Skip to main content
Log in

A model for representing topological relations between lines considering metric details

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A topological relation may be described by different words, and the significance of topological relation models lies in clarifying the semantics of topological relations among different users. Metric details beyond topological relations can help enhance topological relations with qualitative metric information. Although considerable research has been conducted to study topological relation models and metric details, further work is required to consider detailed metrics for topological relation models between lines. Both simple line and nonsimple line are defined, and topological relations for both simple and nonsimple lines have been studied in this research. Metric details for line-line topological relations are elaborated. A topological relation model between lines considering metric details (TRM-MD), including the length ratio and the number-of-endpoints ratio, is proposed in this article. A total of 76 topological relations represented by the TRM-MD and corresponding geometric interpretation is shown, and the inverse relations between these topological relations are also presented. The relationships between the TRM-MD and other topological relation models are discussed. A case study is designed, and the topological relations between bus routes represented by the 9IM, DE-9IM, and TRM-MD are shown to verify the validity of the TRM-MD. The results show the following: (1) both topological relations and metric details can be distinguished by the TRM-MD, and (2) the TRM-MD can be converted to the 9IM and DE-9IM without additional calculations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barzegar M, Rajabifard A, Kalantari M, Atazadeh B (2020) 3D BIM-enabled spatial query for retrieving property boundaries: a case study in Victoria, Australia. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 34(2):251–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berli J, Touya A, Lokhat A, Regnauldb N (2018) Experiments to distribute map generalization processes. Cartogr J 54:322–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen P, Shi W (2018) Measuring the spatial relationship information of multi-layered vector data. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 7(3):88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Li C, Li Z, Gold C (2001) A voronoi-based 9-intersection model for spatial relations. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(3):201–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrobak T, Szombara S, Kozoł K, Lupa M (2017) A method for assessing generalized data accuracy with linear object resolution verification. Geocarto Int 32(3):238–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clementini E, Di Felice P, van Oosterom P (1993) A small set of formal topological relationships suitable for end-user interaction. In: Abel D, Chin Ooi B. (eds) Advances in spatial databases. SSD 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 692. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Cohn A, Li S, Liu W, Renz J (2014) Reasoning about topological and cardinal direction relations between 2-dimensional spatial objects. J Artif Intell Res 51:493–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du S, Qin Q, Wang Q, Ma H (2008) Reasoning about topological relations between regions with broad Boundaries. Int J Approx Reason 47(2):219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube M, Egenhofer M (2020) Binary topological relations on the digital sphere. Int J Approx Reason 116:62–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube M, Barrett J, Egenhofer M (2015) From metric to topology: determining relations in discrete space. In: Fabrikant S, Raubal M, Bertolotto M, Davies C, Freundschuh S, Bell S (eds) Spatial information theory. COSIT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9368. Springer, Cham

  • Egenhofer M (1993) A model for detailed binary topological relationships. Geomatica 47(3–4):261–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer M, Dube M (2009) Topological relations from metric refinements. In: ACM sigspatial international conference on advances in geographic information systems. Seattle, Washington, USA, p 158–167

  • Egenhofer M, Franzosa R (1991) Point-set topological spatial relations. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 5(2):161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer M, Herring J (1991) Categorizing binary topological relations between regions, lines, and points in geographic databases. Technical report. University of Maine, Department of Surveying Engineering, Orono, ME

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer M, Shariff A (1998) Metric details for natural-language spatial relations. ACM T Inform Syst 16(4):321–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Formica A, Mazzei M, Pourabbas E, Rafanelli M (2017) Enriching the semantics of the directed polyline-polygon topological relationships: the DLP-intersection matrix. J Geogr Syst 19(2):175–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formica A, Mazzei M, Pourabbas E, Rafanelli M (2018) Approximate answering of queries involving polyline-polyline topological relationships. Inform Visual 17(2):128–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowicz K, Raubal M (2011) Kuhn W (2011) The semantics of similarity in geographic information retrieval. J Spat Inform Sci 2:29–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostakis O, Papapetrou P (2017) On searching and indexing sequences of temporal intervals. Data Min Knowl Disc 31(3):809–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koylu C, Guo D (2017) Design and evaluation of line symbolizations for origin–destination flow maps. Inform Visual 16(4):309–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurata Y (2008) The 9 + -intersection: A universal framework for modeling topological relations. In: Cova T, Miller H, Beard K, Frank A, Goodchild M (eds) Geographic information science. GIScience 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5266. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Liu Y, Guo Q, Wieczorek J, Goodchild M (2009) Positioning localities based on spatial assertions. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 23(11):1471–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Min D, Jing W, Liu Q (2015) Modeling spatiotemporal topological relationships between moving object trajectories along road networks based on region connection calculus. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sc 43(4):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskovitch R, Shahar Y (2015) Fast time intervals mining using the transitivity of temporal relations. Knowl Inf Syst 42:21–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedas K, Egenhofer M (2008) Spatial-scene similarity queries. . TGIS 12(6):661–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedas K, Egenhofer M, Wilmsen D (2007) Metric details of topological line–line relations. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21(1):21–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park W, Yu K (2011) Hybrid line simplification for cartographic generalization. Pattern Recognit Lett 32(9):1267–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruas A, Pham H (2015) Symbolization and generalization to map water pipe data flow and water quality at different scales. Cartogr J 52(2):149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M, Behr T (2006) Topological relationships between complex spatial objects. ACM T Database Syst 31(1):39–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Chen M, Liu X (2018a) Classification of topological relations between spatial objects in two-dimensional space within the dimensionally extended 9-intersection model. T GIS 22(2):514–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Chen M, Yue S (2018b) A distance-based topological relation model between spatial regions. Arab J Geosci 11(23):763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Shi K, Chen M (2020) Topological relations between directed line segments in the cyclic space. J Geogr Syst 22(4):497–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Qiao M, Liu H, Ye X (2018) Qualitative spatial reasoning on topological relations by combining the semantic web and constraint satisfaction. Geo-Spat Inf 1:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu C (2019) Detailed model of topological and metric relationships between a line and region. Arab J Geosci 12(4):130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J (2007) Formalizing natural-language spatial relations between linear objects with topological and metric properties. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21(4):377–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Luo X, Zhang S, Wei X, Mei L, Hu C (2014) Mining temporal explicit and implicit semantic relations between entities using web search engines. Future Gener Comp Sy 37:468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhu Y (2015) A method based on graphic entity for visualizing complex map symbols on the web. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sc 42(1):44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was jointly supported by the Chongqing Social Science Planning Project (No. 2020PY28) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41830648). We would like to thank the editors and anonymous referees for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingwei Shen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, J., Zhao, D., Shi, K. et al. A model for representing topological relations between lines considering metric details. J Geogr Syst 23, 407–424 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-021-00355-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-021-00355-5

Keywords

JEL Classifcation

Navigation