Abstract
The order in which authors of a scientific paper place their names on the byline follows in many research fields some implicit rules. In most fields, the first author is considered to be the one who contributed most to the intellectual effort described in the paper. Additionally, the last author is normally the most senior researcher and in many situations the contribution to the paper is more indirect. In this manuscript, we intend to analyse the evolution of the positions of computer science (CS) researchers on the bylines of scientific papers throughout their careers. In particular, this bibliometic study considers the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Fellows (the most prestigious members) that present a long and rich publication record. Our hypothesis is that young CS authors tend to have their names placed in the first positions of the bylines, while senior CS researchers are often considered as last authors. Several statistical analyses were conducted by using biblometric data collected from ACM Fellows and other CS researchers. Overall, the obtained results do confirm our initial hypothesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2016). The combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv037.
Abt, H. A. (1981). Some trends in american astronomical publications. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 93(553), 269. https://doi.org/10.1086/130820.
Ackerman, M., & Brânzei, S. (2017). The authorship dilemma: Alphabetical or contribution? Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 31(5), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-016-9351-7.
Basili, V. R. (1992). Software modeling and measurement: The goal/question/metric paradigm. Technical report, University of Maryland.
Bennett, D. M., & Taylor, D. M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific articles. Emergency Medicine, 15(1), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x.
Buehring, G. C., Buehring, J. E., & Gerard, P. D. (2007). Lost in citation: Vanishing visibility of senior authors. Scientometrics, 72(3), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1762-4.
Cabanac, G., Hubert, G., & Milard, B. (2015). Academic careers in computer science: Continuance and transience of lifetime co-authorships. Scientometrics, 102(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1426-0.
Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2011). Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics, 88(1), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0368-z.
Elmacioglu, E., & Lee, D. (2005). On six degrees of separation in DBLP-DB and more. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(2), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1083784.1083791.
Engers, M., Gans, J., Grant, S., & King, S. (1999). First-author conditions. Journal of Political Economy, 107(4), 859–883.
Fernandes, J. M. (2014). Authorship trends in software engineering. Scientometrics, 101(1), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1331-6.
Fernandes, J. M., & Cortez, P. (2020). Alphabetic order of authors in scholarly publications: A bibliometric study for 27 scientific fields. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2773–2792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03686-0.
Fernandes, J. M., & Monteiro, M. P. (2017). Evolution in the number of authors of computer science publications. Scientometrics, 110(2), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2214-9.
Fox, C. W., Ritchey, J. P., & Paine, C. E. T. (2018). Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography. Ecology and Evolution, 8(23), 11492–11507. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4584.
Franceschet, M. (2011). Collaboration in computer science: A network science approach. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 62(10), 1992–2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21614.
Henriksen, D. (2019). Alphabetic or contributor author order: What is the norm in Danish economics and political science and why? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(6), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24151.
Kabacoff, R. (2020). Data Visualization with R. Quantitative Analysis Center: Wesleyan University.
Kennedy, D. (2003). Multiple authors, multiple problems. Science, 301(5634), 733. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.301.5634.733.
Kim, J. (2018). Evaluating author name disambiguation for digital libraries: a case of DBLP. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1867–1886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2824-5.
Kim, J. (2019). Author-based analysis of conference versus journal publication in computer science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24079.
Kosmulski, M. (2012). The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 639–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.06.006.
Krasnova, H., Kummer, T., Schäfer, K., and Veltri, N. F. (2012). Let’s collaborate, but I will be the first author! Exploring the importance of the first authorship for IS researchers. In 20th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2012), page 144.
Ley, M. (2009). DBLP—Some lessons learned. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2(2), 1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.14778/1687553.1687577.
Liang, L., Liu, J., & Rousseau, R. (2004). Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities. Scientometrics, 61(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037359.22151.6f.
Liu, X. Z., & Fang, H. (2014). Scientific group leaders’ authorship preferences: An empirical investigation. Scientometrics, 98(2), 909–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1083-8.
Maciejovsky, B., Budescu, D. V., & Ariely, D. (2008). The researcher as a consumer of scientific publications: How do name-ordering conventions affect inferences about contribution credits? Marketing Science, 28(3), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0406.
Marschke, G., Nunez, A., Weinberg, B. A., & Yu, H. (2018). Last place? The intersection of ethnicity, gender, and race in biomedical authorship. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108, 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181111.
Moore, M., & Griffin, B. W. (2006). Identification of factors that influence authorship name placement and decisions to collaborate in peer-reviewed, education-related publications. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(3), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.04.004.
Peidu, C. (2019). Can authors’ position in the ascription be a measure of dominance? Scientometrics, 121(3), 1527–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03254-1.
Reisenberg, D., & Lundberg, G. D. (1990). The order of authorship: Who’s on first? Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(14), 1857.
Rennie, D., Yank, V., & Emanuel, L. (1997). When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(7), 579–585.
Solomon, J. (2009). Programmers, professors, and parasites: Credit and co-authorship in computer science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(4), 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9119-4.
Way, S. F., Morgan, A. C., Clauset, A., & Larremore, D. B. (2017). The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(44), E9216–E9223. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702121114.
Wren, J. D., Kozak, K. Z., Johnson, K. R., Deakyne, S. J., Schilling, L. M., & Dellavalle, R. P. (2007). The write position: A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors. EMBO Reports, 8(11), 988–991. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401095.
Zuckerman, H. A. (1968). Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology, 74(3), 276–291.
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the R&D Units Project Scope: UIDB/00319/2020. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for the insightful comments that helped improving the contents of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J. M. Fernandes performed the conceptualisation, methodology, software, investigation, resources, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. A. Costa was responsible for software, writing—review and editing, and data curation. P. Cortez contributed with methodology, software, investigation, validation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, and visualisation.
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandes, J.M., Costa, A. & Cortez, P. Author placement in Computer Science: a study based on the careers of ACM Fellows. Scientometrics 127, 351–368 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04035-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04035-5