Abstract
The results of analysis of the status position of a young scientist as a multidimensional sociocultural phenomenon and not only as an instrumental category of scientific policy are presented. The socio-historical context of the formation of the category of youth is considered, the constitutive characteristics of this social group are identified, and the transformations that it undergoes under the dominance of the innovative strategy of economic and social development are revealed. Comparing Russian and foreign (primarily European) practice, the author points out that Russian functionaries lack an understanding of what the status of a young scientist is. It is substantiated that this status is determined according not so much to the age criterion as to the criterion of career advancement. In the leading countries in the field of science, a junior scientist goes through certain stages of career growth, some of which, primarily postdoctoral studies, have no equivalent in Russia. A comparative analysis of the postgraduate and postdoctoral stages makes it possible to draw certain conclusions about the importance of postdoctoral studies as an instrument of scientific policy under, on the one hand, an increased supply of scientific labor and, on the other, the need to transfer knowledge and skills within the framework of the model of interaction between science, the state, and the private sector, known as the triple helix pattern. Finally, the conclusion is substantiated that the position of a junior scientist, characterized by a marginal position in the scientific hierarchy and the risk of leaving the profession, is of great sociocultural importance since it is during “scientific youth” when unique human capital, cognitive and social, is formed. The totality of acquired individual competencies determines the further development of science, as well as related areas involved in the application and dissemination of scientific knowledge.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCE
A. I. Andreev, A. V. Andriyanov, and I. V. Il’in, “Youth policy in science and higher education: New ideas for Russia,” in Man: Image and Essence: Humanitarian Aspects: Yearbook, Vol.: Young Scientists in Modern Russia, Ed. by G. V. Khlebnikov and D. G. Shkaev (INOIN, Moscow, 2012), pp. 47–67 [in Russian].
E. L. Omel’chenko, “Style profiles of labor strategies of young male and female specialists in the focus of gender differences,” Sotsiol. Issled., No. 11, 36–47 (2002).
I. G. Dezhina, “Youth in science,” Sotsiol. Zh., No. 1, 61–79 (2003).
Man: Image and Essence: Humanitarian Aspects: Yearbook, Vol.: Young Scientists in Modern Russia, Ed. by G. V. Khlebnikov and D. G. Shkaev (INOIN, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].
N. A. Shmatko and G. Volkova, “Service or devotion? Motivation patterns of Russian researchers,” Foresight STI Govern. 11 (2), 54–66 (2017).
A. L. Andreev, I. M. Novokhat’ko, and A. S. Osipova, “Research in the motivation of scientific activity at the university as a corporation within the institutional approach,” Sotsiol. Nauk. Sots. Praktika 5 (4), 27–45 (2017).
S. A. Dushina, “Young scientist careers in the institutional context: The experience of Russia and Germany,” Probl. Deyat. Uch. Nauch. Kollektiv., No. 34, 127–137 (2018).
V. Mangematin and R. Robin, “The two faces of PhD students: Management of early careers of French PhDs in life sciences,” Sci. Pub. Pol. 30 (6), 405–414 (2003).
M. Gaughan and S. Robin, “National science training policy and early scientific careers in France and the United States,” Res. Pol. 33, 569–581 (2004).
L. Auriol, “Careers of doctorate holders: Employment and mobility patterns,” STI Working Paper 2010/04 (OECD, Paris, 2010).
L. Auriol, M. Schaaper, and B. Felix, “Mapping careers and mobility of doctorate holders: Draft guidelines, model questionnaire, and indicators,” 3rd ed., OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Working Papers 2012/07 (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2012).
“Supporting early career researchers through gender action plans: A design and methodological toolkit,” in Garcia Working Papers 9, Ed. by R. Bozzon, A. Murgia, and B. Poggio (Univ. of Trento, Trento, 2016).
M. Mead, Culture and Commitment: A Study of the Generation Gap (American Museum of Natural History, Natural History Press/Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y., 1970).
S. N. Ikonnikova and I. S. Kon, Youth As a Social Category (IKSI AN SSSR, Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].
S. N. Ikonnikova, The Youth: Sociological and Sociopsychological Analysis (LGU, Leningrad, 1974) [in Russian].
V. I. Chuprov, Yu. A. Zubok, and C. Williams, Youth in a Risk Society, 2nd ed. (Nauka, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].
M. K. Gorshkov and F. E. Sheregi, Youth of Russia: A Sociological Portrait (TsSPiM, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].
I. M. Il’inskii, The past in the Present: Favorites (Izd. Mosk. Gumanitar. Univ., Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].
Russia and China: The Youth of the 21st Century, Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, Li Chunling, Z. T. Golenkova, and P. M. Kozyreva (Novyi Khronograf, Moscow, 2014) [in Russian].
http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102023954. Cited January 3, 2021.
FZ-489 On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation of December 30, 2020. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202012300003. Cited January 3, 2021.
V. A. Lukov, “Conceptualizing youth in the 21st century: New ideas and approaches,” Sotsiol. Issled., No. 1, 5–16 (2012).
S. V. Pirozhkova, “Category ‘young scientist’ in the context of the history of scieince: To a rational reconstruction,” Polilog/Polylogos 4 (4) (2020). https://polylog.jes.su/s258770110013252-9-1/. Cited January 6, 2021.
UNESCO Science Report: Towards 2030 (UNESCO Publishing, Paris, 2015).
B. V. Dubin, “Generation: meaning and boundaries of the concept,” in Fathers and Sons: Generational Analysis of Modern Russia, Ed. by Yu. Levada and T. Shanin (Nov. Lit. Obozr., Moscow, 2005), pp. 61–79 [in Russian].
N. A. Knysh, “The image of a scientist in feature films of the late 1940s–early 1950s,” Vestn. Chel. Gos. Univ., No. 18, 119–136 (2007). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obraz-uchenogo-v-hudozhestvennom-kinematografe-kontsa-1940-h-nachala-1950-h-godov. Cited October 10, 2020.
S. A. Dushina and N. A. Ashcheulova, “Postgraduate studies in national academic systems (experience of Germany and the USA),” Vestn. MGIMO-Univ. 29 (2), 170–177 (2013).
T. O. Kochetkova, M. V. Noskov, and V. A. Shershneva, “German universities: from the Humboldt reform to the Bologna process,” Vyssh. Obr. Ross., No. 3, 137–142 (2011).
Defining “junior researchers” and challenges they face. http://www.eurodoc.net/sites/default/files/attachments/2017/133/eurodoc2017-juniorresearchersdefinitionandchallenges.pdf. Cited October 9, 2020.
The Science and Technology Labor Force: The Value of Doctorate Holders and Development of Professional Careers, Ed. by L. Gokhberg, N. Shmatko, and L. Auriol (Springer, Heidelberg, 2016).
European career framework: Eurodoc position paper and recommendations. http://eurodoc.net/oldwebsite/2010_Eurodoc-Career-Framework_Recommendations.pdf. Cited December 3, 2020.
H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, “The triple helix—university–industry–government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development,” EASST Rev. 14 (1), 14–19 (1995).
B. Bozeman and V. Mangematin, “Editor’s introduction: Building and deploying scientific and technical human capital,” Res. Pol. 33 (4), 565–568 (2004).
Yu. Yu. Netrebin, “Foreign experience of postdoctoral training of researchers,” Upr. Nauk. Naukometr., No. 2, 204–223 (2019).
Funding
The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-011-00896.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by B. Alekseev
Sophia Vladislavovna Pirozhkova, Cand. Sci. (Philos.), is a Senior Researcher of the RAS Institute of Philosophy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pirozhkova, S.V. The Main Features of the Sociocultural Status of a Young Scientist. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 91, 144–152 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331621020040
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331621020040