Abstract
Despite the many definitions of religion offered over the years, religion as a general concept remains “essentially contested” and characterized by a multiplicity of competing definitions and applications. This, however, has not impeded the proliferation of new religious subcategories (e.g., new age religion, secular religion, civil religion, and cultural religion, among others) that challenge the boundaries of religion as conventionally conceived. This article examines the logics underpinning these conceptual innovations with the objective of enhancing reflexivity and clarifying the processes they aim to elucidate. Critically integrating the writings of Weber and Wittgenstein on definition and classification, I advance a framework based on ideal typification and family resemblance which allows for the intelligibility and analytic utility of unconventional subtypes, even when premised on root conceptions of religion that lack precise boundaries and defining attributes. I show how the logics underlying these subtypes are not limited to specification, but also include looser forms of family resemblance. More generally, my analysis explores conceptual classification and innovation as analytic practices involving the identification and creative interpretation of similarities, affinities, linkages, and other kinds of relationships within the constraints of “language-games” relevant not only to academic debate, but also to more basic and quotidian structures of meaning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Notes
I use the term “essentialist definition” throughout this article in reference to the classical Platonic understanding of definition as comprising necessary and sufficient conditions.
Bowen (2007) likewise flags how French state policies are at odds with ideal-typical understandings of laïcité and uses observed divergences as a point of departure for proposing alternative explanations for France’s approach to religious governance.
It is beyond the scope of this article to enter into a lengthy discussion about Wittgenstein’s conception of language-games. Nevertheless, it is important to highlight that he was interested in language as practice, in parole rather than langue.
Williams (2013, pp. 240–241) provides a useful review of the definitions of civil religion advanced in the literature.
References
Aldridge, A. (2000a). The sovereign consumer? Religious allegiance and disaffiliation in a detraditionalised world. In L. J. Francis & Y. J. Katz (Eds.), Joining and leaving religion: Research perspectives (pp. 9–19). Redwood Books.
Aldridge, A. (2000b). Religion in the contemporary world: A sociological introduction. Polity Press.
Alston, W. P. (1964). Philosophy of language. Prentice-Hall.
Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press.
Astor, A., & Mayrl, D. (2020). Culturalized religion: A synthetic review and agenda for research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 59(2), 209–226.
Astor, A., Burchardt, M., & Griera, M. (2017). The politics of religious heritage: Framing claims to religion as culture in Spain. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(1), 126–142.
Balagangadhara, S. N. (2010). Orientalism, postcolonialism and the “construction” of religion. In E. Bloch, M. Keppens, & R. Hegde (Eds.), Rethinking religion in India: The colonial construction of Hinduism (pp. 135–163). Routledge.
Beckford, J. A. (2003). Social theory and religion. Cambridge University Press.
Bellah, R. N. (1967). Civil religion in America. Daedalus, 96(1), 1–21.
Berger, P. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Doubleday.
Bloor, D. (1983). Wittgenstein: A social theory of knowledge. Macmillan.
Bortolini, M. (2010). Before civil religion. On Robert Bellah’s forgotten encounters with America, 1955-1965. Sociologica, 3(Nov.-Dec.), 1–33.
Bortolini, M. (2012). The trap of intellectual success: Robert N. Bellah, the American civil religion debate, and the sociology of knowledge. Theory and Society, 41(2), 187–210.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J.-C., & Passeron, J.-C. (1991). The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries. Translated by R. Nice. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Bowen, J. R. (2007). Why the French don’t like headscarves: Islam, the state, and public space. Princeton University Press.
Breiner, P. (2005). Weber’s The Protestant Ethic as hypothetical narrative of original accumulation. Journal of Classical Sociology, 5(1), 11–30.
Brubaker, R. (2003). Neither individualism nor “groupism”: A reply to Craig Calhoun. Ethnicities, 3(4), 553–557.
Brubaker, R. (2013). Categories of analysis and categories of practice: A note on the study of Muslims in European countries of immigration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(1), 1–8.
Bruce, S. (2011). Defining religion: A practical response. International Review of Sociology, 21(1), 107–120.
Burchardt, M. (2020). Regulating difference: Religious diversity and nationhood in the secular west. Rutgers University Press.
Burger, T. (1976). Max Weber’s theory of concept formation: History, laws and ideal types. Duke University Press.
Byrne, P. (1988). Religion and the religions. In P. Clarke & S. Sutherland (Eds.), The world’s religions: The study of religion, traditional and new religion (pp. 3–28). Routledge.
Cipriani, R. (2017). Diffused religion. Springer.
Clarke, P., & Byrne, P. (1993). Religion defined and explained. St. Martin’s Press.
Coates, J. (1996). The claims of common sense: Moore, Wittgenstein, Keynes and the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430–451.
Collier, D., & Mahon, J. E. (1993). Conceptual “stretching” revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 845–855.
Cristi, M. (2001). From civil to political religion: The intersection of culture, religion and politics. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Cristi, M., & Dawson, L. L. (2007). Civil religion in America and in global context. In J. A. Beckford & N. J. Demerath (Eds.), The Sage handbook of the sociology of religion (pp. 267–292). Sage.
Dean, J. T. (2003). The nature of concepts and the definition of art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61(1), 29–35.
Demerath, N. J. (2000). The rise of “cultural religion” in European Christianity: Learning from Poland, Northern Ireland, and Sweden. Social Compass, 47(1), 127–139.
Demerath, N. J., & Williams, R. H. (1985). Civil religion in an uncivil society. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 480, 154–166.
Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43(5), 547–579.
Durkheim, E. ([1912] 1995). The elementary forms of the religious life. Translated by K. E. Fields. New York: The Free Press.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
Fitzgerald, T. (1996). Religion, philosophy and family resemblances. Religion, 26, 215–236.
Fitzgerald, T. (1997). A critique of “religion” as a cross-cultural category. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 9, 91–110.
Fitzgerald, T. (2000). The ideology of religious studies. Oxford University Press.
Fitzgerald, T. (2009). Benson Saler: “Conceptualizing religion: Some recent reflections:” a response. Religion, 39, 194–197.
Frère, B. (2004). Genetic structuralism, psychological sociology and pragmatic social actor theory: Proposals for a convergence of French sociologies. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(3), 85–99.
Gallie, W. B. (1955). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.
Geertz, C. (2005). Shifting aims, moving targets: On the anthropology of religion. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11(1), 1–15.
Gentile, E. (2006). Politics as religion. Princeton University Press.
Gert, H. J. (1995). Family resemblances and criteria. Synthese, 105(2), 177–190.
Glock, H.-J. (1996). A Wittgenstein dictionary. Blackwell.
Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton University Press.
Griera, M., & Clot-Garrell, A. (2015). Banal is not trivial: Visibility, recognition, and inequalities between religious groups in prison. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 30(1), 23–37.
Guhin, J. (2014). Religion as site rather than religion as category: On the sociology of religion’s export problem. Sociology of Religion, 75(4), 579–593.
Hanegraaff, W. J. (1999). New age spiritualities as secular religion: A historian’s perspective. Social Compass, 46(2), 145–160.
Hanegraaff, W. J. (2018). New age religion and Western culture: Esotericism in the mirror of secular thought. Brill.
Haugaard, M. (2010). Power: A “family resemblance” concept. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(4), 419–438.
Hervieu-Léger, D. (2000). Religion as a chain of memory. Rutgers University Press.
Hjarvard, S. (2011). The mediatisation of religion: Theorising religion, media and social change. Culture and Religion, 12(2), 119–135.
Hodgson, G. M. (2014). What is capital? Economists and sociologists have changed its meaning: Should it be changed back? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(5), 1063–1086.
Jenkins, T. (2008). Marcel Mauss’s essay On Prayer: An important contribution on the nature of sociological understanding. Revue du MAUSS permanente. http://www.journaldumauss.net/./?Marcel-Mauss-s-essay-On-Prayer-an. Accessed 27 April 2021.
Lakoff, G. (2008). Women, fire, and dangerous things. University of Chicago press.
Laniel, J.-F. (2016). What ‘cultural religion’ says about secularization and national identity: A neglected religio-political configuration. Social Compass, 63(3), 372–388.
Lizardo, O. (2010). Beyond the antinomies of structure: Levi-strauss, Giddens, Bourdieu, and Sewell. Theory and Society, 39(6), 651–688.
Long, C. H. (1974). Civil rights—Civil religion: Visible people and invisible religion. In R. E. Richey & D. G. Jones (Eds.), American civil religion (pp. 211–221). Harper & Row.
Mauss, M. ([1909] 2008). On prayer. Translated by S. Leslie. New York: Berghahn Books.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. The Free Press.
Mouritsen, P. (2006). The particular universalism of a Nordic civic nation: Common values, state religion and Islam in Danish political culture. In T. Modood, A. Triandafyllidou, & R. Zapata Barrero (Eds.), Multiculturalism, Muslims and citizenship: A European approach (pp. 70–92). Routledge.
Nongbri, B. (2013). Before religion: A history of a modern concept. Yale University Press.
Psathas, G. (2005). The ideal type in Weber and Schutz. In M. Endress, G. Psathas, & H. Nasu (Eds.), Explorations of the life-world: Contributions to phenomenology (pp. 143–169). Springer.
Riesebrodt, M. (2010). The promise of salvation: A theory of religion. University of Chicago Press.
Rosch, E. (1987). Wittgenstein and categorization research in cognitive psychology. In M. Chapman & R. A. Dixon (Eds.), Meaning and the growth of understanding (pp. 151–166). Springer-Verlag.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605.
Saler, B. (1993). Conceptualizing religion: Immanent anthropologists, transcendent natives, and unbounded categories. Berghahn Books.
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053.
Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1989). The structures of the life-world. Northwestern University Press.
Sluga, H. (2006). Family resemblance. In M. Kober (Ed.), Deepening our understanding of Wittgenstein (pp. 1–21). Rodopi B.V.
Smart, N. (1973). Phenomenon of religion. Macmillan.
Smith, C. (2017). Religion: What it is, how it works, and why it is still important. Princeton University Press.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1978). Theoretical methods in social history. Academic Press.
Swedberg, R. (2018). How to use Max Weber’s ideal type in sociological analysis. Journal of Classical Sociology, 18(3), 181–196.
Taves, A. (2009). Religious experience reconsidered: A building-block approach to the study of religion and other special things. Princeton University Press.
Thévenot, L. (2015). You said “capital”? Extending the notion of capital, interrogating inequalities and dominant powers. Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 70(1), 65–76.
Turner, B. S. (1991). Religion and social theory. Sage.
von Stuckrad, K. (2010). Reflections on the limits of reflection: An invitation to the discursive study of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 22, 156–169.
Weber, M. (1963). The sociology of religion. Translated by E. Fischoff. Boston: Beacon Press.
Weber, M. ([1904] 2012). The “objectivity” of knowledge in social science and social policy. In H. H. Bruun & S. Whimster (Eds.), Max Weber: Collected methodological writings (pp. 100–138). Routledge.
Williams, R. H. (2013). Civil religion and the cultural politics of national identity in Obama’s America. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(2), 239–257.
Wilson, J. F. (1974). A historian’s approach to civil religion. In American civil religion (pp. 115–138). Harper & Row.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology, Vol. I. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Acknowledgments
I thank Camil Ungureanu and Robert Fishman for their helpful feedback on previous drafts of this article.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable (I am the sole author).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
The author declares he has no conflicts of interest or competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Astor, A. Religion and its modifiers: making sense of the definition and subtypification of a contested concept. Theor Soc 51, 213–232 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09447-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09447-z