Skip to main content
Log in

A Runge–Kutta numerical method to approximate the solution of bipolar fuzzy initial value problems

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many fields of science, engineering and social sciences, fuzzy differential equations occur as it is the simplest way to model unpredictable dynamical systems. In many contexts and scientific disciplines, certain aspects of uncertainty in data are likely to occur. In applied fields, various types of vagueness were recognized. Some are caused by incomplete or contradictory information, as well as different interpretations of the same phenomenon. In various applications like belief systems, expert systems, and information fusion, one real value from the interval [0, 1] in favor of a certain property can not be utilized conveniently, as it is much useful to consider its counter-property. Many domains have bipolarity as a central characteristic. This paper deals with bipolar fuzzy initial value problems (BFIVPs). Numerical methods have much importance because we have many problems which cannot be solved analytically or it is much complicated to solve them analytically. We introduce a Runge–Kutta method to solve BFIVPs. To check efficiency and validity of proposed method, we prove the consistency, convergence and stability of the method. The proposed method is simple to implement as it does not require higher order derivatives of function. The local truncation errors of Euler and Modified Euler methods are \(O(h^{2})\) and \(O(h^{3})\), respectively, while local truncation errors in proposed Runge–Kutta method is \(O(h^{5})\). We apply an introduced method to solve a few numerical examples. We give the comparison of our proposed method with the Euler and Modified Euler methods by finding global truncation errors. Numerical results show the acceptable accuracy of proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Abbasbandy S, Allahviranloo T (2002) Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations by Taylor method. J Comput Methods Appl Math 2:113–124

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmady N, Allahviranloo T, Ahmady E (2020) A modified Euler method for solving fuzzy differential equations under generalized differentiabilty. Comput Appl Math 39(2):1–21

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Arshad M (2019) A novel trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS method for group decision-making. Group Decis Negotiat 28(3):565–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Muhammad G, Allahviranloo T (2019) Bipolar fuzzy linear system of equations. Comput Appl Math 38(2):69

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Allahviranloo T, Pedrycz W, Ali M (2021) Methods for solving LR-bipolar fuzzy linear systems. Soft Comput 25:85–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Ali M, Allahviranloo T (2020) Certain methods to solve bipolar fuzzy linear system of equations. Comput Appl Math 39:213

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Saqib M, Bashir S, Allahviranloo T (2021) A modified numerical scheme to approximate the solution of bipolar initial value problems. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput

  • Allahviranloo T (2020) Fuzzy fractional operators and equations. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Allahviranloo T, Abbasbandy S, Ahmady N, Ahmady E (2009) Improved predictor-corrector method for solving fuzzy initial value problems. Inf Sci 179:945–955

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Allahviranloo T, Ahmady N, Ahmady E (2007) Numerical solution of fuzzy differential equations by predictor-corrector method. Inf Sci 177:1633–1646

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Allahviranloo T, Gouyandeh Z, Armand A (2015) A full fuzzy method for solving differential equation based on Taylor expansion. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29:1039–1055

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Allahviranloo T, Kiani NA, Motamedi N (2009) Solving fuzzy differential equations by differential transformation method. Inf Sci 179:956–966

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Allahviranloo T, Pedrycz W (2020) Soft numerical computing in uncertain dynamical systems. Elsevier

  • Anastassiou GA (1971) Numerical initial value problems in ordinary differential equations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Clifs

    Google Scholar 

  • Armand A, Allahviranloo T, Gouyandeh Z (2018) Some fundamental results of fuzzy calculus. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 15(3):27–46

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arman A, Allahviranloo T, Abbasbandy S, Gouyandeh Z (2019) The fuzzy generalized Taylor’s expansion with application in fractional differential equations. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 16(2):55–72

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arqub OA (2017) Adaptation of reproducing kernel algorithm for solving fuzzy Fredholm Volterra integrodifferential equations. Neural Comput Appl 28(7):1591–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arqub OA, Al-Smadi M (2020) Fuzzy conformable fractional differential equations: novel extended approach and new numerical solutions. Soft Comput 24:12501–12522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arqub OA, Mohammed AS, Momani S, Hayat T (2017) Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations using reproducing kernel Hilbert space method. Soft Comput 20(8):3283–3302

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bede B (2008) Note on “Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations by predictor-corrector method.”. Inf Sci 178:1917–1922

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bede B (2013) Fuzzy differential equations. Stud Fuzziness Soft Comput 295:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bede B, Gal SG (2005) Generalization of the differentiability of fuzzy number valued function with application to fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 151:581–599

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bede B, Rudas IJ, Bencsik AL (2007) First order linear fuzzy differential equations under generalized differentiability. Inf Sci 177:1648–1662

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bede B, Stefanini L (2013) Generalized differentiability of fuzzy-valued functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 230:119–141

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Behzadi SS, Allahviranloo T (2016) Solving fuzzy differential equations by using Picard method. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 13(3):71–81

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cano YC, Flores MS (2008) On new solutions of fuzzy differential equations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 38(1):112–119

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chalco-Cano Y, Roman-Flores H, Jimenez-Gamero MD (2011) Generalized derivative and \(\pi \)-derivative for set-valued functions. Inf Sci 181:2177–2188

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SSL, Zadeh LA (1972) On fuzzy mapping and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2:30–34

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Z, Ma M, Kandel A (1997) Existence of solutions of fuzzy differential equations with parameters. Inf Sci 99:205–217

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1982) Towards fuzzy differential calculus III. Fuzzy Sets Syst 8(3):225–233

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Effati S, Pakdaman M (2010) Artificial neural network approach for solving fuzzy differential equations. Inf Sci 180:1434–1457

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Epperson JF (2007) An introduction to numerical methods and analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fard OS, Feuring T (2011) Numerical solutions for linear system of first order fuzzy differential equations. Inf Sci 181:4765–4779

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M, Ma M, Kandel A (1999) Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential and integral equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 106(1):35–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gasilov NA, Fatullayev AG, Amrahov SE, Khastan A (2014) A new approach to fuzzy initial value problem. Soft Comput 18:217–225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazanfari B, Shakerami A (2012) Numerical solution of fuzzy differential equations by extended Runge–Kutta like formulae of order 4. Fuzzy Sets Syst 189:74–91

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazanfari B, Shakerami A (2013) Numerical solution of second order fuzzy differential equation using improved Runge–Kutta nystrom method. Math Probl Eng Article ID 803462

  • Guang-Quan Z (1991) Fuzzy continuous function and its properties. Fuzzy Sets Syst 43(2):159–171

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hullermeier E (1999) Numerical methods for fuzzy initial value problems. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 7(5):439–461

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ivaz K, Khastan A, Neito JJ (2013) A numerical method for fuzzy differential equations and hybrid fuzzy differential equations. Abstr Appl Anal Article ID 735128:10

  • Jayakumar T, Kanagarajan K, Indrakumar S (2012) Numerical solution of nth-order fuzzy differential equation by Runge–Kutta method of order five. Int J Math Anal 6:2885–2896

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jikantoro YD, Ismail F, Senu N (2013) A new fourth order explicit Runge–Kutta method for solving first order ordinary differential equations. AIP Conf Proc 1522:1003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4801239

  • Kaleva O (1987) Fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 24:301–317

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zhao A, Yan J (2012) The Cauchy problem of fuzzy differential equations under generalized differentiability. Fuzzy Sets Syst 200:1–24

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ma M, Friedman M, Kandel M (1999) Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 105:133–138

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lotkin M (1951) On the accuracy of Runge–Kutta method. Math Tables Other Aids Comput 5(35):128–133

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto JJ (1999) The Cauchy problem for continuous differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 102:259–262

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto JJ, Khastan A, Ivaz K (2009) Numerical solution of fuzzy differential equations under generalized differentiability. Nonlinear Anal Hybrid Syst 3(4):700–707

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Palligkinis S, Papageorgious G, Famelis I (2009) Runge–Kutta method for fuzzy differential equations. Appl Math Comput 209:97–105

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Parandin N (2011) Numerical solution of fuzzy differential equations of nth order by Runge–Kutta method. Neural Comput Appl 181:4765–4779

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson S, Sambandham M (2008) The Runge–Kutta method for hybrid fuzzy differential equations. Nonlinear Anal Hybrid Syst 2:626–634

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson S, Sambandham M (2009) Numerical solution of hybrid fuzzy differential equation IVPs by characterization. Inf Sci 179:319–328

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saqib M, Akram M, Bashir S, Allahviranloo T (2020) Certain efficient iterative methods for bipolar fuzzy linear system of equations. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 39:3971–3985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saqib M, Akram M, Bashir S, Allahviranloo T (2021) Numerical solution of bipolar fuzzy initial value problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40(1):1309–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seikkala S (2020) On the fuzzy initial value problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst 24(3):319–330

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanini L, Bede B (2009) Generalized Hukuhara differentiability of interval-valued functions and interval differential equations. Nonlinear Anal 71:1311–1328

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tapaswini S, Chakraverty S (2012) A new approach to fuzzy initial value problem by improved Euler method. Fuzzy Inf Eng 4(3):293–312

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tapaswini S, Chakraverty S (2014) Euler based new solution method for fuzzy initial value problems. Int J Artif Intell Soft Comput 4:58–79

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tapaswini S, Chakraverty S, Allahviranloo T (2017) A new approach to nth order fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 28(2):278–300

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WR (1998) Bipolar fuzzy sets. IEEE Int Conf Fuzzy Syst Proc 1:835–840

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tofigh Allahviranloo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by Anibal Tavares de Azevedo.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

saqib, M., Akram, M., Bashir, S. et al. A Runge–Kutta numerical method to approximate the solution of bipolar fuzzy initial value problems. Comp. Appl. Math. 40, 151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01535-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01535-1

Keywords

Navigation