Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Closed-loop supply chain under different channel leaderships: considering different deposit–refund systems practically applied in China

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different deposit–refund systems are being practically applied to promote the proper treatment of end-of-life products in China. One is widely used in the industry of household appliances nationwide (DR1) while the other is applied in the industry of electric vehicle (EV) in Shenzhen of China (DR2). It is found that both the deposit–refund entity (either manufacturers or retailers pay tax and receive subsidy) and the channel leadership are different between the two industries. Given the practical conditions, this study aims to comprehensively analyze the influence of the two deposit–refund systems under different channel leaderships. In this end, a game-theoretic model consisting of a manufacturer, a retailer and consumers is established and three channel leaderships including Nash game, M-leader, R-leader are considered. This study presents the collection rate, the total environmental impact and the economic benefit of the whole supply chain as multi-criteria to value the performance of the supply chain. The results indicate that different channel leaderships lead to different channel performances regardless of with DR1 or DR2. The study then explores and confirms the optimal deposit–refund system under each channel leadership. The results further demonstrate the advantages of practically applying the two different deposit–refund systems in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baidya R, Debnath B, Ghosh SK, Rhee SW (2019) Supply chain analysis of e-waste processing plants in developing countries. Waste Manage Res 38:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X19886633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cucchiella F, D’Adamo I, Koh SL, Rosa P (2015) Recycling of WEEEs: an economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Palmer K, Walls M (1997) Optimal policies for solid waste disposal: taxes, subsidies, and standards. J Public Econ 65:193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00028-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sigman H (1995) A comparison of public policies for lead recycling. Rand J Econ 26(3):452–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walls M (2011) Deposit-refund systems in practice and theory. Resources for the Future. https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-11-47.pDR. Accessed 3 Apr 2020.

  6. CHEARI (2018) White paper on WEEE recycling industry in China (2017) (in Chinese). http://www.weee-epr.org/article/detail_133.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2020.

  7. Gree (2017) The dismantling of waste electrical and electronic products in the second quarter of 2017 (in Chinese). http://recycle.gree.com/mall/ActivityContentDisplayView?catalogId=10051&langId=-7&storeId=11651&espotName=huodong10. Accessed 15 Apr 2020.

  8. Li X, Mu D, Du J, Cao J, Zhao F (2020) Game-based system dynamics simulation of deposit-refund scheme for electric vehicle battery recycling in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 157:104788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang Y, Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang G, Li Y (2018) Recycling mechanisms and policy suggestions for spent electric vehicles’ power battery-a case of Beijing. J Clean Prod 186:388–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi T, Li Y, Xu L (2013) Channel leadership, performance and coordination in closed loop supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 146:371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoyt CL, Blascovich J (2003) Transformational and transactional leadership in virtual and physical environments. Small Group Res 34(6):678–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496403257527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Defee CC (2007) Supply Chain Leadership. PhD Dissertation, University of Tennessee. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268770917.pdf

  13. Schul PL, Pride WM, Little TL (1983) The impact of channel leadership behavior on intrachannel conflict. J Mark 47(3):21–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Majumder P, Srinivasan A (2008) Leadership and competition in network supply chains. Manage Sci 54(6):1189–1204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0752

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Almehdawe E, Matin B (2010) Vendor managed inventory with a capacitated manufacturer and multiple retailer: retailer versus manufacturer leadership. Int J Prod Econ 128(1):292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao J, Han H, Hou L, Wang H (2016) Pricing and effort decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under different channel power structures. J Clean Prod 112:2043–2057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fullerton D, Wolverton A (1997) The case for a two-part instrument presumptive tax and environmental subsidy. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper No. 5993. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5993

  18. Lavee D (2010) A cost-benefit analysis of a deposit-refund program for beverage containers in Israel. Waste Manage 30:338–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu H, Wu X, Dou D, Tang X, Leong G (2018) Determining recycling fees and subsidies in China’s WEEE disposal fund with formal and informal sectors. Sustainability 10(9):2979. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou G, Gu Y, Wu Y, Gong Y, Mu X, Han H, Chang T (2019) A systematic review of the deposit-refund system for beverage packaging: operating mode, key parameter and development trend. J Clean Prod 251:119660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fullerton D, Wu W (1998) Policies for green design. J Environ Econ Manag 36:131–148. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1044

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Farber S (1991) Regulatory schemes and self-protective environmental risk control: a comparison of insurance, liability, and deposit/refund systems. Ecol Econ 3:231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(91)90034-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hong IH, Ke J (2011) Determining advanced recycling fees and subsidies in “E-scrap” reverse supply chains. J Environ Manage 92:1495–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hong IH, Lee Y, Chang P (2014) Socially optimal and fund-balanced advanced recycling fees and subsidies in a competitive forward and reverse supply chain. Resour Conserv Recycl 82:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Numata D (2009) Economic analysis of deposit–refund systems with measures for mitigating negative impacts on suppliers. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Numata D (2011) Optimal design of deposit–refund systems considering allocation of unredeemed deposits. Environ Econ Policy Stud 13:303–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-011-0018-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karakayali I, Emir-Farinas H, Akcal E (2007) An analysis of decentralized collection and processing of end-of-life products. J Oper Manag 25(6):1161–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jafari H, Hejazi SR, Rasti-Barzoki M (2017) Sustainable development by waste recycling under a three-echelon supply chain: A game-theoretic approach. J Clean Prod 142:2252–2261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Savaskan RC, Bhattacharya S, Wassenhove LNV (2004) Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Manage Sci 50:239–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Giovanni P, Zaccour G (2014) A two-period game of a closed-loop supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 232:22–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.032

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Z, Nishi T (2019) Government regulations on closed-loop supply chain with evolutionarily stable strategy. Sustainability 11(18):5030. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wei J, Zhao J (2015) Pricing and remanufacturing decisions in two competing supply chains. Int J Prod Res 53(1):258–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.951088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hong X, Govindan K, Xu L, Du P (2017) Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing. Eur J Oper Res 256:820–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.051

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. EC (European Commission) (2012) Directive 2012/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). https://doi.org/10.3000/19770677.L_2012.197.eng. Accessed 8 June 2020.

  35. Ministry of the Environment (2015) Action plan for the collection rate target achievement of the specified household equipment waste (in Japanese). https://www.env.go.jp/recycle/kaden/gaiyo.html. Accessed 18 Jan 2021

  36. NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission) (2019) Interim measures for the management of lead-acid battery recycling (in Chinese). http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-08/14/5421270/files/c709aace6c274fa088431f19362834bb.pdfb. Accessed 9 May 2020.

  37. Ismail H, Hanafiah MM (2019) An overview of LCA application in WEEE management: current practices, progress and challenges. J Clean Prod 232:79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu Z, Tang J, Li B, Wang Z (2017) Trade-off between remanufacturing and recycling of WEEE and the environmental implication under the Chinese Fund Policy. J Clean Prod 167:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the program of “Akita University Doctoral Education Leading Program”.

Funding

The work presented in this paper was supported by grant from the Education Department of Henan Province, China (Project No. 20A790010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juntao Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 12110 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Li, W., Nozomu, M. et al. Closed-loop supply chain under different channel leaderships: considering different deposit–refund systems practically applied in China. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 23, 1765–1776 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01234-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01234-3

Keywords

Navigation