No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Hume is the Enemy of Pyrrho
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2021
Abstract
I offer reasons against reading Hume as a Pyrrhonian sceptic. I argue that Hume's scepticism is motivated differently, that his sceptical strategies are not analogous to Pyrrhonism's, and that it is profitable to read Hume as a critic of Pyrrhonism. I hold that the most informative point of comparison between Hume and Sextus Empiricus is a point of difference, namely, their stands on the connection between suspension of judgement (epochê) and tranquillity (ataraxia). For Sextus, tranquillity flows naturally from suspending judgement on all opinions. Hume, by contrast, consistently treats radical suspension of judgement as resulting in despair and social detachment. I take a firmer stance than past commentators on this issue by affirming that Hume and Sextus do not merely disagree on this issue, but that Hume's view is more plausible. Reading Hume's sceptical crisis, I propose, reveals an insightful criticism of Pyrrhonism, one that sheds light on human nature's response to radical doubt.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy, 2021
References
Ainslie, Donald C., Hume's True Scepticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia, ‘Hume and Ancient Scepticism’, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 66 (2000), 271–85.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette, A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume's Treatise (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Baxter, Donald L.M., Hume's Difficulty: Time and Identity in the Treatise (London: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Baxter, Donald L.M., ‘A Pyrrhonian Interpretation of Hume on Assent’, in Machuca, D.E. and Reed, B. (eds.), Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018), 380–94.Google Scholar
Berry, Jessica N., Nietzsche and the Ancient Skeptical Tradition (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. and Frede, Michael (Eds.). The Original Sceptics: A Controversy. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997).Google Scholar
Coleman, Dorothy, ‘Hume's Alleged Pyrrhonism’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 26 (1988), 461–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimech, Dominic K., ‘Quasi-Realism and Inductive Scepticism in Hume's Theory of Causation’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 97 (2019), 637–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drever, James, ‘A Note on Hume's Pyrrhonism’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 3 (1953), 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieser, James, ‘Hume's Pyrrhonism: A Developmental Interpretation’, Hume Studies, 15 (1989), 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, Robert J., Hume's Skeptical Crisis: A Textual Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fosl, Peter S., ‘The Bibliographic Bases of Hume's Understanding of Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonism’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 36 (1998), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fosl, Peter S., Hume's Scepticism: Pyrrhonian and Academic (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Garrett, Don, “A Small Tincture of Pyrrhonism’: Skepticism and Naturalism in Hume's Science of Man’, in Sinnot-Armstrong, Walter (ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 68–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, J.Y.T (ed.), The Letters of David Hume (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Hume, David, ‘Of the Populousness of Ancient Nations’, in Political Discourses, (Edinburgh: Printed by Sands, Murray, and Cochran for A. Kincaid and A. Donaldson, 1752), 135–234.Google Scholar
Hume, David, The Natural History of Religion, in Four Dissertations, (London: Printed for A. Millar, in the Strand, 1757), 11–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David, ‘An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals’, in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and the Principles of Morals, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975/1748), 135–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and the Principles of Morals, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975/1751), 169–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David, An Abstract of a Book Lately Published, in A Treatise of Human Nature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978/1740), 645–62.Google Scholar
Hume, David, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007/1779).Google Scholar
Livingston, Donald W., Hume's Philosophy of Common Life. (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Loeb, Louis E., ‘Sextus, Descartes, Hume, and Peirce: On Securing Settled Doxastic States’, Noûs 32, (1998), 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, Louis E., Stability and Justification in Hume's Treatise (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopston, Peter, ‘Hume and Ancient Philosophy’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20 (2012), 741–72.Google Scholar
Morris, William Edward, ‘Hume's Conclusion’, Philosophical Studies, 99 (2000), 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olshewsky, Thomas M., ‘The Classical Roots of Hume's Skepticism’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 52 (1991), 269–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palkoska, Jan, ‘Are Humean Beliefs Pyrrhonian Appearances? Hume's Critique of Pyrrhonism Revisited’, The Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 10 (2012), 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penelhum, Terence, ‘Hume's Scepticism and the Dialogues’, in Themes in Hume: The Self, the Will, Religion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000), 177–203.Google Scholar
Perinetti, Dario, ‘Hume at La Fléche: Skepticism and the French Connection’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 56 (2018), 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H., ‘David Hume; His Pyrrhonism and His Critique of Pyrrhonism’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 1 (1951), 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, Hsueh, ‘Hume's Internalist Epistemology in EHU 12’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96 (2018), 517–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas, An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997/1764).Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Brian, ‘Sextus, Montaigne, Hume: Exercises in Skeptical Cartography’ The Modern Schoolman, 87 (2009), 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridge, Michael, ‘Epistemology Moralized: David Hume's Practical Epistemology’, Hume Studies, 29 (2003), 165–204.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus, Outlines of Scepticism, trans. Annas, Julia and Barnes, Jonathan (Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, and Madrid: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Smith, P.J., ‘Hume's Academic Scepticism in Its French Context’, in Smith, P.J. and Charles, S. (eds.) Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy, (Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017), 345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, Gisela, ‘On the Difference between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics’, in Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, Gisela, ‘Academics Versus Pyrrhonists, Reconsidered’, in Bett, Richard (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiel, Jeffrey R., ‘A Pyrrhonist Interpretation of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 34 (1996), 257–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Fred, ‘Is Hume a Sceptic with Regard to Reason?’, Philosophy Research Archives, 10 (1985), 275–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Fred, ‘Is Hume a Sceptic with Regard to the Senses?’ Journal of the History of Philosophy, 27 (1989), 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar