1 Introduction

Eutrophication has become a worldwide environmental problem and a threat to humanity, and it is partly caused by excessive nutrients especially phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) (Paerl et al. 2011; Schmidt et al. 2013; Schindler et al. 2016; Li et al. 2021). However, some efforts to control inputs of external nutrients (e.g., by controlling the direct discharge of domestic sewage, industrial wastewater and agricultural sewage) do not fundamentally solve the problem. Because sediment plays the role of a nutrient sink and source, it releases nutrients to the water column when relevant environmental factors change (Søndergaard et al. 2003; Gu et al. 2019; Lee et al. 2019). For example, the release of P is affected by temperature and levels of dissolved oxygen (Jiang et al. 2008). Additionally, factors such as the rates of organic matter deposition and sediment accumulation drive N release (Cornwell and Owens 2011).

To decrease the internal loading of nutrients in sediments and the risk of nutrient release, various remediation technologies have been developed. These methods mainly include dredging, in situ capping, in situ chemical applications (e.g., injecting Fe, Ca, or Al-based agents) and bioremediation (e.g., microorganism strengthening) (Jiao et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2014; Alvarado et al. 2020; Hu et al. 2020; Lin et al. 2020; Rochera et al. 2020). These techniques all exhibited results in laboratory or field sediment remediation experiments. For example, it was observed that mobile P in sediments was effectively reduced by using the thin-layer capping composed of novel materials (Yin and Kong 2015; Gu et al. 2017). Additionally, P was reduced efficiently by chemical precipitation caused by addition of an aluminum salt (Auvray et al. 2006). In addition to this, an integrated bioremediation method also controlled P release and improved aquaculture eutrophication (Wang et al. 2019). Each of the above methods has its own advantages and disadvantages. Compared with the others, the in situ capping method is more effective and easier to implement and has been widely used.

In addition to P content, N content is also a crucial factor leading to eutrophication (Xiang et al. 2009). There are several methods aimed at relieving the internal load of N in sediments. N release from sediments can be controlled by capping and amendment with iron-modified zeolite (Zhan et al. 2019). In addition, technology involving in situ biochar capping has been applied to control the release of NH4+-N in sediments (Zhu et al. 2019). However, methods to control the release of N are not many as methods to reduce the release of P. The need for joint control of N and P is ever more immediate and vital.

Based on this, we designed a pilot-scale experiment to control N and P jointly through in situ capping technology intended to achieve simultaneous reductions of the risks of N and P release into water bodies. In this study, different materials including iron-rich clay, sugarcane bagasse, Phoslock agent, and Oxone were applied. The levels of N and P species, chlorophyll a (Chl a) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in water samples were determined. The P fraction and sorption, organic carbon composition, nitrate reduction rates and extracellular enzymatic activities including those of β-glucosidase (GLU), leucine aminopeptidase (LAP), and alkaline phosphatase (AP), were determined for sediment samples. The aims of this study are to (1) compare the effectiveness and mechanisms of two P sorbents including iron-rich clay and Phoslock agent, (2) test the effect and illuminate the mechanism and potential risk of sugarcane bagasse in controlling N, and (3) propose suggestions for joint control of N and P levels.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental set-up and sampling

Twelve experimental enclosures were installed in a pond to conduct an in situ pilot-scale experiment. The surface size of the enclosure is 1 m × 1 m, and the height is 2.5 m which reached from the water surface to the sediment. These enclosures were constructed by waterproof plastic film joined with foam, and this structure could prevent the exchange of water between enclosures and surrounding. Sediments that were collected from the highly eutrophic lake, Lake Chaohu, were mixed with different materials and put into the enclosures. According to this, the twelve enclosures were divided into six groups of duplicates. These six groups were the control treatment (CT), the Phoslock agent treatment (Phoslock®), the treatment containing Phoslock agent and sugarcane bagasse (Phoslock®+SU), the iron-rich clay treatment (IR), the treatment containing iron-rich clay and sugarcane bagasse (IR+SU), and the treatment added iron-rich clay and sugarcane bagasse and Oxone (IR+SU+Oxone). Phoslock agent and iron-rich clay were chosen because they can play a role of P sorbent owing to their high P sorption ability, and sugarcane bagasse can provide organic carbon as an electron donor for denitrification while Oxone was used as an oxidizing agent.

The enclosure experiment lasted 1 year (from October 2019 to September 2020, the study was obliged to suspend because of COVID-19 from January to April 2020). Water samples of all groups were collected twice a week and determined nutrients within a day. Surface sediment (0–10 cm) samples were collected at the beginning of experiment (October 2019) and monthly from the middle of experiment to the end (from May 2020 to September 2020) by a Peterson grab sampler and stored at 4 °C for analysis within a week.

2.2 Water sample analysis

The contents of N and P nutrients in water samples were analyzed following national standards (APHA 2012). Total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) were determined in unfiltered water samples. The treated water samples that were filtered through 0.45 μm cellulose acetate membranes were tested for soluble nutrients such as total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), ammonium (NH4+-N), nitrite (NO2-N), nitrate (NO3-N), total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP). Dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP) was calculated as follows: DOP = TDP-SRP. Water samples were filtered through GF/C membranes (Whatman, USA) and measured by Multi N/C 2100 TOC Analyzer in order to test DOC. For the analysis of Chl a, it was extracted with 90% acetone through GF/C filters (Whatman, USA) and determined by fluorometric method (Yentsch and Menzel 1963).

2.3 Sediment sample analysis

Different forms of C in sediment samples including protein (PRT), carbohydrate (CHO), and lipid (LIP) were analyzed. The analysis of PRT followed Hartree (1972) and is expressed as bovine serum albumin equivalents. CHO was tested and expressed as glucose equivalents (Gerchakov and Hatcher 1972). The method that is extracting LIP directly with chloroform–methanol was followed to measure LIP (Bligh and Dyer 1959; Marsh and Weinstein 1966).

Different forms of P in sediment samples which contains Fe(OOH)~P, CaCO3~P, acid-soluble organic P (ASOP), and hot NaOH-extractable organic P (Palk) were extracted in order (Golterman 1996).

To test sediment P sorption, the experiment was conducted on the basis of James et al. (1992) and EPC0 were calculated. The parameters of sediment maximum P adsorbed concentration (Qmax) were calculated by Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation (Sakadevan and Bavor 1998).

The activities of GLU, LAP, and AP were determined fluorometrically using the methylumbelliferone labelled substrates L-leucine-4-methylcoumarinylamid, MUG-beta-D-glucopyranoside, and 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (Hoppe 1983).

The rates of denitrification and anammox were tested via isotope tracing method with a membrane inlet mass spectrometer (MIMS) (Risgaard-Petersen et al. 2003; Hou et al. 2012), and DNRA rates were measured by OX/MIMS (Yin et al. 2014). Briefly, slurries made by sediments and water at a certain ratio by weight purged by helium for about half an hour and then transfer them into 12-mL gas-tight vials (Labco Exetainers) under a helium atmosphere. After 24-h incubation, 15NO3 was added into the vials by a syringe. And then 100 μL of saturated HgCl2 were added into the initial samples of DNRA, denitrification, and anammox. The remaining samples incubated for about 8 h and then preserved with HgCl2 as the final samples. Dissolved nitrogen gas (29N2 and 30N2) was tested in half of the final samples for the calculation of anammox and denitrification rates (Nielsen 1992; Risgaard-Petersen et al. 2003) by MIMS. The other half were oxidized with hypobromite iodine solution to transfer the 15NH4+ produced by DNRA into nitrogen gas (29N2 and 30N2) and then DNRA rates were calculated from concentration changes in 15NH4+ during the incubations.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Samples were analyzed in this study with three replicates, and the mean ± SD of the data was displayed. Average value and standard deviation were analyzed using SPSS Statistics 23. Pearson’s correlation coefficients analyzed by SPSS Statistics 23 were also applied in this study to identify the relationships among variables. A statistical significance level was determined within 0.05 among all analyses. Nonlinear regression estimation for the model parameters was conducted by Sigma-Plot 10.0 and dynamic fit wizard function. The concentrations parameters in samples were drawn in the figures by using OriginPro 9.0.

3 Results and discussion

The Fe(OOH)~P levels in the sample containing IR clay was significantly higher than that in the sample containing Phoslock agent. Compared with the control, the CaCO3~P concentrations in the treatments containing Phoslock agent and IR clay were significantly higher, especially for the treatments containing Phoslock agent (Fig. 1). This suggested that the addition of IR clay promoted the formation of Fe(OOH)~P in sediments, and the addition of Phoslock agent mainly enhanced the formation of CaCO3~P. Analysis of Pearson’s correlation revealed that the content of Fe(OOH)~P was positively correlated with EPC0 (P < 0.01) and that the content of CaCO3~P was positively correlated with Qmax. (P < 0.01) (Table 1). This implied that the addition of the two P sorbents, and especially Phoslock agent, enhanced P adsorption capacity and reduced the risk of phosphorus release into water. The P mobile fraction was transformed into a stable inert P fraction such as CaCO3~P when lanthanum-modified materials were used as sorbents to immobilize P in the surface sediments of shallow eutrophic lakes (Lin et al. 2016; Yin et al. 2020). IR clay minerals were proven to be promising sediment remediation materials useful for P immobilization due to their strong P adsorption ability resulting from Fe–P iron binding (Tang et al. 2020). In this study, compared with applications of Phoslock agent and IR treatment, the addition of SU significantly promoted the reduction of Fe(OOH)~P levels (Fig. 1), implying that the addition of SU led to the formation of an anaerobic state and further accelerated the desorption and release of Fe(OOH)~P. The addition of Oxone significantly alleviated the anaerobic state caused by the addition of SU, resulting in higher Fe(OOH)~P levels (Fig. 1). The substantial amount of available organic C in the sediment after addition of sugarcane bagasse fuelled the release of P from Fe(OOH)~P, which was induced by anoxia (Tang et al. 2020). The intense biomineralization of organic matter and reduction of Fe–Mn oxide levels due to periods of anoxia resulted in transformations of the associated P fractions (Sudheesh et al. 2017). Also, a positive feedback loop may form among factors related to hypoxia, enhanced P release, higher primary productivity, and more severe hypoxia, which could accelerate P recycling in large deep reservoirs (Yu et al. 2020). On the other hand, oxygen depletion and increase in labile P levels at the sediment–water interface caused by the decomposition of the deposited algal biomass can be substantially eliminated by capping with oxygen-carrying materials (Zhang et al. 2020). Hence, we suggest that P adsorbent material and organic C combined with oxidizing agent should be used as an effective mixed material for sediment remediation, which would not only increase P adsorption and provide electron donor for denitrification but also avoid the generation of anoxia.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Different forms of phosphorus (P) in sediments among different treatments

Table 1 Pearson’s correlation coefficients among variables in sediment samples

It should be noted that the ASOP and Palk contents in the treatments containing IR clay were significantly increased, especially Palk (Fig. 1), which indicated that IR clay may contain special components that promote the formation of refractory P. Even though the relevant mechanism is not clear, IR clay was more conducive to P immobilization. Moreover, the addition of IR clay and Phoslock agent significantly reduced EPC0 and increased Qmax values, especially in samples treated with Phoslock agent (Fig. 2), which indicated the reduced risk of P release into water bodies and the enhanced capacity for P adsorption. Additionally, an increased maximum adsorption capacity and decreased EPC0 in surface sediments were observed in sediments amended with a calcium peroxide material (Zhou et al. 2020) and zirconium-modified zeolite (Yang et al. 2014), which was favorable for P adsorption and immobilization. Estimates of EPC0 indicated that all P-sorbing products (including “red ochre”, “black ochre”, “gypsum”, “sander dust”, “mag dust”, “vermiculite”, and Phoslock), with the exception of “gypsum”, were capable of reducing SRP concentrations in water (Spears et al. 2013). Therefore, addition of IR clay and Phoslock agent promoted phosphorus adsorption and reduced the risk of phosphorus release. IR clay offers more advantages in phosphorus adsorption, and Phoslock agent can more effectively reduce the risk of phosphorus release into water.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The parameters of phosphorus (P) sorption in sediments among different treatments

Basically, the added materials had little effect on the organic C contents in sediment. The CHO levels in the samples amended with IR clay and SU were slightly higher than those in other samples and gradually decreased with time. The addition of materials had no effect on the PRT content, which showed little change during the entire experiment. LIP decreased gradually with time in most treatments (Fig. 3). The anammox process was insignificant in all treatments. Denitrification rates resulting from treatments with added materials were significantly increased relative to those of the control, and at the same time, DNRA rates were also enhanced, especially in samples amended with IR clay and SU (Fig. 4). The DNRA rate was significantly positively correlated with the denitrification rate (P < 0.01) (Table 1). It was deduced that both Phoslock agent and IR clay contained electron donors to promote denitrification. It has been proven that N losses via denitrification were high in soils containing high clay contents (Van der Salm et al. 2007). Phoslock agent had a positive influence on denitrification, indicating its substantial denitrification capacity (Lin et al. 2016). In addition, the addition of IR clay and Phoslock agent changed the community structure of denitrifying microorganisms (Ding et al. 2012), which may be another reason for the increased denitrification rate. The mixture of IR clay and SU provided more electron donors, which triggered the DNRA process. This was consistent with the higher CHO level in the sample modified with IR clay and SU (Fig. 3). High organic C content might favor DNRA over denitrification and subsequently sustain cyanobacterial blooms (Jiang et al. 2020). Therefore, Phoslock agent and IR clay, and especially IR clay, promoted the removal of N through denitrification in sediments, but excessive introduction of electron donors, such as with SU addition might lead to DNRA competition over denitrification.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of carbohydrate (CHO), protein (PRT), and lipid (LIP) in sediments among different treatment

Fig. 4
figure 4

Nitrate reduction rates in sediments among different treatments

Multienzyme activity analysis showed that the microbial mediated degradation of organic C and P in the sediment expressed as GLU and AP respectively, substantially increased with time after the addition of remediation materials (Fig. 5). This indicated that the addition of sediment remediation materials promoted the utilization and degradation of organic C by microorganisms, which further led to activation of electron transport processes, such as the denitrification and DNRA processes (Fig. 4). Correlation analysis also confirmed this result which revealed that the extracellular enzymatic activities of GLU and AP were positively correlated with denitrification rates and DNRA rates (P < 0.01) (Table 1). On the other hand, the added materials greatly enhanced P adsorption capability, causing the P regeneration process to shift from P desorption o to the hydrolysis of organic P. At the same time, the LAP activity was very low after adding the remediation materials, indicating the diminished ability of organic N to effect hydrolysis, which stood in contrast with the high denitrification and DNRA rates (Fig. 4). The extracellular enzymatic activities of LAP showed a significant negative correlation with denitrification rates (P < 0.01) and DNRA rates (P < 0.01) according to the correlation analysis (Table 1). This reflected the fact that the processes for N transformation gradually changed from ammonification to denitrification and DNRA. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that succession of the bacterial community may accelerate the transformation of nutrients mediated by microorganisms in the sediment after remediation (Zhang et al. 2019). Therefore, the addition of sediment remediation materials not only acted directly on nutrient levels by adsorption but also changed the microbial activity and community structure, leading to shifts in nutrient transformation processes. Thus, attention should be given to the fact that the addition of sediment remediation materials intensified the nutrient regeneration process mediated by microorganisms.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The extracellular enzymatic activities of leucine aminopeptidase (LAP), β-glucosidase (GLU), and alkaline phosphatase (AP) in sediments among different treatments

SRP and DOP in water bodies showed low levels and no significant differences among all treatments. At the early stages of the experiment, TP was highest in the control, and the lowest in the treatments containing Phoslock agent, Phoslock agent + SU and IR clay. There was no significant difference in TP in any treatment at the later stages of the experiment (Fig. 6). NH4+-N was at a lower level in the control, and higher in the treatment amended with IR clay + SU (Fig. 7), which was consistent with the DNRA rate (Fig. 4), indicating that the addition of IR clay and SU accelerated the DNRA rate in sediment and the accumulation of NH4+-N in water bodies. No significant difference was recorded for NO2-N, NO3-N or DOC among the treatments (Figs. 7 and 8). Chl a concentration in the treatments containing Phoslock agent was the lowest, but there was no significant difference compared with the treatments containing IR clay (Fig. 8). In considering TP levels in water bodies (Fig. 6), the effects of IR clay amendment on TP and Chl a were comparable to those of Phoslock agent.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Concentrations of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP), and total phosphorus (TP) in water column among different treatments

Fig. 7
figure 7

Concentrations of ammonium (NH4+-N), nitrite (NO2-N), nitrate (NO3-N) and total nitrogen (TN) in water column among different treatments

Fig. 8
figure 8

Concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and Chl a in water column among different treatments

4 Conclusions

The addition of IR clay and Phoslock agent promoted the formation of Fe(OOH)~P and CaCO3~P in sediments, respectively. IR clay offered more advantages in phosphorus adsorption, and Phoslock agent can more effectively reduced the risk of phosphorus release into water. There was no significant difference between IR clay and Phoslock agent in controlling the release of phosphorus from sediments into water bodies. In addition, SU addition provided more electron donors for denitrification and promoted the removal of N from sediments, but excessive introduction of electron donors might lead to DNRA enhancement over denitrification. Attention should be given to the fact that SU introduction significantly promoted the generation of an anaerobic state; this led to the desorption and release of Fe(OOH)~P, which was alleviated through amendment with Oxone. Hence, we recommend that P adsorbent material and organic C combined with oxidizing agent should be used as an effective mixed material for sediment remediation, which would not only increase P adsorption and provide electron donors for denitrification but also avoid the generation of anoxia.