Abstract
Load path as a new analysis tool has been widely used in structural design and assessment of load-bearing performance, but it still lacks effective guidance for structural improvement. In this paper, a new structural improvement method of vehicle component based on the load path and load distribution analysis is proposed. Firstly, according to the structural function and design requirements, the potential regions and parameters need to be optimized are identified based on the load path and load distribution analysis using Ustar and U*sum indexes. Secondly, taking the smoother Ustar on the load path and more effective use of the materials as the design criteria, the optimization suggestions are given. Then, as a case study, a safety hook on an automobile is redesigned and the new structure is compared with the original design. The results show that the Ustar becomes smoother and U*sum becomes more uniform. In addition, the stiffness and strength of the safety hook are improved by 25.29 % and 23.44 %, respectively. Finally, the failure tests show that the ultimate load of the safety hook is enhanced by 13.72 %. The method provides clear and effective guidance for structural improvement from the perspective of load path and load distribution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Esnaola, A., Ulacia, I., Elguezabal, B., De Dios, E. D. P., Alba, J. J. and Gallego, I. (2016). Design, manufacturing and evaluation of glass/polyester composite crash structures for lightweight vehicles. Int. J. Automotive Technology 17, 6, 1013–1022.
Harasaki, H. and Arora, J. S. (2001). New concepts of transferred and potential transferred forces in structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 191, 3–5, 385–406.
Harasaki, H. and Arora, J. S. (2002). Topology design based on transferred and potential transferred forces. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 23, 5, 372–381.
Hoshino, H., Sakurai, T. and Takahashi, K. (2003). Vibration reduction in the cabins of heavy-duty trucks using the theory of load transfer paths. JSAE Review 24, 2, 165–171.
Kajtaz, M. (2019). Unconstrained shape optimisation of a lightweight side door reinforcing crossbar for passenger vehicles using a comparative evaluation method. Int. J. Automotive Technology 20, 1, 157–168.
Kamimura, M., Hatta, Y., Ito, S., Koga, Y., Sakurai, T. and Takahashi, K. (2008). Structural optimization and load paths. Trans. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Series A 74, 737, 975–980.
Kelly, D., Reidsema, C., Bassandeh, A., Pearce, G. and Lee, M. (2011). On interpreting load paths and identifying a load bearing topology from finite element analysis. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 47, 8, 867–876.
Kelly, D. W. and Elsley, M. (1995). A procedure for determining load paths in elastic continua. Engineering Computation 12, 5, 415–424.
Kelly, D. W. and Tosh, M. W. (2000). Interpreting load paths and stress trajectories in elasticity. Engineering Computation 17, 2, 117–135.
Kong, B. S. and Park, D. K. (2018). Design optimization of the cowl cross bar — light cowl cross bar satisfying 5 performances. Int. J. Automotive Technology 19, 3, 387–391.
Kwok, T. H., Li, Y. and Chen, Y. (2016). A structural topology design method based on principal stress line. Computer-Aided Design, 80, 19–31.
Lee, J., Yoo, J., Min, S. and Yoon, M. (2019). Topology optimization of anisotropic magnetic composites in actuators using homogenization design method. Structural Multidiscoplinary Optimization 60, 4, 1423–1436.
Ma, Y., Chen, R., Bai, J. and Zuo, W. (2020). Shape optimization of thin-walled cross section for automobile body considering stamping cost, manufacturability and structural stiffness. Int. J. Automotive Technology 21, 2, 503–512.
Marhadi, K. and Venkataraman, S. (2009). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative information provided by different structural load path definitions. Int J Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization 3, 3, 384–400.
Naito, T., Kobayashi, H., Urushiyama, Y. and Takahashi, K. (2011). Introduction of new concept U* sum for evaluation of weight-efficient structure. SAE Int J Passenger Cars-Electronic and Electrical Systems 4, 2011-01-0061, 30–41.
Pejhan, K., Wu, C. Q. and Telichev, I. (2014). Application of load transfer index (U*) in structural analysis in comparison with conventional stress analysis. ASME Int. Mechanical Engineering Cong. and Exposition. Quebec, Canada.
Pejhan, K., Wang, Q., Wu, C. Q. and Telichev, I. (2017). Experimental validation of the U* index theory for load transfer analysis. Int. J. Heavy Vehicle Systems 24, 3, 288–304.
Pejhan, K., Kuznetcov, A., Wang, Q., Wu, C. Q. and Telichev, I. (2018). Design assessment of a multiple passenger vehicle component using load transfer index (U*) method. Int. J. Mechanics and Materials in Design 14, 2, 213–229.
Sakurai, T., Takahashi, K., Kawakami, H. and Abe, M. (2007). Reduction of calculation time for load path U* analysis of structures. J. Solid Mechnics and Materials Engineering 1, 11, 1322–1330.
Suzuki, T., Fukushige, S. and Tsunori, M. (2020). Load path visualization and fiber trajectory optimization for additive manufacturing of composites. Additive Manufacturing, 31, 100942.
Shinobu, M., Okamoto, D., Ito, S., Kawakami, H. and Takahashi, K. (1995). Transferred load and its course in passenger car bodies. JSAE Review 16, 2, 145–150.
Takahashi, K. (1986). “Relative rigidity” of structures and Saint Venant’s principle. Trans. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part C 52, 484, 2615–2621.
Takahashi, K., Omiya, M., Iso, T., Zaiki, Y., Sakurai, T., Maki, T., Urushiyama, Y. and Naito, T. (2013). Load transfer ustar (U*) calculation in structures under dynamic loading. Trans. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part A 79, 807, 1657–1668.
Tamijani, A. Y., Gharibi, K., Kobayashi, M. H. and Kolonay, R. M. (2018). Load paths visualization in plane elasticity using load function method. Int. J. Solids and Structures, 135, 99–109.
Wang, Q. G., Pejhan, K., Telichev, I. and Wu, C. Q. (2017a). Extensions of the U* theory for applications on orthotropic composites and nonlinear elastic materials. Int. J. Mechanics and Materials in Design 13, 3, 469–480.
Wang, Q., Pejhan, K., Telichev, I. and Wu, C. Q. (2018a). Demonstration of the effectiveness of U*-based design criteria on vehicle structural design. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 232, 8, 995–1002.
Wang, Q., Telichev, I. and Wu, C. Q. (2017b). A new load transfer index (U*M) with considering six degrees of freedom and its application in structural design and analysis. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 46, 4, 410–424.
Wang, Q., Zhou, W., Telichev, I. and Wu, C. Q. (2018b). Load transfer analysis of a bus bay section under standard rollover test using U*M index. Int. J Automotive Technology 19, 4, 705–716.
Wang, Q., Zhang, G., Sun, C. and Wu, N. (2019). High efficient load paths analysis with U* index generated by deep learning. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 344, 499–511.
Xia, L., Zhang, L., Xia, Q. and Shi, T. (2018). Stress- based topology optimization using bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 333, 356–370.
Zhang, H., Ding, X., Dong, X. and Xiong, M. (2018). Optimal topology design of internal stiffeners for machine pedestal structures using biological branching phenomena. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 57, 6, 2323–2338.
Acknowledgement
This work is supported by the Chinese National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC0802900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51605422), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2017203372, E2017203156).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Wu, N. et al. Structural Improvement of Vehicle Component Based on the Load Path and Load Distribution Analysis. Int.J Automot. Technol. 22, 787–798 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-021-0072-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-021-0072-9