Skip to main content
Log in

Bivariate Sarmanov Phase-Type Distributions for Joint Lifetimes Modeling

  • Published:
Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we are interested in the dependence between lifetimes based on a joint survival model. This model is built using the bivariate Sarmanov distribution with Phase-Type marginal distributions. Capitalizing on these two classes of distributions’ mathematical properties, we drive some useful closed-form expressions of distributions and quantities of interest in the context of multiple-life insurance contracts. The dependence structure that we consider in this paper is based on a general form of kernel function for the Bivariate Sarmanov distribution. The introduction of this new kernel function allows us to improve the attainable correlation range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdallah A, Boucher J-P, Cossette H (2016a) Sarmanov family of multivariate distributions for bivariate dynamic claim counts model. Insur Math Econ 68:120–133

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Abdallah A, Boucher J-P, Cossette H, Trufin J (2016b) Sarmanov family of bivariate distributions for multivariate loss reserving analysis. North Amer Actuarial J 20(2):184–200

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Financ 9(3):203–228

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Asmussen S, Laub PJ, Yang H (2019) Phase-type models in life insurance: Fitting and valuation of equity-linked benefits. Risks 7(1)

  • Bladt M, Nielsen BF (2017) Matrix-exponential distributions in applied probability. Matrix-exponential Distributions in Applied Probability. Springer

  • Bolancé C, Vernic R (2019) Multivariate count data generalized linear models: Three approaches based on the sarmanov distribution. Insur Math Econ 85:89–103

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers NL, Gerber HU, Hickman JC, Jones DA, Nesbitt CJ (1997) Actuarial mathematics. Society of Actuaries

  • Dickson DCM, Hardy MR, Waters HR (2019) Actuarial mathematics for life contingent risks. International Series on Actuarial Science. Cambridge University Press

  • Dufresne F, Hashorva E, Ratovomirija G, Toukourou Y (2018) On age difference in joint lifetime modelling with life insurance annuity applications. Ann Actuarial Sci 12(2)

  • Frees EJW, Carriere JF, Valdez E (1996) Annuity valuation with dependent mortality. J Risk Insur 63(2)

  • Gobbi F, Kolev N, Mulinacci S (2019) Joint life insurance pricing using extended marshall-olkin models. ASTIN Bullet 49(2):409–432

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Govorun M, Latouche G (2014) Modeling the effect of health: phase-type approach. Eur Actuarial J 4(1):197–218

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Govorun M, Latouche G, Loisel S (2015) Phase-type aging modeling for health dependent costs. Insur Math Econ 62(2015):173–183

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hashorva E, Ratovomirija G (2015) On sarmanov mixed erlang risks in insurance applications. ASTIN Bullet 45(1):175–205

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Horn RA, Johnson CR (1991) Matrix equations and the kronecker product. In: Topics in Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press

  • Kim JHT, Bae T, Kim S (2017) Application of the phase-type mortality law to life contingencies and risk management. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind 33 (2):184–212

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M-LT (1996) Properties and applications of the sarmanov family of bivariate distributions. Commun Stat - Theory Methods 25(6):1207–1222

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano E, Spreeuw J, Vigna E (2008) Modelling stochastic mortality for dependent lives. Insur Math Econ 43(2):234–244

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • NEUTS MF (1975) Probability distributions of phase type. Liber Amicorum Prof. Emeritus H. Florin

  • Neuts MF (1994) Matrix-geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach. Courier Corporation. Google-Books-ID: WPol7RVptz0C

  • Pitacco E, Denuit M, Haberman S, Olivieri A (2009) Modelling Longevity Dynamics for Pensions and Annuity Business. OUP Catalogue. Oxford University Press

  • Ratovomirija G, Tamraz M, Vernic R (2017) On some multivariate sarmanov mixed erlang reinsurance risks: Aggregation and capital allocation. Insur Math Econ 74:197–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmanov OV (1966) Generalized normal correlation and two-dimensional fréchet classes. Doclady Soviet Math 168(1):32–35

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shubina M, Lee M-L T (2004) On maximum attainable correlation and other measures of dependence for the sarmanov family of bivariate distributions. Commun Stat - Theory Methods 33(5):1031–1052

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon X, Lin PhD ASA, Liu X (2007) Markov Aging Process and Phase-Type Law of Mortality. North Amer Actuarial J 11(4):92–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vernic R (2017) Capital allocation for sarmanov’s class of distributions. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 19(1)

  • Vernic R (2018) On the evaluation of some multivariate compound distributions with sarmanov’s counting distribution. Insur Math Econ 79:184–193

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Hashorva E (2013) Extremes and products of multivariate ac-product risks. Insur Math Econ 52(2):312–319

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh AH, Jones BL, Stanford DA (2014) The use of phase-type models for disability insurance calculations. Scand Actuar J 2014(8):714–728

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khouzeima Moutanabbir.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Substochastic Matrix

Definition 5.1

A substochastic matrix is a square matrix with nonnegative entries so that every row adds up to at most 1

1.2 Matrix Exponential

Definition 5.2

Let A be a square matrix of order n, then we call matrix exponential, denoted by eA, the matrix

$$ e^{A} = \sum\limits_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!}A^{k}, $$

with \(e^{0_{n}} = I_{n}\), where 0n is the zero matrix of order n.

It is well known that f(x) = ex is the only function to have the property that f(x + y) = f(x)f(y), i.e. exey = ex+y, where \(x,y \in \mathbb {R}\). However, this is not true for matrix exponential.

Proposition 5.1

Let A and B be square matrices of order n. Then,

$$ e^{tA}e^{tB} = e^{t(A+B)}, t \in \mathbb{R}, $$

if ABB = BA.

The derivative of matrix exponential function is given in the following proposition.

Proposition 5.1

The derivative of a matrix exponential function is given by

$$ \frac{d}{dx}e^{Ax}=Ae^{Ax} = e^{Ax}A. $$

1.3 Kronecker Product and Kronecker Sum

The Kronecker product and the Kronecker sum are defined as follows

Definition 5.3

Let A = (aij) and B be (n × m) and (l × k) real matrices, respectively. Then the Kronecker product \(A \otimes B \in \mathbb {R}^{nl*mk}\) is the partitioned matrix

$$ A \otimes B= \left( \begin{aligned} a_{11} B & a_{12} B & {\dots} & a_{1m} B \\ a_{21} B & a_{22} B & {\dots} & a_{2m} B \\ {\vdots} & {\vdots} & {\ddots} & {\vdots} \\ a_{n1} B & a_{n2} B & {\dots} & a_{nm} B \end{aligned}\right). $$

Definition 5.4

Let A and B be square matrices of orders n and m respectively. Then the Kronecker sumAB is a square matrix of order nm and is given by

$$ A \oplus B = A \otimes I_{m} + I_{n} \otimes B. $$

Definition 5.5

Consider a matrix A. For k ≥ 1, the k th Kronecker power, \(A^{\otimes _{k+1}}\), and the k th Kronecker sum, \(A^{\oplus _{k+1}}\), are defined inductively by

  • \(A^{\otimes _{1}}=A\) and \(A^{\otimes _{k}}= A\otimes A^{\otimes _{(k-1)}}\) for \(k=2,3,\dots \).

  • \(A^{\oplus _{1}}=A\) and \(A^{\oplus _{k}}= A\oplus A^{\oplus _{(k-1)}}\) for \(k=2,3,\dots \).

1.4 Some Properties of Kronecker Product and Kronecker Sum

Proposition 5.3

Define Let Ml,j denote the space of i × j real (or complex) matrices. Let AMm,n, BMp,q, CMn,k, and DMq,r. Then

$$ (A \otimes B)(C \otimes D)=(A C) \otimes(B D). $$

Proposition 5.4

Define Let Ml the space of square real (or complex) matrices. Consider two matrices AMp and BMq

(i):

Assume that μ is an eigenvalue for A with corresponding eigenvector x, and ξ is an eigenvalue for B with corresponding eigenvector y. Then μ + ξ is an eigenvalue of AB with corresponding eigenvector yx.

(ii):

Any eigenvalue of AB arises as such a sum of eigenvalues of A and B

We refer the readers to Horn and Johnson (1991) for more details on Matrix Mathematics and proofs of the previous propositions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moutanabbir, K., Abdelrahman, H. Bivariate Sarmanov Phase-Type Distributions for Joint Lifetimes Modeling. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 24, 1093–1118 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-021-09875-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-021-09875-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation