Skip to main content
Log in

Nested-solution facility location models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classical facility location models can generate solutions that do not maintain consistency in the set of utilized facilities as the number of utilized facilities is varied. We introduce the concept of nested facility locations, in which the solution utilizing p facilities is a subset of the solution utilizing q facilities, for all \(i \le p < q \le j\), given some lower limit i and upper limit j on r, the number of facilities that will be utilized in the future. This approach is demonstrated with application to the p-median model, with computational testing showing these new models achieve reductions in both average regret and worst-case regret when \(r \ne p\) facilities are actually utilized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Averbakh, I.: Minmax regret solutions for minimax optimization problems with uncertainty. Oper. Res. Lett. 27, 57–65 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, B.M., Sheasby, J.: Accelerating the convergence of subgradient optimisation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 117(1), 136–144 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beasley, J.E.: A note on solving large p-median problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 21, 270–273 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Beasley, J.E.: http://people.brunel.ac.uk/~mastjjb/jeb/orlib/pmedinfo.html (2004)

  5. Berman, O., Drezner, Z.: The p-median problem under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189, 19–30 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Current, J., Daskin, M.S., Schilling, D.: Discrete network location models. In: Drezner, Z., Hamacher, H.W. (eds.) Facility Location: Applications and Theory, pp. 81–118. Springer, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Current, J., Ratick, S., ReVelle, C.: Dynamic facility location when the total number of facilities is uncertain: a decision analysis approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 110, 597–609 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daskin, M.S., Maass, K.L.: The p-Median Problem, pp. 21–45. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hakimi, S.L.: Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Oper. Res. 12(3), 450–459 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hakimi, S.L.: Optimum distribution of switching centers in a communication network and some related graph theoretic problems. Oper. Res. 13(3), 462–475 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lodi, A., Mossina, L., Rachelson, E.: Learning to handle parameter perturbations in combinatorial optimization: an application to facility location. EURO J. Transp. Logist. 9(4), 100023 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Snyder, L.V.: Facility location under uncertainty: a review. IIE Trans. 38, 537–554 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Snyder, L.V., Daskin, M.S.: Stochastic p-robust location problems. IIE Trans. 38(11), 971–985 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sobolev Institute of Mathematics. http://www.math.nsc.ru/AP/benchmarks/UFLP/Engl/uflp_eucl_eng.html (2018)

  16. Sonmez, A.D., Lim, G.J.: A decomposition approach for facility location and relocation problem with uncertain number of future facilities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218, 327–338 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research reported in this manuscript was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P20GM104417. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald G. McGarvey.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGarvey, R.G., Thorsen, A. Nested-solution facility location models. Optim Lett 16, 497–514 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-021-01759-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-021-01759-4

Keywords

Navigation