Skip to main content
Log in

Ignition of Gases, Vapors, and Liquids by Hot Surfaces

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gases, vapors, liquid sprays, aerosols and other forms of ignitable fluids dispersed into the atmosphere, under certain circumstances, may encounter a hot surface. When investigating a fire, it may be necessary to determine in such cases if the hot surface was a competent ignition source. The paper reviews the available experimental data and findings on this topic and gives appropriate advice. It is shown that, unlike the autoignition temperature (AIT), which is only slightly dependent on test conditions, the hot-surface ignition temperature (HSIT) is highly dependent on the test environment conditions. The primary variable affecting the outcome is the degree of ‘enclosedness.’ If the degree of enclosedness is not extreme, a standard recommendation is that the hot-surface ignition temperature might be assumed to be 200°C higher than the AIT. But for conditions of significant enclosedness, the actual ignition temperature is more influenced by the fuel’s volatility (which is related to its flash point) than its AIT value. Higher volatility fuels are harder, not easier, to ignite from a hot surface. Since gasoline is the most volatile of the common automotive-use ignitable liquids, it turns out to be the one which is the hardest to ignite by a hot surface. Nonetheless, in some cases, vehicular engine compartment temperatures can become high enough for gasoline to get ignited. When conducting HSIT tests, it is important to be cognizant of the probabilistic nature of the ignition problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Copyright © Springer)

Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ‘Induction period’ is the term used in chemical literature to denote ignition time.

  2. The equivalence ratio, φ, is defined as (fuel/air ratio)actual/(fuel/air ratio)stoichiometric. Consequently, the mixture is lean for φ < 1, and it is rich for φ > 1.

  3. Note that, in some cases, a discharged droplet will not reach the hot surface, since it will fully vaporize enroute. Whether this happens will depend on the size of the droplet, the discharge height, and the temperature and velocity details of the plume.

  4. Some authors use the term MHSIT, denoting ‘minimum hot surface ignition temperature.’ This is not correct usage, since the minimum HSIT is the AIT, and a distinction should be maintained between HSIT and AIT.

  5. For most fuels, the cumulative probability distribution is a monotonically increasing function of the temperature. But for fuels, under some conditions, anomalies have been found experimentally, and unusual probability distribution functions may be encountered.

  6. In case of environments which involve a uniform fuel/air mixture, the velocity is to be understood to be the velocity of this mixture.

  7. Note that the values obtained by Severy et al. were without an imposed wind velocity.

  8. Note that the Federal standard uses a 5-sided box, while the ISO standard a 4-sided one.

References

  1. Davy H (1816) On the firedamp of coal mines and on methods of lighting the mines so as to prevent its explosion. Phil Trans Royal Soc 106: 1–24

  2. Mallard E, Le Chatelier HL (1880) Sur les températures d’inflammation des mélanges gazeux. Comptes Rendus Aca Sci Paris 91:825–828

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coward HF, Guest PG (1927) Ignition of natural gas-air mixtures by heated metal bars. J Amer Chem Soc 49:2479–2486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vanpée M, Bruszak AE (1963) The ignition of combustible mixtures by laminar jets of hot gases (RI 6293). Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  5. Babrauskas V (2003) Ignition handbook. Fire Science Publishers/Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Issaquah WA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laurendeau NM (1982) Thermal ignition of methane-air mixtures by hot surfaces: a critical examination. Combust Flame 46:29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumagai S, Kimura I (1956) Ignition of flowing gases by heated wires, in Sixth Symp. (Intl.) on Combustion, Reinhold, New York, pp. 554–558

  8. Vaivads RH, Bardon MF, Battista V (1997) A computational study of the flammability of methanol and gasoline fuel spills on hot engine manifolds. Fire Safety J 28:307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y-L, Wang Y-H, Lu S-X (2010) Ignition of the leaked diesel on a heated horizontal surface. Fire Safety J 45:58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boussouf, A., Lecoustre, V. R., Li, H., By, R., Sunderland, P. B., Autoignition of R32 and R410 Refrigerant Mixtures with Lubricating Oil, 15th Intl. Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Conf. at Purdue, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette IN (2015).

  11. Pedersen LD, Nielsen KK, Yin C, Sørensen H, Fossan I (2017) Modelling of hot surface ignition within gas turbines subject to flammable gas in the intake, ASME turbo expo 2017: turbomachinery tech. ASME, Conf. & Expo

    Google Scholar 

  12. Colwell JD, Reza A (2005) Hot surface ignition of automotive and aviation fluids. Fire Technol 41:105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Colwell JD (2010) Ignition of combustible materials by motor vehicle exhaust systems—a critical review (SAE Paper 2010–01–0130), SAE

  14. Goyal V, Carayon AB, Meyer S, Gore J, Simmons R (2017) Hot Surface Ignition Temperatures of Hydrocarbon Fuels, AIAA SciTech Forum, 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Mtg., Grapevine TX

  15. Shaw A, Epling W, McKenna C, Weckman E (2010) Evaluation of the ignition of diesel fuels on hot surfaces. Fire Technol 46:407–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dillard LN, Ulcay MS, Gore JP (2021) Effects of pressure on minimum hot surface ignition temperatures (MHSIT) in hot air crossflows, AIAA scitech 2021 forum (AISS 2021–1346). AIAA, Combustors IV

    Google Scholar 

  17. Setchkin NP (1952) Determination of the self-ignition temperature of combustible liquids (NBS report 2100). NBS, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  18. Standard Test Method for Autoignition Temperature of Liquid Chemicals (ASTM E659), ASTM Intl., West Conshohocken PA.

  19. Babrauskas V (2007) Ignition: a century of research and an assessment of our current status. J Fire Protect Eng 17:165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Müller R (1977) Einfluss der zündenergie auf die zündgrenzen von gas/luft-gemischen unter variation von druck und temperatur. Universität Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cutler D, Brearley D (1998) Frictional ignition of dusts and vapours (IR/L/EC/98/01). HSE, Buxton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuchta JM (1985) Investigation of fire and explosion accidents in the chemical, mining, and fuel-related industries—a manual (Bulletin 680). Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Lemos Duarte DC (1994) The Effect of Local Confinement on the Ignition of Flammable Vapour/Air Mixture at a Hot Surface (Ph.D. dissertation), Univ. Edinburgh, Scotland

  24. Cooke RA, Ide RH (1985) Principles of fire investigation. The Institution of Fire Engineers, Leicester, England

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sandel P (1991) Vehicle fires: more accurate ways of reporting causes are needed, Fire 84: (22) 28–30

  26. Scull WE (1951) Relation Between Inflammables and Ignition Sources in Aircraft Environments (NACA Report No. 1019), Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory, Cleveland OH

  27. Goss JC (1989) Brake fluid is a fire hazard, Transport Engineer, p 9

  28. Severy DM, Blaisdell DM, Kerkhoff JF (1974) Automotive collision fires. In: Proc. 18th Stapp Car Crash Conf., Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale PA, pp. 113–199

  29. LaPointe NR, Adams CT, Washington J (2005) Autoignition of gasoline on hot surfaces. Fire Arson Investig 56(2):18–21

    Google Scholar 

  30. Haussmann GJ, Matta LM (2002) Flammable vapor ignition by engine exhaust systems. J Applied Fire Science 11: 335–348

  31. Myronuk DJ (1980) Dynamic, hot surface ignition of aircraft fuels and hydraulic fuels (AFAPL-TR-79–2095). Air Force Aero Propulsion Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bennett JM (1998) Literature review of mechanisms of droplet/spray ignition by hot surfaces (UDR-TR-98-00158). Univ. Dayton Research Inst, Dayton OH

    Google Scholar 

  33. Demetri EP, White BF (1985) Development of a model for hot-surface ignition of combustible liquids (AFWAL-TR-85–2090). WPAFB, Dayton OH

    Google Scholar 

  34. Henningsson D (2015) Hot surface ignition of several alternative fuels (M.S. thesis), Luleå Univ. Tech., Luleå, Sweden

  35. Atkinson AJ, Eklund TI (1971) Crash fire hazard evaluation of jet fuels (FAA-RD-70-72). Federal Aviation Admin, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  36. Slippey A, Bender K, Tarau C, Rokkam S, Goss A (2018) Apparatus for Characterizing Hot Surface Ignition of Aviation Fuels, AIAA propulsion & energy forum, ECS-03, detonation theory, and characterization of energetic components, AIAA

  37. Imamura T, Uehara K, Nakata K, Maruyama S, Kuwana K (2021) Quas-steady characteristics of flowing propane/air mixture ignited by a heated surface. Fire Safety J 120: 10025

  38. Mullen II JW, Fenn JB, Irby MR (1949) The ignition of high velocity streams of combustible gases by heated cylindrical rods. In: 3rd Symp. on combustion and flame and explosion phenomena, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 317–32

  39. McTaggart-Cowan G, Huang J, Turcios M, Singh A, Munshi S (2018) Evaluation of a Hot-Surface Ignition System for a Direct-Injection of Natural Gas Engine, Proc. ASME 2018 Internal combustion engine div. fall tech. conf., v.1 large bore engines; fuels; advanced combustion, San Diego

  40. Menon SK, Boettcher PA, Ventura B, Blanquart G (2016) Hot Surface ignition of n-hexane in air. Combust Flame 163:42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Strasser A, Waters NC, Kuchta JM (1971) Ignition of aircraft fluids by hot surfaces under dynamic conditions (AFAPL-TR-71–86). Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton OH

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mullen JW II, Fenn JB, Irby MR, (1949)The Ignition of High Velocity Streams of Combustible Gases by Heated Cylindrical Rods. In: 3rd Symp. on combustion and flame and explosion phenomena, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 317–329

  43. Johnson AM, Roth AJ, Moussa NA (1988) Hot surface ignition tests of aircraft fluids (AFWAL-TR-88–2101). Air Force Wright Aeronautical Labs, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rehman S (2018) Hot surface ignition and combustion characteristics of sprays in constant volume combustion chamber using various sensors. Cogent Eng 5:1464879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hamins A, Borthwick P (1998) Suppression of ignition over a heated metal surface. Combust Flame 112:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bennett JM (2001) Ignition of combustible fluids by heated surfaces. Process Saf Prog 20:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gerstein M, Mansour MN (1977) The vaporization behavior of a fuel drop on a hot surface (Report AFOSR-TR-78–0010). US Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Bolling AFB, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Knowles RE (1965) Discussion. Inst Marine Eng Trans 77:137–138

    Google Scholar 

  49. Parts L (1979) Assessment of the Flammability of Aircraft Hydraulic Fluids (AFAPL-TR-79-2055), Wright-Patterson AFB

  50. Mével R, Melguizo-Gavilanes J, Boeck LR, Shepherd JE (2019) Experimental and numerical study of the ignition of hydrogen-air mixtures by a localized hot surface. Intl J Heat Fluid Flow 76:154–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Boeck LR, Meijers M, Kink A, Mével R, Shepherd JE (2017) Ignition of fuel-air mixtures from a hot circular cylinder. Combust Flame 185:265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ignition risk of hydrocarbon vapors by hot surfaces in the open air (Publ. 2216), 2nd ed., American Petroleum Institute, Washington (1991)

  53. Standard test method for hot surface ignition temperature of gases on flat surface (ASTM D8211—18), ASTM (2018).

  54. Designation and safety classification of refrigerants (2019) (ASHRAE Standard 34–2019), ASHRAE

  55. Koban M, Coughlan P (2016) Hot surface ignition testing for 2L class refrigerants, ASHRAE Paper ST-16-C067, ASHRAE

  56. Koban M, Minor B, Coughlan P, Gray N, (2016) Hot Surface Ignition Testing of Low GWP 2L Refrigerants, Paper 1759 in Intl. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conf., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette IN

  57. Coughlan P, Gray N, Koban M, (2018) Expanded hot surface ignition testing of A2L refrigerants, paper 1989 in Intl. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conf., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette IN

  58. Standard test method for discrimination between flammability ratings of F = 0 and F = 1 (ASTM D6668), ASTM (2016

  59. Standard for household and similar electrical appliances—safety—Part 2–40: Particular Requirements for Electrical Heat Pumps, Air-Conditioners and Dehumidifiers (IEC 60335–2–40), 6th ed., IEC (2018)

  60. Standard for household and similar electrical appliances—safety—Part 2–40: Particular Requirements for Electrical Heat Pumps, Air-Conditioners and Dehumidifiers (UL 60335–2–40), 3rd ed., UL (2019)

  61. Petroleum and related products—determination of the flammability characteristics of fluids in contact with hot surfaces—manifold ignition test (ISO 20823), ISO (2003)

  62. Deleanu L, Buzoianu D, Rîpă M, Crăciunoiu S, Drug A (2007) Flammability tests on hot surfaces for industrial fluids the annals of university. “Dunărea De Jos“ of Galaţi—Tribology 8:22–31

    Google Scholar 

  63. Georgescu C, Cristea GC, Solea CL, Deleanu L, Sandu IG (2018) Flammability of some vegetal oils on hot surface. Rev Chim 69(3):668–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Manifold Ignition Test (CETOP RP 65H), Comité Européen des Transmissions Oléohydrauliques et Pneumatiques (CETOP), Frankfurt am Main, Germany (1974).

  65. Federal Standard—Testing Method of Lubricants, Liquid Fuels, and Related Products (FED-STD-791), Federal Supply Services, General Services Administration, Washington (2007).

  66. Snyder CE, Krawetz AE, Tovrog T (1981) Determination of the flammability characteristics of aerospace hydraulic fluids. Lubr Eng 37:705–714

    Google Scholar 

  67. Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials (ASTM E119), ASTM.

  68. Fire Resistance Tests–Elements of Building Construction (ISO 834), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

  69. Babrauskas V (2009) Unexposed-face temperature criteria in fire resistance tests: a reappraisal. Fire Saf J 44:813–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Babrauskas V (2021) Electrical fires and explosions. Fire Science Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  71. Nabert K, Schön G (1963) Sicherheitstechnische kennzahle brennbarer gase und dämpfe, 2nd edn. Deutscher Eichverlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  72. Nichols RJ (1980) Investigation of the octane rating and autoignition temperature of methanol-gasoline blends (SAE 800258). SAE Congress and Exposition, Detroit MI

    Google Scholar 

  73. Tewarson A (2005) Thermophysical and fire properties of engine compartment fuels. SAE Trans 114(6):1941–1947

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vytenis Babrauskas.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babrauskas, V. Ignition of Gases, Vapors, and Liquids by Hot Surfaces. Fire Technol 58, 281–310 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01144-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01144-8

Keywords

Navigation