Abstract—
A new exact solution for the problem of potential flow of a capillary fluid past a two-dimensional bubble in a rectilinear channel is derived; the solution generalizes the known particular Joukowski’s solution. It is shown that in one of the limiting cases of an infinitely small bubble this solution coincides with the exact McLeod’s solution for a bubble in an infinite flow.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
A. G. Petrov, “The stability of a fluid cylinder in a plane-parallel flow of an ideal fluid,” J. Appl. Math. Mech. 80(3), 257–263 (2016).
N. E. Joukowski, “Determination of fluid motion under any condition imposed on a streamline,” in: Collected Edition, Vol. 2 (Gostekhizdat, Moscow & Leningrad, 1949, pp. 640–653) [in Russian].
E. B. McLeod, “The explicit solution of a free boundary problem involving surface tension,” J. Ration. Mech. Anal. 4(4), 557–567 (1955).
O. M. Kiselev, “The problem of a gas bubble in plane ideal fluid flow,” Fluid Dynamics 4(4), 7–13 (1969).
P. N. Shankar, “On the shape of a two-dimensional bubble in uniform motion,” J. Fluid Mech. 244, 187–200 (1992).
L. N. Sretenskii, Theory of Wave Motions of Fluids (Nauka, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].
N. B. Volkov, N. M. Zubarev, and O. V. Zubareva, “Exact solutions to the problem on the shape of an uncharged jet of a conducting fluid in a transverse electric field,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 122(5), 950–955 (2016).
G. D. Crapper, “An exact solution for progressive capillary waves of arbitrary amplitude,” J. Fluid Mech. 2, 532–540 (1957).
O. M. Kiselev, “On exact solutions of jet problems with account for surface tension forces,” in: Proc. Workshop on Boundary Value Problems. Issue 4 (Kazan Univ. Press, 1967), pp. 53–60 [in Russian].
W. Kinnersley, “Exact large amplitude capillary waves on sheets of fluid,” J. Fluid Mech. 77(2), 229–241 (1976).
N. M. Zubarev and O. V. Zubareva, “Equilibrium surface configuration of a conducting liquid in external spatially periodic electric field,” Techn. Phys. Letters 36(5), 417–419 (2010).
M. I. Gurevich, Theory of Jets of Ideal Fluids (Fizmatgiz, Moscow, 1961) [in Russian].
H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1932).
M. A. Lavrent’ev and B. V. Shabat, Methods of Theory of the Function of a Complex Variable (Nauka, Moscow, 1973) [in Russian].
P. P. Kufarev, “Solution of the problem of the oil-bearing contour for a circle,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 60(8). 1333–1334 (1948).
S. D. Howison, “Complex variable methods in Hele—Shaw moving boundary problems,” Europ. J. Appl. Math. 3(3), 209–224 (1992).
M. M. Alimov, “Unsteady motion of a bubble in a Hele—Shaw cell,” Fluid Dynamics 51(2), 253–265 (2016).
M. M. Alimov, “Exact solution of the Muskat—Leibenzon problem for a growing elliptic bubble,” Fluid Dynamics 51(5), 660–671 (2016).
Funding
The study is carried out using the funds assigned within the framework of the State support of the Kazan Federal University for the purpose of its competitive growth among the leading world’s research and educational centers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The Author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Translated by M. Lebedev
Appendices
APPENDIX А
In the case in which \({{a}_{1}} \ne 0\) we can immediately derive an expression of the parameter \(A\) in terms of \({{a}_{1}}\) from Eq. (4.10)
Then rewriting expression (4.11) in terms of Eq. (4.10) yields
Substituing this expression into Eq. (4.12) and taking Eq. (А.1) into account we arrive at the expression
where the auxiliary function \(F({{a}_{1}})\) is used (cf. Eq. (4.13)).
Relation (А.3) is a quadratic equation in \(\xi _{0}^{2}\). Solving this equation and discarding its smaller in absolute value root we obtain
In order for the quantity \(\xi _{0}^{2}\) be real the following inequality must be fulfilled
It can restrict the boundaries of the interval on which \({{a}_{1}}\)varies: \( - 1 < {{a}_{1}} < 1\). In fact, let us write the quadratic equation
which represents the denominator of the function \(F({{a}_{1}})\). This equation has two roots \({{a}_{1}} = - {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}} \right. \kern-0em} 3}\) and \({{a}_{1}} = 1\) and only on the interval
the condition \((1 + 2{{a}_{1}} - 3a_{1}^{2}) > 0\) is fulfilled. Then the verification of inequality (А.5) with account for (4.13) reduces to the verification of inequality
This inequality is not fulfilled on the entire interval (А.6) but only on the interval
Thus, the solution is physically meaningful only on interval (А.8), where \(\xi _{0}^{2}\) is real, and using Eqs. (А.2)–(А.4) the parameters \(B\) and \({{\xi }_{0}}\) can be expressed in terms of the parameter \({{a}_{1}}\)
The physical condition \(B > 0\) can also correct the boundaries of the interval for \({{a}_{1}}\) which is now determined by inequality (А.8). In view of Eqs. (4.13) and (А.9) and the fact that \((1 - 3a_{1}^{2} + 2{{a}_{1}}) > 0\), it is necessary to verify the fulfillment of the inequality
It is easy to verify that this reduces to the verification of the inequality \(4{{(1 - a_{1}^{2})}^{2}} > 0\), which is always fulfilled. Thus, on interval (А.8) we have always B > 0.
APPENDIX В
To estimate the bubble area \(S\) we will use the formula
In the \(\zeta \) plane the boundary \(\Gamma \) is associated with \(\zeta = {{e}^{{i\sigma }}}\); on this boundary the differential \(d\sigma \) can be replaced by \({{(i\zeta )}^{{ - 1}}}d\zeta \) [14]. Using the operator \(\mathcal{P}\) introduced in Section 3 we can rewrite Eq. (В.1) in the form of the contour integral:
where the contour \({{C}_{\zeta }}\) is the unit circle \({\text{|}}\zeta {\text{|}} = 1\). Taking Eqs. (3.6) and (5.1) into account we obtain
Substituting Eqs. (5.2) and (В.3) into expression (В.2) we obtain the expression
where two auxiliary functions \({{\Phi }^{ - }}(\zeta )\) and \({{\Phi }^{ + }}(\zeta )\) are introduced (cf. Eq. (5.5)).
The integrand of the first integral (В.4) is regular within the unit circle \({\text{|}}\zeta {\text{|}} < 1\) everywhere except for the simple poles at points \(\zeta = \pm \xi _{0}^{{{\kern 1pt} - 1}}\). At the same time, the integrand of the second integral (В.4) is regular outside the unit circle \({\text{|}}\zeta {\text{|}} > 1\) everywhere, except for the simple poles at points \(\zeta = \pm {{\xi }_{0}}\), while at infinity it behaves as follows:
Then the contour integrals (В.4) can be calculated using theory of residues [14]
As a result, we obtain a closed expression for the bubble area S (cf. Eq. (5.6)).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alimov, M.M. Generalization of Joukowski’s Solution for a Bubble in a Channel. Fluid Dyn 56, 321–333 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462821030010
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462821030010