Early Upper Palaeolithic occupation at Gelimgoush cave, Kermanshah; West-Central Zagros mountains of Iran

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103050Get rights and content

Abstract

The timing and dispersal routes of Homo sapiens (H. sapiens) into the Iranian Plateau have always been a matter of debate in the recent years. Current studies on the Upper Palaeolithic period of the Zagros mountains demonstrated the later colonisation of West-Central Zagros by H. sapiens based on techno-typological and radiocarbon dating. The Kermanshah region is one of the main concentrations of Palaeolithic sites in the West-Central Zagros mountains. Despite presenting rich Palaeolithic sequence records, it suffers from the lack of stratified data associated with chronological control. This issue, until now, has prevented us from evaluating and knowing how these archaeological records relate to the patterns of H. sapiens dispersal and colonisation into the West-Central Zagros mountains. Here, we present the first excavated and dated Palaeolithic site in Kermanshah. Eshkaft-e Gelimgoush Cave yielded a classic Upper Palaeolithic assemblage, representing the Lorestan and Kermanshah (LaK) cultural group documented in the West-Central Zagros. Radiocarbon dates, associated with the material culture from this cave, provide the first dated stratified Upper Palaeolithic evidence in Kermanshah. The data from Eshkaft-e Gelimgoush are consistent with the cultural diversity model among the Upper Palaeolithic populations in the Zagros and confirm later colonisation of the West-Central than northern and southern Zagros mountains.

Introduction

During the last decade, the origins, distribution and behaviour of late Pleistocene Homo sapiens (H. sapiens) have been the subject of critical examination especially since they directly related to the demise of Neanderthals and the broad establishment of H. sapiens across Eurasia (Alex et al., 2017, Bae et al., 2017). The Iranian Plateau located at the crossroads between Africa, Asia and Europe. Despite this important geographical location, we know little of the presence of H. sapiens on this region. Recent research revolving around Late Pleistocene hominin behaviour in Iran has documented variability among the lithic assemblages, namely different cultural groups in the Middle Palaeolithic (MP) and Upper Palaeolithic (UP) in different parts of the Iranian Plateau including the Zagros mountains (Heydari-Guran and Ghasidian, 2017, Ghasidian et al., 2019, Ghasidian, 2019, Heydari-Guran and Ghasidian, 2020). However, one of the most important questions in this regard is the hominin species responsible for these cultural facies during MIS 3. The timing of H. sapiens arrival on the Iranian Plateau is directly influenced by the lack of physical remains. What is, so far, accepted – especially in the Zagros mountains, is that the MP Zagros Mousterian was manufactured by Neanderthals based on several fossils and cultural remains from Shanidar Cave (Solecki, 1963, Pomeroy et al., 2017, Pomeroy et al., 2020) and Bawa Yawan Rocshelter (Heydari-Guran et al., in press) whereas the laminar UP techno-complexes were linked to H. sapiens (Heydari-Guran and Ghasidian, 2020).

The timing of when H. sapiens entered the Iranian Plateau remains a key question. Bayesian modelling combining new and previously obtained radiocarbon dates and their stratigraphic contexts, suggested that the beginning of the UP dates to around 45 ka cal BP both in the Northern and Southern Zagros mountains (Becerra-Valdivia et al., 2017). There are two possibilities: the colonisation of the Zagros by modern humans occurred from two sources/directions, i.e. from the south and the north, independently and simultaneously (Ghasidian et al., 2019), or that it was fast and hence the direction and tempo undetectable using radiocarbon. Recent research on the UP of the Zagros documented cultural diversity among the different groups responsible for manufacturing UP techno-complexes throughout the Zagros. The UP in the Zagros has been identified in at least three varieties: the Baradostian of the Northern, the UP of the West-Central, mostly from Lurestan and Kermanshah regions (LaK: Ghasidian, 2019) and the Rostamian of the Southern Zagros mountains. These three technocomplexes have been documented in excavated and stratified, mostly rock-shelter sites, of which only few have been directly dated.

In the Southern Zagros, the Rostamian technocomplex was documented in the Dasht-e Rostam region (Ghasidian, 2014, Ghasidian, 2019, Heydari-Guran, 2014) and its start was dated at Ghār-e Boof Cave between 45950 and 39350 cal BP (95.4% probability; Becerra-Valdivia et al., 2017).

In the Northern Zagros, the number of archaeological sites is limited. The UP there is mainly documented at Shanidar Cave which yielded stratified UP deposits starting from 48,800 to 39400 cal BP (95.4% probability; Becerra-Valdivia et al., 2017, Solecki, 1958).

In the West-Central Zagros mountains, in the Khorramabad region, two sites -Kaldar and Yafteh- provided stratified material culture associated with absolute dates (Otte et al., 2011, Bazgir et al., 2017). Bayesian age modelling shows the arrival of the UP populations into West-Central Zagros mountains occurred slightly later, starting at Yafteh between 39,250 and 37,600 (95.4% probability, Becerra-Valdivia et al., 2017). These sites are located in the Khorramabad plain, regarded by some as one of the Palaeolithic hot spots in the West-Central Zagros (Hole and Flannery, 1967).

Yet an adjacent region, the Kermanshah plain, is equally promising for holding important information about the progression of the Palaeolithic period, in particular the beginning of the UP in the Zagros. Its high potential during different Palaeolithic periods has been confirmed by recent work (Heydari-Guran and Ghasidian, 2017, Heydari-Guran and Ghasidian, 2020, Biglari and Shidrang, 2016). Despite the discovery of numerous Palaeolithic sites, however, the Kermanshah plain suffers from lack of stratified deposits associated with absolute dates. So far only 2 UP sites have been excavated and published from the region. These are the Warwasi rockshelter and Ghar-e Khar Cave (Braidwood et al., 1961, Smith, 1986). Both sites yielded complete Palaeolithic sequences, spanning from the MP to the Epipalaeolithic period (Dibble and Holdaway, 1993, Olszewski, 1993, Shidrang et al., 2016). However, they lack absolute dates and it remains unclear when each period started and ended. This also limits meaningful comparisons of any lithic techno-typological analyses between neighbouring areas, especially with the Khorramabad plain.

To better understand the chronology and Palaeolithic subsistence strategies in the Kermanshah region of West-Central Zagros and its role in hominin dispersals into the Iranian Plateau, the project “Human Evolution in the Zagros Mountains” (HEZM) started by conducting field surveys to identify new Palaeolithic sites with excavations being conducted on the key sites (Heydari-Guran and Ghasidian, 2017, Heydari-Guran and Ghasidian, 2020). The newly discovered cave site of Eshkaft-e Gelimgoush in the Nawdarwan Valley has been targeted for recovering its Palaeolithic sequence and detailed investigation of the early UP in Kermanshah. The cave is located in one of the richest Palaeolithic areas of the Kermanshah plain, provided the first dated and documented stratified early UP artefacts in Kermanshah. Through the analysis of the findings from this site, we wanted to addresses two issues. The first revolves around the timing of H. sapiens arrival into Kermanshah region, and the second aims at understanding how the new site’s lithic assemblage compare to known UP assemblages from the Zagros. especially from the West-Central region including Warwasi, Yafteh, Kaldar and the other survey sites there.

Section snippets

Eshkaft-e Gelimgoush: Description of the site

Eshkaft-e Gelimgoush (N:34.687622°, E: 46.877745°) is located 41 km northwest of the modern city of Kermanshah in one of the tributaries of the Nawdarwan valley where the Razawar river flows 1300 m east of this cave (Fig. 1). The karst topography of the area is part of the Bisetun-Shahoo block and dates to the Cenozoic era (Braud, 1987). Like other caves in the Zagros region, Eshkaft-e Gelimgoush is formed as a result of the combination of tectonic activities, including vertical and horizontal

Stratigraphy

The first task at Gelimgoush was to clean the profiles of the looters’ pit and widen the illegally excavated area in order to reveal the Palaeolithic profile. Four squares of 1x1 m were excavated, of which, two squares reached to the depth of 230 cm. The whole excavated area covered a part in the cave which received the longest hours of sun-shine during the day when compared to the other parts of the cave (around 5 h, between 2 and 7 pm during summer time) (Fig. 5).

Moving from top to the

Chronology

Seven charcoal samples were recovered from different depths within the excavated sequence, spanning from the historical times to the Palaeolithic period (Table 2, Table 3, Fig. 8). The samples were AMS dated at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU), University of Oxford. The charcoals were pre-treated using advanced oxidation methods (ABOx-SC), which are extremely robust and effective in terms of contamination removal (see Bird et al., 1999, Higham et al., 2009, Douka et al., 2010).

Lithic artefacts

A total of 169 lithic artefacts were recovered from four main GHs in Gelimgoush Cave. The artefacts have a fresh and un-abraded appearance with little or no edge damage attributable to soil movement. Most artefacts come from GH III, which is the thickest layer and possibly represents the longest/most intense occupation of the site. The number of lithic artefacts are reduced towards the bottom of GH III and they fully disappeared in GH IV.

The artefacts are mostly made of red or grey fine-grained

Faunal remains

Eshkaft-e Gelimgoush yielded 960 specimens with a total weight of ca. 628 g (Table 8). The bone fragments were very small and weigh less than 1 gr per specimen (0.65 g in average). Therefore, the fauna was hardly identifiable to genus or species level. The majority of the bone fragments (89%) were identified in size-classes or to other categories, such as “indet. small ruminants” including Capra/Ovis, but excluding gazelle or “indet. small bovids” also including gazelle. The category “indet.

Discussion

Several Palaeolithic excavations and surveys in the Kermanshah (Coon, 1951, Smith, 1986, Jaubert et al., 2006, Braidwood et al., 1961) demonstrated the high potential of this region. However, basic problems concerning a clear picture of late Pleistocene human occupation, settlement patterns and the timing of moden human appearance in the region remained unsolved (Smith, 1986, Heydari-Guran and Ghasidian, 2020). While surveys provide important information of settlement patterns it is only

Conclusion

Our research in Gelimgoush provides chronological and cultural insights for UP presence in Kermanshah, and adds to the growing body of evidence that the region is an important hotspot for early UP and probably late MP groups in the Zagros. Using lithic techno-typological aspects as cultural markers (Foley and Mirazón Lahr, 2011), the characteristic UP artefacts from Gelimgoush find perfect fit to the model of cultural diversity among the UP as being part of the LaK (Lorestan and Kermanshah

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Hamideh Choubak and Dr Neda Jalali from the Iranian Centre for Archaeological Research, Dr Yousef Moradi and Dr Akram Tahmasebi from Iranian cultural heritage, handicraft and tourism organisation in Kermanshah, Mr. Weysi from Darshademan village and the Heydari family for supporting this fieldwork. Afshar Sepehri, Saeed Mansouri and Persheng Bashiri participated to the fieldwork. The fieldwork was funded by Gerda Henkel Stiftung granted to Elham Ghasidian 2015. The

Author roles

Thomas Higham and Katerina Douka performed the dating, Susanne C. Münzel analysed the fauna, Katleen Deckers analysed the flora, Shaghayegh Hourshid, Rahmat Naderi, Saman Heydari-Guran and Elham Ghasidian carried out the fieldwork, Samran Asiabani prepared the maps, Elham Ghasidian analysed the lithics, Saman Heydari-Guran and Elham Ghasidian conducted the field work, designed the research and wrote the paper.

References (60)

  • B. Alex et al.

    Radiocarbon chronology of Manot Cave, Israel and Upper Paleolithic dispersals

    Sci. Adv.

    (2017)
  • E. Allué et al.

    Early evidence of Prunus and Prunus cf. amygdalus from Palaeolithic sites in the Khorramabad Valley, western Iran

    C.R. Palevol.

    (2018)
  • A. Almogi-Labin et al.

    Climatic variability during the last ~90 ka of the southern and northern Levantine Basin basin as evident from marine records and speleothems

    Quaternary Sci. Rev.

    (2009)
  • Andersen, K.K., Svensson, A., Johnsen, S.J., Rasmussen, S.O., Bigler, M., Rothlisberger, R., Ruth, U.,...
  • C.J. Bae et al.

    On the origin of modern humans: Asian perspectives

    Science

    (2017)
  • M.F. Baumler et al.

    A Middle Paleolithic assemblage from kunji cave, Iran

    Paleolithic Prehistory Zagros-Taurus

    (1993)
  • B. Bazgir et al.

    Understanding the emergence of modern humans and the disappearance of Neanderthals: Insights insights from Kaldar Cave (Khorramabad Valley, Western Iran)

    Scientific Reports

    (2017)
  • L. Becerra-Valdivia et al.

    Chronometric investigations of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in the Zagros Mountains using AMS radiocarbon dating and Bayesian age modelling

    J. Hum. Evol.

    (2017)
  • F. Biglari et al.
  • Biglari, F., 2007. Approvisionnement et utilisation des matières premières au Paléolithique moyen dans la plaine de...
  • M.I. Bird et al.

    Radiocarbon dating of “old” charcoal using a wet oxidation, stepped-combustion procedure

    Radiocarbon

    (1999)
  • Z.M. Bochenski et al.

    Fowling during the Gravettian: the avifauna of Pavlov I, the Czech Republic

    J. Archaeol. Sci.

    (2009)
  • R.J. Braidwood et al.

    The Iranian Prehistoric Project: new problems arise as more is learned of the first attempts at food production and settled village life

    Science

    (1961)
  • J. Braud

    La suture du Zagros au niveau de Kermanshah (Kurdistan iranien): reconstitution paléogéographique, évolution géodynamique, magmatique et structurale

    (1987)
  • C. Bronk Ramsey

    Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates

    Radiocarbon

    (2009)
  • I.A. Brookes

    The Physical Geography, Geomorphology, and Late Quaternary History of the Mahidasht Project Area, Qara Su Basin, Central West Iran. Mahidasht Project

    (1989)
  • Coon, C.S., 1951. Cave Explorations in Iran 1949. Museum Monographs. Philadelphia, PA: The University Museum,...
  • H.L. Dibble et al.

    The Middle Paleolithic industries of Warwasi

    Paleolithic Prehistory Zagros-Taurus

    (1993)
  • M. Djamali et al.

    A late Pleistocene long pollen record from Lake Urmia, NW Iran

    Quart. Res.

    (2008)
  • K. Douka et al.

    The influence of pretreatment chemistry on the radiocarbon dating of Campanian campanian iIgnimbrite-aged charcoal from Kostenki 14 (Russia)

    Quat. Res.

    (2010)
  • R.A. Foley et al.

    The evolution of the diversity of cultures

    Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B

    (2011)
  • E. Ghasidian

    Early Upper Paleolithic occupation at Ghār-e Boof, a reconstruction of cultural traditions at the Southern Zagros Mountains of Iran

    (2014)
  • E. Ghasidian

    Rethinking the Upper Palaeolithic of the Zagros Mountains

    PaleoAnthropology

    (2019)
  • E. Ghasidian et al.

    Upper Paleolithic cultural diversity in the Iranian Zagros Mountains and the expansion of modern humans into Eurasia

    J. Hum. Evol.

    (2019)
  • M. Ghobadi et al.

    An introduction to the karst geomorphology of the Bisetun-Taqe Bostan historical region (northeast Kermanshah, Iran) with special emphasis on karst development as a serious threat for the UNESCO World Heritage Site

    Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.

    (2015)
  • B. Hesse

    Paleolithic Faunal faunal Remains remains from Ghar-i Khar

    (1989)
  • Heydari-Guran 2004, Rohmaterialvorkommen für Stein in Iran Einige Fallstudien . In T. Stöllner, R. Slotta und A....
  • S. Heydari

    The impact of geology and geomorphology on cave and rockshelter archaeological site formation, preservation, and distribution in the Zagros Mountains of Iran. Geoarchaeology: an

    Int. J.

    (2007)
  • Heydari-Guran, S., Benazzi, S., Talamo, S., Ghasidian, E., Hariri, N., Oxilia, G., Asiabani, S., Azizi, F., Naderi, R.,...
  • S. Heydari-Guran et al.

    The MUP Zagros Project: tracking the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition in the Kermanshah region, West-Central Zagros, Iran

    Antiquity

    (2017)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text