Skip to main content
Log in

Cut-free Sequent Calculus and Natural Deduction for the Tetravalent Modal Logic

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 29 January 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

The tetravalent modal logic (\({\mathcal {TML}}\)) is one of the two logics defined by Font and Rius (J Symb Log 65(2):481–518, 2000) (the other is the normal tetravalent modal logic \({{\mathcal {TML}}}^N\)) in connection with Monteiro’s tetravalent modal algebras. These logics are expansions of the well-known Belnap–Dunn’s four-valued logic that combine a many-valued character (tetravalence) with a modal character. In fact, \({\mathcal {TML}}\) is the logic that preserves degrees of truth with respect to tetravalent modal algebras. As Font and Rius observed, the connection between the logic \({\mathcal {TML}}\) and the algebras is not so good as in \({{\mathcal {TML}}}^N\), but, as a compensation, it has a better proof-theoretic behavior, since it has a strongly adequate Gentzen calculus (see Font and Rius in J Symb Log 65(2):481–518, 2000). In this work, we prove that the sequent calculus given by Font and Rius does not enjoy the cut-elimination property. Then, using a general method proposed by Avron et al. (Log Univ 1:41–69, 2006), we provide a sequent calculus for \({\mathcal {TML}}\) with the cut-elimination property. Finally, inspired by the latter, we present a natural deduction system, sound and complete with respect to the tetravalent modal logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Anderson, A.R., N.D. Belnap, and J.M. Dunn, Entailment: the logic of relevance and necessity, vol. II, Princeton University Press, 1992.

  2. Avron, A., and B. Konikowska, Multi-valued Calculi for Logics Based on Non-determinism, Logic Journal of the IGPL 13(4):365–387, 2005.

  3. Avron, A., J. Ben-Naim, and B. Konikowska, Cut-free ordinary sequent calculi for logics having generalzed finite–valued semantics, Logica Universalis 1(1):41–69, 2006.

  4. Carnielli, W.A., M.E. Coniglio, and J. Marcos, Logics of Formal Inconsistency. In D. Gabbay, and F. Guenthner, (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 14, Springer, 2007, pp. 15-107.

  5. Carnielli, W.A., and J. Marcos, A taxonomy of C-systems, in W. A. Carnielli, M. E. Coniglio, and I. M. L. D’Ottaviano, (eds.), Paraconsistency–The logical way to the inconsistent, vol. 228 of Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, pp. 1–94.

  6. Coniglio, M.E., and M. Figallo, Hilbert-style Presentations of Two Logics Associated to Tetravalent Modal Algebras, Studia Logica 102(3):525–539, 2014.

  7. Figallo, A.V., and P. Landini, On generalized I-algebras and 4-valued modal algebras, Reports on Mathematical Logic 29:3–18, 1995.

  8. Font, J.M., and M. Rius, An abstract algebraic logic approach to tetravalent modal logics, Journal of Symbolic Logic 65(2):481–518, 2000.

  9. Jung, A., and U. Rivieccio, Kripke semantics for modal bilattice logic, in 2013 28th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, IEEE, 2013, pp. 438–447.

  10. Loureiro, I., Algebras modais tetravalentes, Ph. D. Thesis, Faculdade de Ciências de Lisboa, 1983.

  11. Odintsov, S.P., and H. Wansing, Modal logics with Belnapian truth values, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 20(3):279–301, 2010.

  12. Odintsov, S.P., and H. Wansing, Disentangling FDE-based paraconsistent modal logics, Studia Logica 105(6):1221–1254, 2017

  13. Priest, G., Many-valued modal logics: a simple approach, The Review of Symbolic Logic 1(2):190–203, 2008.

  14. Rivieccio, U., A. Jung, and R. Jansana, Four-valued modal logic: Kripke semantics and duality, Journal of Logic and Computation 27(1):155–199, 2015.

  15. Troelstra, A.S., and H. Schwichtenberg, Basic Proof System, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the anonymous referees for their extremely careful reading, helpful suggestions and constructive comments on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Presented by Heinrich Wansing; Received June 14, 2020.

The original online version of this article was revised due to a retrospective Open Access cancellation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Figallo, M. Cut-free Sequent Calculus and Natural Deduction for the Tetravalent Modal Logic. Stud Logica 109, 1347–1373 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-021-09944-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-021-09944-3

Keywords

Navigation