Abstract
Space—an essential dimension of our life—is analyzable from different viewpoints, which often gives rise to contrasting conceptualizations. Perceptual analyses shed light on the intrinsic anisotropy and deformations of perceived space, raising the issue of which geometry may be able to represent perceptual space. Pictorial drawings and painting have been relevant sources of information about the nature of living and perceived space. Although the geometry of perceptual space is still in its infancy, contributions are beginning to appear. This special issue contributes to the development of the geometry of perceptual space.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albertazzi L (2004) Stereokinetic shapes and their shadows. Perception 33:1437–1452
Albertazzi L (2006a) Continua. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Visual thought. The depictive space of perception. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 1–28
Albertazzi L (2006b) Towards a neo-Aristotelian theory of continua. Elements of an empirical geometry. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Visual thought. The depictive space of perception. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 29–80
Albertazzi L (2013) Appearances from a radical standpoint. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Wiley Handbook of experimental phenomenology. Wiley-Routledge, New York, pp 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118329016
Albertazzi L (2015a) A science of qualities. Biol Theory 10:188–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-015-0213-3
Albertazzi L (2015b) Spatial elements in visual awareness. Challenges for an intrinsic “geometry” of the visible. Philos. Sci 19(3):5–34. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1126
Albertazzi L (2017) Microgenesis of anticipation. Windowing the present. In: Poli R (ed) Handbook of anticipation. Springer, Cham, pp 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_13-1
Albertazzi L (2018) Naturalizing phenomenology. A must have? Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01933
Albertazzi L (2019) Experimental phenomenology: What it is and what it is not. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02209-6
Albertazzi L (2021) Styled morphogeometry. Axiomathes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09438-x (First published online June 2020)
Albertazzi L, Canal L, Vescovi M, Micciolo R (2015) Calligraphy and Klee’s abstract painting: a study on categorical ambiguity. Art Percept 3(3):239–263. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-00002036
Albertazzi L, Canal L, Chisté P, De Rosa M, Micciolo R, Minelli A (2017) Reconsidering morphology through an experimental case-study. Biol Theory 12(3):131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0268-4
Arnheim R (1954) Art and visual perception. University of California Press, Berkeley
Arnheim R (1971) Entropy and art. University of California Press, Berkeley
Bergström SS (2004) The AMBEGUIAS phenomenon and colour constancy. Perception 33:831–835. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5126
Berry E (1969) Estimation of angles. Percept Mot Skills 26:11–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616661915
Brentano F (1979) Untersuchungen zur Sinnespsychologie. In: Chisholm RM, Fabian R (eds). Meiner, Hamburg (1rst German ed 1907)
Brentano F (1988a) Philosophical lectures on space, time and the continuum. In: Körner S, Chisholm RM (eds). Croom Helm, London (1rst German ed 1976)
Brentano F (1988b) Über Ernst Machs Erkenntnis und Irrtum. In: Chisholm RM, Marek J (eds). Rodopi, Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA
Brentano F (1995a) Psychology from empirical standpoint. In: McAlister L (ed). Routledge, London (1rst German ed. 1874)
Brentano F (1995b) Descriptive psychology. In: B Müller (ed). Routledge, London (1rst German ed 1982)
Carnap R (2003) Logical structure of the world and pseudoproblems in philosophy. Open Court, Chicago and La Salle, Ill
Carroll L (1897) Through the looking glass and what Alice found there. Henry Altemus Company, Philadelphia
Cutting JE, Vishton PM (1996) Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W, Rogers S (eds) Handbook of perception and cognition, perception of space and motion, vol 5. Academic Press. San Diego, CA, pp 69–117
Cytowic RE (1989) Synesthesia. A union of the senses. Springer, New York
da Pos O (2021) Phenomenology of perceptual illusions. Psych Conscious. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000264 (First published online December 2020)
Dadam J, Albertazzi L, Da Pos O, Canal L, Micciolo R (2012) Morphological patterns and their colour. Percept Mot Skills 114(2):363–377. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.22.23.PMS.114.2.363-377 (PMID: 22755441)
De Bértola E (1972) On space and time in music and the visual arts. Leonardo 5(1):27–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1572468
Domokos G (2021) Natural numbers, natural shapes. Axiomathes. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10516-018-9411-5 (First published online November 2018)
Domokos G, Langi Z (2021) Plato’s error and a mean field formula for convex mosaics. Axiomathes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09455-w (First published online August 2019)
Erkelens CJ (2013) Virtual slant explains perceived slant, distortion, and motion in pictorial scenes. Perception 42(3):253–270. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7328
Fechner TG (1997) Various attempts to establish a basic form of beauty: Experimental aesthetics, golden section, and square, Niemann M, Qhehl J, Hoege H (Trs). Empir Stud Arts 15:115–115. https://doi.org/10.2190/DJYK-98B8-63KR-KUDN
Fechner TG (2014) Vorschule der Aesthetik (German original ed 1876). Cambridge Library Collection, Cambridge
Fisher H (1969) An experimental study of angular subtension. Q J Exp Psychol 21:356–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746908400231
Galland-Szymkowiak M (2017) Forms, forces, Einfühlung. Theodor Lipps’s aesthetic of space. Rev Métaphis Morale 96(4):477–494. https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.174.0477
Ghyka M (1977) The geometry of art and life. Dover Publications Inc., New York
Gould P, White R (1974) Mental maps. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth
Hachen I, Albertazzi L (2018) Anticipation on the boundaries of musical and pictorial continua. In: Poli R (ed) Handbook of anticipation. Springer, Cham, pp 875–898
Hartmann N (1935) Zur Grundlegung der Ontologie. De Gruyter, Berlin
Hauptmann D (2020) Architecture and the time of space. TU Delft Open
Holmes NP, Spence Ch (2004) The body schema and the multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cogn Process 5(2):94–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-004-0013-3
Husserl, E (1921). Ms D 13 I. Zur Konstitution des Raumes (Phantom und Vollschema) vom okulomotorisch-kephalomotorischen zweidimensionalen Field von “Bildern” aus. Erscheinungssystem und Orientierung (Am Anfang: Phantom, Seite, Aspekt, Erscheinung). Husserl Archiv, Collection
Husserl E (1966) Analysen zur passiven Synthesis Husserliana XI. Nijhoff, Dordrecht
Husserl E (1970) Crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. An introduction to phenomenological philosophy, Carr D (Tr). Northwestern University Press, Evanston
Husserl E (1973a) Experience and judgement. Routledge, London (Churchill JS, Ameriks K (Trs). (1st German ed. 1939))
Husserl E (1973b) Studien zur Arithmetic and Geometrie, Texte aus dem Nachlass (1886–1901, ed I Strohmeyer, Husserliana XXI. Nijhoff, The Hague Boston Lancaster, 262–319.
Husserl E (1997) Thing and space. Lectures of 1907 (1st German ed. 1973). Kluwer, Dordrecht
Husserl E (2001) Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic. In: Steinbock AJ (ed) Husserliana IX. Springer, Berlin-New York
Jammer M (1954) The history of theories of space in physics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA . https://doi.org/10.1086/287474
Jastrow J (1892) Judgments of angles and position of lines. Am J Psychol 5:214–248
Kandinsky W (1926) Punkt Linie zur Fläche. Bern, Benteli. (Trans. 1947, Point and line to plane. Contribution to the analysis of the pictorial elements. Solomon Guggenheim Foundation, New York)
Kanizsa G (1991) Vedere e pensare [Seeing and thinking]. Il Mulino, Bologna
Kappers AML, Koenderink J (2006) Continuum of haptic space. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Visual thought. The depictive space of perception. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 163–180
Katz D (1935) The world of colour. Kegan Paul, London
Kennedy M (2006) Touch and the observer’s vantage points. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Visual thought. The depictive space of perception. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 181–204
Klee P (1961) The thinking eye. Lund Humphries, London
Koenderink JJ, van Doorn A (2012) Gauge fields in pictorial space. SIAM Imaging Sci. https://doi.org/10.1137/120861151
Koenderink JJ, van Doorn AJ, Kappers AML, Todd JT (2001) Ambiguity and the ‘mental eye’ in pictorial relief. Perception 30:431–448. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3030
Koenderink JJ, Albertazzi L, van Doorn AJ, van Ee R, van de Grind WA, Kappers AM, Lappin JS, Norman JF, Stijn Oomes AH, te Pas SP, Phillips F, Pont SC, Richards WA, Todd JT, Verstraten FA, de Vries S (2010) Does monocular visual space contain planes? Acta Psychol 134(1):40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.002 (Epub 2010 Jan 6 PMID: 20053390)
Koenderink JJ, van Doorn A, Wagemans J (2011) Depth. i-Perception 2:541–562. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0438aap
Koenderink JJ, Wagemans J, van Doorn A, Albertazzi L (2015) Relief articulation techniques. Art Percept 3:151–171. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-00002032
Koenderink JJ, van Doorn A, Wagemans J (2018) Vanishing girls, mysterious blaks. i-Perception 9(4):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518786740
Koffka K (1930) Some problems of space perception. In: Murchison C (ed) Psychologies of 1930. Clark University Press, Worchester, MA, pp 161–187
Koffka K (1935) Principles of gestalt psychology. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Krumhansl CL, Kessler EJ (1982) Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychol Rev 89(4):334–368
Langacker RW (2008) Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lappin JS, van de Grind WA (2006) Visual forms in space-time. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Visual thought. The depictive space of perception. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 119–146
Le Fanu JS (1872) In a glass darkly. Bentley & Son, London
Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space. Blackwell, Oxford UK
Lipps Th (1897) Raumaesthetik und geometrisch-optische Täuschungen. Barth, Leipzig
Longo M, Golubova O (2017) Mapping the internal geometry of tactile space. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 43(10):1815–1827. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000434
Louie AH (2021) A relational theory of the visible. Axiomathes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09416-3 (First published online February 2019)
Louie AH, Poli R (2011) The spread of hierarchical cycles. Int J Gen Syst 40:237–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2010.550579
Maclean E, Stacey G (1971) Judgment of angle magnitude: an experimental appraisal. Percept Psychophys 9:499–504. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208965
Maravita A, Iriki A (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci 8(2):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008
Massironi M (2002) The psychology of graphic images. Seeing, drawing, communicating. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey
Metzger W (2009) Laws of seeing, L. Spillmann (ed). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Michotte A (1948) Le caractère de ‘réalité’ des projections cinématographiques. Revue internationale de filmologie: pp 3–4
Michotte A, Burke L (1951) Une nouvelle énigme de la psychologie de la perception: le “donnée amodal” dans l’experience sensorielle [A new enigma in the psychology of perception: The “amodally given” in the sensory experience]. Actes du XIII Congrés Internationale de Psychologie, 179–180. (Reprinted in A. Michotte et al. (eds) (1962) Causalité, permanence et réalité phénoménales. Publications Universitaires, 372–373
Miller R (2014) The art of space: the history of space art, from the earliest visions to the graphics of the modern era. Zenith Press, London
Musatti CL (1975) Stereokinetic phenomena and their interpretation. In: D’Arcais GB (ed) Studies in perception, Festschrift for Fabio Metelli. Martello-Giunti, Milan, pp 166–189
Nerlich G (1976) The shape of space. Cambridge University Press, London, New York, Melbourne
Nicod J (2014) Foundations of geometry and induction. Routledge, London and New York (Original work 1930)
Pedoe D (1976) Geometry and visual arts. Dover Publications Inc., New York
Petitot J (2017) Elements of neurogeometry. Functional architectures of vision. Springer, Berlin New York
Pinna B (2013) Illusion and illusoriness: new perceptual issues and new phenomena. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Wiley handbook of experimental phenomenology. Wiley-Routledge, New York, pp 317–341
Pinna B (2021) Illusory figures: from logic to phenomenology. Psych Conscious, forthcoming.
Poe EA (1840) Tales of the grotesque and arabesque. Lea & Blanchard, Philadephia
Poincaré H (2001) The value of science: essential writings of Henri Poincaré, G B Halsted (Tr). The Modern Library, New York
Poli R (2001) The basic problem of the theory of levels of reality. Axiomathes 12(3–4):261–283. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015845217681
Poli R (2006) Levels of reality and the psychological stratum. Rev Int Philos 6(2):163–180. https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.236.0163
Previc FH (1988) The neuropsychology of 3D space. Psychol Bull 124(2):123–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.123
Purghé F, Coren S (1992) Subjective contours 1900–1990. Research trends bibiliography. Percept Psychophys 51:291–304. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212255
Rizzolati G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V (1977) The space around us. Science 11:190–191
Sarti A, Citti G (2021) Neurogeometry of perception: isotropic and anisotropic aspects. Axiomathes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09426-1 (First published online August 2019)
Shapiro AG, Todorovic D (2016) The Oxford compendium of visual illusions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–37
Shepard RN (1982) Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychol Rev 89(4):305–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.305
Smythies J (1996) A note on the concept of the visual field in neurology, psychology, and visual neuroscience. Perception 25(3):369–371. https://doi.org/10.1068/p250369
Spence C, Deroy O (2013) How automatic are crossmodal correspondences? Conscious Cogn 22:245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.12.006
Stumpf C (1873) Über den psychologischen Ursprung der Raumvorstellung [On the psychological origin of the presentation of space]. Hirzel Verlag, Leipzig
Talmy L (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Todorović D (2021) Effects of changes of observer vantage points on the perception of spatial structure in perspective images: basic geometric analysis. Axiomathes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09421-6 (First published online February 2019)
Torretti R (1978) Philosophy of geometry. From Riemann to Poincaré. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Tversky B (2011) Visualizing thought. Top Cogn Sci 3:499–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x
Tymoczko D (2006) The geometry of musical chords. Science 313:72–74
van Tonder G, Spehar B (2013) The aesthetic appeal of visual qualities. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Handbook of experimental phenomenology: visual perception of shape, space and appearance. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118329016.ch16
Verstraelen L (2005) A geometrical description of visual perception. Kragujevac J Math 28:7–17
Verstraelen L (2015) Psychology and geometry I. On the geometry of the human kind. Filomat JSTOR 29(3):545–552
Viengkham C, Isherwood Z, Spehar B (2021) Fractal-scaling properties as aesthetic primitives in vision and touch. Axiomathes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09444-z (First published online June 2019)
Vishwanath D (2014) Towards a new theory of stereopsis. Psychol Rev 121(2):151–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035233
Vishwanath D (2021) Phenomenological versus functional analysis of 3D space perception. Psychol Conscious 8(1), forthcoming.
Wallenstein S-O (2010) Space, time, and the arts: rewriting the Laocoon. J Aesthet Cult. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.2155
Welsch R, von Castell C, Hecht H (2019) The anisotropy of personal space. PLoS ONE 14(6):e0217587. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217587
Wilczek F (2011) Beautiful losers. NOVA magazine (PBS) December 30th. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/beautiful-losers/
Zanforlin M (1988) The height of a stereokinetic cone: a quantitative determination of a 3-D effect from a 2-D moving patterns without a ‘rigidity assumption.’ Psychol Res 50:162–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310177
Zhou Y, Smith BH, Sharpee TO (2018) Hyperbolic geometry of the olfactory spaces. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq1458
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Liliana Albertazzi—Retired professor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albertazzi, L. One and More Space. Axiomathes 32, 733–742 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09559-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09559-2