Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The importance of spatial and temporal scale in describing hydrogeomorphic character of riverine landscapes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Describing the hydrogeomorphic character of rivers in a holistic way is essential to understanding the processes whereby freshwater ecosystems maintain patterns of biodiversity and ecosystem processes. A key question in carrying out this characterisation is the temporal and spatial scales which best represent differences and similarities between habitats.

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to describe the hydrological and geomorphological character of a large river-floodplain system (the Upper Mississippi River, USA) at multiple spatial and temporal scales in order to holistically determine the physical template influencing the riverine ecosystem.

Methods

Seventeen variables are used to describe the hydrogeomorphic character of 99 backwaters and floodplain lakes along a 100 km reach of the river.

Results

At the landscape scale (10 s of km), position in the landscape and proximity to neighbouring habitats contributed most to variability in hydrogeomorphic character. At the smaller patch scale (10–100 s of m), the shape of entry to the patch and water depth were distinguishing variables. In relation to temporal variables, habitats are distinguished by decadal scale variables describing the historic nature of the rise and fall of connection events, and mean peak and duration of connection over long periods. In contrast, the interplay of magnitude and duration of individual connection events produced unique patterns at the short-term temporal scale (intra-annual). Analysis of all variables across all scales showed that no variable from one scale of observation was dominant, rather variables from multiple scales are contributing to hydrogeomorphic character to varying degrees.

Conclusions

This work demonstrates how an interdisciplinary, multi-scale approach is critical in detecting unique patterns in hydrogeomorphic character across different spatial and temporal scales. This approach enables a holistic view of spatio-temporal heterogeneity of a system and provides a firm basis for investigating how the physical template influences and helps to maintain patterns of biodiversity and ecosystem processes in complex and dynamics systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

© OpenStreetMap contributors, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA, Intermap and the GIS user community

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and software applications support our published claims and comply with field standards.

References

  • Amoros C, Bornette G (2002) Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshw Biol 47:761–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcombe SR, Arthington AH, Foster ND, Thoms MC, Wilson GA, Bunn SE (2006) Fish assemblages of an Australian dryland river: abundance, assemblage structure and recruitment patterns in the Warrego River, Murray–Darling Basin. Mar Freshw Res 57:619–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barko VA, Palmer MW, Herzog DP, Ickes BS (2004) Influential environmental gradients and spatiotemporal patterns of fish assemblages in the unimpounded upper Mississippi river. Am Midl Nat 152:369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs BJF, Nikora VI, Snelder TH (2005) Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function. River Res Appl 21:283–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond N (2019) Hydrologic indices for daily time series data. R package version 0.2.7. https://github.com/nickbond/hydrostats

  • Boulinier T, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Sauer JR, Flather CH, Pollock KH (1998) Higher temporal variability of forest breeding bird communities in fragmented landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:7497–7501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bouska KL, Houser JN, De Jager NR, Van Appledorn M, Rogala JT (2019) Applying concepts of general resilience to large river ecosystems: a case study from the Upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers. Ecol Ind 101:1094–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boys C, Thoms MC (2006) A large-scale, hierarchical approach for assessing habitat associations of fish assemblages in large Dryland rivers. Hydrobiologia 572:11–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks AP, Brierley GJ (2002) Mediated equilibrium: the influence of riparian vegetation and wood on the long-term evolution and behaviour of a near-pristine river. Earth Surf Proc Land 27:343–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsden D, Thornes JB (1979) Landscape sensitivity and change. Trans Inst Br Geogr 4:463–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell FL, Huggard DJ (1999) Biodiversity across spatial and temporal scales: problems and opportunities. For Ecol Manage 115:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Grove JM (2006) Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: heterogeneity, connectivity and history. Ecol Complex 3:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas-Güell E, Teixidó N, Garrabou J, Cebrian E (2015) Structure and biodiversity of coralligenous assemblages over broad spatial and temporal scales. Mar Biol 162:901–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charrad M, Ghazzali N, Boiteau V, Niknafs A (2014) NbClust: an R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. J Stat Softw 61:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Simons DB (1986) Hydrology, hydraulics, and geomorphology of the Upper Mississippi River system. Hydrobiologia 136:5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chown SL, Convey P (2007) Spatial and temporal variability across life’s hierarchies in the terrestrial Antarctic. Phil Trans R Soc B 362:2307–2331

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS (2011) Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 26:899–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson TA, Mackay AW, Wolski P, Mazebedi R, Murray-Hudson M, Todd M (2012) Seasonal and spatial hydrological variability drives aquatic biodiversity in a flood-pulsed, sub-tropical wetland. Freshw Biol 57:1253–1265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Jager NR, Thomsen M, Yin Y (2012) Threshold effects of flood duration on the vegetation and soils of the Upper Mississippi River floodplain, USA. For Ecol Manag 270:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jager NR, Rohweder JJ, Yin Y, Hoy E (2016) The Upper Mississippi River floodscape: spatial patterns of flood inundation and associated plant community distributions. Appl Veg Sci 19:164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jager NR, Rogala JT, Rohweder JJ, Van Appledorn M, Bouska KL, Houser JN, Jankowski KJ (2018) Indicators of ecosystem structure and function for the Upper Mississippi River system. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2018-1143. U.S. Geological Survey, La Crosse, WI. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20181143

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delong M (2005) Upper Mississippi River basin. In: Benke A, Cushing C (eds) Rivers of North America. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Delong M, Thorp J, Thoms M, McIntosh LM (2011) Trophic niche dimensions of fish communities as a function of historical hydrological conditions in a Plains river. River Syst 19:177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delong MD, Thoms MC, Sorenson E (2019) Interactive effects of hydrogeomorphology on fish community structure in a large floodplain river. Ecosphere 10(5):e02731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar ESJ, James CS, Rogers KH, Thoms MC (2007) A framework for interdisciplinary understanding of rivers as ecosystems. Geomorphology 89:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elosegi A, Díez J, Mutz M (2010) Effects of hydromorphological integrity on biodiversity and functioning of river ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 657:199–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-0083-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esri (2019) ArcGIS Desktop: release 10.7.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA

  • Esri (2020) World Topo Base [basemap]. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA

  • eWater CRC (2012) River Analysis Package, version 3.0.7. eWater Cooperative Research Center (CRC), Innovation Centre, University of Canberra, ACT, Australia. https://toolkit.ewater.org.au/Tools/RAP

  • Frissell CA, Liss WJ, Warren CE, Hurley MD (1986) A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ Manage 10:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryirs KA (2015) Developing and using geomorphic condition assessments for river rehabilitation planning, implementation and monitoring WIREs. Water 2:649–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryirs KA et al (2018) Tracking geomorphic recovery in process-based river management. Land Degrad Dev 29:3221–3244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller IC, Gilvear DJ, Thoms MC, Death RG (2019) Framing resilience for river geomorphology: reinventing the wheel? River Res Appl 35:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galili T (2015) dendextend: an R package for visualizing, adjusting, and comparing trees of hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv428

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gao H, Sabo JL, Chen X, Liu Z, Yang Z, Ren Z, Liu M (2018) Landscape heterogeneity and hydrological processes: a review of landscape-based hydrological models. Landscape Ecol 33:1461–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gering JC, Crist TO, Veech JA (2003) Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity conservation. Biology 17:488–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilvear DJ (1999) Fluvial geomorphology and river engineering: future roles utilizing a fluvial hydrosystems framework. Geomorphology 31:229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory KJ, Lewin J (2015) Making concepts more explicit for geomorphology. Prog Phys Geogr 39:711–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell AM (2016) A multi-scale hierarchical framework for developing understanding of river behaviour to support river management. Aquat Sci 78(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy T, Panja P, Mathias D (2005) WinXSPRO, a channel cross section analyser, user’s manual, Version 3.0. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-147

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J et al (2015) A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels. Ecol Evol 5:1235–1248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeinghaus DJ, Winemiller KO, Agostinho AA (2008) Hydrogeomorphology and river impoundment affect food-chain length of diverse Neotropical food webs. Oikos 117:984–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen E, Lauridsen TL, Kairesalo T, Perrow MR (1998) Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton interactions in lakes. In: Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Søndergaard M, Christoffersen K (eds) Ecological studies (analysis and synthesis), vol 131. Springer, New York, pp 91–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutz S (2002) Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes. Freshw Biol 47:867–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassambara A, Mundt F (2017) Factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R package version 1.0.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra

  • Kennard MJ, Olden JD, Arthington AH, Pusey BJ, Poff NL (2007) Multiscale effects of flow regime and habitat and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:1346–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King AJ (2004) Ontogenetic patterns of habitat use by fishes within the main channel of an Australian floodplain river. J Fish Biol 65(6):1582–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight J, Harrison S (2014) Limitations of uniformitarianism in the Anthropocene. Anthropocene 5:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights BC, Ickes BS, Houser JN (2008) Fish assemblages in off-channel areas of the Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers implications for habitat restoration at management-relevant scales. U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin. September 2008. Completion Report 2007APE07 for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island, Illinois.

  • Koel TM (2004) Spatial variation in fish species richness of the Upper Mississippi River system. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:984–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koel TM, Sparks RE (2002) Historical patterns of river stage and fish communities as criteria for operations of dams on the Illinois river. River Res Appl 18:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane BA, Pasternack GB, Sandoval Solis S (2018) Integrated analysis of flow, form, and function for river management and design testing. Ecohydrology. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leszczyńska J, Głowacki ŁR, Grzybkowska M (2017) Factors shaping species richness and biodiversity of riverine macroinvertebrate assemblages at the local and regional scale. Journal of Community Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2017.18.3.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (2000) Multiple scales and the maintenance of biodiversity. Ecosystems 3:498–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Mouquet N, Gonzalez A (2003) Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:12765–12770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K (2019) cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.0.9. https://svn.r-project.org/R-packages/trunk/cluster

  • Marsh N, Stewardson M (2003) Using the River Analysis Package (RAP) for Environmental Flow Studies (p 2.65-2.71). https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.356816695018416

  • Massicotte P, Frenette J-J, Proulx R, Pinel-Alloul B, Bertolo A (2014) Riverscape heterogeneity explains spatial variation in zooplankton functional evenness and biomass in a large river ecosystem. Landscape Ecol 29:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCluney KE et al (2014) Riverine macrosystems ecology: sensitivity, resistance, and resilience of whole river basins with human alterations. Front Ecol Environ 12:48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medley KA, Havel JE (2007) Hydrology and local environmental factors influencing zooplankton communities in floodplain ponds. Wetlands 27(4):864–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore M, Romano SP, Cook T (2010) Synthesis of Upper Mississippi River system submersed and emergent aquatic vegetation: past, present, and future. Hydrobiologia 640:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mykrä H, Heino J, Muotka T (2007) Scale-related patterns in the spatial and environmental components of stream macroinvertebrate assemblage variation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Stream & Aquatic Ecology Center (2005) WinXSPRO, 3.0. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO. https://www.fs.fed.us/biology/nsaec/products-tools.html

  • Newson MD, Large ARG (2006) ‘Natural’ rivers, ‘hydromorphological quality’ and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surf Proc Land 31:1606–1624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons M, Thoms MC, Norris RH (2004) Using hierarchy to select scales of measurement in multiscale studies of stream macroinvertebrate assemblages. J N Am Benthol Soc 23:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JD (2011) Emergence and pseudo-equilibrium in geomorphology. Geomorphology 132:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poeppl RE, Keesstra SD, Maroulis J (2017) A conceptual connectivity framework for understanding geomorphic change in human-impacted fluvial systems. Geomorphology 277:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL et al (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole GC (2010) Stream hydrogeomorphology as a physical science basis for advances in stream ecology. J N Am Benthol Soc 29(1):12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post DM, Doyle MW, Sabo JL, Finlay JC (2007) The problem of boundaries in defining ecosystems: a potential landmine for uniting geomorphology and ecology. Geomorphology 89:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power ME, Sun A, Parker G, Dietrich WE, Wooton T (1995) Hydraulic food-chain models. Bioscience 45:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle CM et al (1988) Patch dynamics in lotic systems: the stream as a mosaic. J N Am Benthol Soc 7:503–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2019) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom G (1998) SPELL, version 1.0. University of Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven EK, Lane SN, Bracken LJ (2010) Understanding sediment transfer and morphological change for managing upland gravel-bed rivers. Prog Phys Geogr 34:23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice S, Stoffel M, Turowski JM, Wolf A (2012) Disturbance regimes at the interface of geomorphology and ecology. Earth Surf Proc Land 37:1678–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach KA, Thorp JH, Delong MD (2009) Influence of lateral gradients of hydrologic connectivity on trophic positions of fishes in the Upper Mississippi River. Freshw Biol 54:607–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogala JT (1999) Methodologies employed for bathymetric mapping and sediment characterization as part of the Upper Mississippi River System Navigation Feasibility Study, ENV Report 13, Interim Report for the Upper Mississippi River—Illinois Waterway System Navigation Study; prepared for US Army Engineers District, Rock Island, US Army Engineers District, St. Louis, and US Army Engineers District, St. Paul. http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/documents/bathymetry/methods.pdf

  • Rolls RJ, Ellison T, Faggotter S, Roberts DT (2013) Consequences of connectivity alteration on riverine fish assemblages: potential opportunities to overcome constraints in applying conventional monitoring designs. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 23:624–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidegger AE (1973) Hydrogeomorphology. J Hydrol 20:193–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA (2018) Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 126:1763–1768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1973) Geomorphic thresholds and complex response of drainage systems. In: Morisawa M (ed) Fluvial Geomorphology. State University of New York, Binghamton, pp 299–310

  • Schumm SA (1979) Geomorphic thresholds: The concept and its applications. Trans Inst Br Geogr 4:485–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA, Lichty RW (1965) Time, space, and causality in geomorphology. Am J Sci 263(2):110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scown MW, Thoms MC, De Jager NR (2015) Floodplain complexity and surface metrics: influences of scale and geomorphology. Geomorphology 245:102–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidle RC, Onda Y (2004) Hydrogeomorphology: overview of an emerging science. Hydrol Process 18:597–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks RE (1995) Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. Bioscience 45:168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeon JJ, Pegg MA, Hamel MJ (2016) Multi-scale approach to hydrological classification provides insight to flow structure in altered river system. River Res Appl 32(9):1841–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford JA, Lorang MS, Hauer FR (2005) The shifting habitat mosaic in river ecosystems. Verhandlungen Des Internationalen Verein Limnologie 29:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr SM, Benstead JP, Sponseller RA (2014) Spatial and temporal organization of macroinvertebrate assemblages in a lowland floodplain ecosystem. Landscape Ecol 29:1017–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theiling C, Korschgen C, Haan HD, Fox T, Rohweder J, Robinson L (2000) Habitat needs assessment for the Upper Mississippi River System: technical report. U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiling C, Nestler J (2010) River stage response to alteration of Upper Mississippi River channels, floodplains, and watersheds. Hydrobiologia 640:17–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R, Townsend C (2006) A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. J Anim Ecol 75:476–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoms MC, Piégay H, Parsons M (2018) What do you mean, ‘resilient geomorphic systems’? Geomorphology 305:8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoms MC, Southwell M, McGinness HM (2005) Floodplain-river ecosystems: fragmentation and water resources development. Geomorphology 71:126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorn CE, Welford MR (1994) The equilibrium concept in geomorphology. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 84:666–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp JH et al (2010) Linking ecosystem services, rehabilitation, and river hydrogeomorphology. Bioscience 60:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp JH (2014) Metamorphosis in river ecology: from reaches to macrosystems. Freshw Biol 59:200–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S (2000) Process, form and change in dryland rivers: a review of recent research. Earth-Sci Rev 51(1):67–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend C, Doledec S, Scarbrook M (1997) Species traits in relation to temporal and spatial heterogeneity in streams: a test of habitat templet theory. Freshw Biol 37:367–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyser RW, Rogers SJ, Owens TW, Robinson LR (2001) Changes in backwater plant communities from 1975 to 1995 in Navigation Pool 8, Upper Mississippi River. Regul Rivers 17(2):117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S Army Corps of Engineers (2002) Rivergages: water levels of rivers and lakes. http://rivergages.mvr.usace.army.mil/WaterControl/new/layout.cfm. Accessed 2012–2014

  • United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2010) Data and tools. Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center (UMESC), U.S. Geological Survey database. www.usgs.gov/centers/umesc/data-tools. Accessed 2012–2013

  • Van Appledorn M, De Jager NR, Rohweder JJ (2020) Quantifying and mapping inundation regimes within a large river-floodplain ecosystem for ecological and management applications. River Res Appl 37:241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig AP (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV (1998) Riverine landscapes: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biol Cons 83(3):269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Malard F, Tockner K (2002) Landscape ecology: a framework for integrating pattern and process in river corridors. Landscape Ecol 17:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Tockner K, Schiemer F (1999) Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul Rivers 15:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassens S, Ning N, Hardwick L, Bino G, Maguire J (2017) Long-term changes in freshwater aquatic plant communities following extreme drought. Hydrobiologia 799:233–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3219-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb MC, Reid MA, Thoms M (2011) The influence of hydrology and physical habitat character on fish assemblages at different temporal scales. River Systems 19:283–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb MC, Thoms MC, Reid MA (2012) Determining the ecohydrological character of aquatic refugia in a dryland river system: the importance of temporal scale. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 12:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEST Consultants (2000) Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway cumulative effects study, Vol. 1 and 2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island District, Rock Island, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2002) Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshw Biol 47:501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wlosinski JH, Hill L (1995) Analysis of water level management on the upper Mississippi River (1980–1990). Regul Rivers 11:239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2016) Spatial heterogeneity as a component of river geomorphic complexity. Prog Phys Geogr 40:598–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (1999) Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Can J Remote Sens 25(4):367–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Loucks OL (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70:439–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeug SC, Winemiller KO, Tarim S (2005) Response of Brazos River oxbow fish assemblages to patterns of hydrologic connectivity and environmental variability. Trans Am Fish Soc 134:1389–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Heartfelt thanks to students of the 2012 and 2013 Large River Ecology class, Winona State University and other volunteers for their help in the field and in the Large Rivers Laboratory. Martin Thoms and Michael Delong aided in project design, field and lab work, and access to facilities and equipment.

Funding

This study was funded by the University of New England, Australia and in-kind support for field and lab work was received from Winona State University, MN, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

    Munique C. Reid & Cara Miller

  2. School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

    Michael A. Reid

  3. Centre for Applied Water Science, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia

    Ross M. Thompson

Authors
  1. Munique C. Reid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cara Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael A. Reid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ross M. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Munique C. Reid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

A disclosure of potential conflicts of interest form has been submitted by the corresponding author on behalf of all co-authors with the submission of this manuscript. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Ethical approval

No ethics approval was required for the work associated with this manuscript since no animal or humans were part of this investigation.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 86 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reid, M.C., Miller, C., Reid, M.A. et al. The importance of spatial and temporal scale in describing hydrogeomorphic character of riverine landscapes. Landscape Ecol 36, 2763–2779 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01269-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01269-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation