Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Red maple dominance and community homogenization in a disturbed forested wetland

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Homogenization of forest stands with generalist species is a hallmark of past disturbance and characterizes the Great Dismal Swamp (GDS), a forested wetland in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Once a mosaic of wetland communities, disturbances (e.g., timber harvesting and ditching) have resulted in altered hydrologic regimes and forested communities. In response, hydrologic restoration and forest management aim to enhance community composition and function. To inform these efforts, we investigated forest communities and their associations with hydrologic regimes at 79 monitoring plots across GDS, where we collected data on vegetation composition and structure, hydrologic indicators, and soil properties. Our results demonstrate that red maple (Acer rubrum) is the dominant species across GDS, where red maple importance is negatively correlated with stand density, richness, and diversity. A hierarchical cluster analysis revealed four distinct community types: Swamp Tupelo-Maple (ST-M), Maple-Holly (M-H), Sweetgum-Maple (SG-M), and Maple (M). Despite ubiquitous presence of red maple in these communities, significant differences in tree composition and structure were found; however, this variation rarely extended to other growth forms. Although water level estimates (via model simulations and high-water marks) failed to explain vegetation differences, soil properties indicative of wetness regimes suggest that communities exist along a hydrologic gradient. The ST-M community likely exists on wetter sites, whereas SG-M communities occur at drier locations. More maple-dominated communities (M and M-H; 68% of plots) likely occur across broader hydrologic gradients, explaining their widespread occurrence. These findings point to potential drivers of forested communities, but additional characterization of hydrology coupled with continued vegetation monitoring are needed to adaptively conduct hydrologic restoration efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams MD (1998) The red maple paradox: what explains the widespread expansion of red maple in eastern forests? Bioscience 48:355–364. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholdi JJ, Platzman LK (1988) Heuristics based on spacefilling curves for combinatorial problems in Euclidean space. Manag Sci 34:291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter V, Gammon PT, Garrett MK (1994) Ecotone dynamics and boundary determination in the Great Dismal Swamp. Ecol Appl 4:189–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers FM, Beilman DW, Yu Z (2011) Methods for determining peat humification and for quantifying peat bulk density, organic matter and carbon content for palaeostudies of climate and peatland carbon dynamics. Mires Peat 7:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavel J, Julliard R, Devictor V (2011) Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Environ 9:222–228. https://doi.org/10.1890/080216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner WH, Toliver JR, Sklar FH (1986) Natural regeneration of baldcypress (Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich.) in a Louisiana swamp. For Ecol Manag 14:305–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(86)90176-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabel CV, Day FP (1977) Structural comparisons of four plant communities in the Great Dismal Swamp, Virginia. Bull Torrey Bot Club 104:352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Caceres M, Jansen F, (2016). Package ‘indicspecies’. Version 1

  • Dean GW (1969) Forests and forestry in the Dismal Swamp. VA J Sci 20:166–173

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBerry JW, Atkinson RB (2014) Aboveground forest biomass and litter production patterns in Atlantic white cedar swamps of differing hydroperiods. Southeast Nat 13:673–690. https://doi.org/10.1656/058.013.0414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drexler JZ, de Fontaine CS, Deverel SJ (2009) The legacy of wetland drainage on the remaining peat in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA. Wetlands 29:372–386. https://doi.org/10.1672/08-97.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drexler JZ, Fuller CC, Orlando J, Salas A, Wurster FC, Duberstein JA (2017) Estimation and uncertainty of recent carbon accumulation and vertical accretion in drained and undrained forested peatlands of the southeastern USA. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 122:2563–2579. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drzymulska D (2016) Peat decomposition—shaping factors, significance in environmental studies and methods of determination; a literature review. Geologos 22:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/logos-2016-0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubé S, Plamondon AP, Rothwell RL (1995) Watering up after clear-cutting on forested wetlands of the St Lawrence Lowland. Water Resour Res 31:1741–1750. https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR00427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston JR, Decker J, Finkelstein J, Wurster F, Misut P, Sturtevant L, Speiran G (2018) Hydrologic conditions and simulation of groundwater and surface water in the Great Dismal Swamp of Virginia and North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report. 2018–5056, 67. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20185056

  • Ehrenfeld JG (1995) Microsite differences in surface substrate characteristics in Chamaecyparis swamps of the New Jersey Pinelands. Wetlands 15:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire TG, Scott CT (2003) Altered selection probabilities caused by avoiding the edge in field surveys. JABES 8:36–38. https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711031247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanberry BB, Kabrick JM, He HS, Palik BJ (2012) Historical trajectories and restoration strategies for the Mississippi River Alluvial Valley. For Ecol Manag 280:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan JL, LaPointe TD, Casey JK, Johnson KS, Westfall JA, Heath M (2019) Northeast Regional Forest Inventory Protocol Framework. USFWS Northeast Region, Hadley, MA

  • Kearney TH, Gardner FD (1901) Report on the botanical survey of the Dismal Swamp Region. Contrib US Natl Herb 5:321–550

    Google Scholar 

  • King SL, Keim RF (2019) Hydrologic modifications challenge bottomland hardwood forest management. J Forest 5:504–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legrand HE (2000) The natural features of Dismal Swamp State Natural Area, North Carolina. The natural history of the Great Dismal Swamp. Omni Press, Madison, pp 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy GF (1991) The vegetation of the Great Dismal Swamp: a review and an overview. VA J Sci 42:411–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtler WF, Walker PN (1974) Hydrology of the Dismal Swamp, Virginia-North Carolina. Geological Survey—Water Resources Division, No. 74–39

  • Lister AJ, Scott CT (2009) Use of space-filling curves to select sample locations in natural resource monitoring studies. Environ Monit Assess 149:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0184-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcotte P, Roy V, Plamondon AP, Auger I (2008) Ten-year water table recovery after clearcutting and draining boreal forested wetlands of eastern Canada. Hydrol Processes 22:4163–4172. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews TJ, Whittaker RJ (2015) On the species abundance distribution in applied ecology and biodiversity management. J Appl Ecol 52:443–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR

  • Miller CA, Benscoter BW, Turetsky MR (2015) The effect of long-term drying associated with experimental drainage and road construction on vegetation composition and productivity in boreal fens. Wetlands Ecol Manag 23:845–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9423-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musselman LJ, Nickrent DL, Levy GF (1977) A contribution towards a vascular flora of the Great Dismal Swamp. Rhodora 79:240–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B et al (2019) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5–4

  • Phipps RL, Ierley DL, Baker CP (1979) Tree rings as indicators of hydrologic change in the Great Dismal Swamp, Virginia and North Carolina. US Geological Survey, Water Resources Division

  • R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  • Reddy KR, Patrick WH (1975) Effect of alternate aerobic and anaerobic conditions on redox potential, organic matter decomposition and nitrogen loss in a flooded soil. Soil Biol Biochem 7:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(75)90004-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy V, Ruel JC, Plamondon AP (2000) Establishment, growth and survival of natural regeneration after clearcutting and drainage on forested wetlands. Forest Ecol and Manag 129:253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00170-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte ML, McLaughlin DL, Wurster FC, Balentine K, Speiran GK, Aust WM, Stewart RD, Varner JM, Jones CN (2019) Linking ecosystem function and hydrologic regime to inform restoration of a forested peatland. J Environ Manag 233:342–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleeter R, Sleeter BM, Williams B, Hogan D, Hawbaker T, Zhu Z (2017) A carbon balance model for the Great Dismal Swamp ecosystem. Carbon Balance Manag 12:2–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-017-0070-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2006) Great Dismal Swamp national wildlife refuge and nansemond national wildlife refuge final comprehensive conservation plan. Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, Suffolk, VA

  • Warren RJ, Rossell IM, Moorhead KK (2004) Colonization and establishment of red maple (Acer rubrum) in a southern Appalachian wetland. Wetlands 24:364–374. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0364:CAEORM]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Web Soil Survey (2017) Soil survey staff, natural resources conservation service. United States Department of Agriculture

  • Whitehead DR (1972) Developmental and environmental history of the Dismal Swamp. Ecol Monogr 42:301–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Will RE, Seiler JR, Feret PP, Aust WM (1995) Effects of rhizosphere inundation on the growth and physiology of wet and dry-site Acer rubrum (red maple) populations. Am Midl Nat 134:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurster FC, Ward S, Pickens C (2016) Forested peatland management in southeastern Virginia and northeast North Carolina, USA. 15th International Peat Congress, abstracts, Sarawak, Malaysia

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was funded by The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, The Edna Baily Sussman Foundation and the Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech. We gratefully acknowledge staff at the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, specifically Chris Lowie and Karen Balentine, for field and other in-kind support, Jeff Horan and Thomas LaPointe with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for help with monitoring protocols and plot selection, and Jack Eggleston with the U.S. Geological Survey for providing hydrologic simulation data. We also thank Trevor Lawson for enduring long, harsh field days for data collection.

Funding

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; The Edna Baily Sussman Foundation; Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DLM, RFL, and FCW designed the study; RFL led data collection and analysis; All authors contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel L. McLaughlin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (DOCX 594 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ludwig, R.F., McLaughlin, D.L. & Wurster, F.C. Red maple dominance and community homogenization in a disturbed forested wetland. Wetlands Ecol Manage 29, 599–615 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-021-09808-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-021-09808-6

Keywords

Navigation