Abstract
Two-phase flow measurement is a key issue in the natural gas industry. Among the many different flow meters available, the swirl meter stands out for its reliability, ease of maintenance, large measurement range, and strong output signal. In this study, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were conducted, using RNG k-e turbulence and Eulerian multiphase models, to investigate the gas–liquid two-phase flow characteristics in swirl meters. The CFD simulation results were then validated against the tested precession frequency of our experiment, and a satisfactory match was found between the outcomes. A detailed analysis was then conducted to generate profiles for velocity, pressure, etc. Based on examinations of the flow field distributions, it was found that gas flow inside swirl meters is sensitive to the presence of the liquid phase; the influence increased with the volume fraction of the liquid present. Further investigation indicated that the vortex precession was attenuated in the presence of the liquid phase. This led to the variation of the entire field; the pressure fluctuations at the end of the throat, in particular, resulted in metering errors of the gas flows.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. Dong, Gas-liquid Two-phase Flowmeters with Extracting and Separating Method, Doctoral thesis, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2000.
Z.H. Lin, Two-phase flow measurements with sharp-edged orifices. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 8 (1982) 683–693.
J.W. Murdock, Two-phase flow measurement with orifices. J. Basic Eng., 84 (1962) 419–432.
D. Chisholm, Flow of incompressible two-phase mixtures through sharp-edged orifices. J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 9 (1967) 72–78.
N. Nederveen, Wet Gas Flow Measurement, SPE Gas Technology Symposium, (1989).
A. W. Jamieson and P. F. Dickinson, High Accuracy Wet Gas Metering. North Sea Workshop, (1993).
R. De Leeuw, Liquid Correction of Venturi Meter Readings in Wet Gas Flow, North Sea Workshop (1993).
R. Steven and A. Hall, Orifice plate meter wet gas flow performance. Flow Meas. Instrum., 20 (2009) 141–151.
W.X. Chen, Y. Xu, C. Yuan et al., An investigation of wet gas over-reading in orifice plates under ultra-low liquid fraction conditions using dimensional analysis. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 32 (2016) 390–394.
F.S. Zhang, F. Dong and C. Tan, High GVF and low pressure gas-liquid two-phase flow measurement based on dual-cone flowmeter. Flow Meas. Instrum., 21 (2010) 410–417.
R. Lansangan, J. Skinner, M. Reese et al., Coriolis mass flow metering for wet gas. Measur. Control, 41 (2008) 213–216.
Y. Xu, P.N. Yu, Z.C. Zhu et al., Over-reading modeling of the ultrasonic flow meter in wet gas measurement. Measurement, 98 (2017) 17–24.
S. Dennis and T. D. Brian, Wet gas over-reading correction for ultrasonic flow meters. Exp. Fluids, 60(3), 45 (2019).
D. Chen, B. Cui and Z. Zhu, Internal flow characteristics and aft-cone angle on performance of swirlmeter. MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 31 (2016) 107–113.
C.Q. Hua and Y.F. Geng, Wet gas meter based on the vortex precession frequency and differential pressure combination of swirlmeter. Measurement, 45 (2012) 763–768.
C.Q. Hua and F. Geng, Wet gas metering technique based on slotted orifice and swirlmeter in series. Flow Meas. Instrum., 30 (2013) 138–143.
S. Pirouzpanah, M. Cevik and G.L. Morrison, Multiphase flow measurements using coupled slotted orifice plate and swirl flow meter. Flow Meas. Instrum., 40 (2014) 157–161.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 52006198) and the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (Grant no. 2020C03099).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, D., Lin, Z. Numerical Investigation of Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow in a Swirl Meter. MAPAN 36, 521–532 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-021-00468-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-021-00468-8