Skip to main content
Log in

Confessions of an Agnostic: Apologia Pro Vita Sua

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Francis Collins, the director of the NEH and well-known Christian, has said that agnosticism is a bit of a cop-out. Either be a Christian or be an atheism, but have the guts to make up your mind. I shall argue in a positive way for agnosticism, showing that it can be as vibrant a position as belief or non-belief. It gives you a renewed appreciation of life and the world in which we live.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Quakers are not enthusiasts for sola scriptura. They come from the radical end of the Reformation. The Sermon on the Mount notwithstanding, Bible reading is not a major part of worship or general practice. It is the inner light that guides you. However, there are exceptions to every rule, and, for me, Paul’s paeon to love, I Corinthians 13, is just such an exception. While, elsewhere in this essay, I quote the New Revised Standard Version, I would violate all I hold sacred if here I were to quote other than the King James Version.

  2. These are just the books!

  3. What is Atheism? | American Atheists

References

  • Aquinas, St. T. (1259–1265)1975. Summa Contra Gentiles. Translator V. J. Bourke. University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Aquinas, S. T. (1952). Summa Theologica, I. Burns, Oates and Washbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardrey, R. (1961). African genesis: A personal investigation into the animal origins and nature of man. Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, J. (1960). Institutes of the Christian religion. Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, W. K. (1901). Body and mind (from Fortnightly Review). In L. Stephen & F. Pollock (Eds.), Lectures and essays of the late William Kingdom Clifford (Vol. 2, pp. 1–51). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F. S. (2007). Language of God: A scientist presents evidence for belief. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. A. (2015). Faith versus fact: Why science and religion are incompatible. Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1997). Is science a religion? The Humanist 57, no. 1.

  • Dawkins, R. (1998). Unweaving the rainbow: Science, delusion and the appetite for wonder. Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dostoevsky, F. (2003). The brothers Karamazov. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D. P. (2014). War, peace, and human nature: The challenge of achieving scientific objectivity. In D. P. Fry (Ed.), War, peace, and human nature: The convergence of evolutionary and cultural views (pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gish, D. (1973). Evolution: The fossils say no! Creation-Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. (1927). Possible worlds and other essays. Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, T. (1994). Collected poems. Wordsworth Poetry Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1959). An introduction to metaphysics. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, J. (2005). An autobiography. Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T. H. (1894). Science and Christian tradition. Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Concluding unscientific postscript to philosophical fragments, Volume 1 (Kierkegaard's Writings, Vol 12.1). Translators H. V. Hong, and E. H. Hong. Princeton University Press.

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. F. W. (1714). Monadology and other philosophical essays. Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. S. (1955). Surprised by joy: The shape of my early life. Geoffrey Bles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1966). On aggression. Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, J., & Ruse, M. (Eds.). (1998). Biology and ethics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1973). The philosophy of biology. Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1979a). The Darwinian revolution: Science red in tooth and claw. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1979b). Sociobiology: Sense or nonsense? Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1986). Taking Darwin seriously: A naturalistic approach to philosophy. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (Ed.). (1988). But is it science? The philosophical question in the creation/evolution controversy. Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1994). Evolutionary naturalism. Routledge.

  • Ruse, M. (1996). Monad to man: The concept of progress in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2001). Can a Darwinian be a Christian? The relationship between science and religion. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2005). The evolution-creation struggle. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2006). Darwinism and its discontents. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2008). Oxford handbook of the philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M., editor. (2009). Philosophy after Darwin: Classic and contemporary readings. Princeton University Press.

  • Ruse, M. (2012). The philosophy of human evolution. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2015). Atheism: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2016). Evolution and religion: A dialogue (2nd ed.). Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2017a). On purpose. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2017b). Darwinism as religion: What literature tells us about evolution. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2017c). A Darwinian pilgrim’s early progress. Journal of Cognitive Historiography 4, no. 151–164.

  • Ruse, M. (2017d). A Darwin’s pilgrim’s middle progress. Journal of Cognitive Historiography, 2019. 4, no. 165–179.

  • Ruse, M. (2017e). A Darwinian pilgrim’s late progress. Journal of Cognitive Historiography, 4, 180–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2018). The problem of war: Darwinism, Christianity, and their battle to understand human conflict. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2019). A meaning to life. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2021). A philosopher looks at human beings. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M., & Richards, R. J., Editors. (2017). The Cambridge handbook of evolutionary ethics. Cambridge University Press.

  • Sartre, J. P. (1948). Existentialism and humanism. Haskell House Publishers Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrale, U. (1986). Colleagues in conflict: An in vitro analysis of the sociobiology debate. Biology and Philosophy, 1, 53–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, R. W. (2013). Why the legend of the killer ape never dies. In D. P. Fry (Ed.), War, peace, and human nature: The convergence of evolutionary and cultural views (pp. 97–111). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb, J. C., & Morris, H. M. (1961). The genesis flood: The biblical record and its scientific implications. Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Ruse.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruse, M. Confessions of an Agnostic: Apologia Pro Vita Sua. SOPHIA 60, 575–591 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00851-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00851-7

Keywords

Navigation