Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ecosystem services-based approach to sustainable development in a peri-urban area of Chennai, India

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban sprawl transforms urban–rural linkages and indiscriminately exploits natural resources, degrading the ecosystems in peri-urban areas (PUAs). In India, the absence of a planning mechanism to steer and manage this transformation of PUAs worsens the problem, with arbitrary changes in land-use–land-cover (LULC) adversely impacting biodiversity, climate, productivity and water resources. In PUAs, the environmental carrying capacity determined by the ecosystem services (ES) model can play a significant role in sustaining the ecology and economy of urban and rural areas. Recent research links LULC change with ES potential. Understanding LULC and ES dynamics in PUAs can promote synergy between future land planning and conservation of ecosystems. This paper presents an ecosystems-based approach to peri-urban development and environmental conservation management to promote sustainability of Indian cities. A generic, qualitative assessment of multiple ES potential for the LULC is obtained using the “expert matrix method” in a data-scarce scenario. The proposed approach is operationalized in a potentially developing PUA of Chennai. LULC change and ES dynamics are analyzed for two time periods in a GIS platform. It is observed that the study area experienced fast peri-urbanization between 2011 and 2015 as a result of which there is a decline in the provisioning and regulating ES potential. Multiple ES potential mapping shows LULC type—Water bodies, Forest and Agricultural land as crucial in providing and maintaining the ES potential of the study area. Spatially, the western part of the study area displays a low potential for ES and hence can be explored further for peri-urban development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aijaz, R. (2019). India’s Peri-Urban Regions: The Need for Policy and the Challenges of Governance, ORF Issue Brief No. 285, Observer Research Foundation.

  • Aithal, B.H., Chandan, M.C., Shivamurthy, V., & Ramachandra, T. V. (2018). Modelling urban dynamics in rapidly urbanising Indian cities. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2017.08.002.

  • Albert, C., Aronson, J., Furst, C., & Opdam, P. (2014). Integrating Ecosystem services in Landscape Planning: requirements, approaches and impacts. Landscape Ecology, 29, 1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, A. (2003). Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: Perspectives on an emerging field. Environment and Urbanization, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780301500103.

  • Arki, V., Koskikala, J., Fagerholm, N., Kisanga, D., & Käyhkö, N. (2020). Associations between local land use/land cover and place-based landscape service patterns in rural Tanzania. Ecosystem Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashiagbor, G., Amoako, C., Asabere, S. B., & Quaye-Ballard, J. A. (2019). Landscape Transformations in Rapidly Developing Peri-urban Areas of Accra, Ghana: Results of 30 years. Open Geosciences, 11(1), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2019-0014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, P. (2018). Integration of PRA with GIS for Planning of PERI Urban Areas. In M. Schrenk, V. V. Popovich, P. Zeile, P. Elisei, C. Beyer, G. Navratil (Eds.), Expanding cities, diminishing space - Are “Smart Cities” the solution or part of the problem of continuous urbanization around the globe? (pp. 251–257), 23rd International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, Vienna, April 2018.

  • Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D., & Gordon, L. J. (2009). Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12, 1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, P. A., & Mifta ul Shafiq., Mir A.A., & Ahmed, P. . (2017). Urban sprawl and its impact on landuse/land cover dynamics of Dehradun City, India. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6, 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürgi, M., Silbernagel, J., Wu, J., & Kienast, F. (2014). Linking ecosystem services with landscape history. Landscape Ecology, 30, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0102-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological indicators, 21, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butsch, C., & Heinkel, S. (2019). Periurban transformations in the global south and their impact on water-based livelihoods. Water, 12(458). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020458.

  • Clark, W. C., & Dickson, N. M. (2003). Sustainability science: The emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 100(14), 8059–8061. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231333100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., & O’neill, R.V., Paruelo, J. . (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., Van der Ploeg, S., et al. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campagne, C. S., Roche, P., Gosselin, F., Tschanz, L., & Tatoni, T. (2017). Expert-based ecosystem services capacity matrices: Dealing with scoring variability. Ecological Indicators, 79, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, M., & Das, A. (2019). Dynamics of Urbanization and its impact on Urban Ecosystem Services (UESs): A study of a medium size town of West Bengal. Eastern India. Journal of Urban Management, 8(3), 420–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, R. S., Foley, J. A., & Asner, G. P. (2004). Land use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(5), 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, R.S., & Hein, L. (2007). Concept and valuation of landscape functions at different scales. In U.Mander, H. Wiggering & K. Helming (Eds.), Multifunctional Land Use – meeting future demands for landscape goods and services (pp. 15–36). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36763-5_2.

  • DHDR-Tiruvallur(District Human Development Report - Tiruvallur). (2017). District Administration, Tiruvallur and State Planning Commission, Tamil Nadu in association with Hand in Hand India. http://www.spc.tn.gov.in/tnhdr2017.html.

  • Dinda, S., Das, K., Chatterjee, N. D., & Ghosh, S. (2019). Integration of GIS and statistical approach in mapping of urban sprawl and predicting future growth in Midnapore town. India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 5(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0536-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazal, S. (2000). Urban Expansion and loss of Agricultural Land – a GIS based study of Saharanpur City. India. Environment & Urbanization, 12(2), 13–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Comín, F. A., & Bennett, E. M. (2014). Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain Agroecosystem. Ecology and Society, 19(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06249-190120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajendran, V., (2016). Chennai’s peri-urban: Accumulation of capital and environmental exploitation. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 7(1), 1–19, National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA). https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425315619049.

  • Gebre, T., & Gebremedhin, B. (2019). The mutual benefits of promoting rural-urban interdependence through linked ecosystem services. Global Ecology and Conservation., 20(e00707), 2351–9894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gret-Regamey, A., Altwegg, J., Sirén, E. A., van Strien, M. J., & Weibel, B. (2017). Integrating ecosystem services into spatial planning – A spatial decision support tool. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, I., & Patel, P. P. (2017). Growth of metro cities in India: trends, patterns and determinants. Urban Research & Practice, 11(4), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2017.1344727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heymans, A., Breadsell, J., Morrison, G. M., Byrne, J. J., & Eon, C. (2019). Ecological Urban Planning and Design: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 11, 3723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, P. (2017). More science in urban development: scientific evidence is crucial for managing health and infrastructures of megacities. EMBO Reports, 18(2), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201643843.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iaquinta, D. L., & Drescher, A. W. (2000). Defining peri-urban: Understanding rural urban linkages and their connection to institutional contexts, partnership programme of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

  • Irene, R.M. (2016). Fallow lands as a tool for farmland biodiversity conservation. Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Lleida. Departament de Hortofructicultura, Botànica i Jardineria. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/398837.

  • Jacobs, S., Burkhard, B., Daele, T. V., Staes, J., & Schneiders, A. (2015). ‘The Matrix Reloaded’: a review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 295, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P. (2009). Assessment of Economic drivers of Land use change in Urban Ecosystems of Delhi, India. AMBIO, 38(1), 35–39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25515797.

  • Liu, Y. L., Chang, K., Stoorvogel, J., Verburg, P., & Sun, C. H. (2012). Evaluation of agricultural ecosystem services in fallowing land based on farmers’ participation and model simulation. Paddy Water Environ, 10, 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-011-0282-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, F., Randhawa, P. (2017a). India’s peri-urban frontier: Rural–urban transformations and food security. International Institute for Environment and Development, London. http://pubs.iied.org/10794IIED.

  • Marshall, F., Dolley, J., Randhawa, P., et al. (2017b). Why peri-urban ecosystem services matter for urban policy (policy briefing). Brighton, UK: STEPS Centre. https://steps-centre.org/publication/peri-urban-ecosystem-services-matter-urban-policy/.

  • MEA. (2005). Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  • Mondal, P. P., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Research Progress on Changes in Land Use and Land Cover in the Western Himalayas (India) and Effects on Ecosystem Services. Sustainability, 10(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC(National Research Council). (2005). Valuing ecosystem services: Toward better environmental decision making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11139.

  • Padmanaban, R., Bhowmik, A. K., Cabral, P., Zamyatin, A., Almegdadi, O., & Wang, S. (2017). Modelling Urban Sprawl Using Remotely Sensed Data: A Case Study of Chennai City. Tamilnadu. Entropy, 19(4), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19040163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Pennington, D., & Johnson, K. A. (2011). The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the State of Minnesota. Environ. Resour. Econ., 48, 219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T.V., & Bharath, S. (2018). Geoinformatics based valuation of forest landscape dynamics in central Western Ghats, India. Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-4134.1000227.

  • Randhawa, P., & Marshall, F. (2014). Policy Transformations and Translations: Lessons for Sustainable Water Management in Peri-Urban Delhi, India. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1068/c10204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruskule, A., Vinogradovs, I., & Villoslada, M. (2018). A Guide book on -The introduction to the Ecosystem service framework and its application in integrated planning. In K. Raimonds (Ed.), LIFE Viva Grass project on “Integrated planning tool to ensure viability of grasslands”, Online ISBN number: 978-9934-556-39-5. https://vivagrass.eu/lessons-cat/theory/.

  • Saarikoski, H., Primmer, E., Saarela, S., et al. (2018). Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice. Ecosystem Services, 29(C), 579–598, ISSN 2212-0416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019.

  • Sadashivam, T., & Tabassum, S. (2016). Trends of urbanization in India: Issues and challenges in the 21st century. International Journal of Information Research and Review, 3(5), 2375–2384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E. A., Ahern, J., & Wileden, J. (2008). Strategies for landscape ecology: An application using cellular automata models. Progress in Planning, 70, 133–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2008.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, W., & Deng, X. (2016). Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Sci Total Environ, 576, 705–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.078.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subekti, R. M., & Suroso, D.S.A. (2018). Ecological footprint and ecosystem services models: A comparative analysis of environmental carrying capacity calculation approach in Indonesia. In 4th Plano Cosmo International Conference, Bandung, April 2018. Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 158, pp. 012026). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012026.

  • Syrbe, R., Schröter, M., Grunewald, K., Walz, U., & Burkhard, B. (2017). What to Map?. In B. Burkhard & J. Maes (Eds.), Mapping Ecosystem Services (Vol. 5.1, pp. 149–156). Sofia: Pensoft Publishers.

  • Talukdar, S., Singha, P., Shahfahad, Mahato, & S., & Praveen, B. . (2020). Dynamics of ecosystem services (ESs) in response to land use land cover(LU/LC) changes in the lower Gangetic plain of India. Ecological Indicators, 112, 106121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi, Y. C., & Tripathi, G. (2003). Some important environmental problems in India and their remedies. In A. Kumar (Ed.), Dimensions of Environmental threats (pp. 376–382). Daya publishing house.

  • Tripathi, R., Moharana, K. C., Nayak, A. D., Dhal, B., Shahid, Md., et al. (2019). Ecosystem services in different agro-climatic zones in eastern India: impact of land use and land cover change. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7224-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TOI. (2018). Govt. set to dust out old plan as metropolis maps new contour. Yogesh Kabirdas. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/62717205.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst.

  • TOI. (2019). Govt may scale down metropolis expansion. Yogesh Kabirdas. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/government-may-scale-down-metropolisexpansion/articleshow/67481021.cms.

  • UN (United Nations). (2014). Department of economic and social affairs. Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352).

  • Vannier, C., Lasseur, R., Crouzat, E., Byczek, C., Lafond, V., Cordonnier, T., Longaretti, P., & Lavorel, S. (2019). Mapping ecosystem services bundles in a heterogeneous mountain region. Ecosystems and People, 15(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1570971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, M. (2018). Review of existing Ecosystem Accounting Initiatives and Literature in India: Biophysical assessments, economic value of Ecosystem services and overview of available data sources, System of Environmental Economic Accounting(SEEA). https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/india_assessment_2019.pdf.

  • Waylen,K.A., Blackstock, K.L., & Holstead, K.L. (2015). How does legacy create sticking points for environmental management? Insights from challenges to implementation of the ecosystem approach. Ecology and Society 20(2): 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07594-200221.

  • Xie, G.D., Zhen, L., Lu, C.X., Xiao, Y., & Chen, C. (2008). Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 23, 911–919 (in Chinese). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-ZRZX200805019.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MEASI Academy of Architecture, Chennai, India

    A. Navara

  2. School of Architecture and Planning, Anna University, Chennai, India

    Ranee Vedamuthu

Authors
  1. A. Navara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ranee Vedamuthu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Navara.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 List of experts approached for the matrix assessment of ES potential
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navara, A., Vedamuthu, R. Ecosystem services-based approach to sustainable development in a peri-urban area of Chennai, India. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 2887–2913 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01558-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01558-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation