1932

Abstract

Fishery rents may be dissipated across margins not well defined or controlled by an individual transferable quota system. Collective rights–based fishery management (CRBFM), where catch rights are held by a group, can sometimes generate greater benefits and can also address external impacts of the fishery. I discuss potential failures of individual quotas and how these problems were addressed by CRBFM institutions. I then focus on the role of CRBFM in addressing environmental and social impacts external to the group of fishers, such as bycatch, habitat impacts, and spatial conflicts. The review suggests that CRBFM can effectively address both intrafishery and external impacts, provided there is sufficient incentive to do so, including maintaining access to preferred markets or the threat of further regulation. However, CRBFM can create moral hazard and adverse selection problems, and successful CRBFM institutions generally have homogeneous membership with well-aligned interests and/or formal contracts with monitoring and enforcement provisions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023110
2018-10-05
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/10/1/annurev-resource-100517-023110.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023110&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J 2010. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 105:490493–505
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Abadie A, Gardeazabal J 2003. The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque Country. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:1113–32
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Abbott JK, Haynie AC, Reimer MN 2015. Hidden flexibility: institutions, incentives, and the margins of selectivity in fishing. Land Econ 91:1169–95
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Abbott JK, Wilen JE 2010. Voluntary cooperation in the commons? Evaluating the sea state program with reduced form and structural models. Land Econ 86:1131–54
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson LG 1994. An economic analysis of highgrading in ITQ fisheries regulation programs. Mar. Resour. Econ. 9:3209–26
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Arnason R 1994. On catch discarding in fisheries. Mar. Resour. Econ. 9:3189–207
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Birkenbach AM, Kaczan DJ, Smith MD 2017. Catch shares slow the race to fish. Nature 544:7649223–26
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bisack KD, Sutinen JG 2006. A New Zealand ITQ fishery with an in-season stock externality. Mar. Resour. Econ. 21:3231–49
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonzon K, McIlwain K, Strauss CK, Van Leuvan T 2010. Catch Share Design Manual: A Guide for Managers and Fishermen New York: Environ. Def. Fund
  10. Boyce JR 1992. Individual transferable quotas and production externalities in a fishery. Nat. Resour. Model. 6:4385–408
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brinson AA, Thunberg EM 2016. Performance of federally managed catch share fisheries in the United States. Fish. Res. 179:213–23
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Christian C, Ainley D, Bailey M, Dayton P, Hocevar J et al. 2013. A review of formal objections to Marine Stewardship Council fisheries certifications. Biol. Conserv. 161:10–17
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Christy FT 1973. Fisherman quotas: a tentative suggestion for domestic management. Occas. Paper Ser. Law Sea Inst. Univ. Rhode Island 19:1–6
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Christy FT 1982. Territorial use rights in marine fisheries definitions and conditions Fish. Tech. Pap. 227, UN Food Agric Organ: Rome
  15. Clark CW 1980. Towards a predictive model for the economic regulation of commercial fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37:1111–29
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Coase RH 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4:16386–405
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Coase RH 1960. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3:1–44
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Costello C, Gaines SD, Lynham J 2008. Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse. ? Science 321:58961678–81
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dawson NL, Segerson K 2008. Voluntary agreements with industries: participation incentives with industry-wide targets. Land Econ 84:197–114
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Deacon RT 2012. Management by harvester cooperatives. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 6:2258–77
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Deacon RT, Parker DP, Costello C 2008. Improving efficiency by assigning harvest rights to fishery cooperatives: evidence from the Chignik salmon co-op. Ariz. Law Rev. 50:479
    [Google Scholar]
  22. De Vos BI, Döring R, Aranda M, Buisman FC, Frangoudes K et al. 2016. New modes of fisheries governance: implementation of the landing obligation in four European countries. Mar. Policy 64:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Essington TE, Punt AE 2011. Implementing ecosystem‐based fisheries management: advances, challenges and emerging tools. Fish Fish 12:123–24
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Estrada GAC, Suazo MÁQ, Dresdner JD 2017. The effect of collective rights-based management on technical efficiency: the case of Chile's common sardine and anchovy fishery. Mar. Resour. Econ. 33:187–112
    [Google Scholar]
  25. EU (Eur. Union). 2013. Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy Amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and Repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision (EC) No 2004/585/EC Brussels: EU
  26. FAO (Food Agric. Organ.). 1995. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries Rome: FAO
  27. Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM 2014. Advances in measuring the environmental and social impacts of environmental programs. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39:495–517
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fluharty D 2005. Evolving ecosystem approaches to management of fisheries in the USA: politics and socio-economics of ecosystem-based management of marine resources. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 300:248–53
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gell FR, Roberts CM 2003. Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:9448–55
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gordon HS 1954. The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. J. Political Econ. 62:124–42
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gruver J 2017. 2016 inshore salmon savings incentive plan agreement—annual report Rep. to N. Pac Fish. Manag. Counc Anchorage, AK: https://www.npfmc.org/wp-content/PDFdocuments/catch_shares/ CoopRpts2016/SSIP%20Report%20-%20FINAL-1.pdf
  32. Gutiérrez NL, Hilborn R, Defeo O 2011. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470:7334386–89
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Harte M 2008. Assessing the road towards self-governance in New Zealand's commercial fisheries. Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance R Townsend, R Shotton, H Uchida 323–34 Rome: FAO
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd PE 1997. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Rev. Econ. Stud. 64:4605–54
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Heintzelman MD, Salant SW, Schott S 2009. Putting free-riding to work: a partnership solution to the common-property problem. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 57:3309–20
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Helson J, Leslie S, Clement G, Wells R, Wood R 2010. Private rights, public benefits: industry-driven seabed protection. Mar. Policy 34:3557–66
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hoefnagel E, de Vos B 2017. Social and economic consequences of 40 years of Dutch quota management. Mar. Policy 80:81–87
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Holland DS 2004. Spatial fishery rights and marine zoning: a discussion with reference to management of marine resources in New England. Mar. Resour. Econ. 19:121–40
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Holland DS 2010. Markets pooling and insurance for managing bycatch in fisheries. Ecol. Econ. 70:1121–33
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Holland DS 2011. Optimal intra-annual exploitation of the Maine lobster fishery. Land Econ 87:4699–711
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Holland DS 2013. Making cents out of barter data from the British Columbia groundfish ITQ market. Mar. Resour. Econ. 28:4311–30
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Holland DS 2015. Structuring rights and privileges in catch share systems. Handbook on the Economics of Natural Resources D Layton, R Halvorsen 281–304 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Holland DS 2016. Development of the Pacific groundfish trawl IFQ market. Mar. Resour. Econ. 31:4453–64
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Holland DS, Ginter JJ 2001. Common property institutions in the Alaskan groundfish fisheries. Mar. Policy 25:133–42
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Holland DS, Jannot JE 2012. Bycatch risk pools for the US West coast groundfish fishery. Ecol. Econ. 78:132–47
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Holland DS, Schnier KE 2006.a Individual habitat quotas for fisheries. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 51:72–92
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Holland DS, Schnier KE 2006.b Protecting marine biodiversity: a comparison of individual habitat quotas and marine protected areas. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63:71481–95
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Holland DS, Speir C, Agar J, Crosson S, DePiper G et al. 2017. Impact of catch shares on diversification of fishers’ income and risk. PNAS 114:359302–7
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Holland DS, Thunberg E, Agar J, Crosson S, Demarest C et al. 2015. US catch share markets: a review of data availability and impediments to transparent markets. Mar. Policy 57:103–10
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Holland DS, Wiersma J 2010. Free form property rights for fisheries: the decentralized design of rights-based management through groundfish “sectors” in New England. Mar. Policy 34:51076–81
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Huang L, Ray S, Segerson K, Walden J 2015. Impact of collective rights-based fisheries management: evidence from New England groundfish fishery Presented at Bienn. Forum, N. Am. Assoc. Fish. Econ., 8th, Univ Alaska Southeast Ketchikan:
  52. Johnson RN, Libecap GD 1982. Contracting problems and regulation: the case of the fishery. Am. Econ. Rev. 72:51005–22
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Joyce S, Thomson I 2000. Earning a social license to operate: social acceptability and resource development in Latin America. CIM Bull 931037:49–53
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Kaiser MJ, de Groot SJ 2000. The Effects of Fishing on Non-Target Species and Habitats. New York: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Kaiser MJ, Spence FE, Hart PJ 2000. Fishing‐gear restrictions and conservation of benthic habitat complexity. Conserv. Biol. 14:51512–25
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Kasperski S, Holland DS 2013. Income diversification and risk for fishermen. PNAS 110:62076–81
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kaufman L 2011. Partnership preserves livelihoods and fish stocks. New York Times Nov. 27. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/28/science/earth/nature-conservancy-partners-with-california-fishermen.html
  58. Kitts A, Demarest C 2013. Impact of quota trading on net revenues in the northeast U.S. groundfish fishery Ref. Doc 13–19 Northeast. Fish. Sci. Cent Woods Hole, MA: https://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/publications/crd/crd1319/crd1319.pdf
  59. Kranton RE, Minehart DF 2001. A theory of buyer-seller networks. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:3485–508
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Labrum K, Oberhoff D 2014. California risk pool annual report 2013 Rep. to Pac. Fish. Manag. Counc. http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/IR7_SUP_2013_CA_RiskPool_Report_JUNE2014BB.pdf
  61. Lindeboom HJ 2000. The need for closed areas as conservation tools. The Effects of Fishing on Non-Target Species and Habitats, eds. M Kaiser, SJ DeGroot 290–302 New York: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Link JS 2002. What does ecosystem-based fisheries management mean?. Fisheries 27:418–21
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Little AS, Needle CL, Hilborn R, Holland DS, Marshall CT 2015. Real‐time spatial management approaches to reduce bycatch and discards: experiences from Europe and the United States. Fish Fish 16:4576–602
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Madsen S, Haflinger K 2016. Chinook salmon bycatch reduction. Incentive plan IPA No. 2 Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv Juneau, AK: https://www.npfmc.org/wp-content/PDFdocuments/catch_shares/CoopRpts2016/CP-IPA_REPORT_2016.pdf
  65. Martin SM, Cambridge TA, Grieve C, Nimmo FM, Agnew DJ 2012. An evaluation of environmental changes within fisheries involved in the Marine Stewardship Council certification scheme. Rev. Fish. Sci. 20:261–69
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Mincher R 2008. New Zealand's Challenger Scallop Enhancement Company: from reseeding to self-governance. Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance R Townsend, R Shotton, H Uchida 307–21 Rome: FAO
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Mize J 2017. Report to the North Pacific Fishery Management Council on the 2016 Bering Sea Pollock Mothership Salmon Incentive Plan Rep. to N Pac. Fish. Manag. Counc Anchorage, AK: https://www.npfmc.org/wp-content/PDFdocuments/catch_shares/CoopRpts2016/MSSIP_2016_Report.pdf
  68. Ostrom E 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  69. Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J 1994. Rules Games and Common-Pool Resources Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  70. Parsons R, Lacey J, Moffat K 2014. Maintaining legitimacy of a contested practice: how the minerals industry understands its ‘social license to operate’. Resour. Policy 41:83–90
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Platteau PE, Seki E 2000. Community arrangements to overcome market failures: pooling groups in Japanese fisheries. Market, Community, and Economic Development M Aoki, Y Hayami 334–402 Oxford, UK: Clarendon
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Reimer M, Haynie AC 2018. Mechanisms matter for evaluating the economic impacts of marine reserves. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 88:427–46
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Rice J 2011. Managing fisheries well: delivering the promises of an ecosystem approach. Fish Fish 12:2209–31
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Ruddle KE, Hviding REJohannes 1992. Marine resources management in the context of customary tenure. Mar. Resour. Econ. 7:4249–71
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Sanchirico JN, Wilen JE 2005. Optimal spatial management of renewable resources: matching policy scope to ecosystem scale. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 50:123–46
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Scott A 1955. The fishery: the objectives of sole ownership. J. Political Econ. 63:2116–24
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Segerson K 2013. Voluntary approaches to environmental protection and resource management. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 5:161–80
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Segerson K 2016. Collective approaches to fisheries management. Effort Rights in Fisheries Management: General Principles and Case Studies from Around the World D Squires, M Maunder, N Vestergaard, V Restrepo, R Metzner et al.251–60 FAO Fish. Aquacult. Proc. 34 FAO, Rome:
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Smith VL 1969. On models of commercial fishing. J. Political Econ. 77:181–98
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Teisl MF, Roe B, Hicks RL 2002. Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 43:3339–59
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Thomson I, Boutilier R 2011. Social license to operate. SME Mining Eng. Handb. 1:1779–96
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Thunberg E, Walden J, Agar J, Felthoven R, Harley A et al. 2015. Measuring changes in multi-factor productivity in US catch share fisheries. Mar. Policy 62:294–301
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Townsend RE, Shotton R, Uchida H 2008. Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance Rome: Food Agric. Organ
  84. Wallace S, Turris B, Driscoll J, Bodtker K, Mose B, Munro G 2015. Canada's Pacific groundfish trawl habitat agreement: a global first in an ecosystem approach to bottom trawl impacts. Mar. Policy 60:240–48
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Ward TJ 2008. Barriers to biodiversity conservation in marine fishery certification. Fish Fish 9:2169–77
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Wilen JE, Cancino J, Uchida H 2012. The economics of territorial use rights fisheries or TURFs. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 6:2237–57
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Yandle. 2008. Rock lobster management in New Zealand: the development of devolved governance. Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance R Townsend, R Shotton, H Uchida 291–306 Rome: FAO
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhou R, Segerson K 2016. Individual versus collective approaches to fisheries management. Mar. Resour. Econ. 31:2165–92
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023110
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error