Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Suppression of vortex rope oscillation and pressure vibrations in Francis turbine draft tube using various strategies

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vortex rope usually occurs in the draft tube of the Francis turbine operated under part-load conditions, to induce strong low-frequency pressure vibrations, and therefore, is very harmful to the safety of the hydropower unit. In the present work, three kinds of strategies are extensively investigated, i.e., the installations of the ventilation and the fin, as well as the hybrid strategy of the air admission through a fin, so as to effectively suppress the vortex rope oscillation and the pressure vibration in the draft tube of a Francis turbine, whose specific speed is 125 m-kW. For the unsteady flow simulation, the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) method is applied coupled with the k-ω SST turbulence model and a homogeneous cavitation model. The flow analysis confirms that the low-frequency pressure vibrations are originated from the periodical oscillation of the vortex rope, and the cavitation usually enhances the vortex rope oscillation in the draft tube. Under the part-load condition, the dominant component of the pressure vibration in the draft tube has a frequency, for example, f1, lower than the runner rotating frequency fn. It is shown that all three strategies can be adopted to alleviate the vortex rope oscillation and the pressure vibrations in the draft tube, but their suppression mechanisms are quite different. The ventilation of an adequate amount from the turbine runner cone can change the vortex rope geometry from the spiral type to the cylindrical type, suppress the vortex rope oscillation, and consequently create the homogeneous distributions of the pressure and the pressure gradient in the draft tube. On the other hand, a fin installed at the draft tube wall can induce a small extra rope, and the interaction between the main vortex rope and the extra rope changes the flow field and alleviates the pressure vibration in the draft tube. It should be noted that a fin is much more effective to suppress the pressure vibration in the draft tube under the cavitation condition than under the non-cavitation condition. A better effect of suppressing the vortex rope oscillation can be achieved by the air admission through a fin, which is studied numerically in this paper. The result indicates that the air admission can further improve the effect of a fin for suppressing the pressure vibration in the inlet cone of the draft tube. This improvement is due to the stronger interaction between the main vortex rope and the extra air rope. However, the air admission through a fin should be carefully treated because the strong interaction may induce a larger pressure vibration in the elbow of the draft tube. Finally, it is clear that any strategy for suppressing the pressure vibration hardly changes the dominant component frequency f1, which is in the range of 0.22 fn-0.23 fn due to the main vortex rope oscillation in this study. The current results may be used in various engineering applications, where the active control of the vortex oscillation and the pressure vibrations with or without the cavitation is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arpe J., Nicolet C., Avellan F. Experimental evidence of hydroacoustic pressure waves in a Francis turbine elbow draft tube for low discharge conditions [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2009, 131(8): 081102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang Y. F., Liu G. N., Fan S. Y. Research on prototype hydro-turbine operation [M]. Beijing, China: Foreign Language Press, 2012, 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Luo X. W., Ji B., Tsujimoto Y. A review of cavitation in hydraulic machinery [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 28(3): 335–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishi M., Liu S. An outlook on the draft tube surge study [J]. International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, 2013, 6(1): 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goyal R., Cervantes M. J., Gandhi B. K. Vortex rope formation in a high head model Francis turbine [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2017, 139(4): 041102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang R. K., Mao F., Wu J. Z. et al. Characteristics and control of the draft-tube flow in part-load Francis turbine [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2009, 131(2): 021101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Enomoto Y., Kurosawa S., Kawajiri H. Design optimization of a high specific speed Francis turbine runner [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2012, 15: 032010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qian Z. D., Li W., Huai W. X. et al. The effect of the runner cone design on pressure oscillation characteristics in a Francis hydraulic turbine [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2012, 226(1): 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Susan-Resiga R., Vu T. C., Muntean S. et al. Jet control of the draft tube vortex rope in Francis turbines at partial discharge [C]. 23rd IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Yokohama, Japan, 2006.

  10. Luo X. W., Yu A., Yu W. P. et al. Pressure oscillation suppression by air admission in a Francis turbine draft tube [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 240: 022008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Papillon B., Sabourin M., Couston M. et al. Methods for air admission in hydroturbines [C]. 21st IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002.

  12. Luo X., Yu A., Ji B. et al. Unsteady vortical flow simulation in a Francis turbine with special emphasis on vortex rope behavior and pressure fluctuation alleviation [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2017, 231(3): 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nishi M., Kawai K., Yoshida K. et al. Installation of a fin as a means to alleviate the draft tube surging [C]. 3rd ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, San Francisco, USA, 1999.

  14. Yu A., Luo X. W., Ji B. Analysis of ventilated cavitation around a cylinder vehicle with nature cavitation using a new simulation method [J]. Science Bulletin, 2015, 60(21): 1833–1839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zwart P., Gerber A., Belamri T. A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics [C]. Fifth International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Yokohama, Japan, 2004.

  16. Li Z. W., Huai W. X., Qian Z. D. Study on the flow field and concentration characteristics of the multiple tandem jets in crossflow [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2012, 55(10): 2778–2788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huai W. X., Wang Z. W., Qian Z. D. et al. Numerical simulation of sandy bed erosion by 2D vertical jet [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(12): 3265–3274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ji B., Luo X., Wu Y. Unsteady cavitation characteristics and alleviation of pressure fluctuations around marine propellers with different skew angles [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2014, 28(4): 1339–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nishi M., Yoshida K., Fujii M. et al. A study on hybrid control of draft tube surge [C]. 21st IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002.

  20. Yu A., Ji B., Huang R. F. et al. Cavitation shedding dynamics around a hydrofoil simulated using a filter-based density corrected model [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2015, 58(5): 864–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang D. D., Yu A., Ji B. et al. Numerical analyses of ventilated cavitation over a 2-D NACA0015 hydrofoil using two turbulence modeling methods [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(2): 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu A., Zou Z., Zhou D. et al. Investigation of the correlation mechanism between cavitation rope behavior and pressure fluctuations in a hydraulic turbine [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 147(1): 1199–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tran C. T., Long X. P., Ji B. et al. Prediction of the precessing vortex core in the Francis-99 draft tube under off-design conditions by using Liutex/Rortex method [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 32(3): 623–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Institute for Guo Qiang, Tsinghua University (Grant No. 2019GQG1019), the Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xian-wu Luo.

Additional information

Projects supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91852103, 51776102), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 3182014).

Biography: Lei Zhu (1985-), Male, Ph. D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Zhang, Rz., Yu, A. et al. Suppression of vortex rope oscillation and pressure vibrations in Francis turbine draft tube using various strategies. J Hydrodyn 33, 534–545 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0038-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0038-4

Key words

Navigation