Abstract
The diffusion of opinions in social networks is a relevant process for adopting positions and attracting potential voters in political campaigns. Opinion polarization, bias, targeted diffusion, and the radicalization of postures are key elements for understanding the voting dynamics’ challenges. In particular, social bots are currently a new element that can have a pronounced effect on the formation of opinions during electoral processes by, for instance, creating fake accounts in social networks to manipulate elections. Here, we propose a voter model incorporating bots and radical or intolerant individuals in the decision-making process. The dynamics of the system occur in a multiplex network of interacting agents composed of two layers, one for the dynamics of opinions where agents choose between two possible alternatives, and the other for the tolerance dynamics, in which agents adopt one of the two tolerance levels. The tolerance accounts for the likelihood to change opinion in an interaction, with tolerant (intolerant) agents switching opinion with probability 1.0 (\(\gamma \le 1\)). We find that intolerance leads to a consensus of tolerant agents during an initial stage that scales as \(\tau ^+ \sim \gamma ^{-1} \ln N\), who then reach an opinion consensus during the second stage in a time that scales as \(\tau \sim N\), where N is the number of agents. Therefore, very intolerant agents (\(\gamma \ll 1\)) could considerably slow down dynamics towards the final consensus state. We also find that the inclusion of a fraction \(\sigma _{{\mathbb {B}}}^-\) of bots breaks the symmetry between both opinions, driving the system to a consensus of intolerant agents with the bots’ opinion. Thus, bots eventually impose their opinion to the entire population, in a time that scales as \(\tau _B^- \sim \gamma ^{-1}\) for \(\gamma \ll \sigma _{{\mathbb {B}}}^-\) and \(\tau _B^- \sim 1/\sigma _{{\mathbb {B}}}^-\) for \(\sigma _{{\mathbb {B}}}^- \ll \gamma \).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Clifford, A. Sudbury, Biometrika 60, 581 (1973)
T.M. Liggett, Interacting particle systems (Springer, New York, 1975)
C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, V. Loreto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009)
F. Vazquez, P.L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 36, L61–L68 (2003)
F. Vazquez, S. Redner, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 37, 8479 (2004)
D. Volovik, M. Mobilia, S. Redner, Europhys. Lett. 85, 48003 (2009)
F. Vazquez, E.S. Loscar, G. Baglietto, Phys. Rev. E 100, 042301 (2019)
N. Masuda, N. Gibert, S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E 82, 010103 (2010)
D.A. Vega-Oliveros, L. Da F. Costa, F.A. Rodrigues, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. v.2, 023401 (2017)
K. Suchecki, V.M. Eguíluz, M. San Miguel, EPL 69(2), 228 (2004)
V. Sood, T. Antal, S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E 77, 041121 (2008)
K. Suchecki, V.M. Eguíluz, M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 72, 036132 (2005)
V. Sood, S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 178701 (2005)
D.A. Vega-Oliveros, L. da Fontoura Costa, F.A. Rodrigues, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 83, 105094 (2020)
F. Vazquez, V.M. Eguíluz, N. J. Phys. 10, 063011 (2008)
F. Vazquez, V.M. Eguíluz, M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 108702 (2008)
G. Demirel, F. Vazquez, G.A. Böhme, T. Gross, Phys. D 267, 68–80 (2014)
S. Galam, Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 333, 49–55 (2004)
G. Serge, F. Jacobs, Phys. A. Stat. Mech. Appl. 381, 366–376 (2007)
M. Mobilia, A. Petersen, S. Redner, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2007, P08029 (2007)
G. De Marzo, A. Zaccaria, C. Castellano, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043117 (2020)
C.E. La Rocca, L.A. Braunstein, F. Vazquez, Europhys. Lett. 106, 40004 (2014)
F. Velásquez-Rojas, F. Vazquez, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp. 2018, 043403 (2018)
F. Vazquez, N. Saintier, J.P. Pinasco, Phys. Rev. E 101, 012101 (2020)
N. Saintier, J. Pablo Pinasco, F. Vazquez, Chaos 30, 063146 (2020)
D. Volovik, S. Redner, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2012, P04003 (2012)
E. Colleoni, A. Rozza, A. Arvidsson, Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in twitter using big data. J. Commun. 64(2), 317–332 (2014)
O. Boichak, S. Jackson, J. Hemsley, S. Tanupabrungsun, Automated diffusion? Bots and their influence during the 2016 US presidential election. In: International conference on information (Springer, 2018), pp. 17–26
A. Duh, M. Slak Rupnik, D. Korošak, Collective behavior of social bots is encoded in their temporal twitter activity. Big Data 6(2), 113–123 (2018)
M. Stella, M. Cristoforetti, M. De Domenico, Influence of augmented humans in online interactions during voting events. PLoS One 14(5), e0214210 (2019)
J. Pastor-Galindo, M. Zago, P. Nespoli, S.L. Bernal, A.H. Celdrán, M.G. Pérez, J.A. Ruipérez-Valiente, G.M. Pérez, F.G. Mármol, Spotting political social bots in twitter: a use case of the 2019 Spanish general election. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.00931 (2020)
D.M.J. Lazer, M.A. Baum, Y. Benkler, A.J. Berinsky, K.M. Greenhill, F. Menczer, M.J. Metzger, B. Nyhan, G. Pennycook, D. Rothschild et al., The science of fake news. Science 359(6380), 1094–1096 (2018)
F. Velásquez-Rojas, F. Vazquez, Phys. Rev. E 95, 052315 (2017)
P.C.V. da Silva, F. Velásquez-Rojas, C. Connaughton, F. Vazquez, Y. Moreno, F.A. Rodrigues, Phys. Rev. E 100, 032313 (2019)
F. Velásquez-Rojas, P. Cesar Ventura, C. Connaughton, Y. Moreno, F.A. Rodrigues, F. Vazquez, Phys. Rev. E 102, 022312 (2020)
W. Wang, M. Tang, H. Yang, Y. Do, Y.-C. Lai, G. Lee, Sci. Rep. 4, 5097 (2014)
C. Granell, S. Gómez, A. Arenas, Phys. Rev. E 90, 012808 (2014)
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) under Grant No.: 2015/50122-0 and the German Research Council (DFG-GRTK) Grant No.: 1740/2. D.A.V.O acknowledges the computational resources from the Center for Mathematical Sciences Applied to Industry (CeMEAI) under Grant 2013/07375-0, and FAPESP Grants 2016/23698-1, 2018/24260-5, and 2019/26283-5. F.V. acknowledges financial support from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Cienítfica y Tecnológica (Grant No. PICT 2016 Nro 201-0215). H.L.C.G. was funded by the research scholarship PCI-INPE, process 301113/2020-3. We thank Prof. Dr. Alessandro Vespignani, Dr. Dario Mazzilli, and PhD(c) Daniele Notarmuzi for useful comments and intellectual discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: complement of the explicit transitions rules
Appendix A: complement of the explicit transitions rules
In this section, we explicitly write all transitions between opinion and tolerance states of agents in the model without bots (Table 1) and with bots (Table 2). The notations \(A^+, A^-, B^+\) and \(B^-\) correspond to states of agents with opinion and tolerance A and \(+\), A and −, B and \(+\), and B and −, respectively. In a single time step \(\Delta t = 1/N\) of the dynamics, one node is chosen at random. Then, this node copies the tolerance of a random neighbor in the ±-layer, and the opinion of a random neighbor in the AB-layer. In Tables 1 and 2, the states on the left and right of a given pair correspond, respectively, to the focal agent—who changes state—and the random neighbor on the corresponding layer. Only situations that lead to a state change are included in the tables.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vega-Oliveros, D.A., Grande, H.L.C., Iannelli, F. et al. Bi-layer voter model: modeling intolerant/tolerant positions and bots in opinion dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 230, 2875–2886 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00151-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00151-8