Skip to main content
Log in

Long Borel Games

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study games of length ω2 with moves in ℕ and Borel payoff. These are, e.g., games in which two players alternate turns playing digits to produce a real number in [0, 1] infinitely many times, after which the winner is decided in terms of the sequence belonging to a Borel set in the product space [0,1].

The main theorem is that Borel games of length ω2 are determined if, and only if, for every countable ordinal α, there is a fine-structural, countably iterable model of Zermelo set theory with α-many iterated powersets above a limit of Woodin cardinals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. P. Aguilera, S. Müller and P. Schlicht, Long games and σ-projective sets, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (2021), Article no. 102939.

  2. J. P. Aguilera, Shortening clopen games, Journal of Symbolic Logic, to appear, https://doi.org/10.1017/jsl.2021.2.

  3. J. P. Aguilera and S. Müller, The consistency strength of long projective determinacy, Journal of Symbolic Logic 85 (2020), 338–366.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Barwise, Admissible Sets and Structures, Perspectives in Logic, Vol. 7, Springer, Berlin, 1975.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Blass, Equivalence of two strong forms of determinacy, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 52 (1975), 373–376.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. H. M. Friedman, Higher set theory and mathematical practice, Annals of Mathematical Logic 2 (1971), 325–357.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Gostanian, Constructible models of subsystems of ZF, Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (1980), 237–250.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Harrington, Analytic determinacy and 0#, Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (1978), 685–693.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. R. B. Jensen, The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy, Annals of Mathematical Logic 4 (1972), 229–308.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. S. Kechris, E. M. Kleinberg, Y. N. Moschovakis and W. H. Woodin, The axiom of determinacy, strong partition properties and nonsingular measures, in Games, Scales and Suslin Cardinals, The Cabal Seminar, Volume I, Lecture Notes in Logic, Vol. 31, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008, pp. 333–354.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Koellner and W. H. Woodin, Large cardinals from determinacy, in Handbook of Set Theory, Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 1951–2119.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. P. B. Larson, Extensions of the Axiom of Determinacy, draft.

  13. W. J. Mitchell and J. R. Steel, Fine Structure and Iteration Trees, Lecture notes in logic, Vol. 3, Springer, Berlin, 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Müller, R. Schindler and W. H. Woodin, Mice with finitely many Woodin cardinals from optimal determinacy hypotheses, Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (2020), Article no. 1950013.

  15. D. A. Martin, The determinacy of infinitely long games, unpublished.

  16. D. A. Martin, Measurable cardinals and analytic games, Fundamenta Mathematicae 66 (1970), 287–291.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. D. A. Martin, Borel determinacy, Annals of Mathematics 102 (1975), 363–371.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. D. A. Martin and J. R. Steel, The extent of scales in L(ℝ), in Games, Scales, and Suslin Cardinals. The Cabal Seminar, Volume I, Lecture Notes in Logic, Vol. 31, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008, pp. 110–120.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. D. A. Martin and J. R. Steel, A proof of projective determinacy, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 2 (1989), 71–125.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. A. R. D. Mathias, Provident sets and rudimentary set forcing, Fundamenta Mathematicae 230 (2015), 99–148.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. N. Moschovakis, Descriptive Set Theory, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Vol. 155, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. N. Moschovakis, Uniformization in a playful universe, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 77 (1971), 731–736.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Montalbán and R. A. Shore, The limits of determinacy in second-order arithmetic, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 104 (2011), 223–252.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. I. Neeman, The Determinacy of Long Games, de Gruyter Series in Logic and its Applications, Vol. 7, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Schindler and J. R. Steel, The core model induction, draft.

  26. R. Schindler and M. Zeman, Fine structure, in Handbook of Set Theory, Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 605–656.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. J. R. Steel, An optimal consistency strength lower bound for AD, unpublished.

  28. J. R. Steel, Scales in L(ℝ), in Games, Scales and Suslin Cardinals, The Cabal Seminar, Volume I, Lecture Notes in Logic, Vol. 31, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008, pp. 130–175.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. J. R. Steel, An outline of inner model theory, in Handbook of Set Theory, Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 1595–1684.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. J. R. Steel, Determinateness and Subsystems of Analysis, PhD. thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 1977.

  31. J. R. Steel, Inner models with many Woodin cardinals, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 65 (1993), 185–209.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. J. R. Steel and W. H. Woodin, HOD as a core model, in Ordinal Definability and Recursion Theory. The Cabal Seminar, Volume III, Lecture Notes in Logic, Vol. 43, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016, pp. 257–346.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. J. R. Steel, The Derived Model Theorem, unpublished.

  34. K. Tanaka, Weak axioms of determinacy and subsystems of analysis. I: Δ 02 games, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 36 (1990), 481–491.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. N. D. Trang., Generalized Solovay Measures, the HOD analysis, and the Core Model Induction, PhD. thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 2013.

  36. P. D. Welch, Weak systems of determinacy and arithmetical quasi-inductive definitions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2011), 418–436.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. T. M. Wilson, Contributions to Descriptive Inner Model Theory, PhD. thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 2012.

  38. W. H. Woodin, Supercompact cardinals, sets of reals, and weakly homogeneous trees, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 85 (1988), 6587–6591.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Aguilera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguilera, J.P. Long Borel Games. Isr. J. Math. 243, 273–314 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-021-2160-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-021-2160-y

Navigation