Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment and simulation of evacuation in large railway stations

  • Research Article
  • Architecture and Human Behavior
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evacuation systems in buildings are frequently assessed to improve emergency response processes. This paper proposes a method to evaluate the performance of different evacuation modes, and determine a rational mode for large railway stations. We developed a simulation for the evaluation of fire safety in large buildings based on an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. This approach includes AHP-based exploration and simulation-based refinement. We considered a typical railway station for validation, conducted a field survey to collect the data, and calculated the influencing factors based on expert opinion. The influencing factors were further processed based on the principles of a hierarchical model. The relative weights of the influencing factors were calculated through a series of pairwise comparisons using the AHP. Further, we applied factor refinement based on the evacuation simulations to determine the degree and status of influence of each factor. The influence of external factors was generally stronger than that of the internal factors. Among them, the building component characteristics and people’s physiological capabilities were the core of the evacuation assessment in large railway stations. Additionally, the exit width, seat layout, visibility, speed, and reaction capabilities were crucial to the evacuation process. The proposed method is practical as it demands limited computations to provide useful information, such as a priority ranking of each influencing factor, for the evaluation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abolghasemzadeh P (2013). A comprehensive method for environmentally sensitive and behavioral microscopic egress analysis in case of fire in buildings. Safety Science, 59: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashe B, Shields TJ (1999). Analysis and modeling of the unannounced evacuation of a large retail store. Fire and Materials, 23: 333–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belz R, Mertens P (1994). SIMULEX—A multiattribute DSS to solve rescheduling problems. Annals of Operations Research, 52: 107–129.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bode NWF, Codling EA (2013). Human exit route choice in virtual crowd evacuations. Animal Behaviour, 86: 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan JL (1957). A study of the survivors reports on the panic in the fire at the Arundel Park Hall in Brooklyn, University of Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan JL (2002). SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. 3rd edn. Quincy, MA, USA: National Fire Protection Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter D, Powell J, Booker K (1988). Psychological aspects of informative fire warning systems (No. BR127). Garston, UK: Building Research Establishment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey M, McCartney M (2004). An exit-flow model used in dynamic traffic assignment. Computers & Operations Research, 31: 1583–1602.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson JM, Alderson DL, Stromberg SP, et al. (2014). Measuring and modeling behavioral decision dynamics in collective evacuation. PLoS One, 9: e87380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang L, He X, Song W (2016). Research on steel structure building evacuation based on empirical formula method and Simulex. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Nankaiensis, 49(6): 21–28. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Chin J (2000). The analysis of performance-based smoke management and egress system in new-type MRT station. Mechanical Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow WK, Ng CMY (2008). Waiting time in emergency evacuation of crowded public transport terminals. Safety Science, 46: 844–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey NC (1969). The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group. Santa Monica, CA, USA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietenberger MA, Boardman CR (2017). EcoSmart fire as structure ignition model in wildland urban interface: predictions and validations. Fire Technology, 53: 577–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong LY, Chen L, Duan XY (2015). Modeling and simulation of pedestrian evacuation from a single-exit classroom based on experimental features. Acta Physica Sinica, 64: 220505. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank GA, Dorso CO (2015). Evacuation under limited visibility. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 26: 1550005.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fridolf K, Nilsson D, Frantzich H (2013). Fire evacuation in underground transportation systems: A review of accidents and empirical research. Fire Technology, 49: 451–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridolf K, Nilsson D, Frantzich H (2016). Evacuation of a metro train in an underground rail transportation system: flow rate capacity of train exits, tunnel walking speeds and exit choice. Fire Technology, 52: 1481–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galea ER, Galparsoro JMP (1994). A computer-based simulation model for the prediction of evacuation from mass-transport vehicles. Fire Safety Journal, 22: 341–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galea ER, Finney KM, Dixon AJP, et al. (2006). An analysis of exit availability, exit usage and passenger exit selection behaviour exhibited during actual aviation accidents. The Aeronautical Journal, 110: 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Graves A, Turner KW, Swan JH (2011). The level of willingness to evacuate among older adults. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 32: 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo R, Huang H, Wong SC (2012). Route choice in pedestrian evacuation under conditions of good and zero visibility: Experimental and simulation results. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46: 669–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heliövaara S, Kuusinen JM, Rinne T, et al. (2012). Pedestrian behavior and exit selection in evacuation of a corridor—An experimental study. Safety Science, 50: 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Guo R (2008). Static floor field and exit choice for pedestrian evacuation in rooms with internal obstacles and multiple exits. Physical Review E, 78: 021131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph M, Pandya PK (1986). Finding response times in a real-time system. The Computer Journal, 29: 390–395.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy WD, Li SK, Harvey NA (2001). Simulation of escape from rail tunnels using Simulex. In: Proceedings of Rail Transit Conference, Miami, FL, USA.

  • Ketchell N, Manford GJ, Kandola B (1995). Evacuation modeling: A new approach. IN: Proceedings of Asiaflam’95, Hong Kong, China.

  • Kisko TM, Francis RL (1985). EVACNET+: A computer program to determine optimal building evacuation plans. Fire Safety Journal, 9: 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuligowski E, Peacock R, Wiess E, et al. (2013). Stair evacuation of older adults and people with mobility impairments. Fire Safety Journal, 62: 230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdi HA, Al-Megren S, Althunyan R, et al. (2018). Effect of exit placement on evacuation plans. European Journal of Operational Research, 269: 749–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S-J, Lee S-H (2008). A study on the development of emergency evacuation simulator considering the characteristic of the behavior pattern in crowding. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 9: 1319–1327. (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao W, Zheng X, Cheng L, et al. (2014). Layout effects of multi-exit ticket-inspectors on pedestrian evacuation. Safety Science, 70: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo SM, Fang Z, Lin P, et al. (2004). An evacuation model: the SGEM package. Fire Safety Journal, 39: 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovreglio R, Ronchi E, Kinsey MJ (2020). An online survey of pedestrian evacuation model usage and users. Fire Technology, 56: 1133–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y, Li L, Zhang H, Chen T (2017). Experimental study on small group behavior and crowd dynamics in a tall office building evacuation. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 473: 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell NC, Boyce KE, Shields J, et al. (2010). The UK 9/11 evacuation study: Analysis of survivors’ recognition and response phase in WTC1. Fire Safety Journal, 45: 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Zhang W (2014). Way-finding during a fire emergency: an experimental study in a virtual environment. Ergonomics, 57: 816–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mott MacDonald Simulation Group (2012). Simulation of Transient Evacuation and Pedestrian movementS—STEPS User Manual 4.1 Version.

  • Nam H, Kwak S, Jun C (2016). A study on comparison of improved floor field model and other evacuation models. Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, 25(3): 41–51. (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson PÅ, Regan MA (2001). A comparison between actual and predicted evacuation times. Safety Science, 38: 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozel F (2001). Time pressure and stress as a factor during emergency egress. Safety Science, 38: 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phipps DL, Meakin GH, Beatty PCW (2011). Extending hierarchical task analysis to identify cognitive demands and information design requirements. Applied Ergonomics, 42: 741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires TT (2005). An approach for modeling human cognitive behavior in evacuation models. Fire Safety Journal, 40: 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran G (1991). Informative fire warning systems. Fire Technology, 27: 66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rød SK, Botan C, Holen A (2012). Risk communication and worried publics in an imminent rockslide and tsunami situation. Journal of Risk Research, 15: 645–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronchi E, Colonna P, Capote J, et al. (2012). The evaluation of different evacuation models for assessing road tunnel safety analysis. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 30: 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronchi E, Nilsson D, Kojić S, et al. (2016). A virtual reality experiment on flashing lights at emergency exit portals for road tunnel evacuation. Fire Technology, 52: 623–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saloma C, Perez GJ, Tapang G, et al. (2003). Self-organized queuing and scale-free behavior in real escape panic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100: 11947–11952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schadschneider A, Klingsch W, Klüpfel H, et al. (2009). Evacuation dynamics: Empirical results, modeling and applications. in: Meyers R (ed), Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields TJ, Boyce KE, McConnell N (2009). The behaviour and evacuation experiences of WTC 9/11 evacuees with self-designated mobility impairments. Fire Safety Journal, 44: 881–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiwakoti N, Sarvi M, Rose G, et al. (2011). Animal dynamics based approach for modeling pedestrian crowd egress under panic conditions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45: 1433–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiwakoti N, Gong Y, Shi X, et al. (2015). Examining influence of merging architectural features on pedestrian crowd movement. Safety Science, 75: 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sime J (2001). An occupant response shelter escape time (ORSET) model. Safety Science, 38: 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld E (2006). Evacuation of people with disabilities. Journal of Security Education, 1: 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson PA, Marchant EW (1995a). Testing and application of the computer model ‘SIMULEX’. Fire Safety Journal, 24: 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson PA, Marchant EW (1995b). A computer model for the evacuation of large building populations. Fire Safety Journal, 24: 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson PA, Wu J, Marchant E (1996). Modelling evacuation in multi-storey buildings with Simulex. Fire Engineers Journal, 56(185): 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thunderhead Engineering (2012). Pathfinder 2012.1.0802 Version. Technical Reference.

  • Vilar E, Rebelo F, Noriega P, et al. (2014). Effects of competing environmental variables and signage on route-choices in simulated everyday and emergency wayfinding situations. Ergonomics, 57: 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Lo S, Wang Q, et al. (2013). Risk of large-scale evacuation based on the effectiveness of rescue strategies under different crowd densities. Risk Analysis, 33: 1553–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Ma H, Wu Y, et al. (2018). Characteristics and prediction of sound level in extra-large spaces. Applied Acoustics, 134: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind Y, Saaty TL (1980). Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 26: 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood PG (1972). Fire Research Note 953. Borehamwood: Building Research Establishment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y (2016). Emergency evacuation safety research for large railway stations based on auditory perception. PhD Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, China. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Kang J, Wang C (2018). A crowd route choice evacuation model in large indoor building spaces. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7: 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Liao S, Liu M (2019). Simulation and assessment of fire evacuation modes for long underwater vehicle tunnels. Fire Technology, 55: 729–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CM, Lo SM, Zhang SP, et al. (2009). A post-fire survey on the pre-evacuation human behavior. Fire Technology, 45: 71–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X-P, Zhong T-K, Zhang J-W (2008). Exploration into the evacuation of crowds in public buildings. China Safety Science Journal, 18(1): 27–33. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J-H (1990). On the architectural creation of China’s major comprehensive railway passenger station. Architectural Journal, 1990(4): 10–18. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K-J, Yang L-Z (2010). The effects of exit position and internal layout of classroom on evacuation efficiency. Acta Physica Sinica, 59(11): 7701–7707. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the Harbin West Railway Station in Harbin, China, for their permission for investigation. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51808160 and 51878210) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HIT.NSRIF.2020035).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Cold Region Urban and Rural Human Settlement Environment Science and Technology, School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 66 West Dazhi Street, Harbin, 150001, China

    Yue Wu & Jingyi Mu

  2. UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London, London, UK

    Jian Kang

Authors
  1. Yue Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jingyi Mu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingyi Mu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Kang, J. & Mu, J. Assessment and simulation of evacuation in large railway stations. Build. Simul. 14, 1553–1566 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0754-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0754-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation