Skip to main content
Log in

Soils оf Oligomesotrophic аnd Mesotrophic Bogs in the Boreal Zone of West Siberia: Possibilities of Botanical Diagnostics within the Framework of the Type of Mesotrophic Peat Soils

  • GENESIS AND GEOGRAPHY OF SOILS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of the taxon “mesotrophic (transitional) peat soils” in the present-day Russian and foreign pedology, including some fundamental publications in this field, its diagnostic features are still uncertain, and this taxon is not included in the recent classification of Russian soils. The proposed criteria based on botanical features—botanical composition of peat soils and indicator plants—will allow separating mesotrophic type from eutrophic and oligotrophic types of peat soils. Special attention is paid to the distinction between mesotrophic and oligotrophic peat soils in accordance with the specific features of mires in northern West Siberia. Among 32 peat soil profiles studied in the Numto Nature Park, 19 profiles were classified as mesotrophic peat soils and 13 profiles, as oligotrophic soils. Owing to the spatial and temporal dynamics of vegetation in large- and flat-topped mound peat complexes, the soils of their hollows (flarks) were in most cases assigned to the oligotrophic type. The soils of aapa mires, as well as mires on low alluvial terraces, river floodplains, and runoff hollows dissecting slopes of the Sibirskie Uvaly Ridge were mainly classified as mesotrophic peat soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. N. A. Avetov, O. L. Kuznetsov, and E. A. Shishkonakova, “Experience in the use of Russian soil classification and diagnosis in the systematics of peat soils of oligotrophic bogs in the north taiga subzone of West Siberia,” Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 74, 169–178 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. A. Avetov and E. A. Shishkonakova, “Some aspects of the systematics and diagnostics of peat soils of boreal mires,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 871–879 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. N. Alekseeva, “Specific features of mires in the Usa River basin,” Lesovedenie, No. 3, 53–58 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. I. Valeeva, D. V. Moskovchenko, and S. P. Aref’ev, Nature of the Numto Park (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. Unified State Register of Soil Resources of Russia (Moscow, 2014) [in Russian]. http://egrpr.esoil.ru/.

  6. L. I. Inisheva, “Peat soils: genesis and classification,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 39, 699–704 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Ya. Kats, S. V. Kats, and E. I. Skobeeva, Atlas of Plant Remains in Peat (Nedra, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Classification of Peat Types and Peatlands (Directorate of the Peat Fund, Council of Ministers of the RSFSR, Moscow, 1951) [in Russian].

  9. L. L. Shishov, V. D. Tonkonogov, I. I. Lebedeva, and M. I. Gerasimova, Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Classification and Diagnostics of Soils of the Soviet Union (Kolos, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

  11. N. P. Kosykh, N. P. Mironycheva-Tokareva, E. V. Mikhailova, and L. G. Kolesnichenko, “Vegetation and plant matter of flat-topped peat mounds,” Pochvy Okruzh. Sreda 2 (1), 1–13 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. O. L. Liss, L. I. Abramova, N. A. Avetov, et al., Mire Systems of Western Siberia and Their Environmental Significance (Grif i K, Tula, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. G. Matukhin, V. G. Matukhina, I. P. Vasil’ev, et al., Classification of Peats and Peatlands in Western Siberia (United Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 2000) [in Russian].

  14. G. V. Matyshak, L. G. Bogatyrev, O. Yu. Goncharova, and A. A. Bobrik, “Specific features of the development of soils of hydromorphic ecosystems in the northern taiga of Western Siberia under conditions of cryogenesis,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 1115–1124 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. National Soil Atlas of the Russian Federation, Ed. by S. A. Shoba (Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Neuhäusl, “Vegetation mapping in Czechoslovakia,” Geobotanicheskoe Kartografirovanie, 16-27 (1982).

  17. Soil Map of the RSFSR, Scale 1 : 2 500 000, Ed. V. M. Fridland (General Office of Geodesy and Cartography, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

  18. A. A. Tigeev, “Specificity of the soil cover in the Khal’ming”yakha River basin (Nadym–Pur interfluve),” Vestn. Tyumen. Gos. Univ., Nauki Zemle, No. 4, 39–48 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. V. Tyuremnov, Peat Deposits (Nedra, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. S. Urusevskaya, “Soil catenas on denudation plains in the forest-tundra and northern taiga zones of the Kola Peninsula,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 765–779 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. G. A. Shamilishvili, E. V. Abakumov, and A. S. Pechkin, “Specificity of the soil cover of Nadym district, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug,” Nauchn. Vestn. Yamalo-Nenets. Avton. Okruga, No. 4, 12–16 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. A. Shishkonakova, N. A. Avetov, T. Yu. Tolpysheva, and A. A. Tarlinskaya, “Plant indication of thermokarst formation in peatlands in the southern part of the Numto Natural Park (Western Siberia),” Sots.-Ekol. Tekhnol., No. 1, 27–57 (2019).

  23. T. K. Yurkovskaya, Geography and Cartography of Wetland Vegetation in the European Part of Russia and Adjacent Territories (Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 1992) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung (AG Boden, Hanover, 1994).

  25. S. Eurola, S. Hicks, and E. Kaakinen, “Key to Finnish mire types,” in European Mires (Academic, London, 1984), pp. 11–117.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Hájek, M. Horsák, P. Hájková, and D. Dítě, “Habit diversity of central European fens in relation to environmental gradients and effort to standardize fen terminology in ecological studies,” Perspect. Plant Ecol., Evol. Syst. 8, 97–114 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. B. Hodgkins, M. M. Tfaily, D. C. Podgorski, et al., “Elemental composition and optical properties reveal changes in dissolved organic matter along a permafrost thaw chronosequence in a subarctic peatland,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 187, 123–140 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Joosten and D. Clarke, Wise Use of Mires and Peatlands (International Mire Conservation Group, Saarijärvi, 2002).

  29. O. L. Kuznetsov, “The diversity of mire massif types in the boreal zone of European Russia,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 138, 012011 (2018).

  30. S. V. Loiko, O. S. Pokrovsky, T. V. Raudina, et al., “Abrupt permafrost collapse enhances organic carbon, CO2, nutrient and metal release into surface waters,” Chem. Geol. 471, 153–165 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Malawska, A. Ekonomiuk, and B. Wilkomirski, “Chemical characterization of some peatlands in southern Poland,” Peat Mires 1 (2), 1–14 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  32. I. S. Mettrop, M. D. Rutte, A. M. Kooijman, and L. P. M. Lamers, “The ecological effects of water level fluctuation and phosphate enrichment in mesotrophic peatlands are strongly mediated by soil chemistry,” Ecol. Eng. 85, 226–236 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Ruuhijärvi and T. Lindholm, “The Finnish mire site type classification system,” in Proceedings of International Symposium “Wetland Ecosystems of the Northern Europe: diversity, Dynamics, Carbon Balance, Reserves, and Protection,” August 30–September 2, 2005 (Petrozavodsk, 2006), pp. 338–347.

  34. M. Seppälä, “Palsa mires in Finland,” Fin. Environ. 23, 155–162 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  35. I. Vincze, W. Finsinger, G. Jakob, et al., “Paleoclimate reconstruction and mire development in the Eastern Great Hungarian Plain for the last 20 000 years,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 271, 104112 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. B. D. Wheeler and M. C. F. Proctor, “Ecological gradients, subdivisions and terminology of north-west European mires,” J. Ecol. 88, 187–203 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. H. Zoller and P. Selldorf, “Untersuchungen zur kurzfristigen Sukzession von Torf- und Braunmoosgesellschaften in einem Übergangsmoor aus den Schweizer Alpen,” Flora 182 (1–2), 127–151 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to N.V. Stoikina (Institute of Biology, Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences) for performing botanical analysis of peat.

Funding

This work was performed within the framework of the state budgetary themes of the Faculty of Soil Science of the Lomonosov Moscow State University, Institute of Biology of the Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (state assignment AAAA-A19-119062590056-0), and the Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute; and supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 19-05-50063.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Avetov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have not conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by D. Konyushkov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avetov, N.A., Kuznetsov, O.L. & Shishkonakova, E.A. Soils оf Oligomesotrophic аnd Mesotrophic Bogs in the Boreal Zone of West Siberia: Possibilities of Botanical Diagnostics within the Framework of the Type of Mesotrophic Peat Soils. Eurasian Soil Sc. 54, 689–701 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321030029

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321030029

Keywords:

Navigation