Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Phase Change on Enhanced Oil Recovery During Injection of Steam Carrying Alumina Nanoparticles: Numerical Simulation

  • Research Article-Petroleum Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effects of phase change specially steam condensation in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes such as steam assisted gravity drainage are a key important factor. Due to the last developments in nanotechnology, it is of great interest to use nanoparticles along with hot fluids to increase EOR efficiency. In current research, effects of phase change (steam condensation) on oil recovery from a two-dimensional porous medium during the injection of steam carrying alumina nanoparticles were studied. Additionally, fluid–fluid interfacial morphology development at different injection fluid temperatures i.e., 100, 110, 150, and 200 °C was examined. The governing equations of multi-phase fluid flow along with phase change were solved using finite volume computational technique. Comparing the results of oil recovery factor between phase change and non-phase change cases at 110 °C showed that initially the oil recovery factor in the case of non-phase change increases sharply, but as time goes on, the efficiency of phase change case becomes greater than that of non-phase change case mainly due to the large variations in fluid properties. It was also predicted that in injection of fluid at different temperatures, initially the recovery of oil grows sharply for 200 °C, but the final results of injected fluid with 110 °C achieves the highest efficiency of 67.5%. The final oil recovery at 110 °C increased by 21.5% compared to 200 °C. Moreover, the results predicted that the trend of oil recovery at different injection temperatures had a non-monotonic behavior over the time. Besides, the results showed that the amount of liquid water accumulation in the porous medium was reduced by increasing the injection temperature due to the low resident time and high energy content of the injected fluid at higher temperatures. Overall, the resident time of the injected fluid, its initial energy content (injection temperature), and phase change are the most vital factors in oil recovery factor enhancement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green, D.W.; Willhite, G.P.: Enhanced oil recovery, p. 545. Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mozaffari, S.; Nikookar, M.; Ehsani, M.R.; Sahranavard, L.; Roayaie, E.; Mohammadi, A.H.: Numerical modeling of steam injection in heavy oil reservoirs. Fuel 112, 185–192 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Green, D.W.; Willhite, G.P.: Enhanced oil recovery, Vol. 6. Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lazar, I.; Petrisor, I.G.; Yen, T.F.: Microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR). Pet. Sci. Technol. 25(11), 1353–1366 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Z.; Liu, X.; Luo, H.; Peng, B.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y.; Rui, Z.: Foaming properties and foam structure of produced liquid in alkali/surfactant/polymer flooding production. J. Energy Res. Technol. 143(10), 103005 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmadlouydarab, M.; Liu, Z.S.S.; Feng, J.J.: Interfacial flows in corrugated microchannels: flow regimes, transitions and hysteresis. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 37(10), 1266–1276 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang, Y.; Hou, C.; He, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Rui, Z.: Review on pore structure characterization and microscopic flow mechanism of CO2 flooding in porous media. Energ. Technol. 9(1), 2000787 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bera, A.; Babadagli, T.: Status of electromagnetic heating for enhanced heavy oil/bitumen recovery and future prospects: a review. Appl. Energy 151, 206–226 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Naqvi, S.: Enhanced oil recovery of heavy oil by using thermal and non-thermal methods. Dalhousie University, Halifax (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alvarado, V.; Manrique, E.: Enhanced oil recovery: an update review. Energies 3(9), 1529–1575 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos, R.G.; Loh, W.; Bannwart, A.C.; Trevisan, O.V.: An overview of heavy oil properties and its recovery and transportation methods. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 31(3), 571–590 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pratama, R.A.; Babadagli, T.: Effect of temperature, phase change, and chemical additives on wettability alteration during steam applications in sands and carbonates. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 23(01), 292–310 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alvarez, J.; Han, S.: Current overview of cyclic steam injection process. J. Pet. Sci. Res. 2(3), 116–127 (2013)

  14. Alikhlalov, K.; Dindoruk, B.: Conversion of cyclic steam injection to continuous steam injection. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2011)

  15. Batycky, J.; Leaute, R.; Dawe, B.: A mechanistic model of cyclic steam stimulation. In: International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1997)

  16. Liu, P.; Zheng, H.; Wu, G.: Experimental study and application of steam flooding for horizontal well in ultraheavy oil reservoirs. J. Energy Res. Technol. 139(1), 012908 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pratama, R. A.; Babadagli, T.: Wettability state and phase distributions during steam injection with and without chemical additives: an experimental analysis using visual micro-models. In: SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2019)

  18. Wu, Z.; Liu, H.: Investigation of hot-water flooding after steam injection to improve oil recovery in thin heavy-oil reservoir. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 9(2), 1547–1554 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kong, X.; Ohadi, M.M.; Petroleum, T.; Xiangling, K.: Applications of micro and nano technologies in the oil and gas industry—overview of the recent progress. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE (2010)

  20. Krishnamoorti, R.: Technology tomorrow: extracting the benefits of nanotechnology for the oil industry. J. Pet. Technol. 58(11), 24–6 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao, B.; Li, C.; Yang, F.; Sjöblom, J.; Zhang, Y.; Norrman, J.; Paso, K.; Xiao, Z.: Organically modified nano-clay facilitates pour point depressing activity of polyoctadecylacrylate. Fuel 15(166), 96–105 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yousefvand, H.; Jafari, A.: Enhanced oil recovery using polymer/nanosilica. Proc. Mater. Sci. 11, 565–570 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mokhatab, S.; Fresky, M.A.; Islam, M.R.: Applications of nanotechnology in oil and gas E&P. J. Pet. Technol. 58(04), 48–51 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ehtesabi, H.; Ahadian, M.M.; Taghikhani, V.; Ghazanfari, M.H.: Enhanced heavy oil recovery in sandstone cores using TiO2 nanofluids. Energy Fuels 28(1), 423–430 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rostami, P.; Sharifi, M.; Aminshahidy, B.; Fahimpour, J.: The effect of nanoparticles on wettability alteration for enhanced oil recovery: micromodel experimental studies and CFD simulation. Pet. Sci. 16(4), 859–873 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gharibshahi, R.; Jafari, A.; Ahmadi, H.: CFD investigation of enhanced extra-heavy oil recovery using metallic nanoparticles/steam injection in a micromodel with random pore distribution. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 174, 374–383 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. GhanadDezfully, M.; Jafari, A.; Gharibshahi, R.: CFD simulation of enhanced oil recovery using nanosilica/supercritical CO2. In: Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 1104, pp. 81–86). Trans Tech Publications, London (2015)

  28. Maghzi, A.; Mohammadi, S.; Ghazanfari, M.H.; Kharrat, R.; Masihi, M.: Monitoring wettability alteration by silica nanoparticles during water flooding to heavy oils in five-spot systems: a pore-level investigation. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 40, 168–176 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jafari, A.; Zamankhan, P.; Mousavi, S.M.; Pietarinen, K.: Modeling and CFD simulation of flow behavior and dispersivity through randomly packed bed reactors. Chem. Eng. J. 144(3), 476–482 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, W. H.: A pressure iteration scheme for two-phase modeling. Technical Report LA-UR 79-975. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (1979)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Ahmadlouydarab.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All authors confirm proper acknowledgements to other works have been given, quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions secured for material that is copyrighted.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadlouydarab, M., Ghaffari, K. & Jafari, A. Effects of Phase Change on Enhanced Oil Recovery During Injection of Steam Carrying Alumina Nanoparticles: Numerical Simulation. Arab J Sci Eng 47, 11135–11144 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05738-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05738-w

Keywords

Navigation