Skip to main content
Log in

Connection Strength of Bolt End Plate of Steel Structures Under Earthquake Action

  • Published:
Russian Physics Journal Aims and scope

Bolt end plate connection is one of the most widely used connection methods in steel structures. It is mainly used for beam-column connection and beam-to-beam splicing in a steel frame and a light steel portal steel frame. The connection strength of the bolt end plates of the steel structure under earthquake action reflects the seismic resistance of the steel structure. The analysis method for the bolt end plate connection strength of steel structures under earthquake action is proposed. The finite element model and the model for the bolt end plate strength of the steel structure under earthquake action are established. Under the one-way static load and cyclic load, the connection strength of the bolt end plate connection joints is simulated and analyzed. The analysis results show that under the action of earthquake, the thickness of the bolt end plate has little influence on the contact area, but it has a great influence on the contact stress. Under the action of earthquake, when the column web and the beam are yielded at the same time, the envelope is the fullest, the energy dissipation coefficient is also the largest, and the seismic performance is the best. The analytical results of the tested methods are in good agreement with the actual values, and the correlation coefficient is always greater than 0.99.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. L. Cheng, C. S. Pei, and H. C. Zhe, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 99, 1-1 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Chen, X. Song, and Z. Liao, J. China Acad Electron. Info. Technol., 2, 129–133 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. F. Du, Z. Han, and J. Q. Chen, Sol. Energ., 159, 125–133 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Han, J. Han, and H. Huang, J. Power Supply, 16, 71–76 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. V. Kononenko and V. I. Konov, Quantum Electron., 48, 40–44 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Zhao, M. He, and G. Tang, Chin. J. Power Sourc., 11, 1632–1634 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Kabir, A. T. Mohd, and B. H. Mohd, Bioresour. Technol., 249, 42–48 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Song, Automat. Instrum., 1, 37–39 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. D. Anja, L. P. Tim, and B. R. Horst, J. Mater. Res., 32, 1–12 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Zhan, R. Wang, and W. Min, J. Jilin Univ. (Sci. Ed.), 55, 1614–1620 (2017).

  11. R. Sari, Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., 5, No. 1, 283–291 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M. S. M. Selvi and L. Rajendran, Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., 4, No. 2, 351–364 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Z. Adam, A. Christopher, and W. A. Calhoun, J. Appl. Cryst., 51, 720–731 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Zhu, T. Zhu, and X. Hong, Comp. Simul., 12, 411–414 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. X. F. Lu and Y. X. Fang, J. Mater. Sci., 53, 2928–2941 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Mark, J. F. Denavit, and T. Hajjar, Eng. Struct., 160, 293–303 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. X. Li, L.Y. Li, and Y. Ben, Metals Mater. Int., 24, 60–66 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fahong Wu.

Additional information

Translated from Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Fizika, No. 2, pp. 121–129, February, 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, F., Shi, W., Zhu, P. et al. Connection Strength of Bolt End Plate of Steel Structures Under Earthquake Action. Russ Phys J 64, 323–332 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-021-02332-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-021-02332-3

Keywords

Navigation