 185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIS (1995). IS 14496–2: Guidelines for preparation of landslide - Hazard zonation maps in mountainous terrains, Part 2: Macro-zonation. Bureau of Indian Standards. https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.14496.2.1998/page/n5/mode/2up. Accessed 9 February 2020.

  • Blair, J., Fisher, M., Prasad, D., Judd, B., Soebarto, V., Hyde, R., & Zehner, R. (2003). Affordability and sustainability outcomes of 'greenfield' suburban development and master-planned communities: A case study approach using triple bottom line assessment, AHURI Positioning Paper No. 50, 1–54. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited, Melbourne, https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/position-papers/50.

  • Cable, F. (2008). Sustainable Neighborhood Rating Systems: An International Comparison. CEU Climate Change and Urban Design Conference, Oslo, Norway.

  • Campbell, S. (2003). URRC 02–07 Case Studies in Planning: Comparative Advantages and the Problem of Generalization. Retrieved February 12, 2020, from www.caup.umich.edu/workingpapers.

  • Cavaye, A. L. M. (1996). Case study research: A multi-faceted research approach for IS Information Systems. Journal Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 6(3), 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetin, M. (2015a). Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu City. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(10), 640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin, M. (2015b). Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: Case study in Kutahya. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 22(5), 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1061066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin, M. (2016). Determination of bioclimatic comfort areas in landscape planning: A case study of Cide Coastline. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 4(9), 800–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin, M. (2019). The effect of urban planning on urban formations determining bioclimatic comfort area’s effect using satellite imagines on air quality: A case study of Bursa city. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health., 12(10), 1237–1249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin, M., Adiguzel, F., Kaya, O., & Sahap, A. (2018). Mapping of bioclimatic comfort for potential planning using GIS in Aydin. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(1), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin, M., & Sevik, H. (2016). Assessing Potential Areas of Ecotourism through a Case Study. In Leszek Butowski (Ed.), Ilgaz Mountain National Park Tourism - From Empirical Research Towards Practical Application (pp. 81–110). InTechOpen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, W. (2011). Improving Sustainability Decision-Making at Neighbourhood Level. The University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devuyst, D., Hens, L., & de Lannoy, W. (2001). How green is the city? : Sustainability assessment and the management of urban environments. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DKS. (2000). New Tehri Town, Baurari. Spatio-Economic Development record: UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dung-Gwom, J., & Jugu. . (2017). Characteristics and planning challenges of hilltop settlements in jos metropolis, Nigeria. Urban Planning LandsCape and Environmental Design, 2(2), 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, K. M., & Rauch, E. M. (2006). Sustainable building rating systems summary. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.2172/926974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, P. & Kaur, H. (2020). Sustainability Issues in Context of Indian Hill Towns. In Littlewood, J. et al. (eds.) Sustainability in Energy and Buildings: Proceedings of SEB 2019, Springer. Singapore. pp. 629–639.

  • GBI (2011) 'GBI Assessment Criteria', (March), 0–57.

  • Ghodrati, M., Mousavi-Kamazani, M., & Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S. (2020). Zn3V3O8 nanostructures: Facile hydrothermal/solvothermal synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical hydrogen storage. Ceramics International, 46(18), 28894–28902.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. (1988). Catastrophic landslide deposits in the Karakoram Himalaya. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 242(4875), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1702494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IGBC. (2010). IGBC Green Townships IGBC Green Townships (For Townships and Large Developments) Rating System. Confederation of Indian Industry: Pilot Version Abridged Reference Guide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, H., & Garg, P. (2019). Urban sustainability assessment tools: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, H., & Garg, P. (2019). Measuring sustainability of development in planned hill towns: A case of new Tehri town. In Amaresh Chakrabarti (Ed.), Smart Innovation Systems and Technologies (pp. 369–379). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, H., & Garg, P. (2020). City profile: New Tehri. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, E., Agca, M., Adiguzel, F., & Cetin, M. (2019). Spatial data analysis with R programming for environment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 25(6), 1521–1530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, M. (2009). Fundamentals of integrated design for sustainable building. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Kumar, K. (2019). Brief about Mountain Division. Retrieved December 13, 2019, from http://gbpihed.gov.in/beta/Mountain_Division_detail.php.

  • LEED-ND (2014). LEED v 4 for Neighbourhood Development. U.S. Green Building Council. Retrieved February 9, 2020, from https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-neighborhood-development-current-version.

  • Mahat, T. J. (2004). Issues in Sustainable Mountain Development: The Himalayan Experience. Kathmandu, Nepal: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). Retrieved February 9, 2020, from https://lib.icimod.org/record/12213.

  • Mapes, J., & Wolch, J. (2011). Living Green: The Promise and Pitfalls of New Sustainable Communities. Journal of Urban Design, 16(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.521012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavoa, S., et al. (2009). Measuring Neighbourhood Walkability in New Zealand Cities.

  • Moneim, S. A., & Ariane, E. (2012). Neighborhood Urban Quality of Life Guidelines for Urban Planning and Development of New Assessment Tool. Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. Retrieved February 9, 2020, from http://www.cpas-egypt.com/pdf/SaraAbdelMoneimElAriane/Ph.D/Neighborhood%20Urban%20Quality%20of%20Life.pdf.

  • Negi, G. C. S., Rawat, R., Sharma, S., & Dhyani, P. P. (2014). Need for strengthening mountain-specific research. Current Science, 106(5), 659–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, B. K., & Altan, H. (2011). Comparative review of five sustainable rating systems Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of APAAS. Procedia Engineering, 21, 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, C., & Grelsson, G. (1995). The fragility of ecosystems: A review. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 32(4), 677. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmer, M. L., Coulton, C., Freedman, D. A., Sobeck, J. L., & Booth, J. (2018). Measures for Community and Neighborhood Research. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planner, C. (2014) A Global Survey of Urban Sustainability Rating Tools. Retrieved February 9, 2020, from http://crit.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/criterion_planners_sustainability_ratings_tool.pdf.

  • Price, M. F., Jansky, L. & Iatsenia (2006). Key issues for mountain areas. Retrieved February 13, 2020, from https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:2448/pdf9789280811025.pdf.

  • Pushplata &Vishwamitter (1997). Sustainable Development of Hill Towns through Integrated Environmental Conscious Planning. In International Conference on Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development, Roorkee.

  • Pushplata (2000). Urban design matrix for hill towns. Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India. Retrieved June 9, 2019, from http://shodhbhagirathi.iitr.ac.in:8081/jspui/handle/123456789/78.

  • Pushplata (2010). Environmental Conscious Planning and Design for Sustainable Development of Hilly Areas. In paper presented at ITPI zonal conference on Sustainable Development of Hilly Areas, Dec 2010.

  • Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarté, S. B. (2010). Sustainable infrastructure: The guide to green engineering and design. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sati, V. (2016). Towards sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in mountain regions. Springer International pu.

  • Saynajoki, E., Kyro, R., Heinonen, J., & Junnila, S. (2012). An assessment of the applicability of three international neighbourhood sustainability rating systems to diverse local conditions, with a focus on Nordic case areas. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development., 3(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/2093761X.2012.696319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi, A. (2013). Sustainability at the Neighborhood Level: Assessment Tools and the Pursuit of Sustainability. Nagoya University. Retrieved February 9, 2020, from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.659.3635&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2014). Neighborhood sustainability assessment in action: Cross-evaluation of three assessment systems and their cases from the US, the UK, and Japan. Building and Environment. Pergamon, 72, 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Ransinchung, R. N., Debbarma, S., & Kumar, P. (2018). Utilization of reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates containing waste from Sugarcane Mill for production of concrete mixes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangl, P., & Guinn, J. M. (2011). Neighborhood design, connectivity assessment and obstruction. Urban Design International, 16(4), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2011.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teriman, S. (2012). Measuring Neighbourhood Sustainability: A comparative analysis of residential types in Malaysia. Queensland University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • URDPFI. (2014). Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation (URDPFI) Guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

  • USGBC. (2011). LEED 2009 for Neighborhood Development Rating System For Public Use and Display. Created by the Congress for the New Urbanism, Natural Resources Defense Council, and the US G. Retrieved February 9, 2020, from www.usgbc.org.

  • Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S., Ghasemian, N., Mousavi-Kamazani, M., & Salavati-Niasari, M. (2021). Effect of zirconia on improving NOx reduction efficiency of Nd2Zr2O7 nanostructure fabricated by a new, facile and green sonochemical approach. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 71, 105376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S., Morassaei, M., Amiri, O., Salavati-Niasari, M., & Foong, L. (2020). Nd2Sn2O7 nanostructures: Green synthesis and characterization using date palm extract, a potential electrochemical hydrogen storage material. Ceramics International, 46(11), 17186–17196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) and the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), India (Grant No. 33197/2015/E.III(A) dated 18.02.2015), in carrying out this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture, Planning and Design, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India

    Harsimran Kaur

  2. Department of Architecture and Planning, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, 247667, India

    Pushplata Garg

Authors
  1. Harsimran Kaur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pushplata Garg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harsimran Kaur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 8188 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, H., Garg, P. Case-based assessment of planned hill town using existing urban sustainability assessment tools. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 4413–4433 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01585-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01585-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation