Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ORIGINAL RESEARCHOnline Information About the Effectiveness of Shoulder Surgery Is Not Based on the Best Available Evidence: A Content Analysis
Section snippets
Study design and inclusion and exclusion criteria
We performed a content analysis of online consumer information about subacromial decompression surgery and rotator cuff repair surgery for adults with shoulder pain (including people with subacromial pain syndrome or rotator cuff tears). We included any online information that was written in English, targeted to consumers, and addressed the decision to have surgery. This included links downloadable as Portable Document Formats or videos featuring relevant information (eg, resources routinely
Search results
We identified 463 webpages from our online searches. After removing duplicates and applying our exclusion criteria, 155 webpages were included (89 discussed subacromial decompression surgery, 90 discussed rotator cuff repair surgery, 24 discussed both procedures) (fig 1). The included webpages came from a variety of sources including both not-for-profit and for-profit web-based consumer information companies, Wikipedia, government funded institutes, health insurers, professional societies,
Summary of main findings
Our study showed that most publicly available online information about subacromial decompression surgery and rotator cuff repair surgery is not aligned with the best available evidence and may be inadequate to inform patient decision making. Few webpages accurately portrayed the best available evidence for surgery, few mentioned the possible harms of surgery, and few recommended people avoid surgery. Most webpages mentioned alternatives to surgery, which is positive. However, most webpages
Conclusions
Most publicly available online information about subacromial decompression surgery and rotator cuff repair surgery does not accurately portray the best available evidence for surgery and may be inadequate to inform patient decision making. Future research should determine what information consumers value most when considering treatment options for subacromial pain syndrome and use this information to inform the development and dissemination of accessible, easy-to-understand consumer resources.
Supplier
- a.
Stata IC Version 13.1; StataCorp.
References (25)
- et al.
Analysis of rotator cuff repair trends in a large private insurance population
Arthroscopy
(2013) - et al.
Drivers of poor medical care
Lancet
(2017) - et al.
Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for subacromial shoulder pain (CSAW): a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, placebo-controlled, three-group, randomised surgical trial
Lancet
(2018) - et al.
General practice activity in Australia 2015-16
(2016) - et al.
In the clinic. Rotator cuff disease
Ann Intern Med
(2015) - et al.
Longitudinal study of use and cost of subacromial decompression surgery: the need for effective evaluation of surgical procedures to prevent overtreatment and wasted resources
BMJ Open
(2019) - et al.
Subacromial decompression surgery for rotator cuff disease
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2019) - et al.
Surgery for rotator cuff tears
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2019) - et al.
Temporal trends and geographical variation in the use of subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair of the shoulder in England
Bone Joint J
(2014) - et al.
Increasing incidence of rotator cuff repairs—a nationwide registry study in Finland
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
(2015)
National trends in rotator cuff repair
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Cited by (7)
Diagnostic labels and advice for rotator cuff disease influence perceived need for shoulder surgery: an online randomised experiment
2022, Journal of PhysiotherapyCitation Excerpt :It provided encouragement to stay active and positive prognostic information. For treatment recommendation, examples of advice were searched for on webpages identified in a content analysis that was conducted examining the quality of online information for shoulder surgery.24 Reputable sources (eg, government, university) that presented contrasting advice to the guideline-based advice script were prioritised.
Who writes this stuff? Musculoskeletal information quality and authorship of popular health websites: A systematic review
2022, Musculoskeletal Science and PracticeCitation Excerpt :Our data supports previous research investigating the quality of online information for various musculoskeletal conditions, which almost ubiquitously characterized the quality of information as poor (Butler and Foster, 2003; Morr et al., 2010; Starman et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2012; Ferreira et al., 2019). A recent paper also showed inaccurate online portrayals of the evidence for common shoulder surgeries (Robertson et al., 2021). However, the present study differs in several ways from existing research.
Online information about the management of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures in Australia: A content analysis
2022, Musculoskeletal Science and PracticeCitation Excerpt :A content analysis of ‘trustworthy’ websites making treatment recommendations for low back pain (n = 79) found that less than half of websites made accurate recommendations (Ferreira et al., 2019). A content analysis of 155 webpages on shoulder surgery found that few webpages provided an accurate portrayal of the evidence for subacromial decompression surgery (18% of webpages) and rotator cuff repair surgery (4% of webpages) (Robertson et al., 2021). Studies of online information highlight the need to develop and disseminate evidence-based resources on the management of musculoskeletal and orthopaedic conditions.
A content analysis of online information about the benefits and harms of spine surgery
2022, Brazilian Journal of Physical TherapyCitation Excerpt :We used a combination of terms described in Supplementary File - Table 1. These terms were defined by the study team, which includes professionals from various backgrounds including physical therapists and orthopaedic surgeons and based on previous studies investigating online information for musculoskeletal conditions.22 We searched the first 2 pages of results as people are unlikely to explore webpages beyond the second page of a Google search.18
Additional Considerations When Evaluating Internet Marketing Accuracy
2021, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Disclosures: All authors declare no support from any organization for the submitted work and no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Rachelle Buchbinder was an author on the 2 Cochrane reviews of subacromial decompression surgery and rotator cuff repair surgery that we used to classify webpages as making an accurate portrayal of the evidence for these operations. The views expressed in this research article do not necessarily represent those of the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District or New South Wales Health.