Counterexamples to a conjecture of Erdős, Pach, Pollack and Tuza

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctb.2021.06.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Erdős et al. (1989) [4] conjectured that the diameter of a K2r-free connected graph of order n and minimum degree δ2 is at most 2(r1)(3r+2)(2r21)nδ+O(1) for every r2, if δ is a multiple of (r1)(3r+2). For every r>1 and δ2(r1), we create K2r-free graphs with minimum degree δ and diameter (6r5)n(2r1)δ+2r3+O(1), which are counterexamples to the conjecture for every r>1 and δ>2(r1)(3r+2)(2r3).

Introduction

The following theorem was discovered several times [1], [4], [6], [7]:

Theorem 1

For a fixed minimum degree δ2 and n, for every n-vertex connected graph G, we have diam(G)3nδ+1+O(1).

Note that the upper bound is sharp (even for δ-regular graphs [2]), but the constructions have complete subgraphs whose order increases with δ. Erdős, Pach, Pollack, and Tuza [4] conjectured that the upper bound in Theorem 1 can be strengthened for graphs not containing complete subgraphs:

Conjecture 1 [4]

Let r,δ2 be fixed integers and let G be a connected graph of order n and minimum degree δ.

  • (i)

    If G is K2r-free and δ is a multiple of (r1)(3r+2) then, as n,diam(G)2(r1)(3r+2)(2r21)nδ+O(1)=(322r11(2r1)(2r21))nδ+O(1).

  • (ii)

    If G is K2r+1-free and δ is a multiple of 3r1, then, as n,diam(G)3r1rnδ+O(1)=(322r)nδ+O(1).

Set k=2r or k=2r+1 according the cases. As connected δ-regular graphs are Kδ+1-free (apart from Kδ+1 itself), we need δk (at least) to make improvement on Theorem 1. Furthermore, as the conjectured constants in the bounds are at most 32k, Theorem 1 implies that the conjectured inequalities hold trivially, unless δ3k21.

Erdős et al. [4] constructed graph sequences for every r,δ2, where δ satisfies the divisibility condition, which meet the upper bounds in Conjecture 1. We show these construction them in Section 2.

Part (ii) of Conjecture 1 for r=1 was proved in Erdős et al. [4]. Conjecture 1 is included in the book of Fan Chung and Ron Graham [5], which collected Erdős's significant problems in graph theory.

No more progress has been reported on this conjecture, except that for r=2 in (ii), under a stronger hypothesis (4-colorable instead of K5-free), Czabarka, Dankelman and Székely [3] arrived at the conclusion of Conjecture 1:

Theorem 2

For every connected 4-colorable graph G of order n and minimum degree δ1, diam(G)5n2δ1.

In Section 3, we give an unexpected counterexample for Conjecture 1 (i) for every r2 and δ>2(r1)(3r+2)(2r3). The question whether Conjecture 1 (i) holds in the range (r1)(3r+2)δ2(r1)(3r+2)(2r3) is still open. The counterexample leads to a modification of Conjecture 1, which no longer requires cases:

Conjecture 2

For every k3 and δ3k21, if G is a Kk+1-free (weaker version: k-colorable) connected graph of order n and minimum degree at least δ, diam(G)(32k)nδ+O(1).

For k=2r, Conjecture 2 is identical to Conjecture 1(ii). For k=2r1, 32k=6r52r1, and, although the conjectured bound is likely not tight for any δ, the fraction 6r52r1 cannot be reduced for all δ according to the construction in Section 3.

Section snippets

Clump graphs and the constructions for Conjecture 1

We define a (weighted) clump graph H as follows: x is a vertex of maximum eccentricity, Li is the set of vertices at distance i from x, D=diam(H), L0={x}, LD={y} the weight of x and y is 1 and all other vertices are weighted with positive integers. The vertices of H are referred to as clumps.

A weighted clump graph H gives rise to a simple (unweighted) graph G by blowing up vertices of H into as many copies as their weight is, i.e. every vertex of H corresponds to an independent set of G with

Counterexamples

We will make use of a clump graph to create a (2r1)-colorable (and hence K2r-free) graphs with minimum degree δ for every r2 that refute Conjecture 1 (i).

To make our quantities slightly more palatable in the description, we make the shift s=r1, and work with (2s+1)-colorable graphs for s1.

For positive integers p,s and δ2s, we will create a weighted clump graph Hs,δ,p with p(6s+1) layers, such that the number of vertices in two consecutive layers is at most 2s+1, each vertex is adjacent to

Acknowledgements

The last two authors were supported in part by the National Science Foundation contract DMS 1600811.

References (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (5)

View full text