Skip to main content
Log in

Study of scoop drive and polymeric surface effects on the separation factors for a gas centrifuge using MD-DSMC method

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gas centrifuges are widely used to isotope separation of about 154 stable isotopes. It is very important to simulate the behavior of dilute gas inside a centrifuge machine using accurate methods to increase the optimal performance of a machine. Due to the high accuracy of the molecular dynamics (MD) method in the interaction of gas molecules with the surfaces, in this paper, this method has been used for the interaction of uranium hexafluoride gas molecules with the rotor surfaces of the machine and its results have been used to simulation of the gas inside the rotor by the DSMC method. Consequently, a gas centrifuge was simulated using a new hybrid MD-DSMC method. The boundary condition used in the MD-DSMC method is the Cercignani–Lampis–Lord. In this method, the gas behavior near the scoop of the centrifuge machine was investigated using the new algorithm of the velocity reduction coefficient. The results show that for the interaction of uranium hexafluoride molecules with the composite surfaces of rotor, the accommodation coefficients take non-unit values. Also, simulation of the rarefied gas inside the rotor by the MD-DSMC method shows that for a velocity reduction coefficient equal to 0.84, the separation work value for the machine will be maximized. Finally, by comparing the separation factors obtained from MD-DSMC and DSMC methods with experimental results, it can be concluded that applying the effects of the polymeric surface of the rotor and gas conditions using the MD-DSMC method increases the accuracy of the results until 6 percent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yousefi-Nasab S, Safdari J, Karimi-Sabet J, Khajenoori M (2020) Prediction of the compression ratio of a Holweck-type molecular pump with the presence of multi-component gases using a modified Sickafus method for high-speed rotors. Vacuum 172:109056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao BY, Sun J, Chen M, Guo Z-Y (2009) Molecular momentum transport at fluid-solid interfaces in MEMS/NEMS: a review. Int J Mol Sci 10:4638–4705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lord R (1991) Some extensions to the Cercignani–Lampis gas-surface scattering kernel. Phys Fluids A 3:706–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lord R (1995) Some further extensions of the Cercignani–Lampis gas-surface interaction model. Phys Fluids 7:1159–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cercignani C, Lampis M (1971) Kinetic models for gas-surface interactions. Transp Theory Stat Phys 1:101–114

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorji MH, Jenny P (2014) A gas-surface interaction kernel for diatomic rarefied gas flows based on the Cercignani–Lampis–Lord model. Phys Fluids 26:122004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Agrawal A, Prabhu SV (2008) Survey on measurement of tangential momentum accommodation coefficient. Vacuum Technol 26:634–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reinhold J, Veltzke T, Wells B, Schneider J, Meierhofer F, Colombi Ciacchi L, Chaffee A, Thöming J (2014) Molecular dynamics simulations on scattering of single Ar, N2, and CO2 molecules on realistic surfaces. Comput Fluids 97:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao B-Y, Chen M, Guo Z-Y (2005) Temperature dependence of the tangential momentum accommodation coefficient for gases. Appl Phys Lett 86:091905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barisik M, Beskok A (2012) Surface–gas interaction effects on nanoscale gas flows. Microfluid Nanofluid 13:789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Prabha SK, Sathian SP (2012) Determination of accommodation coefficients of a gas mixture in a nanochannel with molecular dynamics. Microfluid Nanofluid 13:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yousefi-Nasab S, Safdari J, Karimi-Sabet J, Norouzi A, Amini E (2019) Determination of momentum accommodation coefficients and velocity distribution function for noble gas-polymeric surface interactions using molecular dynamics simulation. Appl Surf Sci 493:766–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yousefi-Nasab S, Safdari J, Karimi-Sabet J, Hasan Mallah M (2021) Molecular dynamics simulations on the scattering of heavy gases on the composite surfaces. Vacuum 183:109864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pradhan S, Kumaran V (2011) The generalized Onsager model for the secondary flow in a high-speed rotating cylinder. Fluid Mech 686:140–142

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang DJ, Zeng S (2011) DSMC simulation of feed jet flow in gas centrifuge, INIS

  16. He L, Jiang DJ, Ying CT (2010) Simulation of overall flow in gas centrifuge considering feed jet, INIS

  17. He L, Jiang DJ, Ying CT (2011) DSMC simulation of feed influence on a gas centrifuge flow field, INIS

  18. Roblin P, Doneddu F (2001) Direct Monte Carlo simulation in a gas centrifuge. In: AIP conference proceedings, pp 169–173

  19. Ghazanfari V, Salehi AA, Keshtkar AR, Shadman MM, Askari MH (2020) Investigation of the continuum-rarefied flow and isotope separation using a hybrid CFD-DSMC simulation for UF6 in a gas centrifuge. Ann Nucl Energy 152:107985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khajenoori M, Safdari J, Asl AH, Norouzi A (2019) Modeling gas-granular flow in molecular using the DSMC method and continuum regions by Onsager’s pancake equation with mass sources and sinks in a rotating cylinder. Granul Matter 21(3):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khajenoori M, Safdari J, Asl AH, Norouzi A (2019) Modeling and simulating of feed flow in a gas centrifuge using the Monte Carlo method to calculate the maximum separation power. J Mol Model 25(11):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadeghi MH, Outokesh M, Karimi-Sabet J (2016) Experimental investigation of effects of the feed flow rate and “tail scoop-wall” clearance on the performance of a gas centrifuge by feeding a Freon mixture. Sep Sci Technol 51(7):1259–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arkilic EB, Breuer KS (2000) Mass flow and tangential momentum accommodation in silicon micromachined channels. Fluid Mech 437:29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun J, Li Z-X (2008) Effect of gas adsorption on momentum accommodation coefficients in microgas flows using molecular dynamic simulations. Mol Phys 106:2325–2332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun J, Li Z-X (2011) Three-dimensional molecular dynamic study on accommodation coefficients in rough nanochannels. Heat Transf Eng 32:658–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Acharya T, Falgoust J, Rasmussen R, Martin MJ (2016) Disk spin-down measurements in the free-molecular flow regime: a new method for measurement of tangential momentum accommodation coefficients. Vacuum 126:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker A, Mehta P, Koller J (2014) Drag coefficient model using the Cercignani–Lampis–Lord gas–surface interaction model. Spacecr Androckets 51:1544–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barisik M, Beskok A (2011) Molecular dynamics simulations of shear-driven gas flows in nano-channels. Microfluid Nanofluid 11:611–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gennaro Z (2015) Rarefied aerodynamic characteristics of aero-space-planes: a comparative study of two gas–surface interaction models. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 53:37–47

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Huntsman (2007) http://www.huntsman.com. Data sheet:Araldite LY556/ Aradur 917/Accelerator DY 070, 2007. [Online]

  31. Wu CF, Xu WJ (2006) Atomistic molecular modelling of crosslinked epoxy resin. Polymer 47:6004–6009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu CF, Xu WJ (2007) Atomistic molecular simulations of structure and dynamics of crosslinked epoxy resin. Polymer 48:5802–5812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-rang molecular dynamic. Comput Phys 117:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Aisen EM, Borisevich VD, Levin EV, Popovb GE, Tikhomirovb AV, Yupatova SV (1996) Study of isotope separation of some chemical elements in a gas centrifuge. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 374:127–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There are no funding sources for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadegh Yousefi-Nasab.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Monica Carvalho.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousefi-Nasab, S., Safdari, J., Karimi-Sabet, J. et al. Study of scoop drive and polymeric surface effects on the separation factors for a gas centrifuge using MD-DSMC method. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43, 344 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03067-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03067-5

Keywords

Navigation