Skip to main content
Log in

Maize Endochitinase Expression in Response to Fall Armyworm Herbivory

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large percentage of crop loss is due to insect damage, especially caterpillar damage. Plant chitinases are considered excellent candidates to combat these insects since they can degrade chitin in peritrophic matrix (PM), an important protective structure in caterpillar midgut. Compared to chemical insecticides, chitinases could improve host plant resistance and be both economically and environmentally advantageous. The focus of this research was to find chitinase candidates that could improve plant resistance by effectively limiting caterpillar damage. Five classes of endochitinase (I-V) genes were characterized in the maize genome, and we isolated and cloned four chitinase genes (chitinase A, chitinase B, chitinase I, and PRm3) present in two maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines Mp708 and Tx601, with different levels of resistance to caterpillar pests. We also investigated the expression of these maize chitinases in response to fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda, FAW) attack. The results indicated that both chitinase transcript abundance and enzymatic activity increased in response to FAW feeding and mechanical wounding. Furthermore, chitinases retained activity inside the caterpillar midgut and enzymatic activity was detected in the food bolus and frass. When examined under scanning electron microscopy, PMs from Tx601-fed caterpillars showed structural damage when compared to diet controls. Analysis of chitinase transcript abundance after caterpillar feeding and proteomic analysis of maize leaf trichomes in the two inbreds implicated chitinase PRm3 found in Tx601 as a potential insecticidal protein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to M. Peiffer and Penn State Microscopy facility (University Park, PA, U.S.A.) for their technical support.

Funding

This study was funded by the Pennsylvania State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yang Han and Dawn Luthe contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Yang Han. Proteomic analysis of trichomes was carried out by Erin Taylor. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yang Han and Dawn Luthe commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn Luthe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 216 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 33.3 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, Y., Taylor, E.B. & Luthe, D. Maize Endochitinase Expression in Response to Fall Armyworm Herbivory. J Chem Ecol 47, 689–706 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-021-01284-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-021-01284-9

Keywords

Navigation