Abstract
This study examines visual and textual representations of Mexican migrants in English-language photojournalism over the course of a decade. We find three clusters of representations: (1) male laborers portrayed as outside the bounds of society but often unfairly victimized (2) migrants portrayed as criminal in encounters with law enforcement, and (3) all other migrants, often portrayed in ways that valorized those who had “made good” or fit in. These clusters initially appeared to employ entirely separate tropes about different demographics of migrants. However, we find that they instead often reflect the same migrant demographics in different geographies and at different moments of the migration trajectory. We argue that these tropes collectively reflect and promote the cultural and economic logic of neoliberal multiculturalism, serving the neoliberal state and legitimating the precarity of migrants in labor markets.
Resúmen
Este estudio examina las representaciones visuales y textuales de los inmigrantes mexicanos en el fotoperiodismo angloparlante a lo largo de una década. Encontramos tres grupos de representaciones: (1) hombres obreros representados como fuera de los lindes de la sociedad pero a menudo injustamente victimizados, (2) inmigrantes representados como criminales en encuentros con las fuerzas policiales y (3) todos los demás inmigrantes, muchas veces representados de forma que valoriza a los que “triunfan” o se adaptan. Estos grupos inicialmente parecían emplear tropos completamente distintos para describir las diferentes poblaciones de inmigrantes. Sin embargo, encontramos que muchas veces reflejan los mismos sectores demográficos de inmigrantes en diferentes geografías y en distintos momentos de su trayectoria migratoria. Planteamos que estos tropos reflejan y promueven colectivamente la lógica cultural y económica del multiculturalismo neoliberal, y que así sirven al estado neoliberal y validan la precariedad de los inmigrantes en los mercados laborales.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There are some key exceptions, particularly Santa Ana’s work (2013) examining representations of Latinos in network news, including visual framing. Chavez (2001) has examined images on the covers of news magazines rather than daily news. Wallen (2003) evaluated some newspaper images of migrants as part of a larger project on representations at the border.
We adopt the broad term “migrant” to avoid confusion with the US legal meaning of “immigrant,” which refers only to those with legal permanent residence.
The San Diego Union-Tribune is the only print daily in the county focused on local news. It had a circulation of about 313,000 in a county of 1.5 million in 2008, toward the end of the years we sampled (circulation figure from “History of the San Diego Union Tribune,” http://legacy.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/metro/multimedia/history/index.html; population figures from US Census Bureau). Although we did not sample from the Union-Tribune’s weekly Spanish-language publication (named Enlace during the 2000s), an informal review suggests vastly different content, with more frequent and diverse representations of Mexican migrants and more transborderism.
Besides the randomizing of weeks to sample, we made substantially different methodological decisions from Wallen, who focused only on the front pages, did not make an electronic record of her data, and did very little systematic content analysis.
There were a couple exceptions in circumstances when we estimated that most readers would almost certainly assume that a person represented was a Mexican immigrant: for example, images of an agricultural worker with a Spanish name picking avocadoes, or a person at the 2006 immigrant rights protest holding a Mexican flag. We do not know the actual biographies of the individuals in these cases, but we believe that readers in this context would very likely project these representations onto Mexican migrants as a category.
Some of these practices have been rendered illegal in particular locations by local ordinances or homeowners’ associations regulations that target or reference immigrant communities.
Coding from a broad conceptual heuristic is less of an exact science than coding for content, and the results should be read only as an indicator of broad patterns. To make the coding as uniform as possible, the authors discussed the categories at length and did the first half of the coding together in the same room, discussing uncertainties as we went. Our standard for inclusion was whether we both agreed that there was at least subtle evidence for a particular narrative in a photo or article. Maher completed the second half alone, after our coding norms were firmly established. An inter-coder reliability test found 79% agreement for narratives, compared with 95% for content.
In many cases, the article or photo caption identified a migrant as lacking legal status; in others, it was implied by the actions described, such as being smuggled in a vehicle or crossing the border in the desert rather than at a port of entry.
The terminology shift followed significant struggle to counter the common practice of representing immigrants as “illegals” or “illegal immigrants.” The AP was among the first to shift policy (Sterne 2013).
Data from 2008 to 2010, from “San Diego,” research summary by the Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration, 2016.
Given a lack of data on Mexican migrant labor force participation in San Diego by gender, we made inferences based on Fortuny et al. (2007), who estimated that women made up 50% of all legal immigrants and 46–47% of all unauthorized immigrants in California and Los Angeles as of 2004. In both groups, 58–59% of women ages eighteen to sixty-four were active in the labor force, a rate lower than immigrant men (84–94% depending on legal status), but still substantial.
In the 2000s, Mexican nationals apprehended while crossing the border without inspection were often offered the option of “voluntary return,” meaning that there was no charge or court proceeding.
The latter is something of a catch-all category, since we did not find any other especially striking divisions or differences in representations, and since the other content categories were all relatively small. We omitted the “dead body” category from narrative analysis, in part because it was a category without visual representations.
The percentages in Fig. 3 show the proportion of the total items that included a particular positive or negative narrative. The numbers for each dimension do not add up to 100% because we coded each of the eight narratives separately: some dimensions were entirely absent in particular articles or photos, and some items included both positive and negative variations of a dimension (e.g., both disorder and order).
For instance, humanitarian organizations working to generate public compassion for human suffering have tended to adopt women and children as “ideal victims” for their public face and image (e.g., Höijer 2004).
As Blow (2015) once wrote, “Pity doesn’t dismantle privilege, but supports it. Pity requires a perch. It rolls down. Pity reinforces imbalances of power. It can be violence operating as benevolence”.
References
Abraham, L., and P. Messaris. 2001. The Role of Images in Framing News Stories. In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, ed. S.D. Reese, O.H. Gandy Jr., and A.E. Grant, 215–226. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Abrego, L.J., and S.M. Lakhani. 2015. Incomplete Inclusion: Legal Violence and Immigrants in Liminal Legal Statuses. Law and Policy 37 (4): 265–293.
Abu-Laban, Y., and J.A. Garber. 2005. The Construction of the Geography of Immigration as a Policy Problem: The United States and Canada Compared. Urban Affairs Review 40 (4): 520–561.
Aguirre, A., E. Rodriguez, and J. Simmers. 2011. The Cultural Production of Mexican Identity in the United States: An Examination of the Mexican Threat Narrative. Social Identities 17 (5): 695–707.
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Andreas, P. 2009. Border Games: Policing the US-Mexico Divide. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Batziou, A. 2011. Framing “Otherness” in Press Photographs: The Case of Immigrants in Greece and Spain. Journal of Media Practice 12 (1): 41–60.
Behdad, A. 2005. A Forgetful Nation: On Immigration and Cultural Identity in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Beltrán, C. 2009. Going Public: Hannah Arendt, Immigrant Action, and the Space of Appearance. Political Theory 37 (5): 595–622.
Blow, C. W. 2015. Jeb Bush, “Free Stuff” and Black Folks. New York Times, 28 September. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/28/opinion/charles-m-blow-jeb-bush-free-stuff-and-black-folks.html.
Branton, R., and J. Dunaway. 2009. Spatial Proximity to the U.S.-Mexico Border and Newspaper Coverage of Immigration Issues. Political Research Quarterly 62 (2): 289–302.
Broughton, C. 2008. Migration as Engendered Practice: Mexican Men, Masculinity, and Northward Migration. Gender and Society 22 (5): 568–589.
Buechler, S. 2014. The Global Financial Crisis and the Retrenchment of Multiculturalism and Economic Opportunities for Brazilian Immigrants in Newark, New Jersey. Latino Studies 12 (4): 596–619.
Calavita, K. 2005. Immigrants at the Margins: Law, Race, and Exclusion in Southern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
California Immigrant Policy Center. 2014. Looking Forward: Immigrant Contributions to the Golden State 2014. California Immigrant Policy Center Report. https://latinocaucus.legislature.ca.gov/sites/latinocaucus.legislature.ca.gov/files/238492032-Looking-Forward-Immigrant-Contributions-to-the-Golden-State-2014.pdf.
Chavez, L.R. 2001. Covering Immigration: Popular Images and the Politics of the Nation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chavez, L.R. 2008. The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cheregi, B., and A. Adi. 2015. The Visual Framing of Romanian Migrants in the National Press: A Social Semiotic Approach. Romanian Journal of Journalism and Communication 10 (2): 12–24.
County of San Diego. 2016. County of San Diego Crop Statistics and Annual Report. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/awm/docs/AWM_2016_Crop_Report.pdf.
Coutin, S. B., and P. Chock. 1995. Your Friend, the Illegal: Definition and Paradox in Newspaper Accounts of U.S. Immigration Reform. Identities 2 (1/2): 123–148.
Dávila, A. 2004. Barrio Dreams: Puerto Ricans, Latinos, and the Neoliberal City. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dávila, A. 2012. Latinos Inc: The Marketing and Making of a People. Berkeley: University of California Press.
De Genova, N. 2002. Migrant “Illegality” and Deportability in Everyday Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 419–447.
De Genova, N. 2013. Spectacles of Migrant “Illegality”: The Scene of Exclusion, the Obscene of Inclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (7): 1180–1198.
Desilver, D. 2014. Chart of the Week: The Most Liberal and Conservative Big Cities. Pew Research Center, 18 August. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/08/08/chart-of-the-week-the-most-liberal-and-conservative-big-cities/.
Dines, N., N. Montagna, and V. Ruggiero. 2015. Thinking Lampedusa: Border Construction, the Spectacle of Bare Life and the Productivity of Migrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (3): 430–445.
Entman, R.M. 1993. Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
Esbenshade, J. 2000. The “Crisis” over Day Labor: The Politics of Visibility and Public Space. WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society 3 (6): 27–70.
Esbenshade, J., B. Wright, P. Cortopassi, A. Reed, and J. Flores. 2010. The Law-and-Order Foundation of Local Ordinances. In Taking Local Control, ed. M. Varsanyi, 255–274. Stanford. CA: Stanford University Press.
Flores, L.A. 2003. Constructing Rhetorical Borders: Peons, Illegal Aliens, and Competing Narratives of Immigration. Critical Studies in Media Communication 20 (4): 362–387.
Fortuny, K., R. Capps, and J.S. Passel. 2007. The Characteristics of Unauthorized Immigrants in California, Los Angeles County, and the United States. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Galindo, R., and J. Vigil. 2006. Are Anti-immigrant Statements Racist or Nativist? What Difference Does It Make? Latino Studies 4 (4): 419–447.
Golash-Boza, T., and P. Hondagneu-Sotelo. 2013. Latino Immigrant Men and the Deportation Crisis: A Gendered Racial Removal Program. Latino Studies 11 (3): 271–292.
Hale, C.R. 2002. Does Multiculturalism Menace? Governance, Cultural Rights and the Politics of Identity in Guatemala. Journal of Latin American Studies 34 (3): 485–524.
Hale, C.R. 2004. Rethinking Indigenous Politics in the Era of the “Indio Permitido”. NACLA Report on the Americas 38: 16–21.
Hale, C. R. 2005. Neoliberal Multiculturalism. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 28 (1): 9–10.
Halter, M. 2007. Tourists “R” Us: Immigrants, Ethnic Tourism and the Marketing of Metropolitan Boston. In Tourism, Ethnic Diversity and the City, ed. J. Rath, 199–215. New York: Routledge.
Höijer, B. 2004. The Discourse of Global Compassion: The Audience and Media Reporting of Human Suffering. Media Culture Society 26 (4): 513–531.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 1994. Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 1995. Women and Children First: New Directions in Anti-Immigrant Politics. Socialist Review 25: 169–190.
Honig, B. 1998. Immigrant America? How Foreignness “Solves” Democracy’s Problems. Social Text 56: 1–27.
Horsti, K. 2016. Visibility Without Voice: Media Witnessing Irregular Migrants in BBC Online News Journalism. African Journalism Studies 37 (1): 1–20.
Inouye, K. 2012. Conditional Love: Representations of Migrant Work in Canadian Newsprint Media. Social Identities 18 (5): 573–592.
Insley, J. 2004. Redefining Sodom: A Latter-Day Vision of Tijuana. Mexican Studies 20 (1): 99–121.
Kim, S., J.P. Carvalho, A.G. Davis, and A.M. Mullins. 2011. The View of the Border: News Framing of the Definition, Causes, and Solutions to Illegal Immigration. Mass Communication and Society 14 (3): 292–314.
Kretsedemas, P. 2008. Immigration Enforcement and the Complication of National Sovereignty: Understanding Local Enforcement as an Exercise in Neoliberal Governance. American Quarterly 60 (3): 553–573.
Kymlicka, W. 2013. Neoliberal Multiculturalism? In Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era, ed. Peter Hall, 99–125. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Maher, K.H. 2004. Borders and Distinction in the Global Suburb. American Quarterly 56 (3): 781–806.
Massey, D., J. Durand, and N.J. Malone. 2003. Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: Mexican Immigration in an Era of Economic Integration. New York: Russell Sage.
Menjívar, C., and L. Abrego. 2012. Legal Violence: Immigration Law and the Lives of Central American Immigrants. American Journal of Sociology 117 (5): 1380–1421.
Newton, L. 2008. Illegal, Alien, or Immigrant: The Politics of Immigration Reform. New York: New York University Press.
Omi, M., and H. Winant. 1986. Racial Formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.
Ong, A. 2006. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Ono, K.A., and J.L. Sloop. 2002. Shifting Borders: Rhetoric, Immigration, and California’s Proposition 187. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Perea, J.F. 1996. Immigrants Out! The New Nativism and the Anti-Immigrant Impulse in the United States. New York: New York University Press.
Portes, A. 1997. Neoliberalism and the Sociology of Development: Emerging Trends and Unanticipated Facts. Population and Development Review 23 (2): 229–260.
Provine, D.M., M.W. Varsanyi, P.G. Lewis, and S.H. Decker. 2016. Policing Immigrants: Local Law Enforcement on the Front Lines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rivera, C. 2014. The Brown Threat: Post-9/11 Conflations of Latina/os and Middle Eastern Muslims in the US American Imagination. Latino Studies 12 (1): 44–64.
Rosenblum, M.R., and A.G. Ruiz Soto. 2015. An Analysis of Unauthorized Immigrants in the United States by Country and Region of Birth. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
Rumbaut, R.G., and W.A. Ewing. 2007. The Myth of Immigrant Criminality and the Paradox of Assimilation: Incarceration Rates among Native and Foreign-Born Men. Washington, DC: American Immigration Law Foundation.
Santa Ana, O. 2002. Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Santa Ana, O. 2013. Juan in a Hundred: The Representation of Latinos on Network News. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Santa Ana, O., J. Morán, and C. Sánchez. 1998. Awash under a Brown Tide: Immigration Metaphors in California Public and Print Media Discourse. Aztlán: A Journal of Chicano Studies 23 (2): 137–176.
Sterne, P. 2013. No More “Illegal Immigrants” in AP Stories. Columbia Journalism Review, 3 April. http://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/no_more_illegal_immigrants_in.php.
Varsanyi, M.W. 2008. Rescaling the “Alien”, Rescaling Personhood: Neoliberalism, Immigration, and the State. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98 (4): 877–896.
Vila, P. 1997. Narrative Identities: The Emplotment of the Mexican on the U.S.-Mexican Border. Sociological Quarterly 38 (1): 147–183.
Vila, P. 2013. The Importance of Photo-Interviewing as a Research Method in the Study of Identity Construction Processes: An Illustration from the U.S.-Mexico Border. Visual Anthropology 26 (1): 51–68.
Wallen, R. 2003. Barrier or Bridge: Photojournalism of the San Diego-Tijuana Border Region. Communication Review 6 (2): 137–164.
Yanow, D. 2014. I Am Not a Camera: On Visual Politics and Method. A Response to Roy Germano. Perspectives in Politics 12 (3): 680–683.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to colleagues in SDSU’s Chicano and Chicana Studies Department, who were a generous and insightful audience as these ideas began to take shape, and to Marcial Gutierrez for his contributions as we reviewed literatures. We also thank Maria Cook, Cetta Mainwaring, Jill Esbenshade, and anonymous reviewers for wise and helpful commentaries.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maher, K.H., Elias, J. Docile, criminal, and upwardly mobile?: Visual news framing of Mexican migrants and the logics of neoliberal multiculturalism. Lat Stud 17, 225–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-019-00181-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-019-00181-3