Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

HEC-RAS and GIS-based flood plain mapping: A case study of Narai Drain Peshawar

  • Research Article - Hydrology
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flood computer modeling is one of the recent practices which is used for the prediction of the flood occurrence at different intervals of time. A study was conducted on Narai Drain Hayatabad, Peshawar, to produce flood plain maps by integrating Arc-GIS with the Hydraulic Modeling software HEC-RAS. The area in the vicinity of Narai Drain was inundated due to the catastrophic flood occurred in the year 2010, which caused huge damage to public property, livestock, communication, and infrastructure. In this study, the Narai Drain watershed was classified into three watersheds, namely Narai Drain Upper, Lower, and Regi Drain. GIS technology was used to delineate the watersheds while the discharges were computed using the WinTR-20 mode. Expected rainfall depths were obtained by using Log-Pearson type III Distribution for different return periods (i.e., 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200). The area inundated by the flood was estimated by using HEC-RAS. These results were then incorporated in GIS to prepare flood inundation maps. Maximum inundation occurred in the sensitive area of Narai Drain Lower for a 10-year return period. The integrated modeling approach used in this study was found very useful to delineate the area vulnerable to flood with a good estimation of inundation depths at various discharge values. The results show that in the upper reach of the Narai Drain, most of the area lying near the flood zone was safe for a 100-year return period, while the lower reach was vulnerable even for a return period of 10 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Kouri O, Al-Rawashdeh S, Sadoun B, Sadoun B, Pradhan B (2013) Geospatial modeling for sinkholes hazard map based on GIS & RS data. J Geogr Inf Syst 5(06):584–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao WM, Zhang XQ, Qu SM (2009) Dynamic correction of roughness in the hydrodynamic model. J Hydrodyn 21(2):255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates PD (2012) Integrating remote sensing data with flood inundation models: how far have we got? Hydrol Process 26(16):2515–2521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat M (2013) Parametric evalution for flood management. Int J Sci Eng Res 4(7):1147–1153

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapi K, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Pham BT, Khosravi K (2017) A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environ Model Softw 95:229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York city

    Google Scholar 

  • Degiorgis M, Gnecco G, Gorni S, Roth G, Sanguineti M, Taramasso AC (2012) Classifiers for the detection of flood-prone areas using remote sensed elevation data. J Hydrol 470:302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal flood commission islamabad (FFCI) (2014). Annual flood report, Ministry of water and power, Government of Pakistan. Accessed 08 March 2015.

  • Fekete A (2009) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazard 9(2):393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid A, Gray DD, Viadero RC Jr, Fortney RH (2004) Channel geomorphology relationships for the beaver creek watershed. West Virginia University Libraries, West Virginia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kabiri R, Chan A, Bai R (2013) Comparison of SCS and green-ampt methods in surface runoff-flooding simulation for klang watershed in Malaysia. Open J Modern Hydrol 3(03):102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakis N, Kougias I, Patsialis T (2015) Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and analytical hierarchy process: application in Rhodope-Evros region, Greece. Sci Total Environ 538:555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan AN, Khan SN, Ali A (2010) Analysis of damages caused by flood-2010 in district Peshawar. J Sc Tech Univ Peshawar 36:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Knebl M, Yang ZL, Hutchison K, Maidment D (2005) Regional scale flood modeling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: a case study for the San Antonio River Basin Summer 2002 storm event. J Environ Manage 75(4):325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalzig J (2008) Climate, poverty, and justice: what the Poznan UN climate conference needs to deliver for a fair and effective global deal. Oxfam Policy Pract: Climate Change Resil 4(3):117–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoud BM, Hassanpour F (2013) Flood management of sistan river using levee. J Acad and Appl Stud 3(10):32–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad J, Khan GD (2015) Win TR-20 application using statistical approaches for long term prediction of peak runoff rates in smaller watersheds of Pakistan. Hydrol Cur Res 6(1):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo M, Ramezani F, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Nyarko EK, Nikoo M (2016) Flood-routing modeling with neural network optimized by social-based algorithm. Nat Hazards 82(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakistan metrological department (PMD),(2015) Peshawar. http://www.pmd.gov.pk/meteorogram/kpk.php?district=Peshawar&division=Peshawar. Accessed 10 March 2015

  • Pradhan B, Shafiee M, Pirasteh S (2009) Maximum flood prone area mapping using RADARSAT images and GIS: kelantan river basin. Int J Geoinform 5(2):11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H (2016a) Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province. Iran Geocarto Int 31(1):42–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati O, Zeinivand H, Besharat M (2016b) Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 7(3):1000–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi S, Rad RJ (2005) Floodplain Zoning in an Iranian urban watershed using HEC-RAS hydraulic model and arcview GIS. Water Energy Abstr 15(1):69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarhadi A, Soltani S, Modarres R (2012) Probabilistic flood inundation mapping of ungauged rivers: linking GIS techniques and frequency analysis. J Hydrol 458:68–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timbadiya PV, Patel PL, Porey PD (2011) Calibration of HEC-RAS model on prediction of flood for lower Tapi River, India. J Water Resour Prot 3(11):805–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USACE (1991) HEC-2: water surface profiles, user’s manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif

  • USACE (2001) HEC-RAS: river analysis system, user’s manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif

  • Yang J, Townsend RD, Daneshfar B (2006) Applying the HEC-RAS model and GIS techniques in river network floodplain delineation. Can J Civ Eng 33(1):19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sher Shah Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Dr. Mohammad Valipour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salman, A., Hassan, S.S., Khan, G.D. et al. HEC-RAS and GIS-based flood plain mapping: A case study of Narai Drain Peshawar. Acta Geophys. 69, 1383–1393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00615-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00615-4

Keywords

Navigation