Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of mass uncertainty on astrophysical rates and \((p,\gamma )\)\((\gamma ,p)\) equilibrium in the rp-process

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid proton capture process (rp-process) is believed to be responsible for energy production and the synthesis of elements in X-ray bursts. Although understanding the \((p,\gamma )\)\((\gamma ,p)\) equilibrium for a wide range of masses during the process is essential, it is hampered by the large uncertainties of several key isotopes participating in the rp-process. In the present work, we investigate the impacts of mass uncertainties on \((p,\gamma )\)\((\gamma ,p)\) equilibria in the rp-process, which strongly affects the reaction paths, the isotopic abundances of nuclei with \(A > 65\), the effective lifetimes of waiting points, and the luminosity of X-ray bursts. The results show that current mass uncertainties still result in rather large deviations up to two orders of magnitude in many astrophysical photodisintegration rates. The numbers of isotopes and the values of the mass resolving power required for precise mass measurements using the multi-reflection time-of-flight (MR-TOF) technique are estimated for future experiments at modern radioactive ion beam facilities, including the RAON in Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.E. Taam, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 35, 1 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. R.E. Taam et al., Astrophys. J. 413, 234 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R.K. Wallace, S.E. Woosley, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 45, 389 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Schatz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3471–3474 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. V.-V. Elomaa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 252501 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Audi et al., Chin. Phys. C 41, 030001 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. R.H. Cyburt et al., Astrophys. J. 830, 55 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Parikh et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 178, 110 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Parikh, J. Jose, G. Sala, AIP Adv. 4, 041002 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Meisel, G. Merz, S. Medvid, Astrophys. J. 872, 84 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Schatz et al., Phys. Rep. 294, 167 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Parikh, J. Jose, C. Iliadis, F. Moreno, T. Rauscher, Phys. Rev. C 79, 045802 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R.H. Cyburt et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 189, 240 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Herndl, J. Gorres, M. Wiescher et al., Phys. Rev. C 52, 1078 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Iliadis, Nuclear Physics of Stars (Wiley, Weinheim, 2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Rauscher, F.-K. Thielemann, Atom. Data Nucl. Data 75, 1 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Rembges et al., Astrophys. J. 484, 412 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Wolf et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 349, 123 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Wang et al., Chin. Phys. C 41, 030003 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Moller et al., Atom. Data Nucl. Data 125, 1 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. J.L. Fisker et al., Nucl. Phys. A 758, 447c–450c (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. J.L. Fisker et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 174, 261 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Y.H. Lam et al., Astrophys. J. 818, 78 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Moller, J.R. Nix, W.D. Myers, W.J. Swiatecki, Atom. Data Nucl. Data 59, 185 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. J.A. Halbleib, R.A. Sorensen, Nucl. Phys. A 98, 541 (1967)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Moller, J. Randrup, Nucl. Phys. A 514, 1 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J.J. Cowan, F.-K. Thielemami, J.W. Truran, Phys. Rep. 208, 267 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. S.E. Woosley et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 151, 75 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. J.A. Clark et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 032801(R) (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. J.A. Winger et al., Phys. Rev. C 48, 3097 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. X.L. Tu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 112501 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. K. Blaum et al., Phys. Scr. T 152, 014017 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Wienholtz et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 421, 285 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M.A. Famiano, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 28(4), 1930005 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. P. Schury et al., Phys. Rev. C 95, 011305(R) (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. P. Schury et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 433, 40 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grants funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (nos. NRF-2020R1C1C1006029, NRF-2017R1D1A1B03030019, NRF-2013M7A1A1075764, NRF-2020R1A2C1005981 and NRF-2019K2A9A2A10018827).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Y. Chae.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duy, N.N., Uyen, N.K. & Chae, K.Y. Impact of mass uncertainty on astrophysical rates and \((p,\gamma )\)\((\gamma ,p)\) equilibrium in the rp-process. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 79, 350–356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-021-00212-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-021-00212-0

Keywords

Navigation