Abstract
Revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-RST) is a major neuropsychological theory of motivation, emotion, and personality. We report the results of a study that examined the unique relationships of the r-RST constructs with two forms of anxiety: social interaction and social performance. Five hundred and seventy-two adults completed the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ) alongside measures of social interaction anxiety and social performance anxiety. Regression results revealed that, as predicted, both social interaction anxiety and social performance anxiety were linked uniquely and positively with the behavioral inhibition system (BIS) scale score. In addition, social performance anxiety was associated uniquely and positively with the fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS) scale score. The theoretical and clinical implications of the findings for social anxiety are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acarturk, C., Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., & de Graaf, R. (2009). Psychological treatment of social anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708003590.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Asher, M., Asnaani, A., & Aderka, I. M. (2017). Gender differences in social anxiety disorder: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 56, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.05.004.
Bijttebier, P., Beck, I., Claes, L., & Vandereycken, W. (2009). Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(5), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.04.002.
Bögels, S. M., Alden, L., Beidel, D. C., Clark, L. A., Pine, D. S., Stein, M. B., & Voncken, M. (2010). Social anxiety disorder: Questions and answers for the DSM-V. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20670.
Corr, P. J. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST): Introduction. In P. J. Corr (Ed.), The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality (pp. 1–43). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819384.002.
Corr, P. J. (2013). Approach and avoidance behaviour: Multiple systems and their interactions. Emotion Review, 5(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913477507.
Corr, P. J. (2016). Reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaires: Structural survey with recommendations. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.045.
Corr, P. J., & Cooper, A. J. (2016). The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1427–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000273.
Cox, B. J., Clara, I. P., Sareen, J., & Stein, M. B. (2008). The structure of feared social situations among individuals with a lifetime diagnosis of social anxiety disorder in two independent nationally representative mental health surveys. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.011.
Fayazi, M., & Hasani, J. (2017). Structural relations between brain-behavioral systems, social anxiety, depression and internet addiction: with regard to revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-RST). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.068.
Furmark, T., Tillfors, M., Stattin, H., Ekselius, L., & Fredrikson, M. (2000). Social phobia subtypes in the general population revealed by cluster analysis. Psychological Medicine, 30, 1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291799002615.
Gomez, R., Watson, S., & Stavropoulos, V. (2020). Associations of behavioral inhibition system with negatively biased social cognitions: moderation by the behavioral approach system. Personality and individual Differences, 166(11), 0164.
Gray, J. A. (1982). Précis of the neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(3), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00013066.
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). Anxiolytic action on the behavioural inhibition system implies multiple types of arousal contribute to anxiety. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61(3), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00344-X.
Harnett, P. H., Loxton, N. J., & Jackson, C. J. (2013). Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: implications for psychopathology and psychological health. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(8), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.019.
Hofmann, S., Heinrichs, N., & Moscovitch, D. (2004). The nature and expression of social phobia: Toward a new classification. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(7), 769–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.004.
Jackson, C. J. (2009). Jackson-5 scales of revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (r-RST) and their application to dysfunctional real world outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.007.
Kimbrel, N. A. (2008). A model of the development and maintenance of generalized social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(4), 592–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.08.003.
Kimbrel, N. A., Meyer, E. C., DeBeer, B. B., Mitchell, J. T., Kimbrel, A. D., Nelson-Gray, R. O., & Morissette, S. B. (2016). Reinforcement sensitivity and social anxiety in combat veterans. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.008.
Kodal, A., Bjelland, I., Gjestad, R., Wergeland, G. J., Havik, O. E., Heiervang, E. R., & Fjermestad, K. (2017). Subtyping social anxiety in youth. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 49, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.03.009.
Kramer, S., & Rodriguez, B. F. (2018). A comparison of reinforcement sensitivity theory measures: unique associations with social interaction anxiety and social observation anxiety. Assessment, 25(5), 627–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116654003.
Kramer, S., Rodriguez, B. F., & Kertz, S. J. (2015). Predicting socially anxious group membership using reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 474–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.053.
Ly, C., & Gomez, R. (2014). Unique associations of reinforcement sensitivity theory dimensions with social interaction anxiety and social observation anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.003.
Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139.
Mattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6.
McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005.
Mundform, D. J., Perrett, J. J., Schaffer, J., Piccone, A., & Roozeboom, M. (2006). Bonferroni adjustments in tests for regression coefficients. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 32(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n33.
Nigg, J. T., John, O. P., Blaskey, L. G., Huang-Pollock, C. L., Willcutt, E. G., Hinshaw, S. P., & Pennington, B. (2002). Big five dimensions and ADHD symptoms: Links between personality traits and clinical symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.451.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x.
Peters, L., Sunderland, M., Andrews, G., Rapee, R. M., & Mattick, R. P. (2012). Development of a short form Social Interaction Anxiety (SIAS) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS) using nonparametric item response theory: The SIAS-6 and the SPS-6. Psychological Assessment, 24(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024544.
Pugnaghi, G., Cooper, A., Ettinger, U., & Corr, P. J. (2018). The psychometric properties of the German language Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory - Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ). Journal of Individual Differences, 39(3), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000262.
Randjelovic, K., & Zeleskov-Djoric, J. (2017). Fear of negative evaluation and social anxiety in the context of the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory. Collection of Papers of the Faculty of Philosophy In Pristina, 47(3), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.5937/ZRFFP47-14985.
Rodebaugh, T. L., Holaway, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (2004). The treatment of social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(7), 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.007.
Smederevac, S., Mitrović, D., Čolović, P., & Nikolašević, Ž. (2014). Validation of the measure of revised reinforcement sensitivity theory constructs. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000121.
Spence, S. H., & Rapee, R. M. (2016). The etiology of social anxiety disorder: an evidence-based model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 86, 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.007.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Harkness, A. R. (1994). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.18.
Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (1992). Personality and psychopathology: an application of the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 363–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14676494.1992.tb00977.x.
Widiger, T. A., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1994). Personality and personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 78.
Copyright
Authors assign copyright or license the publication rights in the present article.
Funding
There was no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RP contributed to the literature review, framework formulation, and the structure and sequence of theoretical arguments. Contact: rapson.gomez@federation.edu.au. VS contributed to the literature review, framework formulation, and the structure and sequence of theoretical arguments. Contact: vasileios.stavropoulos@vu.edu.au. SW contributed to the literature review, framework formulation, and the structure and sequence of theoretical arguments. Contact: shaun.watson@federation.edu.au. TB contributed to the literature review, framework formulation, and the structure and sequence of theoretical arguments. Contact: taylor.brown@live.vu.edu.au. PC: contributed to the literature review, framework formulation, and the structure and sequence of theoretical arguments. Contact: Philip.Corr.1@city.ac.uk.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for Publication
The authors confirm that this paper has not been either previously published or submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere.
Conflict of Interest
The authors of the present study do not report any conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomez, R., Stavropoulos, V., Watson, S. et al. Unique Associations of Revised-Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Constructs with Social Anxiety. Int J Ment Health Addiction 20, 2838–2850 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00552-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00552-9